The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

19
The Future of Big Box Home Delivery Furniture Today & AHFA Logistics Conference 2015

Transcript of The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

Page 1: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

The Future of Big Box Home Delivery

Furniture Today & AHFA Logistics Conference 2015

Page 2: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 2

Agenda

■ Future market outlook

• Trends and growth forecast

• Opportunities through the voice of the customer and consumer

■ Current value chain state –barriers to future promise

• Provider/3PL Industry Structure

• Structural Impasse Today

■ National integrator – a breakthrough model?

Page 3: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 3

Big box delivery is an $8B industry experiencing growth across all segments; ~6% CAGR for Furniture

Delivery Category Growth Insights

Category $ CAGR(2012-2017)

Growth Drivers / Key Insights

6.2%

• Unit sales forecasted to grow 2% driven by housing starts

• Channel switching driving an additional 2% - e-commerce growth (8% today) growing 10% driving increased line-haul revenue

• Estimated 39-42MM units delivered in 2014

6.5% • Unit shipments are forecasted to grow 4%

13.0%

• Overall TV unit shipments growing only 1%

• Yet, unit delivery growth is growing by 8% as customer trade up to 40” and larger TVs which shift from parcel to LFHD

• Channel switching to ecommerce accounts for the remaining 3% and driving increased line haul revenue

6.8%• Sales in the home improvement category is

increasing 7% YoY as housing starts accelerate and housing prices move up

Furniture

MajorAppliances

LargeTVs

Other

Source: A.T. Kearney Analysis, Furniture Today

Page 4: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 4

Growth driven by positive market headwinds

Major Trends in US Retail Market

Rapid growth of

online / omni-channel

Retailer’s

omni-channel transformation

More and Bigger Products

Urbanization

Bifurcation of population to

millennials & boomers

Online

Migration

Retail

Omnichannel

Demographics

Major Trends Implications on Home Delivery Needs

• Stores reducing inventory

• People living in cities

• Boomers and Millennials both looking for more services

• Demand convenience, speed

• Direct to consumer shipping similar to the parcel space

• Smaller stores and more showrooming

• Direct to consumer delivery

• SKU proliferation; larger (e.g., 60” TV)

• People buying more units per home (e.g., TVs, fridge)

Page 5: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 5

Omni-channel retailing growth is the biggest driver for big box last mile demand

Significant growth for line-haul / integrated delivery (DC to home 1-5 day orders); we estimate

line haul will see ~2X more growth vs. pure LM

Potential for co-mingling medium format parcel orders (Same Day deliveries outside of UPS/FedEx

network)

Rising consumer expectations: from cost vs. serviceto cost and service (Amazon effect)

Direct Effect on Last Mile

Indirect Effect on Last Mile

Omni-channel retailing

Retailers are

• Reconfiguring their network (slow-movers more centralized and fast movers more forward deployed)

• Continued increase in show-rooming

• Many large retailers starting Same Day options-e.g. Fulfill from Store, Fulfill from urban DC

$195.0$225.0

$256.0$297.0

$349.0

$385.0

$434.0

20172016201320122011 20152014

+14%

US Online Orders ($B)

Migration of small format technology innovations (route optimization, tracking, agent-based network

coordination – e.g. Shutl, Google Express)

Key driver of last mile growth

Increased demand from retailers on end-to-end visibility and service (including LM)

Large OEMs looking to sell direct

Page 6: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 6

Consumer expectations are also rising

1. Source: A.T. Kearney Insights, Retailer interviews

Product/Service

Attribute

Emerging Consumer Expectations for Furniture Delivery

Day Definite

1. Expect absolute day, not ranges

2. 2-3 day lead time preferred not yet expected (not as critical for Furniture)

Time Definite1. “Leave it there” – end of day

2. “I need to be there” – 2 hour window

Value Added

Services

1. Want more DIFM / installation services – make my life easier

2. Do not want to pay more for it

Visibility1. Expect visibility and tracking every minute from any device

2. Human interaction when needed

Pricing1. Free delivery is becoming the norm (in-home install can be extra)

2. Expect to pay for “get it now”

Growing End-Customer Expectations

Page 7: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 7

Home delivery industry today falling short of expectations

Average 1 piece white-

glove, light install

Page 8: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 8

Agenda

■ Future market outlook

• Trends and growth forecast

• Opportunities through the voice of the customer and consumer

■ Current value chain state –barriers to future promise

• Provider/3PL Industry Structure

• Structural Impasse Today

■ National integrator – a breakthrough model?

Page 9: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 9

The provider market is fragmented

BBHD Market Share by Competitor - 2014

1%

75%

Hundreds of Small/MediumProviders and In House Activity

J.B. Hunt5%5%

MXD

SpiritCEVA2%

10%

XPO

9%

1. Includes Last-mile and Direct-to-Consumer Line-haul business2. HDU revenue estimates based on interview with CEO Brian GallagherSource: Competitor interviews, Company Websites;; A.T. Kearney Analysis

Total Market Size1: $6.9 B

Estimated

Limited capital for innovation and differentiation

The top 5 providers control less than 25% of the market

Significant geographic and supply chain role

fragmentation

Implications

Low barrier to entry further drive fragmentation

Page 10: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 10

Structural factors drive aggressive competition and low margins

Source: A.T. Kearney benchmarks, FedEx 10K; A.T. Kearney analysis

20%

22%

18%

3%

FedEx Ground

3%

Big Box

2012

2010

2011

EBITDA Margin vs. FedEx Ground

Limited Scale Synergy

(for “In-Home” Activities)

Low Barriers to Entry

Limited (Scalable) Differentiation

Implication: profit challenged regardless of demand growth; structural change

needed

Page 11: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 11

The entire industry value chain level is fragmented and sub-scale

• Sub-scale volume

– Limited cross category co-mingling

– Limited cross-retailer co-mingling

– Limited appetite for technology investment

• Fragmentation complexity

‒ Coordination complexity

‒ Limited end-to-end view

Page 12: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 12

Structural Impasse: all players recognize the problem, but structural barriers reinforce sub-optimal state

Challenges for Retailers and HDS Providers

Implication: negatively reinforcing! … simultaneous Retailer and

Provider action needed

Page 13: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 13

Agenda

■ Future market outlook

• Trends and growth forecast

• Opportunities through the voice of the customer/consumer

■ Current value chain state –barriers to future promise

• Provider/3PL Industry Structure

• Structural Impasse Today

■ National integrator – a breakthrough model?

Page 14: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 14

Solution thesis: creation of a (or several) Nationwide Home Delivery Service Integrator

Page 15: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 15

Home Delivery Service Integrator could transform the industry

Page 16: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 16

Strategic benefits to retailers and integrator

1

2

7X

83%

6X

85%

5X

85%

4X

87%

3X

89%

2X

93%

1X

100%

80%

9X

80%

10X8X

83%

Last-mile delivery volume

Cost per delivery

Source: A.T. Kearney analysis

Win-win cost savings from cross-retailer and cross-category volume

Page 17: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 17

XPO is making big acquisitions – could they catalyze formation of an asset-less national integrator model?

Home Delivery Provider Market

Acquires 3PD, largest asset-less LM provider

Acquires OPTIMA, small asset-less LM provider (technology/capability play)

06/’13

11/’13

Acquire New Breed, an omnichannel 3PL (.com fulfillment for large and small format)

Recent Industry Consolidation

5%

4%

JB Hunt 4%

ExelDirect

4%HomeDirect

2012

3PD

CEVA

MXD

JB Hunt

9%

2014

XPO

4%

8%

3%

Other80% Other77%

2%

4%

8.5%

9%

CEVA

Acquires Atlantic Central Logistics – an asset-less East Coast last mile provider

Additional $1.3B equity fund raising06/’15

07/’14

08/’14 $700MM funding from 3 investment companies (22% equity stake)

04/’14Acquires Pacer International, a major US intermodal / line-haul 3PL

Page 18: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 18

For discussion

• What are the key challenges preventing the formation of a Nationwide HDS Integrator?

What new capabilities and assets are required to build and establish an asset-less National Integrator?

• Can continued merger from XPO or MXD catalyze formation of a nationwide integrator?

‒ What is the minimum critical scale market share required ?

• What can retailers do to accelerate and enable formation of a nationwide integrator?

‒ Allow Furniture co-mingling with other retailers?

‒ Divest Furniture network assets and volume to provider?

• Which retailers are in the best position today to tip the industry to enable formation of a nationwide integrator?

Page 19: The Future of Big Box Last Mile Delivery

A.T. Kearney xx/mm.yyyy/00000 19

Check out the companion article – thank you

Michael Hu

[email protected]

Read full article here

www.linkedin.com/in/mhuspace

@mhu_snowcrash