The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English...

36
The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty of Applied Arts King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand

Transcript of The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English...

Page 1: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement

Ponlak Pantahachart

Faculty of Applied Arts

King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand

Page 2: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Outline

1. Background

2. Objectives

3. Hypotheses

4. Scope

5. Significance of the study

6. Literature reviews

Page 3: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Outline

7. Methodology

8. Supplemental online and traditional tutorials

9. Results

10.Conclusion and discussion

11. Suggestions

Page 4: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Background of the Study

English 1 course Students’ English proficiency Lack of electronic instructional media Lack of motivation in learning English

Page 5: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Research Questions

1. Do supplemental online and traditional tutorials cause differences in learners’ English language proficiency?

2. Do supplemental online and traditional tutorials cause differences in learners’ learning achievement in English 1 course?

3. What are the learners’ attitudes towards the supplemental online and traditional tutorials?

Page 6: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Objectives

The effects of supplemental online and traditional tutorials towards the students’ English language proficiency

The effects of supplemental online and traditional tutorials towards the students’ learning achievement in English 1 course

The students’ attitudes towards supplemental online and traditional tutorials

Page 7: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

1. Average English proficiency test scores

2. Average learning achievement scores

Hypotheses

XXH ltraditionaonline 111:

XXH ltraditionaonline 222:

Page 8: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Scope of the Study

Populationcontrolled and experimental groupsEnglish 1 courseNew Inside Out (Pre-Intermediate)

Page 9: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Scope of the Study

Data AnalysisEnglish proficiency test (pre/post)Midterm and final examsStudent attitudes

Page 10: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Definitions of Terms

Supplemental online tutorialhttp://insideouttutorial.net

Supplemental traditional tutorialNew Inside Out exercises

English language proficiency Learning achievement

Page 11: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Significance of the Study

Learners’ option for self-access learning A way of teaching or evaluation Positive attitudes Motivation To understand the class contents

Page 12: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Literature Reviews

English language proficiency Learning achievement Online and traditional methods

Page 13: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Related Studies The effectiveness of a supplemental online

tutorial vs. tradition instruction Zubas, P., Heiss, C. & Pedersen, M. (2006)

Internet-based learning Cook, D. A. et. al. (2008)

The effects of online instruction on students’ achievement Al-Jarf, R.S.(2005)

Computer vs. workbook instruction Nagata, N. (1996)

Page 14: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Methodology

Subjects Research Tools Data Collection

Page 15: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Subjects

First-year undergraduate students Course: English 1 (academic year 1/2009) Groups: controlled and experimental

Page 16: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Research Tools

Pretest and posttest (proficiency test) Midterm and final exams Supplemental online tutorial Supplemental traditional tutorial Questionnaires Interview

Page 17: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Research Tools

Pretest and posttest (proficiency test)Sukamolson, S. (2000)

Midterm and final examsContent from New Inside Out (Pre-

Intermediate)

Page 18: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Supplemental Online Tutorial

Go to http://insideouttutorial.net

log in (with given username & password)

Do the exercises

Get immediate feedback

Check their scores

Page 19: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Supplemental Traditional Tutorial

Students received the tutorial.

They handed it in the following week.

They received the answer key.

Possible questions and answers

Page 20: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Research Tools

QuestionnairesAttitudes towards doing tutorials in English 1

courseAttitudes towards supplemental

online/traditional tutorialsAttitudes towards the formats and styles of

the tutorials Interview

Page 21: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Data Collection

Simple random sampling The students took the proficiency test (pretest). Divided them into controlled and experimental

groups Same teaching methods and lesson plans Controlled group (supplemental traditional

tutorial) Experimental group (supplemental online

tutorial)

Page 22: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Data Collection (continued)

Posttest Questionnaires Interview Data analysis

Test of normality Independent t-testMean and S.D.

Page 23: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Results

English language proficiency Learning achievement Attitudes towards supplemental

online/traditional tutorials

Page 24: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

English Language Proficiency

Page 25: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Learning Achievement

Midterm exam

Page 26: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Learning Achievement

Final exam

Page 27: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Attitudes (Supplemental Online Tutorial)

1 - 14 15 - 36 37 - 50

Page 28: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Usefulness of tutorial Satisfaction with the supplemental

online tutorial Formats and styles

Attitudes (Supplemental Online Tutorial)

Page 29: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Attitudes (Supplemental Traditional Tutorial)

1 - 14 15 - 37 38 - 50

Page 30: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Usefulness of tutorial Satisfaction with the supplemental

traditional tutorial Formats and styles

Attitudes (Supplemental Traditional Tutorial)

Page 31: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Conclusion & Discussion

English language proficiency Learning achievement

Page 32: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

English Language Proficiency

• No statistically significant difference• Content of the tutorials• Effects on students’ language proficiency

Page 33: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Learning Achievement

Midterm Final

• Statistically significant difference• Content familiarity (Al-Shumaimeri, Y. A. N.,2006)• Format and styles of the tutorials

Page 34: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Suggestions

Add one more experimental group exposed to both supplemental online and traditional tutorials

Add one more group without tutorials

Page 35: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.

Limitations

Facilities Self-access learning skills Motivation

Page 36: The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.