The “Code White” Team of Dr. William Ganz: 1979
description
Transcript of The “Code White” Team of Dr. William Ganz: 1979
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
The “Code White” Team of Dr. William Ganz: 1979The “Code White” Team of Dr. William Ganz: 1979
Goal of IC SK Before PCI: Get the artery openGoal of IC SK Before PCI: Get the artery open
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Acute MI Treated with Distal Protection and IC tPA (8 mg)
Acute MI Treated with Distal Protection and IC tPA (8 mg)
After Percusurge / Angiojet
After 8 mg IC tPA
Pre PCI
Clot
Clot
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Patients and RandomizationImmediately after diagnostic angiography
eligible patients (n =41) were randomized to
ICSK group (n=21) Control group (n=20)
(Primary PCI + 250 kU intracoronary streptokinase) (primary PCI)
All patients recieved:
- 300 mg of aspirin,
- A loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel,
- Intracoronary unfractioned heparin at a dose of 100 U/kg during the procedure,
- Tirofiban as a bolus of 0.1 μg/kg in 3 minutes followed by continuous infusion of 0.15 μg/kg/min for 12 hours, and
- Low molecular weight heparin initiated four to five hours after primary PCI and continued for at least 48 hours
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
All patients underwent intracoronary hemodynamic measurement and angiographic analysis two days All patients underwent intracoronary hemodynamic measurement and angiographic analysis two days after primary PCI to evaluate microvascular functionafter primary PCI to evaluate microvascular function
ST segment resolution ST segment resolution
Diastolic deceleration time Diastolic deceleration time
Echocardiographic assessment of Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes and functionleft ventricular volumes and function
Coronary flow reserveCoronary flow reserve
Index of microvascular resistanceIndex of microvascular resistance
Coronary wedge pressure Coronary wedge pressure (mean ad systolic)(mean ad systolic)
Pressure derived collateral flow indexPressure derived collateral flow index
Myocardial blush gradesMyocardial blush grades
Corrected TIMI frame countCorrected TIMI frame count
Study Design
Second angiography and intracoronary hemodynamic
measurements 2 days after AMI.
Ass
esin
g m
icro
vasc
ular
per
fusi
on
and
LV v
olum
es in
ear
ly p
hase
of
ST
EM
I
Control angiography (TIMI frame count, Myocardial blush grade) Infarct size measurement (SPECT), Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes and functionLo
ng te
rm
asse
smen
ts
(at 6
mon
ths)
Transthoracic echocardiography,
2 days after AMI
Pre/post PCI ECG
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Assessment of Microvascular Perfusion by Invasive MethodsAssessment of Microvascular Perfusion by Invasive Methods
• Thermodilution-derived Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)*Thermodilution-derived Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)*
= = Resting mean transit time / hyperemic mean transit timeResting mean transit time / hyperemic mean transit time *Pijls NHJ et al.. Circulation 2002;105:2482-2486*Pijls NHJ et al.. Circulation 2002;105:2482-2486
• Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)**:Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)**:
= Distal coronary pressure x hyperemic mean transit time= Distal coronary pressure x hyperemic mean transit time**Fearon WF. et al.. Circulation. 2003;107:3129-3132**Fearon WF. et al.. Circulation. 2003;107:3129-3132
• Coronary Wedge Pressure (CWP) and Pressure-derived Collateral Flow Index Coronary Wedge Pressure (CWP) and Pressure-derived Collateral Flow Index (CFIp):(CFIp):
= CWP/Pa= CWP/Pa
• Thermodilution-derived Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)*Thermodilution-derived Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)*
= = Resting mean transit time / hyperemic mean transit timeResting mean transit time / hyperemic mean transit time *Pijls NHJ et al.. Circulation 2002;105:2482-2486*Pijls NHJ et al.. Circulation 2002;105:2482-2486
• Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)**:Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)**:
= Distal coronary pressure x hyperemic mean transit time= Distal coronary pressure x hyperemic mean transit time**Fearon WF. et al.. Circulation. 2003;107:3129-3132**Fearon WF. et al.. Circulation. 2003;107:3129-3132
• Coronary Wedge Pressure (CWP) and Pressure-derived Collateral Flow Index Coronary Wedge Pressure (CWP) and Pressure-derived Collateral Flow Index (CFIp):(CFIp):
= CWP/Pa= CWP/Pa
Guiding cath.Microvasculature
Balloon
CWP: mm Hg
Pa: mm Hg
Pressure wire
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
0.0020.0020.17(0.14)-(0.21)
0.17(0.14)-(0.21)
0.08(0.05)-(0.11)
0.08(0.05)-(0.11)
<0.001
<0.001
-0.09(-- 0.13)-(-0.06)
-0.09(-- 0.13)-(-0.06)0.17 + 0.070.17 + 0.070.08 + 0.050.08 + 0.05CFIp (mean, unitless)CFIp (mean, unitless)
<0.001<0.00129.46(21.80)-(37.12)
29.46(21.80)-(37.12)
15.17(8.26)-(22.08)
15.17(8.26)-(22.08)
<0.001
<0.001
-15.56(-21.27)-(-9.85)
-15.56(-21.27)-(-9.85)33.80 + 11.033.80 + 11.018.24 + 6.0718.24 + 6.07CWP, systolic (mmHg)CWP, systolic (mmHg)
0.040.0412.54(6.83)-(18.24)
12.54(6.83)-(18.24)
7.98(2.84)-(13.12)
7.98(2.84)-(13.12)0.0040.004-6.39
(-10.73)-(-2.05)-6.39
(-10.73)-(-2.05)17.20 + 7.9317.20 + 7.9310.81 + 5.4610.81 + 5.46CWP, mean (mmHg)CWP, mean (mmHg)
0.0020.0021.66(1.25)-(2.07)
1.66(1.25)-(2.07)
2.29(1.92)-(2.66)
2.29(1.92)-(2.66)
<0.001
<0.001
0.62(0.35)-(0.93)
0.62(0.35)-(0.93)1.39 + 0.311.39 + 0.312.01 + 0.572.01 + 0.57CFRCFR
<0.001<0.00129.05(22.17)-(35.92)
29.05(22.17)-(35.92)
11.73(5.53)-(17.92)
11.73(5.53)-(17.92)
<0.001
<0.001
-16.20(-21.75)(10.64)
-16.20(-21.75)(10.64)32.49 +11.0432.49 +11.0416.29 + 5.0616.29 + 5.06IMR (U)IMR (U)
ppControl
Group, Mean(95% CI)
Control Group, Mean
(95% CI)
Intracoronary Streptokinase Group, Mean
(95% CI)
Intracoronary Streptokinase Group, Mean
(95% CI)
ppMean
Difference 95% CI
Mean Difference
95% CI
Control Groupn:20
Control Groupn:20
Intracoronary Streptokinase
Groupn:21
Intracoronary Streptokinase
Groupn:21
MultivariateMultivariateUnivariateUnivariate
Intracoronary Hemodynamic Indices of Microvascular Perfusion Intracoronary Hemodynamic Indices of Microvascular Perfusion
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Angiographic (cTFC, MBG), ic (STR) and Echocardiographic (DDT) Indices of Microvascular Perfusion
Angiographic (cTFC, MBG), ic (STR) and Echocardiographic (DDT) Indices of Microvascular Perfusion
0.0010.001257(-65)-(580)
257(-65)-(580)
750(446)-(1054)
750(446)-(1054)<0.001<0.001468
(261)-(676)468
(261)-(676)360+292360+292828+258828+258DDT in the LAD artery (milliseconds)#
DDT in the LAD artery (milliseconds)#
------7 (53.8)7 (53.8)11 (91.7)11 (91.7)2/32/3
0.130.13
----
0.0350.035
--6 (46.2)6 (46.2)1 (8.3)1 (8.3)0/10/1Six months after primary PCI
Six months after primary PCI
------6 (32%)6 (32%)15 (71%)15 (71%)2/32/3
0.0650.065
----
0.0120.012
--13 (68%)13 (68%)6 (29%)6 (29%)0/10/1Two days after primary PCITwo days after primary PCI
------5 (28%)5 (28%)10 (50%)10 (50%)2/32/3
0.700.70
----
0.160.16
--13 (72%)13 (72%)10 (50%)10 (50%)0/10/1Immediately after primary PCI
Immediately after primary PCI
MBGMBG
0.0230.02325.89(18.76)-(33.02)
25.89(18.76)-(33.02)
18.88(13.57)-(24.18)
18.88(13.57)-(24.18)0.0140.014-6.2
(-11.00)-(-1.39)-6.2
(-11.00)-(-1.39)27.62 + 6.4627.62 + 6.4621.42 + 4.9821.42 + 4.98Six months after primary PCISix months after primary PCI
0.0010.00127.51(22.03)-(32.99)
27.51(22.03)-(32.99)
19.10(14.16)-(24.04)
19.10(14.16)-(24.04)<0.001<0.001-9.27
(-13.50)-(-5.03)-9.27
(-13.50)-(-5.03)31.79 + 7.5831.79 + 7.5822.52 + 5.5822.52 + 5.58Two days after primary PCITwo days after primary PCI
0.800.8029.36(21.48)-(37.25)
29.36(21.48)-(37.25)
30.30(23.14)-(37.46)
30.30(23.14)-(37.46)0.690.69-0.79
(-6.66)-(5.08)-0.79
(-6.66)-(5.08)34.44 + 8.2634.44 + 8.2633.6 + 9.4533.6 + 9.45Immediately after primary PCIImmediately after primary PCI
cTFC meancTFC mean
Univariate Multivariate ICSK group Control Mean diff. p ICSK group Control p
Univariate Multivariate ICSK group Control Mean diff. p ICSK group Control p
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
0.170.1737.28(21.57-52.99)
37.28(21.57-52.99)
27.84(14.35-41.32)
27.84(14.35-41.32)0.0050.00537.05 + 13.84
(n: 18)37.05 + 13.84
(n: 18)23 + 13.37
(n: 18)23 + 13.37
(n: 18)Infarct size %,
SPECTInfarct size %,
SPECT
0.820.822.71
(-37.75)-(43.16)
2.71(-37.75)-(43.16)
5.97(-27.32)-(39.26)
5.97(-27.32)-(39.26)0.240.243.46 + 19.023.46 + 19.0214.37 + 31.1414.37 + 31.14Change in LVEF, %Change in LVEF, %
0.240.2451.56(36.90-66.23)
51.56(36.90-66.23)
57.68(45.88-69.47)
57.68(45.88-69.47)0.0200.02046.19 + 12.21
(n: 15)46.19 + 12.21
(n: 15)56.18 + 10.69
(n: 17)56.18 + 10.69
(n: 17)
Six months after
primary PCI
Six months after
primary PCI
0.0780.07847.96(39.86-56.06)
47.96(39.86-56.06)
54.25(46.95-61.55)
54.25(46.95-61.55)0.060.0644.51 + 12.40
(n: 20)44.51 + 12.40
(n: 20)51.52 + 10.76
(n: 21)51.52 + 10.76
(n: 21)
Two days after
primary PCI
Two days after
primary PCILVEF %
LVEF %
0.0360.03614.97
(-18.31)-(48.24)
14.97(-18.31)-(48.24)
-11.19(-37.95)-(15.58)
-11.19(-37.95)-(15.58)0.040.0411.90 + 23.50
(n: 15)11.90 + 23.50
(n: 15)-4.60 + 22.01
(n: 17)-4.60 + 22.01
(n: 17)Change in EDV, %Change in EDV, %
0.0890.089118.77(76.98-160.56)
118.77(76.98-160.56)
92.72(59.11-126.33)
92.72(59.11-126.33)0.0210.021150.13 + 49.28
(n: 15)150.13 + 49.28
(n: 15)115.70 + 29.67
(n: 17)115.70 + 29.67
(n: 17)
Six months after
primary PCI
Six months after
primary PCI
0.500.50118.53 (93.35-143.71)
118.53 (93.35-143.71)
111.22(88.52-133.91)
111.22(88.52-133.91)0.070.07137.75 + 36.82
(n: 20)137.75 + 36.82
(n: 20)119.88 + 23.36
(n: 21)119.88 + 23.36
(n: 21)
Two days after
primary PCI
Two days after
primary PCIEDVml
EDVml
0.0550.05515.30
(-28.40)-(59.01)
15.30(-28.40)-(59.01)
-12.32(-47.47)-(-22.83)
-12.32(-47.47)-(-22.83)0.0140.01412.67 + 30.75
(n: 15)12.67 + 30.75
(n: 15)-13.27 + 25.40
(n: 17)-13.27 + 25.40
(n: 17)Change in ESV %Change in ESV %
0.0680.06858.68(25.10-92.27)
58.68(25.10-92.27)
36.08(9.07-63.10)
36.08(9.07-63.10)0.0040.00483.73 + 39.32
(n: 15)83.73 + 39.32
(n: 15)50.64 + 18.23
(n: 17)50.64 + 18.23
(n: 17)
Six months after
primary PCI
Six months after
primary PCI
0.0630.06365.03(47.76-82.30)
65.03(47.76-82.30)
50.81(31.25-66.37)
50.81(31.25-66.37)0.0130.01378.65 + 30.55
(n: 20)78.65 + 30.55
(n: 20)58.16 + 17.02
(n: 21)58.16 + 17.02
(n: 21)
Two days after
primary PCI
Two days after
primary PCIESVml
ESVml
p(two
tailed)
p(two
tailed)
Control, mean 95%CI
Control, mean 95%CI
ICSK (+), mean, 95%CI
ICSK (+), mean, 95%CI
p(two
tailed)
p(two
tailed)ControlControlICSK (+)ICSK (+)
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
Left Ventricular End Systolic (ESV) and End Diastolic Volumes (EDV), Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Infarct Size (%) Comparisons
Left Ventricular End Systolic (ESV) and End Diastolic Volumes (EDV), Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Infarct Size (%) Comparisons
Sezer et al, et al. NEJM 2007; 356(18): 1823-1834
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Following NEJM Publication in 2007Following NEJM Publication in 2007
Goal of IC SK After PCI: Get the microvasculature openGoal of IC SK After PCI: Get the microvasculature open
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.30.3 0.30.3
4.64.62.82.8
9.59.5
15.615.6
10.210.2
20.220.2
P<0.002P<0.002P<0.04P<0.04
P<0.09P<0.09
P<0.0008P<0.0008
UrgentRevascularization
UrgentRevascularization
RecurrentMI
RecurrentMI
DeathDeath MACEMACE
IC Compared to IV Abciximab Reduces MACE in ACS Pts IC Compared to IV Abciximab Reduces MACE in ACS Pts Undergoing PCI Undergoing PCI
IC Compared to IV Abciximab Reduces MACE in ACS Pts IC Compared to IV Abciximab Reduces MACE in ACS Pts Undergoing PCI Undergoing PCI
Wöhrle J et al. Circulation 2003;107:1840.Wöhrle J et al. Circulation 2003;107:1840.
N = 403 ptsIC – 294IV – 109
N = 403 ptsIC – 294IV – 109
UA and MIUA and MI
IV abciximabIV abciximabIC abciximabIC abciximab
49%49%
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Clot Disaggregation Following IC Eptifibatide: Pre-PCI Angiogram
Clot Disaggregation Following IC Eptifibatide: Pre-PCI Angiogram
Pinto et al, Am J Cardiol 2006
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Retrospective Experience with IC EptifibatideRetrospective Experience with IC Eptifibatide
• 59 patients treated with 59 patients treated with unbuffered IC eptifibatide:unbuffered IC eptifibatide:
• TIMI Grade 3 flow in >90% of TIMI Grade 3 flow in >90% of patients following PCIpatients following PCI
• Normal TIMI myocardial Normal TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 flow (TMPG perfusion grade 3 flow (TMPG 3) present in 54.4% of patients 3) present in 54.4% of patients following PCI (range 20%-25% following PCI (range 20%-25% in past)in past)
• There were no in-hospital There were no in-hospital deaths, reinfarctions, or TIMI deaths, reinfarctions, or TIMI major bleeding events major bleeding events
• No arrhythmias during IC No arrhythmias during IC eptifibatide administrationeptifibatide administration
Pinto et al, Am J Cardiol 2006
Clinical Trial Results . orgClinical Trial Results . org
Impact of IC Adenosine on Clinical & Electrocardiographic Outcomes in the Setting Primary PTCA
Impact of IC Adenosine on Clinical & Electrocardiographic Outcomes in the Setting Primary PTCA
18
00
20
40
60
80
100
Death
18
00
20
40
60
80
100
Death
85
59
0
20
40
60
80
10085
59
0
20
40
60
80
100
% Developing Q Waves
% Developing Q Waves
48
18
0
20
40
60
80
100
48
18
0
20
40
60
80
100
% Death, MI, CHF, Recurrent Angina% Death, MI, CHF, Recurrent Angina
p < 0.02p < 0.02 p < 0.04p < 0.04p < 0.03p < 0.03
Marzilli et al, Circulation 2000; 101:2154-2159Marzilli et al, Circulation 2000; 101:2154-2159
PlaceboPlacebo Adenosine 4 mg in 2 ml via central lumen of PTCA balloonAdenosine 4 mg in 2 ml via central lumen of PTCA balloon
% o
f P
atie
nts
% o
f P
atie
nts