The challenges of abundances analyis for LPVs · 2014. 9. 1. · Animation: Walter Nowotny. Models...

18
The challenges of abundance analysis for LPVs Thomas Lebzelter / Walter Nowotny / Bernhard Aringer / Kenneth Hinkle / Susanne Höfner / Ulrike Heiter / and many more... Acknowledging support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF and the ESF

Transcript of The challenges of abundances analyis for LPVs · 2014. 9. 1. · Animation: Walter Nowotny. Models...

  • The challenges of

    abundance analysis for LPVsThomas Lebzelter / Walter Nowotny / Bernhard Aringer /

    Kenneth Hinkle / Susanne Höfner / Ulrike Heiter /

    and many more...

    Acknowledging support by the Austrian Science Fund FWF

    and the ESF

  • Why abundances from AGB stars?

    Surface abundances are changed by third dredge up:

    C/O

    Isotopic ratios

    s-process elements

    Important for:

    Stellar and Galactic Evolution

    Stellar Nucleosynthesis

  • LPVs are...

    Low temperature objects

    With an extended atmosphere

    And large amplitude variability

  • A little experiment from 2010

    Analysis results for a Tau

    Based on R=80 000, S/N=200 spectrum between 4900 and 9750 A

    plus V-I, J-K, and V-K colours. Lebzelter et al. 2012, A&A 547, A108

  • Variability and atmospheric

    structure

    Animation: Walter Nowotny

  • Models vs. Observations

    Sample of 5 non-variable red giants

    and 7 variable AGB stars in 47 Tuc

    L, M, [Fe/H] well known

    Teff from NIR photometry

    Grid of hydrostatic COMARCS spectra and

    5 dynamical model atmospheres for C/O=0.48 and 0.25

    Investigation of 9 spectral features

  • Non-variable vs. variable

  • Results (example)

    Lebzelter et al. 2014, A&A in press

  • Conclusions ( )

    Hydrodynamical models fit the observed high-resspectra of LPVs better than hydrostatic models

    BUT: none of the nine configurations tested here gave a good fit to the entire observed high-res spectra

    A reasonable fit with hydrostatic models is possible forsome of the mildly pulsating stars.

    To fit the EWs observed in LPVs with hydrostatic models:Teff (EW)

  • Results (example)

    Lebzelter et al. 2014, A&A in press

  • Variability and Line strengthsequ.

    wid

    th [

    A]

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    V [mag]4 6 8 10 12 14

    Dynamical model

    L: 4000 L

    C/O: 0.48

    Teff: 3500 K period: 200 d

    [Fe/H]: -0.7 mass loss: 2E-7 M/yr

    Filled dots: Dynamical model

    Triangles: R Cas (Mira)

    Lebzelter et al. 2010, A&A 517, A6

  • Lebzelter et al. 2014, A&A in press

  • A little experiment from 2010

    Pre-defined set of stellar parameters:

    Teff = 3900 K, log g = 1.3, [Fe/H] = -0.2, x = 2 kms-1, M = 2 M⊙

  • A little experiment from 2010

    High resolution spectra of four cool giant stars (plus some

    photometric colours) were provided to various groups

    working in the area of spectral synthesis asking them to derive

    stellar parameters from the data provided (Teff, log g, [Fe/H]).

    6 results using MARCS models

    5 results using ATLAS models

    1 result from PHOENIX model

    1 result from CODEX model

    1 result from Tsuji model atmosphere

    Various methods, various spectral synthesis codes

    Lebzelter et al. 2012, A&A 547, A108