7/30/2019 The British Empire Consolidates its Property

1/2

By Matthew Ehret-Kump

While Canadian foreign policy has always fol-

lowed the British lead, there have been brief in-

stances of resistance. The cases of the 1970s

sanctions of apartheid South Africa and Canadasnon-participation in the precursor of the British

Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Iraq War in 2002

spring immediately to mind. However, under

Prime Minister Stephen Harper who took power

in 2006 and now leads a majority government

with those near unchallenged powers enjoyed

with such majorities, the unquestioned obedience

to British endgame geopolitics has never been so

strong.

Though Canadas cooperation in the defence andcultivation of the heroin production of Afghani-

stans Helmand province had already been under-way from the beginning of the Afghan war, this

overt military policy became significantly more

aggressive with the Arab Spring in 2011. It was at

this time that Canada committed its military to

provide 10% of the air support and logistics dur-

ing the regime change program that illegally

killed Muamar Qaddafi under the umbrella of

NATO. In hindsight, it was discovered that thegreatest atrocities of this war were not to have

been committed by the disposed head of state, but

rather, by those moralizing forces who conducted

the humanitarian intervention, armed radicalIslamists and killed 70 000 innocent Libyan civil-

ians. The official legal precedent for this war was

the anti-nation state doctrine of R2P.

This program was continued with expelling Syr-

ian diplomats and shutting down the Syrian em-

bassy in March 2012, merely weeks after the An-

nan Peace Plan was begun (and later sabotaged),to the effect that all illusions of Canadian peace-

making and diplomacy was exposed as an illu-

sion. Before Canada, the only nation to shut down

Syrian diplomatic missions was the UK. This ag-

gressive policy was repeated with Canadas shut-down of the Iranian embassy in early September

2012 modelled again after the British precedent.

Since Canadas actions so obediently followed

British geopolitical doctrine from 2006-2012, anovert branding as British property has been called

for.

The rebranding of Canada

In April 2011, the British makeover officially

began with the renaming of the Canadian mili-

tary. This policy saw Harper pass a law which re-

inserted the Royal into all branches of the Ca-

nadian military. Controversy briefly erupted asConstitutional lawyers and defence specialists

pointed out that Section 15 of the British North

America Act of 1867 states that the command of

the Canadian military is not vested in Parliament,

but rather in the Crown. This mandate was re-affirmed with Section 14 of the National Defence

Act of 1985 with the words: The CanadianForces are the armed forces of Her Majesty

raised by Canada and consist of one Service

called the Canadian Armed Forces. Universityof Ottawa defence specialist Philippe Lagassargued during this time that while the military is

answerable to the Parliament, it is accountable

and obedient only to Ministers of the Crown. Any

lingering denial of this control of the Canadian

military by Ministers of the Crown was highly

shaken.

Embassies Unite:

The British Consolidate their Property

Up until recently, Harpers rabid anglophilia was consid-

ered little more than a bizarre fetish for onlookers, but has

now blossomed into a global security threat.

7/30/2019 The British Empire Consolidates its Property

2/2

2

This was followed immediately by Harpers renam-

ing the main wall in the Canadian Foreign Office

Headquarters the Sovereign Wall, deriving itsname from the gigantic mural sized portrait of

Queen Elisabeth. Not only was this unsightly por-

trait forced into public display in one Ottawa build-

ing, but an accompanying order was passed forcing

portraits of the Queen to be mounted upon the walls

of every Canadian embassy in the world. While

many onlookers watched in bewilderment, the fa-

natic anglophile could still be heard shouting but

the Monarchy is only a symbol! The British Empire

carries no real power!

Embassies Unite

As of September 23 2012, many Canadian embas-sies the world over will no longer simply have Ca-

nadian flags hanging from their flag poles, butrather the Canadian ambassadors and their respec-

tive staff within and the Canadian Maple Leaf flag

without will now be joined with British ambassa-

dors and the Union Jack. Ministers of Foreign Af-

fairs of the UK and Canada (John Baird and Wil-

liam Hague) have officially announced the melding

of the embassies of

both nations! Ostensi-

bly, this measure is

being undertaken to

save money, but the

true motive for suchovert consolidation of

the British Empirespossessions can only

be addressed if one lets

go of all popular illu-

sions regarding the true

workings of the shadow empire maintained by the

London-centered oligarchy. This process is madethe more dangerous as the Empire is not unaware of

the demise of its own monetary system.

In the context of the collapse of the British con-

trolled world monetary system, these policies are

intended to do nothing less then set fire to the entire

African and Middle Eastern worlds, by fuelling

what Samuel P Huntington dubbed the Clash ofCivilizations doctrine, to the point of risking ther-

monuclear warfare with Russia and China.

Stephen Harper and Thomas

Mulcair: Agents of the British

Empire.

For those who still believe that the Privy Council ofCanada is merely a relic of old traditions long dead exer-

cising no more control than the Queen, they would do

well to reconsider that view as it is not the people, or

parliament who hold the allegiance of those who are

introduced into its roster, but rather the Queen of Eng-

land.

I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear that I shall

be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen

Elizabeth the Second, as a member of Her Majesty's

Privy Council for Canada. I will in all things to be

treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faith-

fully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opin-

ion. I shall keep secret all matters committed and re-

vealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly

treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do

as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Maj-

esty.

That both Stephen Harper, as well as NDP leader Tho-

mas Mulcair have taken this oath of allegiance and se-

crecy should send alarm bells in the minds of any think-

ing citizen. This also means that these illustrious menhave joined the ranks with such national disasters and

foreign agents of influence as Maurice Strong, Paul Des-

marais of Power Corporation, Lord Conrad Black,

Prince Phillip of Edinburg, and the current head of the

powerful Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE)

John Manley.

Being a member of this select group does not immedi-

ately prove an individual is engaged in treason anymore

than someones participation in a Bilderberger meeting

or freemasonic society. It does however speak volumesif the person in question is actively carrying out the in-

tentions of a financial oligarchy which has explicitly

stated their intention to reduce the world population

from the current 7 billion to less than one (see

Environmentalism and the General Welfare Make Poor

Bedfellows on page 21).

Baird and Hague an-

nounce joint embas-

sies in Ottawa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_IIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II