TH S S. 1975

II

117TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. 1975

To protect a person’s ability to determine whether to continue or end a

pregnancy, and to protect a health care provider’s ability to provide

abortion services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8, 2021

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. MARKEY,

Mr. KING, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BROWN, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. REED,

Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. SMITH, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MENENDEZ,

Ms. HASSAN, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. BOOK-

ER, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr.

WHITEHOUSE, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms.

DUCKWORTH, Ms. CANTWELL, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. CARPER, Mr. BENNET, Mr. WARNER, Mr. PADILLA, Mr.

COONS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. LEAHY, Mr.

TESTER, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. PETERS, Mr. LUJAN, Mr. KELLY, Mr.

OSSOFF, and Mr. WARNOCK) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL To protect a person’s ability to determine whether to con-

tinue or end a pregnancy, and to protect a health care

provider’s ability to provide abortion services.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-1

tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 2

VerDate Sep 11 2014 16:50 Jun 22, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1975.IS S1975pam

tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

2

•S 1975 IS

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 1

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Health Pro-2

tection Act of 2021’’. 3

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 4

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 5

(1) Abortion services are essential health care 6

and access to those services is central to people’s 7

ability to participate equally in the economic and so-8

cial life of the United States. Abortion access allows 9

people who are pregnant to make their own decisions 10

about their pregnancies, their families, and their 11

lives. 12

(2) Since 1973, the Supreme Court repeatedly 13

has recognized the constitutional right to terminate 14

a pregnancy before fetal viability, and to terminate 15

a pregnancy after fetal viability where it is nec-16

essary, in the good-faith medical judgment of the 17

treating health care professional, for the preserva-18

tion of the life or health of the person who is preg-19

nant. 20

(3) Nonetheless, access to abortion services has 21

been obstructed across the United States in various 22

ways, including blockades of health care facilities 23

and associated violence, prohibitions of, and restric-24

tions on, insurance coverage; parental involvement 25

laws (notification and consent); restrictions that 26


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

3

•S 1975 IS

shame and stigmatize people seeking abortion serv-1

ices; and medically unnecessary regulations that nei-2

ther confer any health benefit nor further the safety 3

of abortion services, but which harm people by de-4

laying, complicating access to, and reducing the 5

availability of, abortion services. 6

(4) Reproductive Justice requires every indi-7

vidual to have the right to make their own decisions 8

about having children regardless of their cir-9

cumstances and without interference and discrimina-10

tion. Reproductive Justice is a human right that can 11

and will be achieved when all people, regardless of 12

actual or perceived race, color, national origin, immi-13

gration status, sex (including gender identity, sex 14

stereotyping, or sexual orientation), age, or disability 15

status have the economic, social, and political power 16

and resources to define and make decisions about 17

their bodies, health, sexuality, families, and commu-18

nities in all areas of their lives, with dignity and 19

self-determination. 20

(5) Reproductive Justice seeks to address re-21

strictions on reproductive health, including abortion, 22

that perpetuate systems of oppression, lack of bodily 23

autonomy, white supremacy, and anti-Black racism. 24

This violent legacy has manifested in policies includ-25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

4

•S 1975 IS

ing enslavement, rape, and experimentation on Black 1

women; forced sterilizations; medical experimen-2

tation on low-income women’s reproductive systems; 3

and the forcible removal of Indigenous children. Ac-4

cess to equitable reproductive health care, including 5

abortion services, has always been deficient in the 6

United States for Black, Indigenous, and other Peo-7

ple of Color (BIPOC) and their families. 8

(6) The legacy of restrictions on reproductive 9

health, rights, and justice is not a dated vestige of 10

a dark history. Presently, the harms of abortion-spe-11

cific restrictions fall especially heavily on people with 12

low incomes, BIPOC, immigrants, young people, 13

people with disabilities, and those living in rural and 14

other medically underserved areas. Abortion-specific 15

restrictions are even more compounded by the ongo-16

ing criminalization of people who are pregnant, in-17

cluding those who are incarcerated, living with HIV, 18

or with substance-use disorders. These communities 19

already experience health disparities due to social, 20

political, and environmental inequities, and restric-21

tions on abortion services exacerbate these harms. 22

Removing medically unjustified restrictions on abor-23

tion services would constitute one important step on 24

the path toward realizing Reproductive Justice by 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

5

•S 1975 IS

ensuring that the full range of reproductive health 1

care is accessible to all who need it. 2

(7) Abortion-specific restrictions are a tool of 3

gender oppression, as they target health care serv-4

ices that are used primarily by women. These pater-5

nalistic restrictions rely on and reinforce harmful 6

stereotypes about gender roles, women’s decision- 7

making, and women’s need for protection instead of 8

support, undermining their ability to control their 9

own lives and well-being. These restrictions harm the 10

basic autonomy, dignity, and equality of women, and 11

their ability to participate in the social and economic 12

life of the Nation. 13

(8) The terms ‘‘woman’’ and ‘‘women’’ are used 14

in this bill to reflect the identity of the majority of 15

people targeted and affected by restrictions on abor-16

tion services, and to address squarely the targeted 17

restrictions on abortion, which are rooted in misog-18

yny. However, access to abortion services is critical 19

to the health of every person capable of becoming 20

pregnant. This Act is intended to protect all people 21

with the capacity for pregnancy—cisgender women, 22

transgender men, non-binary individuals, those who 23

identify with a different gender, and others—who 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

6

•S 1975 IS

are unjustly harmed by restrictions on abortion serv-1

ices. 2

(9) Since 2011, States and local governments 3

have passed nearly 500 restrictions singling out 4

health care providers who offer abortion services, 5

interfering with their ability to provide those services 6

and the patients’ ability to obtain those services. 7

(10) Many State and local governments have 8

imposed restrictions on the provision of abortion 9

services that are neither evidence-based nor gen-10

erally applicable to the medical profession or to 11

other medically comparable outpatient gynecological 12

procedures, such as endometrial ablations, dilation 13

and curettage for reasons other than abortion, 14

hysteroscopies, loop electrosurgical excision proce-15

dures, or other analogous non-gynecological proce-16

dures performed in similar outpatient settings in-17

cluding vasectomy, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. 18

(11) Abortion is essential health care and one 19

of the safest medical procedures in the United 20

States. An independent, comprehensive review of the 21

state of science on the safety and quality of abortion 22

services, published by the National Academies of 23

Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in 2018, found 24

that abortion in the United States is safe and effec-25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

7

•S 1975 IS

tive and that the biggest threats to the quality of 1

abortion services in the United States are State reg-2

ulations that create barriers to care. These abortion- 3

specific restrictions conflict with medical standards 4

and are not supported by the recommendations and 5

guidelines issued by leading reproductive health care 6

professional organizations including the American 7

College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Soci-8

ety of Family Planning, the National Abortion Fed-9

eration, the World Health Organization, and others. 10

(12) Many abortion-specific restrictions do not 11

confer any health or safety benefits. Instead, these 12

restrictions have the purpose and effect of unduly 13

burdening people’s personal and private medical de-14

cisions to end their pregnancies by making access to 15

abortion services more difficult, invasive, and costly, 16

often forcing people to travel significant distances 17

and make multiple unnecessary visits to the pro-18

vider, and in some cases, foreclosing the option alto-19

gether. For example, a 2018 report from the Univer-20

sity of California San Francisco’s Advancing New 21

Standards in Reproductive Health research group 22

found that in 27 cities across the United States, 23

people have to travel more than 100 miles in any di-24

rection to reach an abortion provider. 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

8

•S 1975 IS

(13) An overwhelming majority of abortions in 1

the United States are provided in clinics, not hos-2

pitals, but the large majority of counties throughout 3

the United States have no clinics that provide abor-4

tion. 5

(14) These restrictions additionally harm peo-6

ple’s health by reducing access not only to abortion 7

services but also to other essential health care serv-8

ices offered by many of the providers targeted by the 9

restrictions, including— 10

(A) screenings and preventive services, in-11

cluding contraceptive services; 12

(B) testing and treatment for sexually 13

transmitted infections; 14

(C) LGBTQ health services; and 15

(D) referrals for primary care, intimate 16

partner violence prevention, prenatal care and 17

adoption services. 18

(15) The cumulative effect of these numerous 19

restrictions has been to severely limit the availability 20

of abortion services in some areas, creating a patch-21

work system where access to abortion services is 22

more available in some States than in others. A 23

2019 report from the Government Accountability Of-24

fice examining State Medicaid compliance with abor-25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

9

•S 1975 IS

tion coverage requirements analyzed seven key chal-1

lenges (identified both by health care providers and 2

research literature) and their effect on abortion ac-3

cess, and found that access to abortion services var-4

ied across the States and even within a State. 5

(16) International human rights law recognizes 6

that access to abortion is intrinsically linked to the 7

rights to life, health, equality and non-discrimina-8

tion, privacy, and freedom from ill-treatment. United 9

Nations (UN) human rights treaty monitoring bod-10

ies have found that legal abortion services, like other 11

reproductive health care services, must be available, 12

accessible, affordable, acceptable, and of good qual-13

ity. UN human rights treaty bodies have likewise 14

condemned medically unnecessary barriers to abor-15

tion services, including mandatory waiting periods, 16

biased counseling requirements, and third-party au-17

thorization requirements. 18

(17) Core human rights treaties ratified by the 19

United States protect access to abortion. For exam-20

ple, in 2018, the UN Human Rights Committee, 21

which oversees implementation of the ICCPR, made 22

clear that the right to life, enshrined in Article 6 of 23

the ICCPR, at a minimum requires governments to 24

provide safe, legal, and effective access to abortion 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

10

•S 1975 IS

where a person’s life and health is at risk, or when 1

carrying a pregnancy to term would cause substan-2

tial pain or suffering. The Committee stated that 3

governments must not impose restrictions on abor-4

tion which subject women and girls to physical or 5

mental pain or suffering, discriminate against them, 6

arbitrarily interfere with their privacy, or place them 7

at risk of undertaking unsafe abortions. Further-8

more, the Committee stated that governments should 9

remove existing barriers that deny effective access to 10

safe and legal abortion, refrain from introducing 11

new barriers to abortion, and prevent the stigmatiza-12

tion of those seeking abortion. 13

(18) UN independent human rights experts 14

have expressed particular concern about barriers to 15

abortion services in the United States. For example, 16

at the conclusion of his 2017 visit to the United 17

States, the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme pov-18

erty and human rights noted concern that low-in-19

come women face legal and practical obstacles to ex-20

ercising their constitutional right to access abortion 21

services, trapping many women in cycles of poverty. 22

Similarly, in May 2020, the UN Working Group on 23

discrimination against women and girls, along with 24

other human rights experts, expressed concern that 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

11

•S 1975 IS

some states had manipulated the COVID–19 crisis 1

to restrict access to abortion, which the experts rec-2

ognized as ‘‘the latest example illustrating a pattern 3

of restrictions and retrogressions in access to legal 4

abortion care across the country’’ and reminded 5

U.S. authorities that abortion care constitutes essen-6

tial health care that must remain available during 7

and after the pandemic. They noted that barriers to 8

abortion access exacerbate systemic inequalities and 9

cause particular harm to marginalized communities, 10

including low-income people, people of color, immi-11

grants, people with disabilities, and LGBTQ people. 12

(19) Abortion-specific restrictions affect the 13

cost and availability of abortion services, and the 14

settings in which abortion services are delivered. 15

People travel across State lines and otherwise en-16

gage in interstate commerce to access this essential 17

medical care, and more would be forced to do so ab-18

sent this Act. Likewise, health care providers travel 19

across State lines and otherwise engage in interstate 20

commerce in order to provide abortion services to 21

patients, and more would be forced to do so absent 22

this Act. 23

(20) Health care providers engage in a form of 24

economic and commercial activity when they provide 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

12

•S 1975 IS

abortion services, and there is an interstate market 1

for abortion services. 2

(21) Abortion restrictions substantially affect 3

interstate commerce in numerous ways. For exam-4

ple, to provide abortion services, health care pro-5

viders engage in interstate commerce to purchase 6

medicine, medical equipment, and other necessary 7

goods and services. To provide and assist others in 8

providing abortion services, health care providers en-9

gage in interstate commerce to obtain and provide 10

training. To provide abortion services, health care 11

providers employ and obtain commercial services 12

from doctors, nurses, and other personnel who en-13

gage in interstate commerce and travel across State 14

lines. 15

(22) It is difficult and time and resource-con-16

suming for clinics to challenge State laws that bur-17

den or impede abortion services. Litigation that 18

blocks one abortion restriction may not prevent a 19

State from adopting other similarly burdensome 20

abortion restrictions or using different methods to 21

burden or impede abortion services. There is a his-22

tory and pattern of States passing successive and 23

different laws that unduly burden abortion services. 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

13

•S 1975 IS

(23) When a health care provider ceases pro-1

viding abortion services as a result of burdensome 2

and medically unnecessary regulations, it is often 3

difficult or impossible for that health care provider 4

to recommence providing those abortion services, 5

and difficult or impossible for other health care pro-6

viders to provide abortion services that restore or re-7

place the ceased abortion services. 8

(24) Health care providers are subject to license 9

laws in various jurisdictions, which are not affected 10

by this Act except as provided in this Act. 11

(25) Congress has the authority to enact this 12

Act to protect abortion services pursuant to— 13

(A) its powers under the commerce clause 14

of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of 15

the United States; 16

(B) its powers under section 5 of the Four-17

teenth Amendment to the Constitution of the 18

United States to enforce the provisions of sec-19

tion 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment; and 20

(C) its powers under the necessary and 21

proper clause of section 8 of Article I of the 22

Constitution of the United States. 23

(26) Congress has used its authority in the past 24

to protect access to abortion services and health care 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

14

•S 1975 IS

providers’ ability to provide abortion services. In the 1

early 1990s, protests and blockades at health care 2

facilities where abortion services were provided, and 3

associated violence, increased dramatically and 4

reached crisis level, requiring Congressional action. 5

Congress passed the Freedom of Access to Clinic 6

Entrances Act (Public Law 103–259; 108 Stat. 694) 7

to address that situation and protect physical access 8

to abortion services. 9

(27) Congressional action is necessary to put an 10

end to harmful restrictions, to federally protect ac-11

cess to abortion services for everyone regardless of 12

where they live, and to protect the ability of health 13

care providers to provide these services in a safe and 14

accessible manner. 15

(b) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this Act— 16

(1) to permit health care providers to provide 17

abortion services without limitations or requirements 18

that single out the provision of abortion services for 19

restrictions that are more burdensome than those re-20

strictions imposed on medically comparable proce-21

dures, do not significantly advance reproductive 22

health or the safety of abortion services, and make 23

abortion services more difficult to access; 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

15

•S 1975 IS

(2) to promote access to abortion services and 1

women’s ability to participate equally in the eco-2

nomic and social life of the United States; and 3

(3) to invoke Congressional authority, including 4

the powers of Congress under the commerce clause 5

of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the 6

United States, its powers under section 5 of the 7

Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the 8

United States to enforce the provisions of section 1 9

of the Fourteenth Amendment, and its powers under 10

the necessary and proper clause of section 8 of arti-11

cle I of the Constitution of the United States. 12

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 13

In this Act: 14

(1) ABORTION SERVICES.—The term ‘‘abortion 15

services’’ means an abortion and any medical or 16

non-medical services related to and provided in con-17

junction with an abortion (whether or not provided 18

at the same time or on the same day as the abor-19

tion). 20

(2) GOVERNMENT.—The term ‘‘government’’ 21

includes each branch, department, agency, instru-22

mentality, and official (and other person acting 23

under color of law) of the United States or a State. 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

16

•S 1975 IS

(3) HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.—The term 1

‘‘health care provider’’ means any entity or indi-2

vidual (including any physician, certified nurse-mid-3

wife, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant) 4

that— 5

(A) is engaged or seeks to engage in the 6

delivery of health care services, including abor-7

tion services, and 8

(B) if required by law or regulation to be 9

licensed or certified to engage in the delivery of 10

such services— 11

(i) is so licensed or certified, or 12

(ii) would be so licensed or certified 13

but for their past, present, or potential 14

provision of abortion services permitted by 15

section 4. 16

(4) MEDICALLY COMPARABLE PROCEDURE.— 17

The term ‘‘medically comparable procedures’’ means 18

medical procedures that are similar in terms of 19

health and safety risks to the patient, complexity, or 20

the clinical setting that is indicated. 21

(5) PREGNANCY.—The term ‘‘pregnancy’’ refers 22

to the period of the human reproductive process be-23

ginning with the implantation of a fertilized egg. 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

17

•S 1975 IS

(6) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ includes the 1

District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 2

Rico, and each territory and possession of the 3

United States, and any subdivision of any of the 4

foregoing. 5

(7) VIABILITY.—The term ‘‘viability’’ means 6

the point in a pregnancy at which, in the good-faith 7

medical judgment of the treating health care pro-8

vider, based on the particular facts of the case be-9

fore the health care provider, there is a reasonable 10

likelihood of sustained fetal survival outside the 11

uterus with or without artificial support. 12

SEC. 4. PERMITTED SERVICES. 13

(a) GENERAL RULE.—A health care provider has a 14

statutory right under this Act to provide abortion services, 15

and may provide abortion services, and that provider’s pa-16

tient has a corresponding right to receive such services, 17

without any of the following limitations or requirements: 18

(1) A requirement that a health care provider 19

perform specific tests or medical procedures in con-20

nection with the provision of abortion services, un-21

less generally required for the provision of medically 22

comparable procedures. 23

(2) A requirement that the same health care 24

provider who provides abortion services also perform 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

18

•S 1975 IS

specified tests, services, or procedures prior to or 1

subsequent to the abortion. 2

(3) A requirement that a health care provider 3

offer or provide the patient seeking abortion services 4

medically inaccurate information in advance of or 5

during abortion services. 6

(4) A limitation on a health care provider’s abil-7

ity to prescribe or dispense drugs based on current 8

evidence-based regimens or the provider’s good-faith 9

medical judgment, other than a limitation generally 10

applicable to the medical profession. 11

(5) A limitation on a health care provider’s abil-12

ity to provide abortion services via telemedicine, 13

other than a limitation generally applicable to the 14

provision of medical services via telemedicine. 15

(6) A requirement or limitation concerning the 16

physical plant, equipment, staffing, or hospital 17

transfer arrangements of facilities where abortion 18

services are provided, or the credentials or hospital 19

privileges or status of personnel at such facilities, 20

that is not imposed on facilities or the personnel of 21

facilities where medically comparable procedures are 22

performed. 23

(7) A requirement that, prior to obtaining an 24

abortion, a patient make one or more medically un-25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

19

•S 1975 IS

necessary in-person visits to the provider of abortion 1

services or to any individual or entity that does not 2

provide abortion services. 3

(8) A prohibition on abortion at any point or 4

points in time prior to fetal viability, including a 5

prohibition or restriction on a particular abortion 6

procedure. 7

(9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viabil-8

ity when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the 9

treating health care provider, continuation of the 10

pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant pa-11

tient’s life or health. 12

(10) A limitation on a health care provider’s 13

ability to provide immediate abortion services when 14

that health care provider believes, based on the 15

good-faith medical judgment of the provider, that 16

delay would pose a risk to the patient’s health. 17

(11) A requirement that a patient seeking abor-18

tion services at any point or points in time prior to 19

fetal viability disclose the patient’s reason or reasons 20

for seeking abortion services, or a limitation on the 21

provision or obtaining of abortion services at any 22

point or points in time prior to fetal viability based 23

on any actual, perceived, or potential reason or rea-24

sons of the patient for obtaining abortion services, 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

20

•S 1975 IS

regardless of whether the limitation is based on a 1

health care provider’s degree of actual or construc-2

tive knowledge of such reason or reasons. 3

(b) OTHER LIMITATIONS OR REQUIREMENTS.—A 4

health care provider has a statutory right to provide abor-5

tion services, and may provide abortion services, and that 6

provider’s patient has a corresponding right to receive 7

such services, without a limitation or requirement that— 8

(1) is the same as or similar to one or more of 9

the limitations or requirements described in sub-10

section (a); or 11

(2) both— 12

(A) expressly, effectively, implicitly, or as 13

implemented singles out the provision of abor-14

tion services, health care providers who provide 15

abortion services, or facilities in which abortion 16

services are provided; and 17

(B) impedes access to abortion services. 18

(c) FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION.—Factors a court 19

may consider in determining whether a limitation or re-20

quirement impedes access to abortion services for purposes 21

of subsection (b)(2)(B) include the following: 22

(1) Whether the limitation or requirement, in a 23

provider’s good-faith medical judgment, interferes 24

with a health care provider’s ability to provide care 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

21

•S 1975 IS

and render services, or poses a risk to the patient’s 1

health or safety. 2

(2) Whether the limitation or requirement is 3

reasonably likely to delay or deter some patients in 4

accessing abortion services. 5


reasonably likely to directly or indirectly increase the 7

cost of providing abortion services or the cost for ob-8

taining abortion services (including costs associated 9

with travel, childcare, or time off work). 10


reasonably likely to have the effect of necessitating 12

a trip to the offices of a health care provider that 13

would not otherwise be required. 14


reasonably likely to result in a decrease in the avail-16

ability of abortion services in a given State or geo-17

graphic region. 18

(6) Whether the limitation or requirement im-19

poses penalties that are not imposed on other health 20

care providers for comparable conduct or failure to 21

act, or that are more severe than penalties imposed 22

on other health care providers for comparable con-23

duct or failure to act. 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

22

•S 1975 IS

(7) The cumulative impact of the limitation or 1

requirement combined with other new or existing 2

limitations or requirements. 3

(d) EXCEPTION.—To defend against a claim that a 4

limitation or requirement violates a health care provider’s 5

or patient’s statutory rights under subsection (b), a party 6

must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that— 7

(1) the limitation or requirement significantly 8

advances the safety of abortion services or the health 9

of patients; and 10

(2) the safety of abortion services or the health 11

of patients cannot be advanced by a less restrictive 12

alternative measure or action. 13

SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY AND PREEMPTION. 14

(a) IN GENERAL.— 15

(1) Except as stated under subsection (b), this 16

Act supersedes and applies to the law of the Federal 17

Government and each State government, and the im-18

plementation of such law, whether statutory, com-19

mon law, or otherwise, and whether adopted before 20

or after the date of enactment of this Act, and nei-21

ther the Federal Government nor any State govern-22

ment shall enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation, 23

standard, or other provision having the force and ef-24

fect of law that conflicts with any provision of this 25


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

23

•S 1975 IS

Act, notwithstanding any other provision of Federal 1

law, including the Religious Freedom Restoration 2

Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.). 3

(2) Federal statutory law adopted after the 4

date of the enactment of this Act is subject to this 5

Act unless such law explicitly excludes such applica-6

tion by reference to this Act. 7

(b) LIMITATIONS.—The provisions of this Act shall 8

not supersede or apply to— 9

(1) laws regulating physical access to clinic en-10

trances; 11

(2) insurance or medical assistance coverage of 12

abortion services; 13

(3) the procedure described in section 14

1531(b)(1) of title 18, United States Code; or 15

(4) generally applicable State contract law. 16

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. 17

This Act shall take effect immediately upon the date 18

of enactment of this Act. This Act shall apply to all re-19

strictions on the provision of, or access to, abortion serv-20

ices whether the restrictions are enacted or imposed prior 21

to or after the date of enactment of this Act, except as 22

otherwise provided in this Act. 23


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

24

•S 1975 IS

SEC. 7. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. 1

(a) LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION.—In interpreting the 2

provisions of this Act, a court shall liberally construe such 3

provisions to effectuate the purposes of the Act. 4

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 5

shall be construed to authorize any government to inter-6

fere with a person’s ability to terminate a pregnancy, to 7

diminish or in any way negatively affect a person’s con-8

stitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, or to displace 9

any other remedy for violations of the constitutional right 10

to terminate a pregnancy. 11

SEC. 8. ENFORCEMENT. 12

(a) ATTORNEY GENERAL.—The Attorney General 13

may commence a civil action for prospective injunctive re-14

lief on behalf of the United States against any government 15

official that is charged with implementing or enforcing any 16

limitation or requirement that is challenged as a violation 17

of a statutory right under this Act. The court shall hold 18

unlawful and set aside the limitation or requirement if it 19

is in violation of this Act. 20

(b) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.— 21

(1) IN GENERAL.—Any individual or entity, in-22

cluding any health care provider, aggrieved by an al-23

leged violation of this Act may commence a civil ac-24

tion for prospective injunctive relief against the gov-25

ernment official that is charged with implementing 26


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

25

•S 1975 IS

or enforcing the limitation or requirement that is 1

challenged as a violation of a statutory right under 2

this Act. The court shall hold unlawful and set aside 3

the limitation or requirement if it is in violation of 4

this Act. 5

(2) HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.—A health care 6

provider may commence an action for prospective in-7

junctive relief on its own behalf and/or on behalf of 8

the provider’s patients who are or may be adversely 9

affected by an alleged violation of this Act. 10

(c) EQUITABLE RELIEF.—In any action under this 11

section, the court may award appropriate equitable relief, 12

including temporary, preliminary, or permanent injunctive 13

relief. 14

(d) COSTS.—In any action under this section, the 15

court shall award costs of litigation, as well as reasonable 16

attorney fees, to any prevailing plaintiff. A plaintiff shall 17

not be liable to a defendant for costs in any non-frivolous 18

action under this section. 19

(e) JURISDICTION.—The district courts of the United 20

States shall have jurisdiction over proceedings under this 21

Act and shall exercise the same without regard to whether 22

the party aggrieved shall have exhausted any administra-23

tive or other remedies that may be provided for by law. 24


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

26

•S 1975 IS

(f) ABROGATION OF STATE IMMUNITY.—A State 1

shall not be immune under the Eleventh Amendment to 2

the Constitution of the United States from an action in 3

Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a vio-4

lation of this Act. In any action against a State for a viola-5

tion of the requirements of this Act, remedies (including 6

remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such 7

a violation to the same extent as such remedies are avail-8

able for such a violation in an action against any public 9

or private entity other than a State. 10

SEC. 9. SEVERABILITY. 11

If any provision of this Act, or the application of such 12

provision to any person, entity, government, or cir-13

cumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder 14

of this Act, or the application of such provision to all other 15

persons, entities, governments, or circumstances, shall not 16

be affected thereby. 17

Æ


tman

n on

DS

KB

C07

HB

2PR

OD

with

BIL

LS

TH S S. 1975

Documents

Transcript of TH S S. 1975