TFM Felicity 2010.ppt - Welcome to the ICP...
20
ICP VEGETATION Overview of the results of the 2009 bean study Felicity Hayes, Gina Mills Coordination Centre, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK ICP VEGETATION
Transcript of TFM Felicity 2010.ppt - Welcome to the ICP...
ICP VEGETATION
Overview of the results of the 2009 bean study
Felicity Hayes, Gina Mills
Coordination Centre,
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
ICP VEGETATION
ICP VEGETATION
Site Ambient Air
Chambers Site
Austria - Seibersdorf √
Belgium - Tervuren √ √ Germany - Giessen
France - Champenoux √ Germany – Trier
Germany – Braunschweig √ Poland – Szarow
Germany – Hohenheim √ Ukraine - Kiev
Greece - Crete √
Hungary - Gödöllõ √ Greece - KalamataHungary - Gödöllõ √ Greece - Kalamata
Italy – Bari √ Greece - Thessaloniki
Italy – Pisa √
Italy - Rome √
Slovenia - Ljubljana √
Slovenia – Zavodnje √
Spain – Valencia √
UK – Ascot √ √
UK – Bangor √ √
ICP VEGETATION
Leaf injury
ICP VEGETATION
0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
sSeibersdorf - R
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
s
Seibersdorf - S
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
09/07/2009 27/07/2009 06/08/2009 09/07/2009 27/07/2009 06/08/2009
Austria
ICP VEGETATION
0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
s
Lubljana - R
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy 0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
s
Lubljana - S
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
Slovenia
ICP VEGETATION
0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
sAscot - R
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy0
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
s
Ascot - S
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
UK
ICP VEGETATION
10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
sPisa - R
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy10
20
30
40
50
No
of
lea
ve
s
Pisa - S
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
0
01/09/2009 15/09/2009
0
01/09/2009 15/09/2009
Italy
ICP VEGETATION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No
of
lea
ve
sRome - R
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
No
of
lea
ve
s
Rome - S
dead
>25%
5-25%
1-5%
healthy0
Italy
0
Note change of scale to 100 leaves per plant
ICP VEGETATION
For data analysis purposes, a single number for ‘injury’ is useful
Weighting for severity of injury
Suggestion:
A: 1 x % leaves with 1-5% injury
B: 3 x % leaves with 5-25% injury
C: 5 x % leaves with >25% injury or dead
‘Injury score’ = A + B + C
ICP VEGETATION
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
16-Jun 06-Jul 26-Jul 15-Aug 04-Sep
Inju
ry s
co
re
Slovenia - Ljubljana
R
S
0
100
200
300
400
500
Inju
ry s
co
re
Hungary - Gödöllõ
R S
16-Jun 06-Jul 26-Jul 15-Aug 04-Sep 16-Jun 26-Jun 06-Jul 16-Jul 26-Jul 05-Aug
0
100
200
300
400
500
01-Jul 06-Jul 11-Jul 16-Jul 21-Jul 26-Jul 31-Jul
Inju
ry s
co
re
Italy - Rome
R S
0
100
200
300
400
500
06-Jul 16-Jul 26-Jul 05-Aug 15-Aug 25-Aug
Inju
ry s
co
re
Spain - Valencia
R S
ICP VEGETATION
0
100
200
300
400
500
07-May 27-May 16-Jun 06-Jul 26-Jul 15-Aug 04-Sep
Inju
ry s
co
reSlovenia - Zavodnje
R S
0
100
200
300
400
500
06-Jul 26-Jul 15-Aug 04-Sep 24-Sep
Inju
ry s
co
re
UK - Ascot
R S
0
100
200
300
400
500
30-Aug 04-Sep 09-Sep 14-Sep 19-Sep
Inju
ry s
co
re
Italy - Pisa
R S
0
100
200
300
400
500
06-Jul 16-Jul 26-Jul 05-Aug 15-Aug
Inju
ry s
co
re
Austria - Seibersdorf
R S
ICP VEGETATION
Yield
ICP VEGETATION
Site S/R pod no
Austria - Seibersdorf 1.06
France - Champenoux 0.44
Germany – Braunschweig 0.9
Germany – Hohenheim 1.17 0.9
Hungary - Gödöllõ 1.25
Italy – Bari 1.03
Italy – Pisa 0.622
3
4
5
6
7
Italy – Pisa 0.62
Italy - Rome 1.54
Slovenia - Ljubljana 1.10
Slovenia – Zavodnje 0.65
Spain – Valencia 1.32
UK – Ascot 1.21
0
1
<0.5 0.5-0.75 0.75-1 1-1.25 1.25-1.5 >1.5
Ratio of number of pods > 4cm. S/R
France Rome
ICP VEGETATION
1
1.5
2
S/R
Total pod weight
CF
NF
AA
CC
ICP Veg 2008
ICP Veg 2009
0
0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
12h mean O3 (ppb)
ICP Veg 2009
ICP VEGETATION
r² = 0.97
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
S / R
ra
tio
Germany Giessen2008 and 2009
AA
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
AOT40, ppm.h
• At individual sites with exposure studies,
there are good relationships
• Ambient air data from the same site fits well
ICP VEGETATION
r² = 0.61
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 200 400 600
S/R
se
ed
we
igh
t ra
tio
S Injury score (end)
r² = 0.05
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 5 10 15
S in
jury
sc
ore
(e
nd
)
AOT40, ppm.h
• Injury not related to AOT40
• Plants with a lot of injury don’t have as many seeds
• Exposure results at an individual site are linear
• More data needed to further investigate this – flux?
ICP VEGETATION
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Sto
mata
l co
nd
ucta
nce
PAR
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Sto
ma
tal
con
du
cta
nce
Temperature
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sto
mata
l co
nd
ucta
nce
VPD
~ 2500 datapoints
UK
Belgium
Germany
Italy
(Slovenia)
Spain
In broad agreement with the ‘crops’
group bean parameterisation
ICP VEGETATION
0 23
4
injury Pod yield
Data received
1 3
1
ozone
ICP VEGETATION
ICP VEGETATION
• Exposure duration: 58 – 110 days (standardise??)
• Start date: 4th May – 11th August (standardise further??)
• Pot size??
• Soil mix: Variable (‘good quality’ and nutrients needed??)
• Germination was good at all sites
• Some batches died for unidentified reasons
Final thoughts
• Some batches died for unidentified reasons
• Some sites didn’t have nearly as much injury as expected – why?
• Some sites showed lots of injury on R – is this ozone or something else?
• Is there an interaction with other pollutants e.g. NOx?
• Can get good linear relationships with exposure studies at individual sites
• More comprehensive dataset needed – investigate fluxes
