Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ”
-
Upload
adam-england -
Category
Documents
-
view
23 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ”
Tewksbury Township Schools
“Measuring Our 2012 Results”
District Testing Report2011-2012
NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2
NJ ASK Grades 3-8
Prepared for the Tewksbury Board of EducationNovember 28, 2012
1
NJ PASS: 1st Grade Language Arts
2
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient
Current Status Recommendations
• Advanced Proficiency improved 14% • 100% Proficient
• Continue LA Curriculum Articulation Dialogues;• Continue ASAP Intervention & Support;• Continue Brain-Based Reading Strategies such as
FastForword; and• Explore Alternative Assessment Programs such as
AIMSweb, Superkids Comprehensive Reading Program & Study Island Reading Egg Program.
NJ PASS: 1st Grade Mathematics
3
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient
Current Status Recommendations
• Advanced Proficiency improved 10%• 99% Proficient
• Continue ongoing Mathematics Curriculum Articulation Dialogues;
• Continue ASAP Intervention & Support;• Develop Teacher-Made Assessments; and• Explore Study Island Assessment Alternatives.
NJ PASS: 2nd Grade Language Arts
4
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient
Current Status Recommendations• Advanced Proficiency improved 17%• 100% Proficient
• Continue LA Curriculum Articulation Dialogues;• Continue ASAP Intervention & Support;• Continue Brain-Based Reading Strategies such as
FastForword; and• Explore Alternative Assessment Programs such as:AIMSweb, Superkids Comprehensive Reading Program &
Study Island Reading Egg Program.
NJ PASS: 2nd Grade Mathematics
5
Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient
Current Status Recommendations
• Advanced Proficiency improved 6%• 95% Proficient overall
• Continue ongoing Mathematics Curriculum Articulation Dialogues;
• Continue ASAP Intervention & Support;• Develop Teacher-Made Assessments; and• Explore Study Island Assessment Alternatives.
NJ ASK Test Grades 3rd through 8th Language Arts
Overview:• Assessed in Reading and Writing• Writing portion consisted of two writing prompts in grades
3-8– Grades 3-5 : expository & speculative– Grade 6: persuasive & speculative– Grades 7-8: persuasive & explanatory
• Reading portion consisted of narrative and informational passages:
– Grades 3-5, included three reading passages– Grades 6-8, included four reading passages– Passages specific to: working with text and analyzing text
6
District Goals
Given effective classroom practice, early intervention strategies, and the integration of specific technology software applications; the students in grades 3-8 will achieve at a total proficient rating in language arts equal to or above the total proficient achievement rating of the DFG as measured by the NJASK for the 2012/13 school year. The achievement rating will exceed the DFG for the 2013/14 school year.
10
District Goals
Given effective classroom practice, early intervention strategies, and the integration of specific technology software applications; the students in grades 3-8 will achieve at a total proficient rating in mathematics equal to or above the total proficient achievement rating of the DFG as measured by the NJASK for the 2012/13 school year. The achievement rating will exceed the DFG for the 2013/14 school year.
11
PROGRESS TOWARD OUR GOALS HAS BEEN MADE.
WE HAVE MUCH MORE TO DO.
WE NEED TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER LEVEL.
Bottom Line15
NJ ASK Results Grades 3 & 4 ~ Language
Arts
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 3 Total Proficient %
Grade 4Total Proficient %
2010-2011 74.7% (Adv. 5.7%)DM = 211.8
DFG = 221.7 – 85%
85.8%DM = 229.9DFG = 223.1
2011- 2012 87.8% (Adv. 11%)DM = 216.4
DFG = 219.5 – 88.6%
75.9% (Adv. 9.6%)DM = 212
DFG = 218.6 – 83.6%
Analysis +13.1%DM = +4.6DFG = - 2.2
-9.9%DM = -17.9DFG = -4.5
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
5
5
6
4
16
Analysis Present Grade 5~ Language Arts
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
74.7% 75.9% +1.2%
DM 211.8 212 + .2
DFG 221.7 218.6 - 3.1
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
17
Essential Questions
How can we ensure that our third grade students perform at and above their performance in 2011/12?
How can we ensure that our current 5th grade class further increases their level of performance?
18
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs. Introduce Fast ForWord Reading Intervention.Continue and further utilize Visualization and
Verbalization strategies in the classroom. Expand the implementation of Reciprocal Reading
Groups.Introduce and expand upon Study Island. Introduce the Reading Assistant.Continue to expand upon Formative Assessment
Strategies.I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed above.
19
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Fast ForWord Expanding the program through grade 8.
Ongoing through June, 2013.
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Reading Assistant Introduction Webinar Nov. 27, staff feedback, and additional training sessions.
Complete implementation in designated areas by June, 2013.
Reciprocal Reading Utilize Parent Pilot Group at TES and provide additional training to parent volunteers at OTS.
Implementation at TES , December, 2012, and March, 2013 at OTS.
20
NJ ASK Results Grades 4 & 5 ~ Language
Arts
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 4Total Proficient %
Grade 5Total Proficient %
2010-2011 85.8% (Adv. 27.6%)DM = 229.9
DFG = 223.1 – 85%
83.4%DM = 217.8DFG = 225.3
2011- 2012 75.9%DM = 212
DFG = 218.6
84.1% (Adv. 16%)DM= 222.1
DFG = 222.9 – 85.8%
Analysis -9.9%DM = -17.9DFG = -4.5
+.7%DM = +4.3DFG = -2.4
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
6
6
7
5
21
Analysis Present Grade 6~ Language Arts
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
85.8% 84.1% -1.7 %
DM 229.9 222.1 -7.8
DFG 223.1 222.9 -.2
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
22
Essential Questions
Does the first year at OTS affect the assessment results? If so, how and why?
Is there a need for adjustments in the curriculum? If so, what are the needed adjustments?
How can we ensure that the students continue to make progress each year?
23
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Introduce Fast ForWord Reading Intervention.
Continue and further utilize Visualization and Verbalization strategies in the classroom.
Introduce Reciprocal Reading Groups.
Introduce and expand upon Study Island.
Introduce the Reading Assistant. Continue to expand upon
Formative Assessment Strategies.
I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed above.
Evaluate the schedule at OTS to determine its effectiveness.
Establish sub committees via the Council of Instruction to evaluate the ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
24
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Fast ForWord Expanding the program through grade 8.
Ongoing through June, 2013.
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Reading Assistant Introduction Webinar Nov. 27, staff feedback, and additional training sessions.
Complete implementation in designated areas by June, 2013.
Reciprocal Reading Utilize Parent Pilot Group at TES and provide additional training to parent volunteers at OTS.
Implementation at TES , December 2012, and March, 2013 at OTS.
25
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Evaluate OTS Schedule
Gather data from multiple sources and make recommendations.
May, 2013.
ASPIRE and ASAP Evaluation
Form sub committees via the Council of Instruction, gather data, research, and recommend.
Begin March, 2013 and conclude June, 2014.
26
NJASK Results 5 & 6 Language Arts
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 5Total Proficient %
Grade 6 Total Proficient %
2010-2011 83.4% (Adv. 7.8%)DM = 217.8
DFG = 225.3 – 86.9%
90.2%DM = 222.0DFG = 227.1
2011-2012 84.1%DM= 222.1
DFG = 222.9
90.5% (Adv. 22.6%)DM = 229.4
DFG = 228.2 – 90.9%
Analysis +.7%DM = +4.3DFG = -2.4
+.3%DM = +7.4DFG = +1.1
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
7
76
8
27
Analysis Present Grade 7~ Language Arts
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
83.4% 90.5% +7.1Adv. +14.8%
DM 217.8 229.4 +11.6
DFG 225.3 228.2 +2.9
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
Note: 3 to 4 = -3.6 & 4-5 = +1
28
Essential Questions
What has accounted for the progress from 2o11 results to 2012 results?
How can we ensure that
this progress continues through the grade levels?
29
Interventions
Continue with ASAP. Introduce Fast ForWord Reading
Intervention. Continue and further utilize
Visualization and Verbalization strategies in the classroom.
Introduce Reciprocal Reading Groups. Introduce and expand upon Study
Island. Introduce the Reading Assistant. Continue to expand upon Formative
Assessment Strategies. I&RS consider utilizing interventions
as listed above. Evaluate the schedule at OTS to
determine its effectiveness. Establish sub committees via the
Council of Instruction to evaluate the ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Address the issue in reference to the excellent results from the 2012 assessment data during Team Meetings.
30
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Fast ForWord Expanding the program through grade 8.
Ongoing through June, 2013.
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep,. 2013.
Reading Assistant Introduction Webinar Nov. 27, staff feedback, and additional training sessions.
Complete implementation in designated areas by June, 2013.
Reciprocal Reading Utilize Parent Pilot Group at TES and provide additional training to parent volunteers at OTS.
Implementation at TES , December 2012, and March, 2013 at OTS.
31
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Evaluate OTS Schedule
Gather data from multiple sources and make recommendations.
May, 2013.
ASPIRE and ASAP Evaluation
Form sub committees via the Council of Instruction, gather data, research, and recommend.
Begin March, 2013 and conclude June, 2014.
32
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Team Meeting utilized to analyze assessment results.
Review data, look for patterns, and determine what factors possibly influenced the positive results.
June, 2013.
33
NJ ASK Results Grades 6 & 7 ~ Language Arts
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 6 Total Proficient %
Grade 7Total Proficient %
2010-2011 90.2% (Adv. 13%)DM = 222
DFG = 227.1 – 89.2%
90.8%DM = 235.4DFG = 231.2
2011-2012 90.5%DM = 229.4DFG = 228.2
87.6% (Adv. 19.1%)DM = 226.9
DFG = 232.6 – 88.6%
Analysis -.3%DM = -6DFG = -3
-3.2%DM = -8.5
DFG = + 1.4
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
8
7
9
8
34
Analysis Present Grade 8~ Language Arts
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
90.2% 87.6% -2.6%
DM 222 226.9 +4.9
DFG 227.1 232.6 +5.5
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
Adv. +6.1
35
Analysis Present Grade 9~ Language Arts
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
93.8% 96% +3.2
DM 241.5 244.6 +3.1
DFG 243 239.9 -3.1
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
36
Essential Questions
How can we maintain the positive trend in becoming advanced proficient and also increase the proficiency total as a whole?
37
Interventions
Continue with ASAP. Introduce Fast ForWord Reading
Intervention. Continue and further utilize Visualization
and Verbalization strategies in the classroom.
Introduce Reciprocal Reading Groups. Introduce and expand upon Study Island. Introduce the Reading Assistant. Continue to expand upon Formative
Assessment Strategies. I&RS consider utilizing interventions as
listed above. Evaluate the schedule at OTS to
determine its effectiveness. Establish sub committees via the Council
of Instruction to evaluate the ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Address the issue in reference to the excellent results from the 2012 assessment data during Team Meetings.
Evaluate the implementation of the 55 minute integrated language arts block in grades 7 &8.
38
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Fast ForWord Expanding the program through grade 8.
Ongoing through June, 2013.
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Reading Assistant Introduction Webinar Nov. 27, staff feedback, and additional training sessions.
Complete implementation in designated areas by June, 2013.
Reciprocal Reading Utilize Parent Pilot Group at TES and provide additional training to parent volunteers at OTS.
Implementation at TES , December, 2012, and March, 2013 at OTS.
39
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Evaluate OTS Schedule
Gather data from multiple sources and make recommendations.
May , 2013.
ASPIRE and ASAP Evaluation
Form sub committees via the Council of Instruction, gather data, research, and recommend.
Begin March, 2013 and conclude June, 2014.
40
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Team Meeting utilized to analyze assessment results.
Review data, look for patterns, and determine what factors possibly influenced the positive results.
June, 2013.
Evaluate the 55 minute language arts block.
Gather data from multiple sources and make recommendations.
May, 2013.
41
DFG Comparison – Language Arts
Grade Level Tewksbury J Districts Comparison
3rd 87.8% - 216.4 88.6% - 219.5 -.8% and -3.1 pts.
4th 75.9% - 212 83.6% - 218.6 -7.7% and -6.6 pts.
5th 84.1% – 222.1 85.8% - 222.9 -1.7% and -.8
6th 90.5% - 229.4 90.9% - 228.2 -.4% and +1.2 pts.
7th 87.6% - 226.9 88.6% - 232.6 -1% and -5.7 pts.
8th 96% - 244.6 91.8% - 239.9 +4.2% and +4.7 pts.
42
PROGRESS TOWARD OUR GOALS HAS BEEN MADE.
WE HAVE MUCH MORE TO DO.
WE NEED TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER LEVEL.
Bottom Line43
NJ ASK Test Grades 3rd through 8th Mathematics
Overview: Measures knowledge and skills in four clusters
Number & numerical operations Geometry & measurement Patterns & algebra Data analysis, probability & discrete mathematics
Some mathematics questions are also classified as problem solving (involve multiple steps and reasoning)
44
NJ ASK Results Grades 3 & 4 ~ Math
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 3 Total Proficient %
Grade 4Total Proficient %
2010-2011 89.6% (Adv. 44.8%)DM = 243.4
DFG = 256.3– 94.1%
90.9%DM = 247.6DFG = 251.9
2011- 2012 91.5% (Adv. 42.7%)DM = 246.5
DFG = 257.4 – 94.7%
85.6% (Adv. 45.8%)DM = 242.7
DFG = 254.8 – 93.7%
Analysis -1.9%DM = -3.1
DFG = - 1.1
-5.3%DM = -4.9DFG = -2.9
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
5
5
6
4
47
Analysis Present Grade 5~ Math
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
89.6% 85.6% -4%
DM 243.4 242.7 -.7
DFG 256.3 254.8 - 1.5
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
48
Essential Questions
Why is there no observable progress from third to fourth grade in the area of mathematics?
How can we ensure that our current 5th grade class increases their level of performance?
49
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs. Introduce and expand upon Study Island.Implement visualization techniques and provide
additional training in the “Seeing Stars” program. Continue to expand upon Formative Assessment
Strategies.I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed
above.
50
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Visualization of math concepts.
Obtain feedback in reference to the implementation of visualization strategies.
Provide additional professional development and further implement the visualization strategies in the classroom.
Ongoing implementation.
Obtain feedback by February, 2013.
Provide additional professional development by July, 2013.
51
NJ ASK Results Grades 4 & 5 ~ Math
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 4Total Proficient %
Grade 5Total Proficient %
2010-2011 90.9% (Adv. 48%)DM = 247.6
DFG = 251.9 – 94.1%
96.6%%DM = 257.1DFG = 259.7
2011- 2012 85.6% (Adv. 45.8%)DM = 242.7
DFG = 254.8 – 93.7%
94.7% (Adv. 58.5%)DM= 257
DFG = 261.2 – 95.9%
Analysis -5.3%DM = -4.9DFG = -2.9
-1.9%DM = -.1
DFG = -1.5
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
6
6
7
5
52
Analysis Present Grade 6~ Math
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
90.9% 94.7% +3.8 %
DM 247.6 257 +9.4
DFG 251.9 261.2 +9.3
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
53
Essential Questions
How can we ensure that the progress noted will be sustained and improved upon in 2013?
54
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Introduce and expand upon Study Island.
Implement visualization techniques and provide additional training in the “Seeing Stars” program.
Continue to expand upon Formative Assessment Strategies.
I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed above.
Provide time during team planning sessions to reflect upon strategies that seem to be most effective.
Articulate with the fifth grade teachers.
55
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Visualization of math concepts.
Obtain feedback in reference to the implementation of visualization strategies.
Provide additional professional development and further implement the visualization strategies in the classroom.
Ongoing implementation.
Obtain feedback by February, 2013.
Provide additional professional development by July, 2013.
56
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Team Reflections Discuss effective strategies that can be utilized in all content areas but may be best utilized in the area of mathematics.
Ongoing throughout the year.
Vertical Articulation Discuss students and strategies with teachers from different grade levels.
Ongoing throughout the year.
57
NJASK Results 5 & 6 Math
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 5Total Proficient %
Grade 6 Total Proficient %
2010-2011 96.6%%DM = 257.1
DFG = 259.7 – 96%
92.4%DM = 239.8DFG = 250
2011-2012 94.7% (Adv. 58.5%)DM= 257
DFG = 261.2 – 95.9%
95.2% (Adv. 58.3%)DM = 254.5
DFG = 256.8 – 95.3%
Analysis -1.9%DM = -.1
DFG = +1.5
+2.8%DM = +14.7DFG = +6.8
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
7
76
8
58
Analysis Present Grade 7~ MathCompared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
96.6% 95.2% -1.4%
DM 257.1 254.5 -2.6
DFG 259.7 256.8 -2.9
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
59
Essential Questions
What do we need to do in order to take the students to a higher level of achievement?
60
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Introduce and expand upon Study Island.
Implement visualization techniques and provide additional training in the “Seeing Stars” program.
Continue to expand upon Formative Assessment Strategies.
I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed above.
Investigate multiple ways to motivate students in the area of mathematics.
61
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 5 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Visualization of math concepts.
Obtain feedback in reference to the implementation of visualization strategies.
Provide additional professional development and further implement the visualization strategies in the classroom.
Ongoing implementation.
Obtain feedback by February, 2013.
Provide additional professional development by July, 2013.
62
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Team Reflections Discuss effective strategies that can be utilized in all content areas but may be best utilized in the area of mathematics.
Ongoing throughout the year.
Vertical Articulation Discuss students and strategies with teachers from different grade levels.
Ongoing throughout the year.
63
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Motivational Strategies
Discuss effective strategies that can serve to motivate students in the area of mathematics during team and/or faculty meetings.
Ongoing throughout the year.
64
NJ ASK Results Grades 6 & 7 ~ Math
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Grade 6 Total Proficient %
Grade 7Total Proficient %
2010-2011 92.4% (Adv. 44.6%)DM = 239.8
DFG = 250 - 94.4%
93.4%DM = 248.4DFG = 246.3
2011-2012 95.2% (Adv. 58.3%)DM = 254.5
DFG = 256.8 – 95.3%
88.8% (Adv. 42.7%)DM = 235.8
DFG = 247.1 – 89%
Analysis +3.2%DM = +14.7DFG = +6.8
-4.6%DM = -12.6DFG = +.8
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
8
7
9
8
65
Analysis Present Grade 8~ Math
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
92.4% 88.8% -5.6
DM 239.8 235.8 -4
DFG 250 247.1 -2.9
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
66
Analysis Present Grade 9~ Math
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
2010-2011 2011-2012 Comparisons
Total Proficient
88.6% 94.7 +6.1
DM 247.8 259 +11.2
DFG 250.6 254.4 +3.8
DM= Scale Score Mean All Students(District) DFG=Demographic Factor Group
67
Essential Questions
How do we ensure that our current 8th grade students achieve the level that was realized by the Class of 2012?
68
Interventions
Continue with ASAP and ASPIRE programs.
Introduce and expand upon Study Island.
Implement visualization techniques and provide additional training in the “Seeing Stars” program.
Continue to expand upon Formative Assessment Strategies.
I&RS consider utilizing interventions as listed above.
Consider additional articulation with the high school teachers.
69
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Study Island Additional training on Dec. 6 to facilitate implementation of LA/Math in grades 3-8.
Ongoing progress with implementation and full implementation by Sep., 2013.
Visualization of math concepts.
Obtain feedback in reference to the implementation of visualization strategies.
Provide additional professional development and further implement the visualization strategies in the classroom.
Ongoing implementation.
Obtain feedback by February, 2013.
Provide additional professional development by July, 2013.
70
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Team Reflections Discuss effective strategies that can be utilized in all content areas but may be best utilized in the area of mathematics.
Ongoing throughout the year.
Vertical Articulation Discuss students and strategies with teachers from different grade levels.
Ongoing throughout the year.
71
Action Items
Item Action Target Dates
Articulation with the high school teachers.
Reach out to the high school teachers and discuss strategies that could further enhance student achievement.
Ongoing throughout the school year.
72
DFG Comparison – Math
Grade Level Tewksbury J Districts Comparison
3rd 91.5% - 246.5 94.7% - 257.4 -3.2% and -10.9 pts.
4th 85.6% - 242.7 93.7% - 254.8 -8.1 and -12.1 pts.
5th 94.7% - 257 95.9% - 261.2 -1.2% and -4.2 pts.
6th 95.2% - 254.5 95.3% - 256.8 -.1% and -2.3 pts.
7th 88.8% - 235.8 89% - 247.1 -.2% and -11.3 pts.
8th 94.7% - 259 91.8% - 254.4 +2.9% and +4.6 pts.
73
NJ ASK Test Grades 4th and 8th Science
Overview: Measures knowledge and skills in three clusters:
Life Physical Earth
Science questions may also be classified as Application and Knowledge
74
Analysis Present Grade 4~ Science
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Tewksbury DFG Comparisons
Total Proficient
98.8% 98.3% +.5%
Scaled Score
262.3 260.7 +1.6
DFG=Demographic Factor Group
76
Analysis Present Grade 8~ Science
Compared to Last Year
NJ ASKLanguage Arts
Tewksbury DFG Comparisons
Total Proficient
98.7% 96.3% +2.4%
Scaled Score
251.6 253.6 -2
DFG=Demographic Factor Group
77
DFG Comparison – Language Arts
Grade Level Tewksbury J Districts Comparison
3rd 87.8% - 216.4 88.6% - 219.5 -.8% and -3.1 pts.
4th 75.9% - 212 83.6% - 218.6 -7.7% and -6.6 pts.
5th 84.1% – 222.1 85.8% - 222.9 -1.7% and -.8
6th 90.5% - 229.4 90.9% - 228.2 -.4% and +1.2 pts.
7th 87.6% - 226.9 88.6% - 232.6 -1% and -5.7 pts.
8th 96% - 244.6 91.8% - 239.9 +4.2% and +4.7 pts.
78
DFG Comparison – Math
Grade Level Tewksbury J Districts Comparison
3rd 91.5% - 246.5 94.7% - 257.4 -3.2% and -10.9 pts.
4th 85.6% - 242.7 93.7% - 254.8 -8.1 and -12.1 pts.
5th 94.7% - 257 95.9% - 261.2 -1.2% and -4.2 pts.
6th 95.2% - 254.5 95.3% - 256.8 -.1% and -2.3 pts.
7th 88.8% - 235.8 89% - 247.1 -.2% and -16.3 pts.
8th 94.7% - 259 91.8% - 254.4 +2.9% and +4.6 pts.
79
PROGRESS TOWARD OUR GOALS HAS BEEN MADE.
WE HAVE MUCH MORE TO DO.
WE NEED TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER LEVEL.
Bottom Line80