TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

6
Scope: 1. 1.1 This protocol covers determination of the dynamic pull-off performance of roofing fastener heads or fasteners with bearing plates. 1.2 This protocol is applicable to both metal and plastic bearing plates. Metal bearing plates shall also be tested for dynamic pull-through resistance with roofing membranes in compliance with TAS 117(B). 1.3 The test procedures outlined herein utilize a dynamic eccentric loading procedure. 1.4 All testing and calculations shall be con- ducted by a certified testing agency and all test reports, including calculations, shall be signed and sealed by a Registered Design Professional per F.S., Section 471 or 481. Referenced Documents: 2. 2.1 The Florida Building Code, Building 2.2 Application Standards: TAS 117(B) Test Procedure for Dy- namic Pull-Through Perfor- mance of Roofing Membranes Over Fastener Heads or Fasteners with Metal Bearing Plates 2.3 Norwegian Building Research Institute: Roofing Systems with Mechanical At- tachments 2.4 ASTM Standards: D 1079 Standard Definitions and Terms Relating to Roofing, Waterproofing and Bitumi- nous Materials E 380 Excerpts from the Standard Practice for Use of the Inter- national System of Units (SI) (the Modernized Met- ric System) Terminology & Units: 3. 3.1 Definitions–For definitions of terms in this Protocol, refer to Chapter 2 and Sec- tion 1513 of the Florida Building Code, Building and ASTM D 1079. The defini- tions from the Florida Building Code, Building shall take precedence. 3.1.1 All references to “bearing plate” are interchangeable with “stress plate.” 3.1.2 The dynamic pull-off value under dynamic eccentric loading shall be defined as the mean load capac- ity obtained at failure. Failure shall be defined as any of the fol- lowing: breakage of the stress plate; pull through of the fastener head in the stress plate; or, permanent deformation of the fastener, fastener head or stress plate in excess of 1 / 4 inch (6.3 mm). 3.2 Units—For conversion of U.S. customary units to SI units, refer to ASTM E 380. Significance and Use: 4. 4.1 The test procedure provides a means of determining of the dynamic pull-off per- formance of roofing fastener assemblies when exposed to dynamic eccentric load- ing. 4.2 The test procedure is acceptable for all types of fasteners with integral bearing plates and fasteners with separate bearing plates. Note: Roofing nails or cap nails are not approved for use within the high-velocity hurricane zone jurisdiction. therefore, results from testing these nail types shall not be utilized as design values for projects within this ju- risdiction. In addition, the minimum and maximum bearing plate diameters for an- chor or base sheet attachment within the high-velocity hurricane zone jurisdiction 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (TAS) 117(C)-95.1 TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST PROCEDURE FOR DYNAMIC PULL-OFF PERFORMANCE OF ROOFING FASTENER HEADS OR FASTENERS WITH BEARING PLATES

Transcript of TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

Page 1: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

Scope:1.

1.1 This protocol covers determination of thedynamic pull-off performance of roofingfastener heads or fasteners with bearingplates.

1.2 This protocol is applicable to both metaland plastic bearing plates. Metal bearingplates shall also be tested for dynamicpull-through resistance with roofingmembranes in compliance with TAS117(B).

1.3 The test procedures outlined herein utilizea dynamic eccentric loading procedure.

1.4 All testing and calculations shall be con-ducted by a certified testing agency andall test reports, including calculations,shall be signed and sealed by a RegisteredDesign Professional per F.S., Section 471or 481.

Referenced Documents:2.

2.1 The Florida Building Code, Building

2.2 Application Standards:

TAS 117(B) Test Procedure for Dy-namic Pull-Through Perfor-mance of RoofingMembranes Over FastenerHeads or Fasteners withMetal Bearing Plates

2.3 Norwegian Building Research Institute:Roofing Systems with Mechanical At-tachments

2.4 ASTM Standards:

D 1079 Standard Definitions andTerms Relating to Roofing,Waterproofing and Bitumi-nous Materials

E 380 Excerpts from the StandardPractice for Use of the Inter-national System of Units(SI) (the Modernized Met-ric System)

Terminology & Units:3.

3.1 Definitions–For definitions of terms inthis Protocol, refer to Chapter 2 and Sec-tion 1513 of the Florida Building Code,Building and ASTM D 1079. The defini-tions from the Florida Building Code,Building shall take precedence.

3.1.1 All references to “bearing plate”are interchangeable with “stressplate.”

3.1.2 The dynamic pull-off value underdynamic eccentric loading shallbe defined as the mean load capac-ity obtained at failure. Failureshall be defined as any of the fol-lowing:

• breakage of the stress plate;

• pull through of the fastenerhead in the stress plate; or,

• permanent deformation of thefastener, fastener head orstress plate in excess of 1/4

inch (6.3 mm).

3.2 Units—For conversion of U.S. customaryunits to SI units, refer to ASTM E 380.

Significance and Use:4.

4.1 The test procedure provides a means ofdetermining of the dynamic pull-off per-formance of roofing fastener assemblieswhen exposed to dynamic eccentric load-ing.

4.2 The test procedure is acceptable for alltypes of fasteners with integral bearingplates and fasteners with separate bearingplates.

Note: Roofing nails or cap nails are not approvedfor use within the high-velocity hurricanezone jurisdiction. therefore, results fromtesting these nail types shall not be utilizedas design values for projects within this ju-risdiction. In addition, the minimum andmaximum bearing plate diameters for an-chor or base sheet attachment within thehigh-velocity hurricane zone jurisdiction

2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (TAS) 117(C)-95.1

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95

TEST PROCEDURE FOR DYNAMIC PULL-OFF PERFORMANCEOF ROOFING FASTENER HEADS OR FASTENERS WITH BEARING PLATES

Page 2: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

are 15/8 inches (41 mm) and 2 inches (51mm), respectively. Therefore, results fromtesting bearing plates having a diameterless than 15/8 inches (41 mm) or greaterthan 2 inches (51 mm) shall not be utilizedas design values for projects within this ju-risdiction.

Sampling:5.

5.1 Fastener and/or bearing plate samplesshall be provided directly from the re-spective manufacturer and shall be testedas delivered. Unless otherwise specified,14 samples shall be tested for each vari-able in the test specimen (i.e. different fas-tener or different bearing plate).

Test Method:6.

6.1 General:

6.1.1 The dynamic pull-off value is de-termined by subjecting the testspecimen to a dynamic eccentricloading.

6.2 Apparatus

6.2.1 The test apparatus is shown in Fig-ures 1, 4 and 5, attached.

6.2.2 A wire reinforced test strap (SeeFigures 2 and 3, attached). Thetest strap shall consist of a 0.08inch (2 mm) diameter steel wirewelded between two plys of 0.05inch (1.2 mm) PVC membrane re-inforced with polyester fabric. Atthe point of contact in the wireloop, an additional ply of mem-brane shall be wrapped around thewire to avoid cutting action on thefastener.

6.2.3 Attachment cables having varyinglengths for various drop heights.

6.2.4 Drop weights having a mass of 5pounds (2.3 kg).

6.2.5 A device to measure, referenceand mark the height of drop.

6.3 Preparation of test samples:

6.3.1 The fasteners shall not be pre-pared in any way; however, careshall be taken to insure that fasten-

ers are mounted in the test speci-men in a defined, consistent man-ner.

6.3.2 The fastener assembly sampleshall be installed through the cen-ter of the test apparatus as shownin Figure 1, attached.

6.3.3 Dynamic pull-through testingshall be conducted in a room withcontrolled temperature and hu-midity, 73°F (23 ± 2°C) and RH 50percent.

6.4 Procedure:

6.4.1 The fastener assembly test speci-men shall be mounted in the testapparatus to insure no fastenerwithdrawal will occur upon load-ing.

6.4.2 The dynamic load shall be appliedas follows:

• Fixed drop height:The fastener assembly shallbe subjected to a dynamic im-pact load with the drop weightbeing released from a fixeddrop height to the nearest 1inch.

• Intervals of increasing dropheights:The fastener assembly shallbe subjected to dynamic im-pact loads of increasing inten-sity with the drop weightbeing released from increas-ing drop heights at intervals of3 inches (100 mm) until fail-ure occurs.

Application of a dynamic impactload from a fixed drop height shallonly be considered if the fastenerassembly has previously beentested and the intent is to upgradethe fastener assembly pull-offvalue. The datum point of dropheight shall then be the previoustest result.

6.5 Interpretation of results:

6.5.1 Table 1 below lists the corre-sponding fastener assembly

(TAS) 117(C)-95.2 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ

(TAS) No. 117(C)-95

Page 3: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

pull-off values which relate to re-spective drop heights. These val-ues shall be recorded uponcompletion of testing and shall bestatistically analyzed, as noted inSection 6.6, herein.

TABLE 1FASTENER ASSEMBLY PULL-OFF VALUES

VS. DROP HEIGHT

Drop Height (ft) Pull-Off Value (lbf)

456789

1011121314

2025303540455055606570

For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.

6.6 Statistical analysis of results:

6.6.1 Eliminate the “high” and “low”values recorded during the dy-namic pull-off testing and calcu-late a mean and a standarddeviation from the remaining 12recorded values using the follow-ing equations.

F Fii

==∑1

12

12

1

where,( )S F FF ii

= −=∑1

11

212

1

F = mean load;

SF = standard deviation;

F = record load; and,

i = test number

6.6.2 Determine the percent deviationfrom the mean (S’F) using the fol-lowing equation.

′ = ⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟

×SS

FF

F 100

If the percent deviation from themean (S F) is greater than 35 per-cent, then the test results shall beconsidered null and void and the

dynamic pull-off performance un-der dynamic eccentric loadingshall be retested.

Report:7.

7.1 The final test report shall include the fol-lowing relevant information:

7.1.1 Name and address of the testinglaboratory.

7.1.2 Identification number of the testreport.

7.1.3 Name and address of the organi-zation or the person who orderedthe test.

7.1.4 Purpose of the test.

7.1.5 Method of sampling and other cir-cumstances (date and person re-sponsible for the sampling).

7.1.6 Name and address of manufac-turer or supplier of the tested ob-ject(s).

7.1.7 Name or other identificationmarks of the tested object(s).

7.1.8 Description of the tested ob-ject(s).

7.1.9 Date of supply of the tested ob-ject(s).

7.1.10 Date of the test.

7.1.11 Test method.

7.1.12 Conditioning of the test speci-mens, environmental data duringthe test (temperature, pressure,RH, etc.).

7.1.13 Identification of the test equip-ment and instruments used.

7.1.14 Any deviations from the testmethod.

7.1.15 Test results and statistical analysiscomputations.

7.1.16 Date and signature.

2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (TAS) 117(C)-95.3

(TAS) No. 117(C)-95

Page 4: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

(TAS) 117(C)-95.4 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ

(TAS) No. 117(C)-95

1. Steel Frame2. 13/4-inch (45 mm) rubber pad3. 2-inch (50 mm) wood plank4. Drop height measurement device5. Drop height reference indicator6. Fastener assembly test specimen7. Test strap8. Steel wire of appropriate length9. Drop weight

For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm.

FIGURE 1DIAGRAM OF DYNAMIC PULL-OFF TEST APPARATUS

Page 5: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (TAS) 117(C)-95.5

(TAS) No. 117(C)-95

FIGURE 2DIAGRAM OF WIRE REINFORCED TEST STRAP

FIGURE 3PHOTOGRAPH OF TYPICAL WIRE REINFORCED TEST STRAP

Page 6: TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(C)-95 TEST ...

(TAS) 117(C)-95.6 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE — TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ

(TAS) No. 117(C)-95

FIGURE 5PHOTOGRAPH OF DYNAMIC PULL-OFF TESTING

FIGURE 4PHOTOGRAPH OF DYNAMIC PULL-OFF TESTING