Teorii leadership

download Teorii leadership

of 2

Transcript of Teorii leadership

  • 8/9/2019 Teorii leadership

    1/2

    Becoming an effective strategic leader involves developing your skills and knowledge to cope

    with competition and respond quickly to opportunities. Strategic leaders also influence

    subordinates to recognize and take actions that enable the companys long-term success.

    Balancing daily operations with visionary planning requires that you think and act appropriately to

    sustain a competitive advantage. Creating an effective strategy can involve planning plotting

    responding to patterns taking advantage of a position or shaping the companys perspective.

    !eadership theories

    There is a wide and ever growing variety of theories to explain the concept and practice

    of leadership. I will provide a brief overview of the more dominant or better known

    theories. I hope that others will share their thoughts on whether this list neglects any

    theories of note. In the future we can discuss some of the emerging leadership

    theories/approaches such as adaptive, authentic, and appreciative. It is important to note

    that this submission attempts to provide an overview of

    leadership theoriesversus models. I view models as attempts to functionalize the more

    theoretical aspects of leadership and make them easier to put into play by organizations

    and consultants. This is, in and of itself, an important activity.Most theories view leadership as grounded in one or more of the following three

    perspectives leadership as aprocess or relationship, leadership as a combination

    of traits or personality characteristics, or leadership as certain behaviorsor, as they are

    more commonly referred to, leadership skills. In virtually all of the more dominant

    theories there exist the notions that, at least to some degree, leadership is aprocessthat

    involves influencewith a groupof people toward the realization ofgoals. I will say on the

    front end that, in my opinion, leadership is a dynamic and complex process, and that

    much of what is written these days tends to over!simplify this process. My goal here is

    to provide an overview that keeps things simple, without crossing into over!simplification,

    and for the most part refraining from any criti"uing of the various theories. I will leave

    that to my fellow bloggers for now.Trait Theory

    This theory postulates that people are either born or not born with the qualitiesthat

    predispose them to success in leadership roles. That is, that certain inherited "ualities,

    such as personality and cognitive ability, are what underlie effective leadership. There

    have been hundreds of studies to determine the most important leadership traits, and

    while there is always going to be some disagreement, intelligence, sociability, and

    drive #aka determination$ are consistently cited as key "ualities.

    Skills Theory

    This theory states that learned knowledge and ac"uired skills/abilities are significant

    factors in the practice of effective leadership. %kills theory by no means disavows the

    connection between inherited traits and the capacity to be an effective leader & it simplyargues that learned skills, a developed style, and ac"uired knowledge, are the real keys

    to leadership performance. It is of course the belief that skills theory is true that

    warrants all the effort and resources devoted to leadership training and development

    Situational Theory

    This theory suggests that different situations re"uire different stylesof leadership. That

    is, to be effective in leadership re"uires the ability to adapt or adjustone's style to the

    circumstances of the situation. The primary factors that determine how to adapt are an

    assessment of the competenceand commitmentof a leader's followers. The assessment

    of these factors determines if a leader should use a more directiveor supportivestyle.

    Contingency Theory

  • 8/9/2019 Teorii leadership

    2/2

    This theory states that a leader's effectiveness is contingent on how well the leader's

    style matches a specific setting or situation. (nd how, you may ask, is this different from

    situational theory) In situational the focus is on adaptingto the situation, whereas

    contingency states that effective leadership depends on the degree of fitbetween a

    leader's "ualities and style and that of a specific situation or context.

    Path-Goal TheoryThis theory is about how leaders motivatefollowers to accomplish identified ob*ectives.

    It postulates that effective leaders have the ability to improve the motivation of followers

    by clarifying the pathsand removing obstaclesto high performance and desired

    ob*ectives. The underlying beliefs of path!goal theory #grounded in expectancy theory$

    are that people will be more focused and motivated if they believe they are capable of

    high performance, believe their effortwill result in desired outcomes, and believe their

    work is worthwhile.

    Transformational Theory

    This theory states that leadership is the process by which a person engageswith others

    and is able to create a connectionthat results in increased motivationand moralityin

    both followers and leaders. It is often likened to the theory of charismaticleadershipthat espouses that leaders with certain "ualities, such as confidence,

    extroversion, and clearly stated values, are best able to motivate followers. The key in

    transformational leadership is for the leader to be attentive to the needsand motivesof

    followers in an attempt to help them reach their maximumpotential. In addition,

    transformational leadership typically describes how leaders can initiate, develop, and

    implement important changes in an organization. This theory is often discussed in

    contrast with transactional leadership.

    Transactional Theory

    This is a theory that focuses on the exchangesthat take place between leaders and

    followers. It is based in the notion that a leader's *ob is to create structures that make it

    abundantly clear what is expected of his/her followers and also the consequences#i.e.rewards and punishments$ for meeting or not meeting these expectations. This theory is

    often likened to the concept and practice of managementand continues to be an

    extremely common component of many leadership models and organizational structures.

    Servant Leadership Theory

    This conceptualization of leadership reflects a philosophy that leaders should be servants

    first. It suggests that leaders must place the needs of followers, customers, and the

    community ahead of their own interests in order to be effective. The idea of servant

    leadership has a significant amount of popularity within leadership circles & but it is

    difficult to describe it as a theory inasmuch as a set of beliefs and values that leaders are

    encouraged to embrace.