Temperature Controlled Rate Studies of Co(salen) Reversible Oxygen Binding
-
Upload
steven-hartman -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Temperature Controlled Rate Studies of Co(salen) Reversible Oxygen Binding
Temperature Controlled Rate Studies of Co(salen)
Reversible Oxygen BindingBy Philip Chuang
Background Information• Co(salen) is Cobalt N,N’-bis (salicylaldehyde)
ethylenediamine • Ability to reversibly bind oxygen discovered by
Tsumaki in 19381
• A square planar dioxygen carrier• Exists in both an Active and Inactive state• Interested in Effect of Temperaturee on Rate in:
– Oxygenation of Inactive Co(Salen) in DMSO
• [(DMSO)Co(Salen)]2 + O2 [(DMSO)Co(Salen)]2O2
– Deoxygenation of Active Co(salen) in CHCl3• Co(Salen)O2
Co(Salen) + O2
Active State vs. Inactive State
• Active State binds Oxygen readily
• Dimeric Form coordinates between Cobalt centers.2
• Binds Oxygen in polar aprotic solvents
• Dimeric Form coordinates Co and O.3
Diagram from Reference 3Diagram from Reference 2
Hypothesis
• The Rate of Oxygen Binding and Dissociation increases with Higher Temp. More specifically:– The Rate of Inactive Co(salen) Oxygenation
will Increase with Temperature in DMSO.– Rate of Active Co(salen) Deoxygenation will
Increase with Temperature in chloroform.
Synthetic Method• Synthesis of Inactive Co(salen)
– 1 eq. ethylenediamine added to 2 eq. Salicylaldehyde in boiling ethanol, for 4 min.
– 1 eq. Salen product (from above) refluxed in ethanol under Argon, 1 eq. Cobalt Acetate in H2O added via addition funnel
– Stirred and kept in 700C Water bath for 1 hour
• Synthesis of Active Co(salen)– Same methods as Inactive, but no hot water
bath
Procedure derived from Reference 4
UV-Vis
UV-VIS of Inactive Co(salen) in DMSO in atmosphere
UV-Vis of Inactive Co(salen) in DMSO in N2 from literature5
The UV spectra indicates that the Inactive product was obtained.
Differences between UV spectra likely due to availability of Oxygen in the DMSO solution
H-NMR
H-NMR of Active Product in dDMSO
H-NMR of Inactive Product in dDMSO
-The H-NMRs did not correspond to predicted H-NMRs
-Conclusive Identification from H-NMR unobtainable
-Future improvement: prepare H-NMR in inert atmosphere, include C13 NMR
IR Spectra
IR Spectra of inactive Co(salen) from Unniversity of Wimona6
IR spectra of Inactive Co(salen)
With the exception of the C-H peak at 3000, and the nujol peaks at 1500, 1400 and 700 cm-1 look similar
Further reinforces likelihood of obtaining Inactive Product
UV-Vis Kinetics Results pt.1Absorbance vs Time at 15 C, CHCl3, 409 nm
Trace
0.000000
0.020000
0.040000
0.060000
0.080000
0.100000
0.120000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Time (s)
Ab
sorb
ance
(A
U)
Absorbance vs Time at 15 C, CHCl3, 409 nm Trace
y = -7E-06x + 0.0671
R2 = 0.5286
0.0625000.0630000.0635000.0640000.0645000.0650000.0655000.0660000.0665000.0670000.067500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Time (s)
Ab
sorb
ance
(A
U)
Absorbance vs Time graph of oxygenated Co(salen) in CHCl3 at 150C
Absorbance vs. Time graph of oxygenated Co(salen in CHCl3 at 150C, excluding first 8 data points
The first 8 data points were removed
Not enough time given to allow temperature to equilibrate
UV-Vis Kinetics Results pt. 2Absorbance vs Time, 50 C, CHCl3, 409 nm Trace
0.000000
0.020000
0.040000
0.060000
0.080000
0.100000
0 200 400 600 800
Time (s)
Ab
so
rba
nc
e (
AU
)
Absorbance vs Time, 50 C, CHCl3, 409 nm Tracey = 2E-05x + 0.0456
R2 = 0.9616
0.046000
0.048000
0.050000
0.052000
0.054000
0.056000
0 200 400 600 800
Time (s)
Ab
so
rban
ce (
AU
)
Absorbance vs. Time graph of oxygenated Co(salen) in CHCl3 at 500C
Absorbance vs. Time graph of oxygenated Co(salen) in CHCl3 at 500C without first 8 data points
Again, the first 8 data points were discarded.
Not enough time was given for temperature to equilibrate
UV-Vis Spectra Results pt. 3-LN Absorbance vs Time, 15 C, 409 nm Time
Trace in CHCl3y = 0.0002x + 2.6812
R2 = 0.629
2.6400002.6600002.6800002.7000002.7200002.7400002.7600002.780000
4.5 104.5 204.5 304.5 404.5 504.5 604.5 704.5
Time
-LN
Ab
sorb
ance
-LN Absorbance vs Time, 50 C, 409 nm Trace, in CHCl3
y = -0.0003x + 3.0807
R2 = 0.9467
2.882.9
2.922.942.962.98
33.023.043.06
4.5 204.5 404.5 604.5 804.5
Time
-LN
Ab
so
rba
nc
e
-LN Absorbance vs Time plot for 150C deoxygenation of Inactive Co(salen)
-LN Absorbance vs. Time plot for 500C deoxygenation of Inactive Co(salen)
The slope of the –LN Absorbance vs. Time plot yields the rate constant of a first order reaction.
UV-Vis Kinetics Results pt. 4Absorbance vs Time, 15 C, DMSO, 409 nm
Trace y = -2E-05x + 0.2922
R2 = 0.9792
0.265000
0.270000
0.275000
0.280000
0.285000
0.290000
0.295000
0.300000
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Time (s)
Ab
so
rba
nc
e (
AU
)
-LN Absorbance vs Time, 15 C, DMSO, 409 nm Time Trace y = 0.0498x + 1.1575
R2 = 0.9733
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.6
0 2 4 6 8
Time (s)
-LN
Ab
sorb
ance
Absorbance vs. Time plot for Inactive Co(salen) in DMSO at 150C
-LN Absorbance vs. Time plot for Inactive Co(salen) in DMSO at 150C
No Data points were removed
For the DMSO runs, temperature was allowed to equilibrate
UV-Vis Kinetics Results pt. 5Absorbance vs Time, 50 C, DMSO 409 nm
Time Trace
0.1720.1730.1740.1750.1760.1770.1780.179
0.18
0 200 400 600 800
Time (s)
Ab
so
rba
nc
e (
AU
)
Absorbance vs. Time graph of inactive Co(salen) in DMSO at 500C
Result was not workable, rate could not be calculated
Possible explanations in Discussion Section
Discussion• When LN Absorbance vs. LN Time plotted
(not pictured), linearity observed• Indicated a first order reaction:
– R = k[A] -d[A]/dt = k[A]– -d[A]/[A] = k Integrate to get LN [A] = -kt – Thus k = -LN [A] /t
• This method used to attain reaction rates from results
• Decreasing absorbance indicative of oxygen complex formation5
Discussion• k = 0.0002 1/s for oxygenated Active Co(salen)
in CHCl3 at 150C in atmospheric conditions– Validity in question due to low correlation coefficient
• k = -0.0003 1/s for oxygenated Active Co(salen) in CHCl3 at 150C in atmospheric conditions
• k = 0.05 1/s for inactive Co(salen) in DMSO at 150C
• k could not be determined for inactive Co(salen) in DMSO at 500C– Possible Reason: Reaction has finished– Supported by the lower absorbance compared to the 150C
sample.
Conclusions• Data supports hypothesis for increased rate of
Oxygen Dissociation for Oxygenated Co Active Co(salen) at increased temperatures
• Not enough data to support or disprove hypothesis for increased rate of Oxygen uptake in Active form of Co(salen at increased temperatures.
• Future Considerations:– Prepare NMRs and UV-Vis solutions in an inert
glovebox using a sealable cuvette– Take the C13 NMR to better characterize products– Run more samples at different temperatures to give
better overall picture
References
1. T. Tsumaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 13, 252 (1938).
2. Schaefer, W. P., and Marsh, R. E., Acta Crystallogr., B25, 1675 (1969)
3. Bruckner, S.,Calligaris, M., Nardin, G., and Randaccio, L., Acta Crystallogr., B25, 167 (1969)
4. Bailes, R. H., and Calvin, M., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 69, 1886 (1947)
5. B. Ortiz, and Park, S., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 21, 4, (2000)
Acknowledgements
• I’d like to thank Ankur for always being available to help me at all hours of the day
• Simone for being a big help during the lab sessions and being ridiculously funny
• Professor Roth for allowing me to use her temperature controlled UV-Vis and giving us a cool, albeit hard final project that taught us to make use of the journal articles available to us
• Finally my fellow students for being ever supportive and cheery