Tell Me a Riddle FLE
-
Upload
fahim-khan -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.302 -
download
2
Transcript of Tell Me a Riddle FLE
ReFLE01: Eva Character Analysis and Title Meaning
“Tell Me a Riddle,” says the title of Tillie Olsen’s short story. “I know no riddles,”
declares Eva the dying grandmother when the phrase is echoed by one of her grandchildren
(85-6). And why is that? Her husband David knows many riddles, and they have lived
together for 47 years – so she certainly hasn’t been lacking for time. Nor is it true that Eva is
a shallow or simple person, as evidenced by stream of consciousness-type italicized
passages throughout the story that offer glimpses of her intricate mind. In fact, Eva’s private
language is insightful and deeply introspective, represented through a plethora of vivid
metaphors. One such image is of rocks and stones, found almost exclusively in Eva’s internal
ruminations, which suggests that it means something very personal i.e. they are deep
reflection of her being. Assuming that the suggestion is true is fruitful and the purpose of
this analysis is to use the implications to describe what Eva’s thoughts and overall self-
identity are, providing the reasons for them, and then explain why Eva claims to know no
riddles despite the plentitude of knowledge that she has.
The central rock image in the story is first instanced in a passing remark by Eva’s
grandson Richard. The child mentions how in geology, all rocks are classified into just three
types – “igneous, sedimentary, metamorphic” (85). Eva characterizes them as “earth’s fire
jetting; rock of layered centuries; crucibled new out of the old (igneous, sedimentary,
metamorphic). But there was that other—frozen to black glass, never to transform or hold
the fossil memory” (90). The black glass is obsidian (87) and it is something that has no
effect on the world, nor is it affected by the world. If Eva’s description of rocks is read as a
metaphor for the different kinds of human personalities, then her conception of obsidian is
clearly reminiscent of herself – she also is separated from the world. Eva hides in closets so
that she doesn’t have to talk with her family, and when she goes to a concert she “turned off
her hearing aid… as she would have wished to turn off sight” (97). She is purposefully
isolated. Eva makes a conscious effort to avoid connecting with people around her because
she doesn’t want to be overwhelmed with other people’s emotions i.e. she does not want to
feel empathy. She says that it is “easy to keep your head above water” if it’s empty as “empty
things float” (97). By “becoming” obsidian, she is able to stay empty, and afloat, because her
head is clear of concern for the world around her.
Because Eva consciously blocks out the world, her actions seem to suggest that Eva
just isn’t a very caring person – and this is true, somewhat. Indeed, she does not physically
care for others (she refuses to play with her daughter’s new baby), but her lack of caring is
more out of ignorance rather than malice because Eva has never really been cared for as a
person – she is unable to “pay it forward” so to speak. As a girl growing up in Communist
Russia, she was not allowed to pursue her interests, such as reading Tolstoy, since they
conflicted with what she was “supposed” to be. So, consideration for Eva never entered into
the minds of her caretakers, and Eva grew up into a life that held no value for her. In this
manner, Eva is not fundamentally uncaring, but her unsociability is due to external causes -
her likeness to the obsidian metaphor was not always present. Olsen sort of already hints at
this realization because obsidian is not really a fourth kind of rock as Eva states, but is an
igneous rock that formed of lava cooled before it has had a chance to crystallize.
Metaphorically, Eva’s passions were suppressed before they could materialize. Also, a
possibly more profound implication is that Eva’s sense of self-identity is misguided as she is
in fact no different from many other people.
Olsen illustrates literally that Eva isn’t foundationally different from other people
when she has a radical change of attitude in the last days of her life: “She, who in her life had
spoken but seldom and then only when necessary (never having learned the easy, social
uses of words), now in dying, spoke incessantly” (103). Moreover, the speech itself was near
incoherent, but not because the words or sentences were nonsensical but because they
seemed too deep to understand. To Eva’s piercing and disturbing statements, her husband
replies, “Who wanted questions? Everything you have to wake?” (114). Eva, who had once
said that she knew no riddles, apparently knows more than anyone else can handle. Her
knowledge of riddles was suppressed along with her passion for life. In actuality, the two
are really inseparable because asking riddles requires a person be involved in life, to care
about it enough to wonder what it all means.
Olsen’s use of rock imagery points to a deep incongruence in Eva’s perception of
herself and the word – she perceives herself as innately different from others, even though
the reality is that she was indeed born like many other people; she was only raised in such a
negligent manner that she came to believe that she was different, not formally a human. Eva
changes right before her death perhaps because she realized that despite her wasted life,
she could not maintain complete isolation from the world, to cover herself against others, as
if inside a layer of obsidian glass. Eva has a husband and children who will carry on her
memory, and have already imprinted themselves on her despite her solitary temperament.
They are in some sense a part of her, and Eva seems to realize that she knows what they
know – and so she must know riddles.