Teen Driver Safety · PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer...
Transcript of Teen Driver Safety · PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer...
Call (866) 835-7973 to join
Teen Driver Safety
Topic Call #4 February 20, 2018
Strategy Team Updates
2
Tips
Mute yourself when you’re not talking
This webinar is being recorded
Call (866) 835-7973
for audio
Ask questions in the chat at any time
Download
resources from File
Share pod
This webinar is subject to the CS CoIIN data agreement*
3
TDS Staff & Participants
Jenny Stern-
Carusone, M.S.W.
Coordinator
Jane Taylor, EdD
Improvement Advisor
Team
Rebecca Willmer
Tech Guru
Jen Leonardo, Ph.D.
Improvement Advisor
Team
Teen Driver Safety
8 Strategy Teams
•Florida
•Kentucky
•Nebraska
•New Hampshire
•*North Dakota*
•Tennessee
•Texas
•Wisconsin
4
• Strategy Team Updates (approx. 5 min/team for presentation and TA)
• Looking ahead: Setting 90-day Aims
• Upcoming events
Agenda
5
About This Slide Deck
Please contact us if you need assistance!
What we display Where we get it How you can edit it
Drivers & Change Ideas
Process Measures
Aim Statements
Your online Driver DiagramSubmit, re-submit, or edit
your online Driver Diagram
Description of goals, theory
or approachYour Storyboard E-mail us
Charts
Charts are only generated
for the process measures
selected in your driver
diagram
Select the correct Process
Measures in your driver
diagram
Content of your charts
comes from your monthly
report
Submit or edit your monthly
reports
This information is shared with HRSA MCHB and CS CoIIN Topic Teams
6
Teen Driver SafetyEngagement Metrics FL KY NE NH ND TN TX WI Topic Team
Driver Diagram Submitted Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes 100%Reporting
Number of Monthly Reports
Submitted 9 7 7 7 7 7 4 8 100%Reporting at least once
Number of PDSAs Submitted 1 1 9 1 3 2 0 3 88%Reporting at least once
Number of Topic Calls State
Participated In 9 7 9 8 9 7 9 8 8.25On Average
Assessment Scale 2 3.5 3 3 3 3.5 1.5 3 3Mode
Updated February 19, 2018; Run charts updated February
7
TDS: Process Measures
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Percent of communities that participate in campaign
2. Percent of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use and
texting
3. Percent of teens reporting driving during restricted hours
4. Percent of teens reporting use of seat belts
5. Percent of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs
6. Percent of teens reporting speeding
7. Percent of teens reporting driving with teen passengers
8. Percent of teens reporting driving while fatigued
9. Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
10. Percent of teens reporting safe driving practices
11. Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
12. Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
13. Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in
an evidence-based teen driver safety program
14. Percent of schools that provide GDL education
15. Percent of health care organizations that give anticipatory guidance to
caregivers on teen driver safety
16. Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety
coalition
Teen Driver Safety Process Measures
8
Florida AIM:
• Deaths: -5%
• Hospitalizations: -5%
• ED Visits: -5%
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition
PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to
Parents
PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements
PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs
Process Measures
1. % of communities that
participate in campaign
2. % of teens reporting distracted
driving, including cell phone use
and texting
13. % of signed parent-teen driving
agreements among teens
participating in an evidence-based
teen driver safety program
16. % of active stakeholders in the
state/jurisdiction teen driver safety
coalition
The team plans to promote teen driver safety through
messaging tied to national health observances,
including March – Brain Injury Awareness Month; April
– Safe Kids Day, National Minority Health & Health
Disparities Month, World Health Day; June – National
Safety Month; October – Child Health Day USA. The
team will compile and share messaging with partners
and will request to be included on monthly county
health department directors’ conference calls to
facilitate outreach to all 67 county health departments
for presentations and discussions that coincide with
these national health observances. Stakeholders: Safe
Kids coalitions; local health departments; Students
Against Destructive Decisions members and sponsors
9
Florida
Teen Driver Safety
Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related Fatalities
Florida has begun reporting outcome data, showing an initial reduction in
teen motor vehicle related fatalities.
10
Kentucky
AIM:
• Deaths: -6.67%
• Hospitalizations: -6.67%
• ED Visits: -6.67%
The Kentucky team is working to increase parent and teen
knowledge of Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) and the risks of
inexperience, speed, passengers, no seat belt, rural roads, and all
types of distraction and impairment.
In Cohort 1, a teen driver safety working group was formed, and the
group developed a teen driver safety package, which was adopted
and is being utilized by 6 counties. In Cohort 2, the teen driver
safety working group will increase implementation of CheckPoints
and Alive at 25.
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers
PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance
PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection
PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation
PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education
PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education
Process Measures
1.% of communities that participate in campaign
14. % of schools that offer/provide GDL education
15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory
guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety
16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction
teen driver safety coalition
11
Kentucky
Teen Driver Safety
Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related Fatalities
Kentucky has been working closely with state epidemiologists and the KY
DOT to collect and report outcome data.
12
Kentucky
Teen Driver Safety
Outcome Measure 2: Rate of Teen Driver-related Hospitalizations
Kentucky has been working closely with state epidemiologists and the KY
DOT to collect and report outcome data.
13
Kentucky
Teen Driver Safety
Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related ED Visits
Kentucky has been working closely with state epidemiologists and the KY
DOT to collect and report outcome data.
14
KentuckyProcess Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign
Teen Driver Safety
Kentucky used their ‘heat mapping’ to determine the highest risk counties and
set a goal of engaging 12 of them to implement CheckPoints. Utlizing strategic
partnerships and incentive funding from KY DOT, they have successfully
engaged all 12 counties and will begin implementation in January 2018.
15
KentuckyProcess Measure 15: Percent of health care organizations that give anticipatory guidance to
caregivers on teen driver safety
Teen Driver Safety
Kentucky Injury Prevention Resource Center is working to engage pediatric
offices to begin providing anticipatory guidance.
16
KentuckyProcess Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver
safety coalition
Teen Driver Safety
Kentucky used their ‘heat mapping’ to determine the highest risk counties and
set a goal of engaging 12 of them to implement CheckPoints. Utlizing strategic
partnerships and incentive funding from KY DOT, they have successfully
engaged all 12 counties and will begin implementation in January 2018.
17
Nebraska AIM:
•Deaths: -9%
•Hospitalizations: -9%
•ED Visits: -9%In Cohort 1, Nebraska developed, tested, implemented,
and spread an informational card on GDL requirements,
which was distributed at 98 sites by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.
In Cohort 2, Nebraska will:
• Educate policy makers on TIRF
• Launch a coalition to support the 28 schools that are implementing Teens in the
Driver Seat
• Design and implement a Parent-Teen
Driving Agreement specific to Nebraska
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions
PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements
Process Measures
3. % of teens reporting driving during
restricted hours
7. % of teens reporting driving with teen
passengers
12. % of parents reporting enforcement of
GDL with their teen driver
13. % of signed parent-teen driving
agreements among teens participating in an
evidence-based teen driver safety program
16. % of active stakeholders in the
state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition
18
Nebraska
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent enforcement of GDL; 100% of the parents
in the first small-scale tests confirmed that they enforce GDL requirements with their teens.
When distributed to a larger group of 75 parents, 95% reported enforcement of GDL.
19
Nebraska
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens
participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program
The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent completion of parent-teen driving
agreements. 100% of the parents in the first small-scale tests signed the agreement with
their teen. In a larger group of 76 parents, 95% signed the agreement with their teen.
20
Nebraska
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver
safety coalition
The team turned it’s attention to launching a statewide teen driver safety coalition in cohort
2 in order to support schools implementing Teens in the Driver Seat. As of Sept 2017, they
are looking to move leadership out of DHS and to a school in hopes it will be more flexible
and responsive to school needs.
21
New HampshireAIM:
• Deaths: -6.67%
• Hospitalizations: -6.67%
• ED Visits: -6.67%
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions
PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection, Assessment, Tracking
and Reporting
PD3.SD1.CI4: Positive Messaging
• Maximize communication and education for teens
in 40 high schools through the Teen Driver
Program to reduce distracted driving and increase
seat-belt use
• Create a toolkit to enable peer leaders to provide
education and support outside of organized
educational events.
• Educate parents and guardians of teens and
encourage them to be actively involved in the
driving experiences of their teens.
• Utilize safety messaging and social media focused
on teens.
Process Measures
1. % of communities that participate
in campaign
2. % of teens reporting distracted
driving, including cell phone use
and texting
4. % of teens reporting use of seat
belts
14. % of schools that provide GDL
education
Alternative measure: # of GDL
education events
22
New Hampshire
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign
The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of
the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of
working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20
schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.
23
New Hampshire
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 2: Percent of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use
and texting.
The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and
provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts
and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey indicated 0% of
teens were observed using technology as they left the parking lot.
24
New Hampshire
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 4: Percent of teens reporting use of seatbelts
The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and
provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts
and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey showed 91%
students were properly using a seat belt.
25
New Hampshire
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education
The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of
the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of
working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20
schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.
26
North Dakota AIM:
• Deaths: -0.5%
• Hospitalizations: -0.5%
• ED Visits: -%0.5
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD2.SD1.CI5: Teen Driver Program Evaluations
PD3.SD1.CI5: Educate Teen Drivers Using
Evidence-based Programs
Process Measures
1. % of communities that participate
in campaign
2. % of teens reporting distracted
driving, including cell phone use and
texting
9. % of teens reporting understanding
of GDL requirements
14. % of schools that provide GDL
education
Alternative measure: % of schools
implementing GDL education program
that are reporting evaluation data
• Implement and grow the Impact Teen Driver
program in North Dakota.
• Increase evaluation of the Impact Teen
Driver program.
• Disseminate messaging on the prevention
of distracted driving from the North Dakota
Department of Transportation.
27
North Dakota
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign
The North Dakota TDS team is working towards spreading the Impact Teen Driver program
across the state through their partnership with the state Extension Service which has an
office in every county and relationships with most of the Tribes.
28
Tennessee AIM:•Deaths: -6.67%
•Hospitalizations: -6.67%
•ED Visits: -6.67%
In Cohort 1, Tennessee successfully tested
parking pass incentives at one high school.
Another 12 schools made the CheckPoints
program mandatory.
In Cohort 2, they are working with 2 new
counties that have high crash rates and have
spread the CheckPoints program to 10 new
high schools in 2017 with another 10 possible
for the new year, and improve their data
collection process to provide more longitudinal
information.
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition
PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents
PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent-Teen Driving Agreements
Process Measures
9. % of teens reporting understanding
of GDL requirements
11. % of parents reporting
understanding of GDL requirements
12. % of parents reporting enforcement
of GDL with their teen driver
13. % of signed parent-teen driving
agreements among teens participating
in an evidence-based teen driver safety
program
14. % of schools that provide GDL
education
16. % of active stakeholders in the
state/jurisdiction teen driver safety
coalition
29
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related Fatalities
30
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 9: Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up,
Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread
the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of teens
is increasing and their percent of teens understanding continues to remain above
80%.
31
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up,
Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread
the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of
parents is increasing and their percent of parents understanding continues to
remain above 80%.
32
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up,
Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they spread the
CheckPoints program across the state, the total number of parents is increasing, yet
their percent reporting enforcement continues to remain at 80%.
33
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens
participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program
Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up,
Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL in the current school
year. Over the course of the program, they have now accumulated 2,212 signed
agreements.
34
Tennessee
Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education
The original goal was to implement CheckPoints in 20 schools across the state.
The TN TDS team increased from 1 initial pilot school in cohort 1 to 10 current
schools and have a new county on line for implementation in Fall 2018 and a
private day school beginning implementation in January 2018.
35
Texas
Hidalgo CountyAIM:
• Deaths: -2%
• Hospitalizations: -2%
• ED Visits: -2%
Texas is working to improve education to parents and teens in Hidalgo County, focusing on
CheckPoints
Teen Driver Safety
Change Ideas
PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents
PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to Parents
PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements
PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education
PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs
Process Measures
2. % of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use and texting
3. % of teens reporting driving during restricted hours
4. % of teens reporting use of seat belts
5. % of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs
6. % of teens reporting speeding
7. % of teens reporting driving with teen passengers
8. % of teens reporting driving while fatigued
9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices
11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
13. % of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in an EB TDS program
16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition
36
Wisconsin: TeenDrivingPlan AIM:
• Deaths: -6.67%
• Hospitalizations: -6.67%
• ED Visits: -6.67%
Teen Driver Safety
• Developed facilitator training and data collection tools for TeenDrivingPlan
• Trained local health department staff and community members as facilitators
• Created an online training for facilitators
• Created survey tools in Redcap to collect session and fidelity data• In Cohort 2, they are implementing statewide GDL campaign• Grants proposed for 2018 incorporate components of the change
package (PD1.SD) focusing on policy makers and stakeholders
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policymakers
PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition
PD1.SD2.CI2: MOUs
PD1.SD2.CI3: Strategic Plan
PD2.SD1.CI1: GDL Enforcement
PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance
PD2.SD1.CI4: Improve Data Collection
PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation Plans
PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education
PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and
Teach-Back to Parents
PD3.SD1.CI3: Driving Agreements
PD3.SD1.CI4: Educate Teens
PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs
Process Measures
1. % of communities that participate in campaign
9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices
11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen
driver
14. % of schools that provide GDL education
15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory
guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety
16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen
driver safety coalition
37Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign
WisconsinTeenDrivingPlan
The WI TDS team is aiming to actively engage 72 communities in their GDL
strategy. Thus far, they have 3 communities actively engaged and a few
communities sporadically engaged.
38Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
Wisconsin has seen significant variability in parent understanding of GDL, which
continues to inform their multi-media education efforts.
WisconsinTeenDrivingPlan
39Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
.
WisconsinTeenDrivingPlan
Wisconsin has seen significant variability in parent enforcement of GDL, which
continues to inform their multi-media education efforts.
40Teen Driver Safety
Process Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver
safety coalition
Wisconsin has increased their target number of stakeholders from 12 to 72 over
the course of the two CoIIN cohorts.
WisconsinTeenDrivingPlan
41
SUGGESTIONS OR QUESTIONS?
We’re
listening.
42
Upcoming Topic Calls & Deliverables
Monthly Reports about February are due on March 13th
The next QI Corner Topic Call will be held on March 20th
The next Populations and Settings Topic Call will be held on March 27th
On April 19th the IPVP topic call will be used to harvest learning on our change package
Learning Session 5 will be held on May 15th!
43
Thank you for participating!
Please complete this brief evaluation:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NH8G3VW
Questions or Comments? Contact:
617-543-9473
or
617-618-2385
For more information, visit: https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin