Technology Adaptation In Power Generationgas turbine technology • CO 2/H 2O working fluid in the...
Transcript of Technology Adaptation In Power Generationgas turbine technology • CO 2/H 2O working fluid in the...
Penn State March 2013 Page 1 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Technology Adaptation In Power Generation
Evolution of the Gas Turbine
Bruce Rising Siemens Energy, Inc.
Penn State March 2013 Page 2 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
US Power Generation—Today
The US power infrastructure is in the process of evolving from one that is substantially based on thermal (Rankine) energy conversion § Approximately 500,000 MWe of thermal power
§ 330,000 MWe based on coal § We have retired some 70,000 MW of thermal plants since 1970 § Over 1,100 units, averaging 44 years of service, and 77 MWe capacity § Expect to retire at least this amount in the next few years.
§ 250,000 MWe of combined (Brayton + Rankine) cycle systems § 125,000 MWe of Brayton cycle (peaking units) § 100,000 MWe of Nuclear (Rankine cycle) units § 4 additional units under construction, and some being retired
§ 50,000+ MWe of Wind Expect that the gas turbine (Brayton) cycle will be the mainstay for much of future energy developments
Penn State March 2013 Page 3 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
BACKGROUND ON THE DEVELOPMENT
Penn State March 2013 Page 4 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Expansion of the US Power Infrastructure
1970 CAA
1990 CAA
NYC Blackout NE Blackout
FGD Retrofit Era
1977 CAA
Rankine Era Brayton Era
PURPA Fuel Use Act
PUHCA PUHCA Repeal
Global Economic
Depression
Penn State March 2013 Page 5 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Generation by Fuel Type-through 2012
Primarily Rankine cycles
Combination of Rankine and Brayton Cycles
Penn State March 2013 Page 6 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
67,259 MWe Coal 54,865 MWe Coal
200,985 MWe Coal 17,791 MWe Coal
Penn State March 2013 Page 7 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Penn State March 2013 Page 8 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS
Penn State March 2013 Page 9 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Large Frame Gas Turbine (+250 MW)
Penn State March 2013 Page 10 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Evolution in Turbine Design
Penn State March 2013 Page 11 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
COMPRESSOR CHALLENGES
Component Development Compressor
§ Increased mass flow § Increased efficiency requirements § Increased pressure ratio § Cost
Compressor CFD Results
COMPRESSOR SOLUTIONS
Compressor Rear Stage Test Rig
§ New Compressor design, decreased stages § Lower production cost § 3-D blading for improved efficiency § Highly loaded airfoils
Penn State March 2013 Page 12 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
• Eliminate use of water injection for NOx control
• Reaching lower NOx emission levels than possible with diluents
• Increased efficiency
• Increased parts life
DLN Combustor
Penn State March 2013 Page 13 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Premixed combustion system designs are the de facto standard in much of the world. They are primarily optimized to function with natural gas (some smaller industrial units can function with liquid distillate fuels). But natural gas is the default fuel design for the bulk of systems placed into practice. DLN combustors require a narrow range of fuel quality specifications (i.e. quantities of methane, ethane, and propane, in the fuel supply). Nominally, this is controlled by a pipeline tariff.
Premixed Combustor Design-a 30 year design evolution
Penn State March 2013 Page 14 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Combustion System Design
Penn State March 2013 Page 15 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
TURBINE CHALLENGES
Component Development Turbine
§ High firing temperatures exceed material limits
§ Increased mass flow § Multi-fuel capability requirement § Physical component size (blade height)
TURBINE SOLUTIONS
§ Aerodynamics § Advanced 2D & 3D CFD Modeling § High Turning, Highly Loaded Airfoils § End Wall Contouring development § Exhaust diffuser development § Sealing Technology
§ Heat Transfer § Advanced cooling row 1 blade, novel
cooling of row 4 blade, advanced film cooling patterns
§ Component Design § Manufacturing of novel component
concepts § Blade root design optimization through
software tool development
CFD Analysis
Advanced Vane
Penn State March 2013 Page 16 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
A single vane airfoil Turbine Wheel with all blade airfoils
Power Turbine-High Temperature Energy Conversion
Penn State March 2013 Page 17 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Heat Transfer-Blade Cooling
Penn State March 2013 Page 18 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Material Evolution on the Steam Cycle
Penn State March 2013 Page 19 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Killingholme, 2 x 450 MW
Didcot “B” 1&2, 710 MW + 702 MW
Mainz-Wiesbaden, > 400 MW
1996 1992
Irsching 4 incl. SGT5-8000H, > 530 MW
2008/2011 2001
> 58% net efficiency
> 60% net efficiency
56% net efficiency
52%
net efficiency
Continuous development of gas turbine and
combined cycle technology
Evolution of Combined Cycle Power Plants
Penn State March 2013 Page 20 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Conceptual design looks like this…
T&D-relays, switchgear
Heat transfer materials-corrosion
Plume drift
Acoustics/noise
NOx, CO, NH3, PM2.5
Acoustics/noise
Acoustics/noise
NOx, CO, NH3, PM2.5
Material Stress
Material Stress
Piping design
Engine controls, diagnostics and monitoring
Plume model
Gas quality Lube systems
Grid interconnection
SFC for fast-start
Gas pipeline supply
Steam Turbine
Gas Turbine
Penn State March 2013 Page 21 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
It finally looks like this…
Penn State March 2013 Page 22 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
WHAT ELSE?
Penn State March 2013 Page 23 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
P-4
§ The area occupied by the carbon capture and compression equipment can be a significant portion of the total plant layout.
§ In 1990: Estimated CAPEX was $60,000/tpd of CO2 capture on a 200 tpd gas fired plant
§ In 1999: Estimated OPEX for a 1,000 tpd Recovery on a coal-fired unit was $18.70/ton
…and if CO2 has to be captured…
Penn State March 2013 Page 24 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
CO2 Capture: Process Chemistry
CO2 extraction (recovery) is energy intensive, and requires unique solvent chemistry tailored to the application
CO2 extraction is more efficient at high pressure, where physical solvents are more effective.
At low pressure, i.e. conditions at a typical power plant exhaust stack, only chemical solvents are used
Granulated slag
Cooling screen
Pressur. water
Quenchwater
inlet
overflowWater
Gas outlet
Cooling jacket
Oxygen, SteamFuel
Pressur. wateroutlet
Burner
Gas separation technologies are key to limiting GHG emissions Gas separation of oxygen, CO2, nitrogen, hydrogen and ammonia
Penn State March 2013 Page 25 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Potential Game Changers?
• Adaptation of existing steam and gas turbine technology
• CO2/H2O working fluid in the power turbine section
• Isolation of CO2 –no solvents
• Enhanced carbon capture
• Adaptable for CO2 use in EOR
• First demonstration will using a modified Siemens SGT-900 gas turbine in an EOR application
• Multiple product streams: Electricity, H2O, and CO2
• Innovation similar to Oxy-Fuel
• Oxygen delivered to fuel via a metal oxide
• CO2/H2O exits as one stream; N2 exits the other
• High thermodynamic efficiencies possible
• 40-45%, including CO2 extraction
• But a long development cycle; no commercial units or full scale demonstrations yet
§ 582 MWenet
§ ~65% carbon capture (~3 M tons of CO2/year)
§ Siemens scope includes:
§ Two SGT6-5000F gas turbine generators
§ Primary Fuel: High H2 Syngas
§ Backup/Startup fuel: Natural gas
§ Capability to extract air for integration, air-blown gasifier
Mississippi Power Plant Ratcliffe IGCC Project
Spring 2013
Oxy-Fuel
Chemical Looping
• H2O+CO2
• O2+N2
• Fuel (CH4)
• N2
MeO MeO
Me Me
Penn State March 2013 Page 26 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Innovative Technology Announcements
Recent DOE Awards in new energy conversion technologies Oxy-Fuel
• Siemens • Gas Technology Institute* • Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne* • Unity Power Alliance/MIT*
Chemical Looping • Alstom Power* • Babcock & Wilcox* • University of Kentucky
Research Foundation* Source: http://www.fe.doe.gov/news/techlines/2012/PrintVersion_1_44848_44848.html?print
(*)Announced 26 July 2012
200
874
0 6
456
34 0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
1000
Chemical Looping
Superconducting Power
Penn State March 2013 Page 27 © Siemens AG 2012. All rights reserved
Summary
Power generation technical innovation has evolved rapidly in the last few decades. The US has moved relatively quickly into a period where advanced cycles like the Brayton cycle now dominate new project developments. • Required evolution of new design methodologies and materials, notably the expanded role of adapting to extreme temperatures (heat transfer) • Required new computation methods to design highly specialized features in the gas flow path (Improved compressor performance and compressor maps, turbine performance) • Yielded new combustion system designs that reduce water consumption using premixed combustion to meet restrictive environmental requirements. • Also, it brought along new tools for advanced diagnostics-real time monitoring of highly stressed components; predictive monitoring methods to mitigate component failure. • This technology (gas turbine) is probably the only core technology capable of achieving compliance with tough environmental regulations—air, water, soil, hazardous, etc.