Team Performance System
-
Upload
alainperrot -
Category
Documents
-
view
317 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Team Performance System
Commit your Teams to your Ambition with TPS (Team Performance System)
Commit your Teams to your Ambition with TPS (Team Performance System)
Alain Perrot – Big Fish – February 2011Alain Perrot – Big Fish – February 2011
AgendaAgenda
• Why TPS ?
• What is TPS ?
• The Way Forward
• Proposed Next Steps
It is better to do the right thing wrong than to It is better to do the right thing wrong than to keep doing the wrong thing better and better!keep doing the wrong thing better and better!
Russell AckoffRussell Ackoff
What do we mean by System ?What do we mean by System ?
Team Performance
= NOT
What do we mean by System ?What do we mean by System ?
A set of units in mutual interactionsA set of units in mutual interactionsLudwig Von BertalanffyLudwig Von Bertalanffy
A set of units in mutual interactionsA set of units in mutual interactionsLudwig Von BertalanffyLudwig Von Bertalanffy
Examplary Captain
Charismatic CoachHumble StarQuality Resourcing
Monumental pillar
SolidarityWith weak
Link
20 yearsExperience
Staff
Diversityof Scorers
Your ChallengeYour Challenge
OutrageousAmbition
Complexity
Why TPS ?Why TPS ?
• A Paradox : Being too static, Current Teamwork& Organisation models are clearly insufficient,but still represent 80% of the focus of Executives.
This is NOT a Team
This is NOT an Organisation
These are NOT modern Leaders
What is TPS ?What is TPS ?
• TPS is the metamorphosis of Teamwork & Organisation Management through GPS proven methodology
GPS meeting
PRE-GPS
FUEL THE GROWTH
SUPPLY MEETING
DEMAND MEETING
GPS Model
What is TPS ?What is TPS ?
• TPS is the metamorphosis of Teamwork & Organisation Management through GPS proven methodology
Ambition CoOperations
New Resources
TEAM MEMBERS
LEADER
Team Performance System
Our Way based on GPS CODEOur Way based on GPS CODE
Complexity :
Outrageous Ambition : 34 CBU’s in 3 years boosted by ACE
Fast track implementation through Few Key Universal Principles Customizedby each CBU in a unique Way
1. Vision2. People3. Processes4. Tools
80% of the Focus(100% CODE Compliant)
TPS House borrowed with pride from GPS CODETPS House borrowed with pride from GPS CODE
Team Ambition Casting Trust Team Values
TPS Health Check
6 BOX
Rainbow
Radar
TPSScorecard
5 StepsProcess
Team Member
Commitment
Kaizen
BusinessAmbition
1. Business, not functional2. Right to Left Thinking3. Focus on drivers not numbers4. Focus on the reds5. Shoot the Monkey6. Confront the brutal facts7. The Process is guilty
TPS FoundationsTPS Foundations
Inattention to Results(Status and Ego)
Source : The five dysfunctions of a Team – Patrick Lencioni
Right to Left thinking People RainbowRight to Left thinking People Rainbow
Q3 Q1 N+1Q1 Q2 Q4
SolutionProviders
Foundational :The 7 keys of S&OP
Controllers
Retain faith that you will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties
Confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be
Entrepreneurs LabDeliverables:
•New Blood induction•Walk the talk•Resourcing mgt•Geographical plan
2011 2012 2013 2014
Assumptions
•Decrease 1/3 of shipments on 1/3 of the Customers•Shipments massification limited to single brands orders•30 k€ due to project PPF
Opportunities
•Accelerate massification project•Launch Claims project•OSA project with Carrefour
Decisions Made
•Heppner costs analysis
•Launch Project damaged cans
Assumption Changes
•570 k€ Opportunity for N+1
Risks
•Quality Dashboard
•Picking Heppner
Decisions Reqd/Recomm
•Validate savings N+1
•Validate Transport tender
Time
Rev
enue
Focus on driversWe have some choicesHere are some decisionsHere are some recommendations
Please agree with my number – I can explain
Time
Focus on numbers
Budget
SingleNumber
Rev
enue
The 6BOX helps The Learning organisationto focus more on the How than the WhatThe 6BOX helps The Learning organisationto focus more on the How than the What
Budget
High
Low
100 ?False
Dile
mna between T
arget
& Realis
tic F
oreca
st
Robus
t Dial
ogue
on
Validit
y of
Assum
ption
s
& Acti
on O
rient
ed M
eetin
g
110
90 !
ICI Paints Logistics Project example: 5% Productivity / yearICI Paints Logistics Project example: 5% Productivity / year
Hypothèses1. Baisse de 1/3 des livraisons sur 1/3 des clients2. Massification des livraisons limitée à
monomarques 70% clients3. Achats : Résultat économique4. Savings comité de distribution “inductifs”5. Surstock projet PPF 30 k€6. Savings Qualité de service “inductifs”
Risques & Opportunités Savings productivité Heppner Extension du plan fréquences /massification Quantifier les savings liés à la baisse des litiges Savings comité de distribution Savings palettes Savings inter-dépôts
Points non résolus1. Tableau de bord Qualité transport2. Niveau élevé des stocks (+50 k€ vs budget )3. Analyse emplacement picking (Heppner)4. Plan d’action sku’s avec pb gencod5. Analyse Cost To Serve par Client
Décisions / Actions prises depuis le 26/081. Analyse coûts Heppner entreposage2. Lancement projet qualité préparation3. Lancement projet boîtes cabossées4. 1ère approche savings 2006
Changements depuis le 26/91. Ecart performance de 208 k€ favorables vs
Budget à fin septembre2. Opportunité de 570 k€ en 2006
Décisions à prendre / Recommandations1. Valider l’AO Transport Sud (objectif septembre 06)2. Valider savings 2006
Projets Parrain Chef de P LE 2004 R 2004 Inf PA 2005 2006 Total 1) Fréquence des livraisons/commandes HK CJ 50 50 50 2) Application du Franco HK CJ 30 30 30 3) Négociation Transporteurs RB PB 140 165 -190 310 120 285 4) Qualité de service Logistique RB SdeK 200 200 200 5) Gestion des entrepôts RB MM 200 200 110 110 310 6) Massification des Commandes JZ MM 185 185 140 325 7) Pertes Palettes RB DF 70 70 30 100 8) Collaboration Heppner RB PB 60 60 60 9) Projet Hercule ET SR 100 100 200 30010) Refacturation litiges transport RB SdeK 100 100 125 125 22511) Gestion des inter-dépôts OD CJ 50 5012) Appel d'Offre Transport Sud RB PB *13) Qualité de service préparation VS JZ *14) Productivité Administrative ? RB 150 15013) Quick Wins FB/YL 165 165 165
TOTAL 605 630 -190 1240 1050 570 2250
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
INTEGRATED RECONCILIATION
INTEGRATED RECONCILIATION
MANAGING NEW
ACTIVITIES
MANAGING PLATFORMS
MANAGING PORTFOLIO
MANAGING NEW
ACTIVITIES
MANAGING PLATFORMS MANAGING
PLATFORMS
MANAGING PORTFOLIO MANAGING PORTFOLIO
CODEV
PÔLE
GROUPInnovationCommittee
1 month
70%of
Decisions
20%of
Decisions
10%of
Decisions
Comex
Focus on the Red Portfolio MgtFocus on the Red Portfolio Mgt
Supply Platforms Portfolio Marketing Consumer
The Customer is not an interruption in our work, but its Goal
Cash Flow
Material Flow
Information Flow
Process Flow
PRODUCTIVITY
INNO
PROMO
3 M
6 M
12 M
18 M
24 M
ADVERTISING
AuchanRentrée
Carrefourbirthday
Yodélice
Actimilk
Activia
Accelerate
435
230
202
786XY
198
694
244
327
344
164
703
151
217
311
601
572414
701
701
701
701 701
701
701701
701
701701
INPUTS
•A Few things intimate about me•My Strengths & Weaknesses to contribute to the Team •My request of support from the Team
KPI’s
TPS Healthcheck score
REQUIRED BEHAVIOURS
OUTPUTS
•Spend 30% of my time on Strategy•Delegate project XYZ to Bruno
MY OBJECTIVES
MY CONTRIBUTION
Team Member Public CommitmentTeam Member Public Commitment
TEAM(to Make my contribution happen)
TPS scorecard TPS scorecard
Ambition
Casting
CoOperations
New Resources
Results
YTD M+1 YTG
TPS : The Way ForwardTPS : The Way Forward
TPS uses GPS proven Project MethodologyTPS uses GPS proven Project Methodology
Team : Focus onHOW & WHEN
ASSESSMENT
CO-DESIGN
ROADMAP
TRANSFORMATION
AMBITION
Coach : focus on WHO & WHAT
Best Practices of bits & pieces exist, but the full cycle has never been completedBest Practices of bits & pieces exist, but the full cycle has never been completed
ASSESSMENT
CO-DESIGN
ROADMAP
TRANSFORMATION
AMBITION
Coach : focus on WHO & WHAT
Dairy Supply Chain
Team
BestFoodsOperations Team
DairyOperations
Team
Air Liquide Welding
Team
BiscuitsOperations
Team
TPS TargetScore
Element
Q
Question
CBU Score(Y or N)
1People are excited about the Ambition of the Organization
Y
2Key People have participated in building the Ambition
Y
3The Ambition has been shared with all the organization and understood by it
Y
4People see clearly how they contribute to the Ambition
Y
5The Ambition is visible (Posters, Medias,…) across the organization
Y
6The Ambition is endorsed by the People
Y
7The Ambition is crystal clear and recognized as a key contributor to the rest of the Business
Y
8The Ambition is a true breakthrough and change the traditional way of doing Business
Y
9
The Ambition is concrete (€) and aligned with the overall Business needs
Y
1The team is diversified (age, sex, cultures, characters)
Y
2The Team has complementary hard & soft skills
Y
3All Team members have a positive attitude. Critiques are always constructive
Y
4Team Talents are properly used and developed
Y
5Team members profiles sheets are documented and communicated to all
Y
6Team members demonstrate they live CODE
Y
7Team specific Values are defined and shared with all the organization
Y
8Team members demonstrate they live Team specific values
9Each team member agrees with the split of roles & responsibilities
Y
10Values are developed with key People
Y
1Each Team member sees the benefits of the Project and the Teamwork for himself
Y
2Team members trust each other
Y
3Team members speak frankly to each other about all subjects
Y
4The Team leader receives regular honest feedback from the Team members
5Team members stimulate each other in terms of targets, achievements and actions
Y
6All Team issues are discussed and solved
Y
7The Team constantly develops and measures relationship with all relevant stakeholders
(colleagues, peers, internal customers and suppliers)
Y
8Team members objectives are aligned and shared to team objectives
Y
9The share of voice of all Team members (including the Leader) is well balanced
Y
10People help each other whenever and where ever required (especially when one team member is
in difficulty)
Y
11All Team members Co-produce in small groups (2-3 people) on a continuous basis
Y
12Team members are coached on the Gemba using the EDAD cycle (see comment)
Y
13Team members continuously share successes and failures to establish best practices
Y
14The team uses lean processes and tools to communicate with each other
Y
1Consistently with Challenge clockspeed, the Team is continuously & successfully enriched with
new team members
Y
2
The Projects bridge the gap between the Ambition and the current reality
Y
3
Projects progresses are clearly tracked with green/red flags
Y
4
Each Team Member has at least a cross-team project / Role
Y
5The Team extensively uses external network and suppliers to enrich its capability
Y
6The Team regularly questions its way of working
Y
7New ideas are permanently captured, registered and revisited regularly
Y
8Potential candidates are permanently screened based on diversity and talents
Y
9
The Team regularly benchmarks its performance and practices against the ambition
Y
1The Team walks the talk
Y
2The Team deliver results according its objectives
3The team learns from successes and failures (formal post mortem are made)
Y
4The team has a Team Performance Dashboard which is reviewed and managed in the monthly
team meeting
Y
5TPS Decisions and actions from the Team Meeting are documented and communicated to the
appropriate teams. Compliance with agreed actions is reviewed each meeting.
Y
6
Each team member is committed to the overall team success
Y
7Each team member is committed to his personal roadmap
Y
8Team works hard and plays hard
Y
9People from other functions want to join the team
Y
10The Team has a permanent healthy dissatisfaction attitude
Y
11The team is recognized as a strong team by its peers
Y
12Team members know and care about the details of their business
Y
3051
9
6
Ambition
9
6
Casting
11Results
6
6
CoOperations
9
13
6
New Resources
The TPS Healthcheck is used as a guide for the AssessmentThe TPS Healthcheck is used as a guide for the Assessment
ASSESSMENT Coach : focus on WHO & WHAT
• Each Team Member + Coachanswers individually to the Healthcheck
•Key differences are debated to agreeon a strong consensus on the score
Ready for a
Metamorphosis ?
Ready for a
Metamorphosis ?