Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective
Teacher Education Reform in the United States
-
Upload
thaddeus-shaffer -
Category
Documents
-
view
35 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Teacher Education Reform in the United States
Teacher Education Reform in theUnited States
John CoganUniversity of Minnesota
Marilyn JohnstonOhio State University
ChallengesPoliticization
Futures
One challenge: The numbers and diversity in U.S. schools
53 million students 3 million teachers 92,000 public schools 15,000 school districts 40% of the students are minorities
17% Black, 16 Hispanic, 4% Asian, 1% Native Amer. 1 in 5 speaks another language at home 1 in 4 comes from a single-family home
84% of teachers are White
Challenge: Attrition of New Teachers
Most leave after three years and more than 50% leave within 5 years
Need for induction and mentorship programs
Challenge: Two Competing Perspectives
Job training/preparation, free market competition
Role of education is to move the economy forward
Top down administration—bureaucratic reforms
Based on transferable models Competitive, individualistic, tests
used for selection/hiring
Equity/equality/citizenship
Role of education is to create a just and democratic society
Requires national leadership & community dialogue
Civic education; problem solving, critical thinking, collaboration
Only consistent licensure and accreditation will insure that all children have qualified teachers.
Market-based rationale Democratic rationale
Challenge:Accountability
Increased calls for accountability
this began with the Reagan’s “A Nation at Risk" report in the early 1980s, it has gained momentum with the Bush administration in Washington.
Challenge:Alternative Certification
Would bypass the traditional undergraduate and post-graduate faculties of education completely as well as traditional certification/licensure and accreditation programs.
Ignored in this "alternative" debate is the fact that the recent post-graduate or fifth year programs ARE alternative themselves.
Politicization of education through federal policy
Consequence:
lack of state autonomy and local policy making
Arguments included in federal policies:
Administrators should be free to hire within an open market—quality control
Should recruit persons with strong subject matter knowledge
Criteria should include general knowledge, verbal ability and subject matter knowledge
Subject matter tests are sufficient to measure teaching competence
Arguments from within the profession:
Standards, licensure, & accreditation necessary
Need to recruit stronger students into high quality programs
Teachers need a comprehensive set of abilities & knowledges beyond subject matter
Knowledge of teaching & learning highly correlates with academic achievement
Trained worker vs. professional teacher
Assaults on Teacher Education
Will assaults on undergraduate and post-graduate teacher education continue?
Differences in Ed School and administration perspectives
Argue for approaches that will remove roadblocks that keep “qualified persons” from becoming teachers
Will fulfill the needs for teachers in large urban districts
Business, Religion & Politics
Business leaders have aligned with conservative politicians and fundamentalist Christian special interest groups.
Private sector involvement in education.
Future of Teacher Education?
In general, it will depend on. . . .
Who wins the national Presidential election
Intensity of the backlash against No Child Left Behind
Perpetuation of current national budget trends, e.g., www.TrueMajority.org/oreo
It will depend on teacher education identity
viewed by their colleagues as "soft", not content based, and an unnecessary appendage of the institution
larger institution has no interest in teacher education per se in the long term.
It will depend on educating our publics
need to take a more aggressive posture with respect to educating our "publics" about what we do and why
need to make a stronger case for why schools need “educated” professionals
It will depend on teacher shortages
Federal government projected (in 1999) that we would need 1.7 to 2.7 new teachers in 2008.
In 1987-88, only 2.7 entered without certification (or on provisional certification)--In 1990-2000 5.7% entered without certification.
Urban schools have more uncertified teachers than suburban schools—especially with new teachers, 11% more of them are not certified if they teach in urban (cf. to suburban schools).
See K.C. Lai & Joe Hong’s policy paper: “Crash Courses for Untrained Teachers”.
It will depend on support for new teachers
Need professional induction and mentorship programs for new teachers
Where these have been introduced, more than 80% of the new teachers remain on the job after the first five years of service.
It will depend on which rationale will have currency
increased pressure on teacher education programs
increased use of business models for running schools & universities
increased use of tests to evaluate teachers and schools
increased use of free market competition to solve educational problems
further emphasis on questions of equity and social justice
standards used to create a broader curriculum
increased use of social justice arguments to justify the need for licensure
wider use of performance assessment for teachers and students
Market rationale will mean: Democratic rationale will mean: