Tax Reform, Labour Supply and Earnings Growth - UCLuctp39a/ZEW Presentation Blundell Final...

© Institute for Fiscal Studies

Tax Reform, Labour Supply and Earnings Growth

Richard Blundell University College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies

Slide Presentation [Draft paper available]

Economic Policy Lecture ZEW

September 11th 2014

•  Focus here on the labour market, human capital and earnings tax reforms.

•  Even before the recent crisis, governments around the EU faced pressure to increase employment and earnings.

•  The current recession has added to pressure on government revenues.

•  Ask two general questions: •  What are the key margins where might expect tax/welfare reform to

have most impact on earnings and employment growth? •  How has this changed in the light of the great recession? 1.  Develop an empirical foundation for tax design and reform. 2.  Use the Mirrlees Review (2011) as a running example. 3.  Overview of main issues and prospects with current tax systems.

Tax Reform, Labour Supply and Earnings Growth

•  Current systems remain unnecessarily complicated and induce too many people not to work or to work too li5le.

•  Target work incen9ves where they are most effec9ve –  our simula9ons show key increase in work/earnings,

–  reducing means-‐tes9ng and improving the flows into work for lower educa9on mothers and maintaining work for those aged 55+.

•  Integrate overlapping benefits -‐ a single integrated benefit –  Mirrlees -‐ ‘ifs’ reforms.

•  Reduce disincen9ves at key margins for the educated –  enhancing working life9me and the career earnings profile,

–  simula9ons show significant impact on human capital.

•  Align tax rates at the margin across income sources.

Summary overview...…

•  In this talk I draw loosely on four of my recent ‘post-Mirrlees’ studies: –  ‘Labor Supply and the Extensive Margin’; AER 2011 –  ‘Empirical Evidence and Tax Reform’; JEEA 2012 –  ‘Hours of Work and the Optimal Taxation of Low Income

Families’; ReStud 2012 –  ... and on-going work with Antoine Bozio, Guy Laroque and

Andreas Peichl. •  Additional question: To what extent do dynamic ‘longer-run’

issues change our view of earnings tax reform? •  Labour Supply, Human Capital and Welfare Reform’; NBER

2013

•  Overall question: How should we assemble the empirical foundations for tax policy design?

•  Consider the role of evidence under five headings: 1.  Key margins of adjustment to reform 2.  Measurement of effective incentives 3.  The importance of information and complexity 4.  Evidence on the size of responses 5.  Implications for policy design •  Use these to build an empirically based agenda for reform

–  > an efficient redesign of tax policy…. •  What have we learned … so far? •  Are the proposals still relevant post recession?

•  There are common key points in the life-‐cycle where individuals are likely to be most responsive to effec9ve tax and welfare incen9ves –  Derives from compara9ve work across UK, US, FR and DE,

–  Labour market entry, parents of younger children and older workers.

•  Human capital on the job is strongly complementary with formal educa9on –  Pay-‐off to on the job experience and training is low for those with lower

educa9onal qualifica9ons.

•  Effec9ve tax rates can be extremely high for no good reason –  Interac9ons of means-‐tested programmes at the bo5om and employer/

employee taxes /contribu9ons in the middle.

•  Effec9ve budget constraints are complex and oXen poorly understood –  Working age parents in France face the interac9on of more than 17 different

overlapping taxes, employer contribu9ons and benefits – only 13 in UK!

•  Differen9al rates on similar sources of remunera9on induce significant tax shiXing and avoidance.

•  Let’s take a run through the evidence….. The five steps….

1. Key margins of adjustment to reform •  A ‘descriptive’ analysis of the key aspects of observed

behaviour –  not ‘causality’ just the correlations in the data, –  the key facts!

•  Where is it that individuals, families and firms most likely to respond? –  e.g. the margins of labour market adjustment.

Key margins of adjustment Employment for men by age – FR, UK, US & GER 2007

Blundell, Bozio, Laroque and Peichl (2014)

Female Employment by age


and for women …..

Female Hours by age


Source: Blundell, Dias, Meghir and Shaw (2013)

1.6

1.8

22.

22.

42.

6lo

g w

age

20 30 40 50age

secondary further higher

Wage profiles by education and age – UK Women

Women’s employment - UK


.5.6

.7.8

.91

empl

oym

ent r

ates

20 30 40 50age

All employment

0.0

5.1

.15

.2.2

5em

ploy

men

t rat

es20 30 40 50

age

Part−time employment

secondary further higher

Women’s employment after childbirth - UK


Wages by education and age – US Men

Notes: PSID, 1996-2010, mean log wage by age, cohort effects removed

Source: Blundell, Pistaferri and Saporta (2013)

1.9

2.1

2.3

2.5

2.7

2.9

3.1

3.3

3.5

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65

High School

Drop out

Some College

Employment for men by education and age – US

Blundell, Bozio and Laroque (2011)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

Less than College College

Summary so far…key facts

•  A lifetime view of employment and hours –  differences accentuated at particular ages and for particular

demographic groups, –  higher attachment to the labor market for higher educated,

career length matters.

•  Wages grow stronger and longer over the lifetime for higher educated –  human capital accumulation during work is shown to be

complementary to education, –  essential to explain employment and wage profiles for those

with more education.

•  Other key facts include growth of high employment incomes and consequent impact on inequality.

2. Measurement of effective incentives

•  Precisely how do tax policies impact on the incentives facing the key players?

•  e.g. overlapping taxes, tax credits and welfare benefits. –  What are the ‘true’ effective tax rates on (labor) earnings?

© Ins9tute for Fiscal Studies

Notes: wage £6.50/hr, 2 children, no other income, £80/wk rent. Ignores council tax and rebates

Budget Constraint for Single Parent: UK 2011

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

$20,000

$22,000

$24,000

$26,000

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 $20,000

Net income (£/year)

Gross annual earnings

Current system

Interactions matter: Budget Constraint for Single Parent in UK



Source: Urban Institute (NTJ, Dec 2012). Notes: Value of tax and value transfer benefits for a single parent with two children.

Universally Available Tax and Transfer Benefits in US (Single Parent with Two Children, 2008)


Effective Marginal Tax Rates (US Single Parent with Two Children in Colorado, 2008)


Average EMTRs for different family types: UK 2011 40

%50

%60

%70

%80

%

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200Employer cost (£/week)

Single, no children Lone parentPartner not working, no children Partner not working, childrenPartner working, no children Partner working, children

Mirrlees Review (2011)

Average PTRs for different family types: UK 2011


30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200Employer cost (£/week)

Single, no children Lone parentPartner not working, no children Partner not working, childrenPartner working, no children Partner working, children

3. The importance of information and complexity

•  How is the policy likely to be understood by the agents involved?

•  For example, how ‘salient’ are the various tax and welfare benefit incentives? –  ‘Take-up’ of welfare and tax credits among eligible families –  ‘Bunching’ at kink points

© Institute for Fiscal Studies

Variation in tax credit ‘take-up’ with value of entitlement 0

.2

.4

.6

.8

1 Pr

obab

ility

of t

ake-

up

0 50 100 150 200 WFTC entitlement (£/week, 2002 prices)

Lone parents Couples

Budget Constraint for Single Parent: UK



Are these hours rules salient? Single Women (aged 18-45) - 2002

Blundell and Shephard (2010)

Hours’ distribution for lone parents, before WFTC


Hours’ distribution for lone parents, after WFTC


Bunching at Tax Kinks Married Tax Filers: US


Source: Saez (2010)

Bunching at Tax Kinks and the EITC One child families: US


Source: Saez (2010)



Universally Available Tax and Transfer Benefits in US (Single Parent with Two Children, 2008)


Source: Saez (2010)

Bunching at Tax Kinks and the EITC One child families: US

Taxes on Higher Incomes Marginal tax rates by income level, UK


0% 5%

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 Gross income

Earned income Self employment income Dividend income

Note: assumes dividend from company paying small companies’ rate. Includes income tax, employee and self-employed NICs and corporation tax.

Bunching at the higher rate threshold, UK


0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

Num

ber in each £100 bin

Distance from threshold

Composi9on of income around the higher rate tax threshold


-‐$1 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9

Total incom

e pe

r £10

0 bin (£ billion)

Distance from threshold

Interest

Property

Dividends

Other investment income Self employment

Other

Pensions

Benefits

Employment

Deductables

4. Evidence on the size of responses

•  This is where the rigorous econometric analysis of structure and causality comes into play.

•  Eclec9c use of two approaches: 1.  Quasi-‐experimental/RCT/reduced form evalua9ons of the

impact of (historic) reforms

•  robust but limited in scope.

2.  A ‘structural’ es9ma9on based on a the pay-‐offs and constraints faced by individuals and families

•  comprehensive in scope and allow simula9on, but fragile.

•  account for life-‐cycle facts, effec9ve tax rates, and salience/s9gma.

Ø  What do we need to get observed responses to match with incen9ves?

•  Labour supply elas9ci9es vary in key ways by educa9on group, family type and age. No single number! –  large at certain key points in the working life and for certain demographic

groups, this is where tax and welfare benefit distor9ons are important.

•  Informa9on, s9gma and salience ma5er –  dis9nguish large reforms that are well understood.

•  Taxable income is responsive for self-‐employed and top earners –  but oXen reflects tax shiXing and avoidance.

•  Experience ma5ers: especially for those with above basic educa9on –  and, it seems, only for those in full-‐9me employment,

–  can explain ‘success’ of simpler simula9ons of reforms for low-‐wage workers.

•  To match employment, hours and wages over the life-‐cycle it is key is to allow complementarity between human capital investments –  between schooling and ‘on the job’ investments.

Data and Simulations for Wages by education and age – UK Women, BHPS


Data and Simulations for Women’s Employment - UK


Younger Workers •  Extensive margin responses are low (e≈.15) at young ages for college

educated –  but much higher (≈.9) for mothers with basic educa9on & kids in 3-‐7 age range, and larger than intensive elas9ci9es which are more modest (≈.5)

–  extensive/intensive elas9ci9es imply op9mal earned income tax credits,

–  small human capital/experience effects for low educated so li5le progressivity but need to account for ‘take-‐up’.

Human capital effects

•  Two forms of human capital – schooling and on-‐the-‐job investment –  the hourly wages of those with more educa9on are higher, and grow faster and for longer into the working life -‐ formal educa9on complements experience capital,

–  for educated young workers, unlikely to respond to tax incen9ves during career, rather effect career length and re9rement.

Older workers… •  Elas9ci9es increase for 60+ age group for both men and women

–  appear to remain higher for women at both margins,

–  elas9ci9es increase as mandatory re9rement restric9ons/earnings tests are liXed and actuarial fairness introduced,

–  joint re9rement ma5ers above pure incen9ves.

•  Lower educated are responsive to incen9ves in disability insurance, social security and medical insurance.

•  Higher educated more responsive too at these ages

–  larger density of workers around the work/no-‐work margin,

–  wage and wealth effects become important.

•  Response elas9ci9es are sizable but do not appear to explain all the recent rises in employment at older ages (e.g. in UK and US).

Early re9rement and inac9vity by age and wealth quin9le UK: men

Note: Wealth quinMles are defined within each five-‐year age group. Source: Banks and Casanova (2003), based on sample of men from the 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Taxable income…for top earners •  Captures addi9onal avoidance and tax shiXing responses

–  the ‘elas9city’ can be expected to fall as the tax base broadens •  For a given tax base we can get an idea of the Laffer rate, the

revenue maximising top rate

–  1/[1 + taxable income elas9city (e) * Pareto parameter (a)]

–  ‘a’ around 1.67 and ‘e’ around .45 for UK; Mirrlees (2011).

–  ‘e’ reliable?, Ignore a variety of dynamic and structural issues.

0.0000

0.0000

0.0001

0.0010

0.0100

£100,000 £150,000 £200,000 £250,000 £300,000 £350,000 £400,000 £450,000 £500,000

Prob

abili

ty d

ensi

ty (l

og s

cale

)

Pareto distribution

Actual income distribution

Some key messages emerge for reform: •  First, it is important to take a‘life9me’view

–  key points in the working life where tax incen9ves ma5er.

•  Second, must account for interac9ons between taxes and welfare

–  effec9ve tax rates depend on incen9ves in the welfare system, taxes on employers as much as in the personal tax system.

•  Third, fixed costs, informa9on costs and s9gma are important

–  responses at the extensive margin differ from intensive margin,

–  take-‐up among eligibles is costly.

•  Fourth, accoun9ng for human capital investment ma5ers

–  educa9onal investments enhance human capital at work,

–  incen9ves for educa9onal investments influenced by taxes.

•  Finally, taxable income captures avoidance/shiXing opportuni9es.

Evidence since the financial crisis suggests •  In general workers and families are ac9ng as if they expect a long-‐run

fall in rela9ve living standards

–  evidence from consump9on and saving; and responses in labour supply.

•  Capital investment and/or produc9vity have been slow to pick up

–  employment for the young/low skilled may bounce back, but what of real wages and produc9vity?

•  Appears the number of rou9ne jobs near the middle of the earnings distribu9on has declined steadily, at least in the UK and US

–  more jobs are now professional or managerial.

•  Suggests longer term earnings growth will mostly come from high-‐skilled occupa9ons, with some at the very bo5om.

•  There remain the same key points where tax systems can be reformed to enhance earnings, employment and human capital.

Consump9on Growth


80

85

90

95

100

105

2005Q1

2005Q3

2006Q1

2006Q3

2007Q1

2007Q3

2008Q1

2008Q3

2009Q1

2009Q3

2010Q1

2010Q3

2011Q1

2011Q3

2012Q1

2012Q3

2013Q1

Private consum

pMon

(2008Q

1 = 100) EU28

Spain

Italy

United Kingdom

Non-‐ (and semi) durables; UK recessions


90

95

100

105

110

115

120

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Qua

rter before recession = 100

Quarters since start of recession

1980

1990

2008

Employment rate for older workers: women aged 60-64

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Euro area (13 countries)

Germany (un9l 1990 former territory of the FRG)

Spain

France

Italy

United Kingdom

Employment rate for older workers: men aged 65-‐69

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012



Spain

France

Italy

United Kingdom

Employment rate for older workers: men aged 60-64

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012



Spain

France

Italy

United Kingdom

For the young employment fell back.... Employment rate: men aged 25-29

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012



Spain

France

Italy

United Kingdom

Employment shares of occupation groups: UK


Note: the discontinuities in occupation classification in 2001 and 2011 have been addressed in the following way. For the conversion of SOC 1990 to SOC 2000, we look at individuals who were surveyed in 2000Q4 and 2001Q2 and stayed with the same employer and infer the transition matrix from this group. For the conversion of SOC2010 to SOC 2000, we used the ONS two-way tabulation of the LFS 2007 Q1 sample by the major occupation groups under the two SOC systems.

Recent evidence suggests •  In general workers and families are ac9ng as if they expect a long-‐run

fall in rela9ve living standards

–  evidence from consump9on and saving; responses in labour supply.

•  Produc9vity and capital investment have been slow to pick up

–  employment for the young/low skilled may bounce back, but what of real wages and produc9vity?

•  Appears the number of rou9ne jobs near the middle of the earnings distribu9on has declined steadily

–  more jobs are now professional or managerial.

•  Suggests longer term earnings growth will mostly come from high-‐skilled occupa9ons, with some at the very bo5om.

•  There remain the same key points where tax systems can be reformed that will also enhance earnings, employment and human capital.

Prospects… •  S9ll much to do in focussing on older workers in general, on return to

work for parents/mothers, and on entry into work.

•  There are some poten9al big gains here,

–  for example, as (higher skilled) women age in the workforce.

•  Tax/welfare reforms to enhance earnings (from Mirrlees):

–  refocus incen9ves towards transi9on to work, return to work for lower skilled mothers and on enhancing incen9ves among older workers.

•  Human capital and ‘on the job’ wage/produc9vity complementarity

–  note the poten9al importance of mismatch of entry skills in this recession.

•  Produc9vity remains a key issue.

5. Some key messages emerge for reform: •  First, it is important to take a‘life9me’view

–  key points in the working life where tax incen9ves ma5er.

•  Second, must account for interac9ons between taxes and welfare

–  effec9ve tax rates depend on incen9ves in the welfare system, taxes on employers as much as in the personal tax system.

•  Third, fixed costs, informa9on costs and s9gma are important

–  responses at the extensive margin differ from intensive margin,

–  take-‐up among eligibles is costly.

•  Fourth, accoun9ng for human capital investment ma5ers

–  educa9onal investments enhance human capital at work,

–  incen9ves for educa9onal investments influenced by taxes.

•  Finally, taxable income captures avoidance/shiXing opportuni9es.

•  Current systems remain unnecessarily complicated and induce too many people not to work or to work too li5le.

•  Target work incen9ves where they are most effec9ve –  simula9ons in Mirrlees (2011) show key increase in work/earnings

–  reducing means-‐tes9ng and improving the flows into work for lower educa9on mothers and maintaining work for those aged 55+.

•  Integrate overlapping benefits -‐ a single integrated benefit –  Mirrlees (2011) -‐ ‘ifs’ and ‘universal credit’ reforms.

•  Reduce disincen9ves at key margins for the educated –  enhancing working life9me and the career earnings profile

–  simula9ons in BDMS (2013) show significant effect on human capital.

•  Align tax rates at the margin across income sources

Implications for efficient redesign of tax policy

Tax Reform, Labour Supply and Earnings Growth - UCLuctp39a/ZEW Presentation Blundell Final...

Documents

Transcript of Tax Reform, Labour Supply and Earnings Growth - UCLuctp39a/ZEW Presentation Blundell Final...