Target -Method Match

Selecting The Right Assessment

Keys to Quality Classroom Assessment

Clear PurposesWhy Assess?

What’s the purpose?Who will use results?

Clear TargetsAssess What?

What are the learning targets?Are they clear?Are they good?

Good DesignAssess How?

What method?Sampled how?

Avoid bias how?

Sound CommunicationCommunicate How?

How manage information?How report?

Accurate Assessment

Effectively Used

Student InvolvementStudents are users, too.

Students need to understand learning targets, too.Students can participate in the assessment process, too.

Students can track progress and communicate, too.

Today’s Outcomes

Review target typesLearn the different assessment methodsBe able to match assessment methods

to target typesBegin matching assessment methods to

essential curriculum target types

Review of 4 types of Learning Targets

KnowledgeReasoningPerformance/SkillProduct

(Remember: the pink sheet has a list of verbs that will help you determine the target type)

Relationship of Targets

Standard (target) type Underpinning Learning Targets

Product Product + S + R + K

Skill Skill + R + K

Reasoning Reasoning + K

Knowledge Knowledge

Review: Why It’s Important to Determine Target Type

Know if the assessment adequately covers what we taught

Correctly identify what students know and don’t know

Keep track of student learning target by target or standard by standard

Helps determine HOW to assess (method)

Clear Targets:Benefit to Students

According to Marzano, “Students who could identify their learning (I can statements) scored 27 percentile points higher than those who could not.

Students can hit any target they can see that holds still for them.

Target -Method Match: What is it?

A way to design assessments that cover our targets

Answers “ASSESS HOW?”

Methods:Types of Assessment Methods

Selected response & short answerExtended written responsePerformance assessmentPersonal communication

Selected Response (SR)

Students select correct or best response from a list provided

Students’ scores are figured as the number or proportion of questions answered correctly

Formats include: Multiple choice True/false Matching Short answer Fill-in questions

Extended Written Response (EWR)

Requires students to construct a written answer in response to a question or task (not select one from a list)

extended = several sentences in length Examples:

Compare pieces of literature Solve a math problem, show & explain work Interpret music, scientific info. or polling data Analyze artwork Describe in detail an economics process

Extended Written Response

Correctness judged by:Giving points for specific info. present ORUse of a rubric

Scores can be:Percentage of points attained ORRubric scores

Performance Assessment (PA)

Based on observation & judgmentJudgment made on qualityExamples:

Playing instrument; speaking in foreign language; working in a group (the doing/process is impt)

Creating products like a lab report, term paper, work of art (quality of product is impt)

Performance Assessment

2 parts: Performance task or exercise Scoring guide/Rubric

Scoring guide: Can award points for specific features of

performance or product Can take form of rubric: levels of quality described

Scores could be number or percent of points earned or a rubric score

Personal Communication (PC)

Find out what students have learned through interacting with them

Often an informal assessment, but if clear & accurate info. is gathered, can be used for feedback to students, self-reflection for students, goal setting

Examples: Oral examinations Interviewing students in conferences Looking at & responding to students’ comments in

journals and logs

Personal Communication

Student responses evaluated in 2 ways:Correct/incorrect (for short, simple answers;

parallels scoring of written selected response questions)

Evaluate quality (for longer, more complex; parallels to extended written response)

Could use a rubric to score or scoring guide

Matching Target andAssessment Methods

Accuracy in the classroom assessment revolves around matching the different target TYPES with the appropriate form of assessment METHODS

Which METHOD would you use to assess the following?

1. Ability to write clearly and coherently• Performance assessment

2. Group discussion proficiency• Performance assessment

3. Reading comprehension• SR, EWR or PC (not PA b/c it’s a reasoning target)

4. Proficiency using specified math procedures• Could be knowledge or reasoning: SR, EWR, PC

5. Proficiency conducting investigations in science• Performance assessment