Table of Water Supply
7
TABLE 4.8 CONSTRUCTION COST OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION TECHNOLOGIES Water supply Technologies Construction Costs per Capita per Person Served Protect well $3-200 U.S Bore hole with Hand pump $10-60 U.S Sanitation Technologies Construction Costs per Capita per Person Served Simple Pit latrine $5-100 U.S VIP latrine $25- 300 U.S Table 4.7 Comparison of Water Supply and Sanitation Coverages in the Village of Gouansolo, Rural Mali, Rural Africa, and the Rural World % water Supply Coverage % Sanitation Coverage Village of Gouansolo 48 91 Rural of Mali 61 58 Rural Africa 47 45 Rural World 71 38 Table 4.6 Village Needs Assessment Responses Need Expressed Number of House holds Expressing Need Maternity 25 Latrine 20 Health care Centre 19 Road 14 Well 10 Bottom well repair 10 School 10 Large diameter garden well 6 Top well repair 3 Large diameter well for 3
description
hghgffgg
Transcript of Table of Water Supply
TABLE 4.8 CONSTRUCTION COST OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION TECHNOLOGIES
Water supply Technologies Construction Costs per Capita per Person Served
Protect well $3-200 U.SBore hole with Hand pump $10-60 U.SSanitation Technologies Construction Costs per Capita per Person
ServedSimple Pit latrine $5-100 U.SVIP latrine $25- 300 U.S
Table 4.7
Comparison of Water Supply and Sanitation Coverages inthe Village of Gouansolo, Rural Mali, Rural Africa, and the Rural World
% water Supply Coverage % Sanitation Coverage Village of Gouansolo 48 91Rural of Mali 61 58Rural Africa 47 45Rural World 71 38
Table 4.6 Village Needs Assessment Responses
Need Expressed Number of House holds Expressing Need Maternity 25Latrine 20Health care Centre 19Road 14Well 10Bottom well repair 10School 10Large diameter garden well 6Top well repair 3Large diameter well for Djinkoo 3Metal roof for house 3Live stock 3Bore hole pump 2Motorized pump for water garden 2Fencing for garden 2Farming tools and equipments 2Carts 2Sullage drainage at bore hole pump 1Cement latrine 1Training in water treatment 1House 1
Fencing for animals 1
4.5 Types of Water Sources and Reported Problems
Types of water Source Problem Number of Times Reported Not improved Traditional well
During hot season well dries up and water is not good
Bottom of well eroded
Top of well eroded
3
2
1
Improved Traditional well During hot season well dries up and water is not good
Bottom of well eroded
Wellhead eroded
Worms occasional present in water
Top of well eroded
Water dirty from debris falling into well
During rainy season runoff water enter well and water is not good
Lack of cover
Water is dirty
Water does not taste good
Too many user Modem well Children throw things
into well Borehole Pump No problem reported
Table 4.4 Distances in Mete rs Traveled by Households that Collect Drinking Water from a Different Source
House Hold ID Number
Distance to Drinking Water Source
Type of Drinking Water Source
Distance to Other Water Source
Type of other Water Source
Difference in Distance
1 18 Bore hole Pump
22 Improved Traditional Well
4
3 40 Bore hole pump
22 Improved Traditional Well
18
4 43 Bore hole pump
12 Improved Traditional Well
31
7 47 Bore hole pump
12 Improved Traditional Well
35
29 37 Bore hole pump
12 Improved Traditional Well
25
32 92 Bore hole pump
13 Improved Traditional Well
79
36 120 Bore hole pump
8 Improved Traditional Well
112
40 97 Bore hole pump
52 Improved Traditional Well
45
41 80 Bore hole pump
33 Improved Traditional Well
47
42 127 Bore hole pump
18 Improved Traditional Well
109
43 130 Bore hole pump
17 Improved Traditional Well
113
45 125 Bore hole pump
63 Improved Traditional Well
62
12 18 Improved Traditional Well
10 Not improved traditional well
8
16 40 Improved Traditional Well
13 Improved traditional well
27
28 28 Improved Traditional
28 Improved traditional
0
Well well 4.3 Availability of water by type of water source and village Quartier:Type of water Source
Village Quartire
Sokoura Djinkono Djomogola
Year Round
Seasonal Year Round
Seasonal Year round Seasonal
Not improved traditional well
1 2 3 1 0 0
Improved traditional well
6 5 10 3 4 0
Modern well
1 0 0 0 0 0
Borehole Pump
1 0 0 0 1 0
Total 9 7 13 4 5 0
Table : 4.2 Number of water Source by type and Village Quartier
Type of Water Source Number Present Village Quartier
Sokoura Djinkono Djomogola
Not improved traditionalhand dug well
7 3 4 0
Improved traditionalhand dug well
28 11 13 4
Modern hand dug well 1 1 0 0Borehole pump 2 1 0 1Total 38 16 17 5
3.3 table Stage Time Frame Characteristics
InitialEnthusiasm
First week or twoin hostcountry
Exposure to country and culture is limited.Excitement and enthusiasm abound.Everything is exotic and quaint.Attitude toward host country is generally positive.Little is expected of the Peace Corps Volunteer (PCV).
Initial Country&Culture Shock
First few weeks; first half oftraining
Wider exposure to country and culture means morerealistic and mixed reactions.Enthusiasm is tempered with frustration.Feelings of vulnerability and dependence are common.Homesickness is frequent.Nothing is routine.Limited language ability undermines confidence.
InitialAdjustment
Second halfofTraining
Routines are reestablished.Some aspects of the country and culture are now seen asnormal.Adjustment to the physical aspects of the host country isbetter.PCV is somewhat more self-reliant.PCV is more positive about his/her ability to function incountry.
FurtherCulture Shock
First few months aftertraining; settling-inperiod
PCV experiences post-training withdrawal symptoms.PCV is adjusting to being on his/her own in country.It is PCV’s first experience taking care of himself/herselfin country.PCV is having first encounters with the work-relatedaspects of culture, with initial surprises and frustrations.PCV misses daily contact with Americans and hostcountry nationals (HCNs) who understand him/her andhis/her version of the local language.
FurtherAdjustment
Postsettling- in
PCV is getting used to being on his/her own.PCV is better able to take care of himself/herself.PCV is making friends in the community.PCV speaks the language better.PCV is more effective at work because he/sheunderstands the culture better.
