SWITCH LA Indonesia- Inception meeting report

UNESCO Office Jakarta - Water Sciences Unit Jakarta ‐ 25 April 2011

SWITCH‐in‐Asia

Citarum Learning Alliance

Inception meeting report


2

INDEX

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 3

INTRODUCTION 4

THE CONTEXT FOR LEARNING ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT 4

MEETING PARTICIPANTS 5

THE ROLE OF UNESCO 6

LEARNING ALLIANCE INITIATION PROCESS 6

LEARNING ALLIANCE PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS 6

INCEPTION MEETING SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES 7

MEETING AGENDA 7

LEARNING ALLIANCE APPROACH AND SWITCH CITARUM PROJECT PRESENTATIONS 8

LEARNING ALLIANCE AND SWITCH CITARUM PROJECT QUESTION SESSION 9

STAKEHOLDERS’ FAMILIARIZATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CAPACITIES AND RESOURCES 12

PRELIMINARY SCREENING OF PROBLEMS/CHALLENGES IN THE WATER SECTOR 18

CITARUM LEARNING ALLIANCE ACTIVITIES 19

LEARNING ALLIANCE WORKING PLAN MAY‐DECEMBER 2011 20

ANNEX 1 22


3

Abbreviations and Acronyms

APCE Asia‐Pacific Centre for Ecohydrology

BAPPENAS National Development Planning Agency

BPLHD West Java Environmental Management Office

CKNet – INA Collaborative Knowledge Network Indonesai

ITB Bandung Institute of Technology

LIPI Indonesian Institute of Sciences

PU Ministry of Public Works

PUSKIM Research Institute for Human Settlements

WPL Warga Peduli Lingkungan


4

Introduction

The Citarum Learning Alliance inception meeting took place on the 20th of April 2011, in the framework of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Programme, an action research and demonstration programme that addresses the challenges faced by cities, towns and villages in providing efficient, safe and sustainable water and sanitation services for people, while preserving water and environmental resources. Relevant actors of the water sector were invited to form a multi‐stakeholder partnerships aimed at promoting the effective communication of research activities and the scaling‐up of research impacts in the field of water management in the Citarum River Basin and discuss the development of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Citarum project. In particular the meeting was held as a follow‐up of the meeting held on the 15th of March 2011 in Bandung at the Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Bandung Institute of Technology and attended by representatives of LIPI, PUSKIM, WPL and ITB.

The context for learning alliance development

Each learning alliance operates within a specific context. Such context is made of historical, cultural, demographic, institutional, infrastructural, economic and political aspects. Here we provide a synthetic overview of the salient aspects related to the water sector in the Citarum area. The Citarum river basin is one of most strategic river basin in Indonesia, with a population of more then 10 million living along the basin, 50% in urban areas, and with a served population around 25 million. The River is the largest and longest in West Java, with a length of 270km and a total drainage area of 6,600 km2. The basin covers 12 administrative regions and is characterized by poor levels of access and service quality of water supply and sanitation. In this regard bottled water is often the most reliable, but also most expensive, source of drinking water for the population. Moreover, the use of bottled water contributes to the issues related to solid waste management, which are extremely problematic in the Citarum area. In several areas of the basin, due to insufficient regulation and scarce law enforcement groundwater extraction is used extensively and without controls resulting in water quality and environmental issues. The management of water resources in the area is administered under the general national water and sanitation regulatory framework characterized by responsibilities shared among multiple ministries and agencies (i.e. Ministry of Health, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Public Works and National Development Planning Agency). Despite recent attempts for improvement the basin institutional framework appear fragmented and characterized by inefficient degree of coordination.


5

Meeting Participants

In the organization of the meeting the UNESCO office made a preliminary mapping and selection of the stakeholders involved in the water sector in the Citarum river area. Such mapping and selection were carried out according to the indication of the participants of the meeting held on the 15th of March in Bandung and according to the Water Sciences Unit experience in the field and in the development of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Citarum project. The process lead to the individuation of several stakeholders coming from different sectors: Governmental sector, Research sector, Academic sector and Non governmental sector. The contact with the stakeholders started with email containing a preliminary meeting agenda and a short contextualization of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Programme and SWITCH‐in‐Asia Learning Alliance concept. Finally the meeting was attended by 11 people representing 9 different institutions and by 2 UNESCO’s representatives (Pic. 1 and Annex 1).

Pic. 1. Meeting Participants


6

The role of UNESCO

UNESCO undertakes a facilitating and catalyzing role for the Learning Alliance. The rationale behind this role is that multi‐stakeholder learning processes usually do not begin spontaneously, but through the action or one or more dedicated actors that assist beginning of the process and operate to catch the interest of key stakeholders. Indeed for a learning alliance to be operative, especially at an early stage, it is necessary to implement a facilitation process that consists of several critical functions: development of a preliminary stakeholders’ identification and mobilization; provision of methodological guidance shaped according to the needs of the stakeholders and to the local context; empowerment of the stakeholders so that the processes of critical analysis and guidance of the Alliance activities can be undertaken by the stakeholders themselves with the least possible supervisory action; finally, provide a third party that can deal with conflict management issues between the stakeholders.

Learning alliance initiation process

Usually, at the first stage of a learning alliance, stakeholders are either brought together around a common specific issue that they want to analyse and tackle or they meet and subsequently define their common central problem. These processes, however, can happen almost simultaneously. In fact some stakeholders might participate to the starting up of the alliance with a clear idea of a common issue, while others might take part without such a clear idea of a central problem, which is then defined the stakeholders’ meeting. Therefore it is complex and not easy to define if a learning alliance is problem‐initiated or stakeholder‐initiated. In the case of the Citarum Learning Alliance the stakeholder meet with the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Citarum project as a common point of interest, but without a specific common shared problem already identified. Thus, the project represents a common starting point for the activity of the Alliance, which can be considered project‐initiated.

Learning alliance process characteristics

The organization of the meeting and the processes adopted were based on previous experiences in the development of Learning Alliances, mainly in the framework of the SWITCH programme, co‐funded by the European Union, and implemented between 2006 and 2010. The lesson learnt from these experiences is that, in the early stages, learning alliances might not be completely structured in terms of vision, activities, and resources. Usually a strategic plan can’t be elaborated from the very beginning of the learning alliance development process, and also the allocation of resources and the specific tasks of the members of the Alliance are can’t be clearly defined. These issues are usually unavoidable because of the inner nature of the demand‐led multi stakeholders processes, which include and involve representatives from a very


7

diverse background and characteristics; however, for the multi‐stakeholder process to be a rich and effective it is vital for the learning alliance members to be engaged in processes that will lead to the identification of vision, objectives, joint activities and general modus operandi. Moreover the stakeholders have to be active in monitoring the progresses of the alliance to evaluating the processes in which the alliance and its activities are organized and implemented.

Inception meeting specific objectives

The inception meeting was developed to provide the first collective opportunity for the participants to familiarize with the Learning Alliance approach and its underpinning concepts. Furthermore the meeting aimed to provide a space for feedbacks on the local SWITCH Citarum project in the Dara Ulin and Mahmud Oxbows. The third objective of the meeting was to provide a space for the stakeholders to familiarize between each other and to identify their capacities and resources as well producing a preliminary screening of the problems/challenges of research in the water sector in the Citarum basin. Then the meeting aimed at defining in which processes the stakeholders wanted to engage themselves, and which actions can be developed in the future; in this regard another activity implemented during the meeting was the drafting of a short term work‐plan aimed to further develop the Alliance. Finally the meeting also aimed to select and endorse a small supporting management team, who together will be in charge of taking action points forward and coordinate the future activities. Meeting agenda 9:30 – 10:00 Presentation of participants (organization main activities)

10:00 – 10:30 Introduction to the Learning Alliance (LA) approach

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee Break

11:00 – 12:30 Socialization of the SWITCH Citarum project activities

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch Break

13:30 – 15:00 Identification of objectives and possible joint activities of the LA

15:00 – 15:30 Selection of Learning Alliance coordination team


8

Learning Alliance approach and SWITCH Citarum project presentations

The meeting started with the brief presentation of all the participants who indicated their names, roles and organization of provenience. Then the space was given to the presentation dedicated to the Introduction to the Learning Alliance (LA) approach (Pic. 2), conducted by Mr. Marco Bonetti and the socialization of the SWITCH Citarum project, (Pic. 3) carried out by Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona. Both presentations followed a “frontal presentation” method, with a space for questions and clarifications. For the Introduction to the Learning Alliance approach a question time was given at the end of the presentation, while for the socialization of the SWITCH Citarum project activities the space for the debate and the questions was open during all the presentation (Pic. 4).

Pic. 2. Socialization of the SWITCH Citarum project


9

Learning Alliance and SWITCH Citarum project question session During the question time after the introduction to the Learning Alliance (LA) approach and during the socialization of the SWITCH Citarum project several questions and comments (Q) were raised to which the facilitators provided answers (A) as follows. Q ‐ Mr. Jan T. L. Yap (CKNet ‐ INA): To what field is LA currently applied? A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): LA approach is applied with different connotations in different fields like education, public health and business. However our main reference and inspiration come from the experience of the city based learning alliances that work in filed of urban water management under the framework of the SWITCH programme co‐funded by the EU, which ended in December 2010. Q ‐ Mr. Jan T. L. Yap (CKNet ‐ INA): In the water sector is the LA approach applicable only in the context of urban management? A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): The LA approach made of flexibility one of its main qualities. In fact it focuses on the processes more than on specific outcomes; therefore it can be adapted and then used in different specific fields of the water sector according to the directions and objectives of the stakeholders. Q ‐ Mr. Heru Santoso (APCE / LIPI): It’s the first time that I’m in contact with the LA approach. It looks very promising especially considering the importance of cooperation in this sector and in this country. Is the approach also related to achieving changes in terms of decision‐making behaviours? A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): Coordination is a key factor. In fact, the approach is based on the need to provide a momentum to the diffusion of innovation processes and scaling‐up of research through synergies between research users and research generators. Such innovation processes, which the learning alliances deal with, are definitely including the promotion of actions towards decision‐making actors. Q ‐ Mr. Heru Santoso (APCE / LIPI): What is the relationship between the Learning Alliance and the SWITCH project? A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): The SWITCH project, first of all, represents an opportunity for the Learning Alliance. Both are part of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Programme’s strategy, and the SWITCH project can represent a common ground in which the Learning Alliance stakeholders can start joint activities and reflexion. On the other hand the activities of the Learning Alliance don’t have to focus exclusively on the project Q ‐ Mr. Heru Santoso (APCE / LIPI): What about the LA in other countries? A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): In the other countries which are part of the SWITCH‐in‐Asia Programme the UNESCO Office Jakarta is using the same approach promoting the creation of LAs in combination with the development of the local SWITCH projects. Once established in different countries the Learning Alliances will operate as a regional network.


10

Q ‐ Mr. Eka Jatnika Sundana (BPLHD): What is the current stage of the project development? When it is expected to be implemented and how long will implementation phase last for? A ‐ Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona (UNESCO): A final draft of the project proposal is ready. The final draft is available for the stakeholders and is still open for their observations. In this regard, the discussion of the project is also one of the “activities” to be implemented under a Learning Alliance perspective. Currently the proposal is being translated in Indonesian and it’s in the process of being included in the BAPPENAS Blue‐book and in the Citarum Roadmap. As soon as the project will be included in the BAPPENAS Blue‐book it will have access to funding from donors. We expect, according to the availability of funding, to start the implementation phase during the next year. The project expected duration is 3 years. Q ‐ Mr. Eka Jatnika Sundana (BPLHD): The West Java Environmental Management Office has a relevant amount of data produced by consultants working in some of the Citarum oxbows. If requested these information can be made available for the project. A ‐ Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona (UNESCO): The access to the The West Java Environmental Management Office data can be very useful both to improve the draft proposal and to provide baseline information for the research that will be implemented under the project framework Q ‐ MS. Adhi Yudha Mulia (PUSKIM): The typology of intervention and in particular the decision about developing a constructed wetland system should be carefully evaluated by studying Oxbows' hydrological system to avoid problems. A ‐ Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona (UNESCO): The knowledge of the Oxbows' hydrological system is definitely one of the main components of the project. In fact the project aims to develop research activities to create knowledge for the implementation of appropriate technologies. Q ‐ Ms. Tirta Sutedjo (Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation): Is there any need for population re‐settlement, which usually is a long and costly process, especially for what concerns the creation of wetlands? A ‐ Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona (UNESCO): We don’t expect the need for re‐settlement. Nonetheless part of the project itself is to conduct studies to understand what kind of intervention and technology will be used in the area. A ‐ Ms. Reliana L. Toruan (Research Center for Limnology – LIPI): As the choice of most suitable technologies is yet to be done, is not possible to be sure about the need for re‐settlement. The choice should take into account the consequences of selecting a specific technology, including the need for re‐settlement. A ‐ Mr. Marco Bonetti (UNESCO): In fact when we talk about “most suitable technologies” we mean suitable in terms of technical aspects, but also suitable from a social point of view.


11

Q ‐ Mr. Eka Jatnika Sundana (BPLHD): Community participation is a key issue for the success of a project. What are you going to do about that? A ‐ Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona (UNESCO): We are collaborating with a “community champion”, a non governmental organization, Warga Peduli Lingkungan, which has experience in community participation and which enjoy the trust of the communities located in the Oxbows. A ‐ Mr. Jan T. L. Yap (CKNet ‐ INA): Civil society involvement, through the creation of community project’s ownership is definitely the key for success.

Pic. 4. Discussion during the presentation of the Citarum Project


12

Stakeholders’ familiarization and identification of capacities and resources

Each representative of the organization that attended the meeting was invited to give a definition of “who we are” and “what capacity do we have”1.

Organization Who we are? What capacity do we have?

Research Institute for Human Settlements

“PUSKIM” ‐ Ministry of Public Works ¨PU¨

Governmental institution under the ministry of Public Works. Perform research and development of applied technologies and formulate standards in human settlements field. We have three scopes of work: research and development, consulting services (to local governments and other institutions), and education (dissemination of standards and research collaboration with other institutions). One of our key research activities is the development of eco‐settlements in the Cimanuk River Basin, as well as floating sanitation research projects in South Kalimantan.

Expertise on water and sanitation and on building materials and building sciences. Five laboratories for research on water and sanitation, building material, structures, housing and environment and buildings design. Access to the community which deals with the formulation of settlements codes’ standards.

1 The representative of the Public Health Department of Atma Jaya University could not attend this session of the meeting.


13


West Java Environmental Management Office

¨BPLHD¨

Governmental agency under the West Java Provincial Government. Our main responsibility is to formulating environmental policies. We mainly act as a coordinating agency and we don’t execute large scale projects. The action and implementation of policies is taken up by sectoral agencies. In the Citarum area we combine data from different agencies to produce policies for provincial level governments.

Capacity to implement policy studies and research and publish the results and presenting them with workshops at national and international level. Strong institutional linkage with local government through the production of technical guidelines and capacity building addressed to the municipalities in West Java. Ability to implement dissemination and socialization workshops. In relation to the Citarum basin we have a yearly budget allocated for water quality monitoring.

Asia‐Pacific Centre for Ecohydrology “APCE” / Indonesian Institute of

Sciences “LIPI”

New Research Center under UNESCO Category 2 (not legally part of the Organization, but associated with it through formal arrangements). Our work focuses on Ecohydrology working in coordination with LIPI. Soon we will be implementing demosite projects (one of them in the Saguling area located in Citarum River Basin).

Expertise in water science and hydro‐meteorology and Climate Change adaptation. Access to LIPI’s network and to their experts in Social Sciences.


14


Research Center for Limnology ‐ LIPI

Governmental institution, National research centre under LIPI. We work on research on freshwater ecology. We develop both basic research and applied research on a nation wide base including the Citarum area.

Expertise in water sciences with different technical backgrounds. Access to databases of Indonesian freshwater systems. Annual funding from the government and also funding coming form international cooperation. Access to expertise in various fields, including social sciences, thanks to the LIPI’s network

Bandung Institute of Technology ¨ITB”, Environmental

Engineering Department

State University. We have three main fields of expertise and research. Air and waste management, environmental management technologies, and water and wastewater engineering. Environmental management technologies studies are focused in the Upper Citarum Basin with several researches already implemented on topics like insecticide contamination and heavy metals contamination. Academic staff has already carried out research in the Citarum Oxbow of Dara Ulin,

Capacity to conduct research on wastewater treatment and solid waste management and environmental health and water resource management. Facilities to support research (several laboratories). Access to human resources, students, interested in research projects.


15


with the study of the relation between groundwater quality and public health and bioremediation of land contamination in the oxbow area.

Research Institute for Water Resources

“PUSAIR” ” ‐ Ministry of Public Works ¨PU¨

Governmental institution under the ministry of Public Works. Perform research and development of applied technologies and formulate standards in water resources field. We have three scopes of work: research and development, consulting services (to local governments and other institutions), and education (dissemination of standards and research collaboration with other institutions). We are implementing research activities in developing wastewater industrial treatment in South Bandung and simple/appropriate technologies for water quality improvement (not only in the Citarum, but also in other basins). We are also involved in the application and improvement of water quality models.

Access to 8 laboratories and expertise in hydraulics and geotechnics, hydrology, water quality, coastal engineering, irrigation engineering, sabo dam engineering, river engineering, and swamp engineering.


16


Directorate of Water and Irrigation ‐ BAPPENAS

Governmental institution. Our main task is to formulate long term, medium term and annual development plans in the water resources and irrigation sector. In the Citarum area we worked on the formulation of the Citarum Roadmap with a large number of stakeholders. In this regard, BAPPENAS is facilitating the stakeholders to develop the roadmap to define what vision they want to achieve for the basin. The Roadmap already includes 80 activities/interventions to be implemented from 2010 to 2025.

Capacities of coordination, implementation and monitoring of water resources development projects. Close relationship with implementing agencies such as DG for Water Resources in the Ministry of Public Works. Coordinate the formulation of the Blue‐book (list of development projects endorsed by the Indonesian Government). Experience of coordination with donor agencies.

CKNet ‐ INA Multistakeholders platform focusing on knowledge management on infrastructure, Water, and Environment in Indonesia.

We include universities and research centers, governmental agencies, private sector, consultancy companies, NGOs etc.

Access to knowledge within the CK Net but also at a worldwide level thanks to contacts with other networks. Through the Universities that belong to the CK Net have access to research facilities and training modules on water resources (institutional aspect, governance, etc.). Access to the UNDP Cap Net expertise. Can mobilize funding for training and module development and small scale field research,


17


Previously financed by governmental funds and sustained by PT‐IHE Indonesia. The members, through paying a membership fee, are financing the basic operation costs.

and for fellowships.

UNESCO Office Jakarta – Water Sciences Unit

International Organization. We are a specialized agency of the United Nations. We implement activities through the five programme areas of Education, Natural Sciences, Social and Human Sciences, Culture, and Communication and Information. Our Unit at the UNESCO Office Jakarta works on a broad range of water sciences issues.

Expertise in water science. We have (limited) funding that can be allocated specifically for the LA activities. Access to other experts a world wide basis (IHE, old SWITCH experts). Advocacy capacity. Access to experts from different sectors in the UNESCO Office Jakarta.


18

Preliminary screening of problems/challenges in the water sector The stakeholders were asked to reflect about the problems/challenges in the water sector research in the Citarum river basin. In particular they were asked to reflect on the issues that could be improved by the activities of the Learning Alliance. The stakeholders individuated the following challenges:

Lack of development of knowledge management.

Scarce coordination problems the several actors (e.g. research institutes, governmental agencies, non governmental organizations, etc.) working on interconnected issues in the water sector.

Research users (research demand) and research producers (research offer) don’t meet and interact on a regular basis.

Absence of realistic common vision and common goals for the stakeholders in the Citarum Basin.

During the discussion several comments were raised about the necessities to scale up research and promote the diffusion of innovation that could be met by the activities of the Learning Alliance. The following necessities were individuated:

o Necessity for integrating the work and establish cooperation between people from different backgrounds. In this regard was mentioned the necessity for social scientists and communication specialists to collaborate with researchers to translate research into a language that can be understood by different stakeholders and not just by the experts.

o Necessity to develop joint learning sites. For instance individuating locations were a specific technology is applied and places with similar characteristics were the technology is no applied, and to organize field visit for different stakeholders (schools, planners, policy makers, other researcher, etc.). Different stakeholders should be guided by facilitators using different languages according to the stakeholders’ background.

o Necessity to put in contact the grassroots level organizations and the research

organizations with the key policy makers through advocacy.

o Necessity to set up a process documentation strategy to track the process and

facilitate the access to the materials produced.


19

Citarum Learning Alliance activities

The stakeholders discussed in which activities they want to be engaged as a Learning Alliance. The activities individuate match the capacities and the time availability of the stakeholders and are specifically elaborated considering the Alliance early stage of development. The focus of the planned activities is related to the necessity of providing further understanding of both the expectations of the Alliance’s members and the strategic direction of the Alliance. Four main activities were individuated with their associated working coordination figures (which will be all supported by UNESCO) and milestones. Activities

1. Development and maintenance of a Learning Alliance website.

2. Development of Learning Alliance stakeholder’s expectation mapping.

3. Organization of Learning Alliance’s expectation mapping discussion meeting.

4. Organization of Learning Alliance visioning workshop.

Milestones

1.1Active website with links to the stakeholders’ websites and gathering basic information about the Learning Alliance and the profile of its members

2.1 Realization of an expectations questionnaire;

2.2 Summary of the results of the Web based Administration of the expectations questionnaire

3.1 Production of Learning Alliance’s expectation map

4.1 Production of Learning Alliance’s vision document

Coordination team

o Mr. Mochamap Adhiraga Pratama (ITB)

o Mr. Jan T. L. Yap (CKNet – INA)

o UNESCO Office Jakarta team

o Mr. Heru Santoso (APCE/LIPI)


20

Learning Alliance working plan May‐December 2011

With the contribution and agreement of the participants an 8 months working plan, from May 2011 until December 2011, was drafted to further develop the Alliance (Tab. 2). The working plan is meant to be open for new activities to be included in this period of time according to the outcome of the meetings that will be held during the working plan implementation period. Tab. 2 Learning Alliance working plan May‐December 2011.

Months

May June July August September October November December

Weeks

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Activities Milestones

1. Development and maintenance of a Learning Alliance website

M 1.1 Active website with links to the stakeholders’ websites and gathering basic information about the Learning Alliance and the profile of its members

M 1.1

2. Development of Learning Alliance stakeholder’s expectation mapping

M 2.1 Realization of an expectations questionnaire; M 2.2 Summary of the results of the Web based Administration of the expectations questionnaire

M 2.1

M 2.2


21

Months

May June July August September October November December

Weeks

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Activities Milestones

3. Organization of Learning Alliance’s expectation mapping discussion meeting

M 3.1 Production of Learning Alliance’s expectation map

M 3.1

4. Organization of Learning Alliance visioning workshop

M 4.1 Production of Learning Alliance’s vision document

M 4.1


22

Annex 1

Meeting participants

Organization Name Email

Institute for Human Settlements “PUSKIM” ‐ Ministry of Public Works

¨PU¨

Mr. Sudradjat [email protected]

MS. Adhi Yudha Mulia [email protected]

Mr. Elis Hastuti [email protected]

West Java Environmental Management Office

¨BPLHD¨

Mr. Eka Jatnika Sundana

[email protected] [email protected]

Asia‐Pacific Centre for Ecohydrology “APCE” / Indonesian Institute of

Sciences “LIPI”

Mr. Heru Santoso [email protected]

Research Center for Limnology ‐ Indonesian

Institute of Sciences “LIPI”

Ms. Reliana L. Toruan [email protected]

Bandung Institute of Technology ¨ITB”, Environmental

Engineering Department

Mr. Mochamap Adhiraga Pratama

[email protected]

Research Institute for Water Resources

“PUSAIR” ” ‐ Ministry of Public Works ¨PU¨

Eko Winar Irianto [email protected]

Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation – State Ministry of National Development Planning

“BAPPENAS”

Ms. Tirta Sutedjo [email protected]

Collaborative Knowledge Network Indonesia “CKNet – INA”

Mr. Jan T. L. Yap [email protected]

Public Health Department Atma Jaya University

Ms. Bryany Titi Santi [email protected]

UNESCO Office Jakarta, Water Sciences Unit

Mr. Jose Miguel Ruiz Verona

jm.ruiz‐[email protected]

Mr. Marco Bonetti [email protected]

SWITCH LA Indonesia- Inception meeting report

Documents

Transcript of SWITCH LA Indonesia- Inception meeting report