Sustainability: Managing Mindset Shifts - CIMA - Chartered ... and CPD courses docs... ·...
Transcript of Sustainability: Managing Mindset Shifts - CIMA - Chartered ... and CPD courses docs... ·...
Sustainability: Managing Mindset ShiftsSignposts for the Future
Sustainability: Managing Sustainability: Managing Mindset ShiftsMindset ShiftsSignposts for the FutureSignposts for the Future
Dzulkifli Abdul RazakUniversiti Sains Malaysia
Dzulkifli Abdul RazakDzulkifli Abdul Razak
Universiti Sains MalaysiaUniversiti Sains Malaysia
[email protected]@usm.my
Regional CIMA Conference 2011Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
12-13 July 2011
© DAR 2011
“Development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”UN World Commission on Environment and Development 1987
What is Sustainable Development?
What is Sustainable What is Sustainable
Development?Development?
© DAR 2011
Why Sustainable Development?Why Now?
Why Sustainable Development?Why Sustainable Development?
Why Now?Why Now?Sustainable development has been the
rallying cry…since 1992, when 100 presidents and prime ministers endorsed it
at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit.
In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development (known as the Brundtland Commission) challenged the world community to fulfill "the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs."
Ancient wisdom:You do not eat your paddy (corn) “seed”
Jangan makan benih padi sendiri
© DAR 2011
Drawing from the research of Drawing from the research of
1,300 experts from 95 1,300 experts from 95
countries, the UN report countries, the UN report
concludes thatconcludes that 60% of the 60% of the
systems that support life on systems that support life on
Earth are being Earth are being dedegraded or graded or
used used ununsustainably.sustainably.The Wall Street Journal Europe (2005) Questions for the Future, July 13, A6
Where are we?Where are we?
Are we eating our paddy (corn) “seed”?
© DAR 2011
Source : Ecological Footprint Report (2004)
Breached
Trend Continues
World Ecological Footprint (1961World Ecological Footprint (1961--1997)1997)
Biocapacity breached in midBiocapacity breached in mid--1970s1970s
Brundtland ‘87
Rio Summit ‘92
© DAR 2011
Asian nationsAsian nations’’ FootprintFootprint(global hectares per capita)
Myanmar : Myanmar : 0.760.76
Vietnam : Vietnam : 0.76 0.76
Sri LankaSri Lanka: 0.88: 0.88
Indonesia : Indonesia : 0.980.98
Cambodia:Cambodia: 1.031.03
Philippines : Philippines : 1.111.11
Thailand : Thailand : 1.411.41
�� World : 2.18World : 2.18
�� Korea Republic: Korea Republic: 2.432.43
�� Malaysia : Malaysia : 2.992.99
�� Japan : Japan : 3.913.91
�� Korea DPRP : Korea DPRP : 4.074.07
�� Singapore : > Singapore : > 66
Breached
© DAR 2011
Ecological Footprint Report (2004)Ecological Footprint Report (2004)
�� World Average :World Average : 2.18*2.18*
�� World Biocapacity :World Biocapacity : 1.89*1.89*
Are We Living Beyond Our
Means?
* global hectares per capita
Human activities have
ecological impacts
at least 30% beyond
the planet’s capacity
to renew itself and absorb pollution*
*Sacquet (2005) World Atlas of Sustainable Development, p. 53
© DAR 2011http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/
Image obtained: Oct 01, 2006
REUTERS & AFPJul 11, 2001
Global Ecological Footprint
Haze footprint
© DAR 2011
Dense smog settled over the North China Plain on February 20, 2011. This photo-like image taken at 11:35 a.m. by the Moderate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite.The featureless gray-brown haze is so thick that the ground
is not visible in parts
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov
© DAR 2011
The Arizona fire raging since May 29 through more than 670 square miles so far, is threatening more than homes and property.
June 12, 2011 at 6:41 pm
http://modernsurvivalblog.com/
© DAR 2011
Ecological Footprint (1999)Ecological Footprint (1999)
-- by region and income groupby region and income group
2.18: World Ecological Footprint
1 874 4 0 87
© DAR 2011
Quality of Life (Total pop: 6 Billion)
Sustainable
level
80%consumed by
One
Billion
Resourc
e/ E
nerg
y c
onsum
ption
Modified from Mats-Olov Hedblom, Ericsson
Dennis Pamlin (2003), Global Policy Advisor, WWF
Are some of us living Are some of us living beyondbeyond their meanstheir means??
20%by
Rest of the
World
© DAR 2011
Human Ecological Footprint (1950Human Ecological Footprint (1950--2050)2050)
Nu
mb
er
of
pla
nets
Reality Check?
© DAR 2011
Consider the following passage from the UN secretary general's own report: Keeping the Promise:…progress does not look very encouraging, in fact, the number of people living in extreme poverty actually went up between 1990 and 2005 by about 36 million ... The number of "$1 a day poor" went up by 92 million in sub-Saharan Africa and by eight million in west Asia during the period 1990 to 2005.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2010/sep/21/mdgs-rose-shuman-channeled-approach
© DAR 2011
Kofi Annan Kofi Annan UN UN SecretarySecretary--General (2001)General (2001)
Our biggest challengeOur biggest challenge
in this new century isin this new century is
to taketo take an idea that sounds an idea that sounds
abstractabstract
–– sustainable developmentsustainable development ––
andand turn it into reality turn it into reality
for the worldfor the world’’s peoples people
Can we meet the challenge?Can we meet the challenge?
© DAR 2011
Is the ACCOUNTING WORLD sustainable?
http://energy.i2i.org/category/cdphe/
USTAINABLE?
The notion of the triple bottom line pervades practice in the business, public, and not for profit sectors and provides the best known area of social and environmental accounting research - Prof Roger Burritt
http://www.unisa.edu.au/news/2008/031208.asp
© DAR 2011
Accounting Forum, June 2001
Vol. 25(2): 128-157
This paper has been written in response to the perception that ‘sustainable development’ (hereafter SD) and its derivatives are being used in, amongst others, the accounting literature in a way which equates…with ‘good environmental management’. Further, the paper assumes that such usage of SD arises, at least in part, from a lack of awareness of the origins of the concept and of the debates which surrounded its origin.
The paper, therefore, seeks to remedy this perceived problem…focused on…the international development literature because it was from this that the Brundtland Report originated.
The main conclusion of this paper, therefore, is that one shouldbe careful about following the business literature and using SD to mean ‘good environmental management’. While ‘good environmental management’ is part of the answer to such a question, this paper argues that it is not the core issue at stake.
Jan Bebbington, Sustainable development: a review of the international development, business and accounting literature
© DAR 2011
Princeton, 2011, 216 pp.
ethical fading -- the removal of ethics from the decision-making process (eg Challenger space shuttle disaster, steroid use in Major League Baseball, the crash in the financial markets)
ethical standards shift --neglecting to notice and act on the unethical behavior of othersethical sinkholes -- creating questionable actions
© DAR 2011http://www.smilepk.info/
should self
the person who
knows what is correct
want self
the person who ends
up making decisions
motivatedblindness
indirect
blindness
© DAR 2011
“I should behave ethically
… therefore I will”
“I should havebehaved ethically… therefore I did”
PredictionForecasting errors
RecollectionMemory revision
Shifting standards
Decision TimeEthical fading
Visceral responses
“I don’t see the ethical implications of this decision…so I do what I want to do”
Should-self
Want-self Blind Spots p. 67
© DAR 2011
Trying to run a complex society on a single indicator like the Gross National Product (GNP) is like trying to fly a 747 with only one gauge on the instrument panel ...
H Henderson (1991) Paradigms of Progress: Life Beyond Economics
or
Use this gauge only
What Indicator(s) ?What Indicator(s) ?What Indicator(s) ?
© DAR 2011
We have a fourth brother, DO NO EVIL, but he left
the group for an accounting firm.
Time Time for a for a behaviour changebehaviour change
© DAR 2011
4 Action Areas
� UNESCO is the lead UN agency
2005-2014:
The Decade of Education
for Sustainable Development
�Approved by UN General Assembly (2002)
1. Promotion and improvement of basic education;2. Reorienting existing education at all levels to
address sustainable development;3. Developing public understanding and awareness
of sustainability;4. Training the workforce with knowledge and skills
to perform their work in a sustainable manner
© DAR 2011
The Sustainability “Stool”
Environmental Ethics S
cope of measures
Transformative Education
Community Consciousness
““turn it into realityturn it into reality””
© DAR 2011
ConclusionConclusion
““Achieving sustainable development Achieving sustainable development is perhaps one of the most difficult and is perhaps one of the most difficult and most pressing goals we face. It requires most pressing goals we face. It requires
on the part of all of us on the part of all of us commitmentcommitment, , action, partnerships and sometimes, action, partnerships and sometimes,
sacrifices of our traditional life patterns sacrifices of our traditional life patterns and personal interests.and personal interests.””
-- Mostafa Tolba, ChairpersonMostafa Tolba, Chairperson
Commission Commission on Sustainable Developmenton Sustainable Development
© DAR 2011
This presentation and the opinions expressed are those of the author as of the
date of writing and are subject to change. It has been prepared solely for purposes
of education, information and discussion by the recipients. Any reference to past
data/indicators are not necessarily a guide to the present and future.
The information and analysis contained in this publication have been compiled or
arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, and are duly acknowledged.
The author does not make any representation as to their accuracy or
completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use hereof.
Neither this document nor any copy thereof may be sent to or
taken into territories/places where the use and the distribution
may be restricted by local law and/or regulation.
This document may not be reproduced either in whole,
or in part, without the written permission of the author © DAR 2007-2011
Acknowledgement
& Disclaimer
© DAR 2011
�� Nearly 10 years later, sustainable development has Nearly 10 years later, sustainable development has largely failed as an organizing principle.largely failed as an organizing principle.
�� The lack of progress in confronting climate change, The lack of progress in confronting climate change, biodiversity loss, and other pressing global environmental biodiversity loss, and other pressing global environmental challenges is glaring, as is the lack of improvement in the challenges is glaring, as is the lack of improvement in the developing world's air and water quality. developing world's air and water quality.
�� As tempting as it may be to put the blame solely on a As tempting as it may be to put the blame solely on a lack of international will, lack of international will, the seeds of sustainable the seeds of sustainable development's failure were in fact sown at its development's failure were in fact sown at its inceptioninception. .
�� Under the rubric of sustainable development, the [1987 Under the rubric of sustainable development, the [1987 UN] commission UN] commission sought to accommodate the sought to accommodate the competing desirescompeting desires of developed countries to combat of developed countries to combat worldwide environmental threats and of developing worldwide environmental threats and of developing countries to put poverty at the top of the global agenda. countries to put poverty at the top of the global agenda.
Daniel C. Esty, A Term's Limits, Sep 1, 2001