Supreeya Wongtra-ngan, MD,MHPEd What is it?. Student evaluation: what for 1. Incentive to learn...
-
Upload
ralf-sullivan -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Supreeya Wongtra-ngan, MD,MHPEd What is it?. Student evaluation: what for 1. Incentive to learn...
Supreeya Wongtra-ngan, MD,MHPEd
What is it?What is it?
Student evaluation: what for
1. Incentive to learn (motivation)2. Feedback to student3. Modification of learning activities4. Selection of students5. Success or failure6. Feedback to teacher7. School public relations 8. Protection of society
S= summative, F= formative, S&F = both
Stage of Assessment Prerequisite level testing Pre-testing Interval testing Pre-final feedback comprehensive testing “Subjective” impression Final testing Safety(re-evaluation) testing Follow-up testing
Continuous evaluation
Formative evaluationOr
Diagnostic evaluation
Summative evaluation
OrCertifying evaluation
Continuous evaluation
Formative Evaluation Is a method of judging the worth of
a program while the program activities are forming or happening.
Focus on process
Bhola, 1990
Student evaluationFormative Process focused Assess students through
the course Collecting information to
give feedback Determine corrections
and alternations to improve program
Determine the nature and extent of the required final assessment
Summative Outcome driven End of program or
predetermined time Determine student
achievement Determine the
worth of program (original objectives are met)
Benefits of Formative Identify student’s strength and
weakness Help student develop under non-
judgmental and non-threatening conditions
Enhance student learning Promote self-evaluation skills Evaluate and modify course and
teaching
Disadvantage of Summative Not all students perform to
their full potential under exam condition
Previous test influence a teacher appraisal of current ability and self expectation
Extrinsic rewards, competition
Guideline for implementing Formative Assessment Voluntary, frequently Provide throughout the period of
instruction Identical or similar to summative
instruments Broadly sample knowledge and skills
tested at summative Followed by feedback and remedy
Student-directed study, suggested reading Formal,faculty-directed
Student evaluation Its main aim is to inform the
student on his progress Preserve anonymity Enables the teacher to decide to
replace one program by another Justifies the decision to let a
student move up to another level Permit rank-ordering of students
F
F
S&F
S
S&F
S= blue, F= pink, S&F = green
Potential drawbacks Students want to learn to pass the
exam Time-wasting and inefficient98% of 1st yr Newcastle students
declared extremely worthwhile Heavy demand on staffSelf marking, access to model
answers Difficulty in providing feedback
Good outcomes in summative assessment largely depend on the quality of formative assessment
Relationship between formative and summative
Learning goals and objectivesFormative assessment
Identify the strength and weaknessSuggest and implement remedial measures
Work towards achievement of the goals & objSummative assessment to judge whether the
original goals & obj are met
Formative instruments Any test Observation Classroom discussion Analysis student work : homework,tests Portfolio (collections of student work) Self evaluation Peer evaluation
Is it worth doing? Little data published Encourage to adopt “deep” approach
learning Shifting teacher thinking: system of marking,grading or
ranking supporting students and assisting
them to defined their own learning needs
Student evaluation: what for
1. Incentive to learn2. Feedback to student3. Modification of learning
activities4. Selection of students5. Success or failure6. Feedback to teacher7. School public relations 8. Protection of society
S&FS&FS&F
S&FS&F
SS
S
S= blue, F= pink, S&F = green
Don’t trust your eyes!