Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

download Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

of 12

Transcript of Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    1/12

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    4/16/12

    Supporting Bottom-up

    Innovation: Case of BiofuelDevelopment in Indonesia

    Yuti Ariani Fatimah and Sonny YuliarWorkshop on the Role of Universities andCouncils in Innovation for Inclusive Developmentin Southeast Asia

    Bangkok, 1-3 April 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    2/12

    4/16/12

    Outline

    Overview of the projects

    RoKS

    Lessons learned After RoKS

    (Biofuel) Scientists in the Society

    Bottom-up Innovation

    Biofuel project findings

    Discussion: Supporting Bottom-up

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    3/12

    4/16/12

    Overview of the projects

    Inequality and Knowledge System:Challenges to DevelopmentalUniversities in Indonesia for Research

    on Knowledge System, IDRCResearch Competition 2005-2006

    Towards Inclusive Biofuel Innovation

    in Indonesia, IDRC 2010-2012

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    4/12

    4/16/12

    ITB

    (Autono-

    mous

    University)UGM

    (Autonomo

    us

    University)

    Ministry ofHE

    Ministry of

    R & T

    Research

    Programs

    Structural

    TransformationStructural

    Transformation

    Natl.

    Res.Council

    Research

    Agenda

    Stake-

    holders

    Private

    Partners

    LocalCoomu-

    nity

    Stake-

    holders

    Biofuel

    Develop-

    ment

    Defence relatedInnovation

    Lapindo MudVolcano

    Conflict

    Rural ICT

    Parlia-ment

    Legislation

    on Univ.Autonomy

    Satyawaca

    na (Private

    University)

    Research

    Programs

    Structural

    Transformation

    Policy System

    Knowledge SystemCo-Shaping

    RoKS Project Activities: Multi-site,Multi-case

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    5/12

    4/16/12

    Lessons Learned

    On University Autonomy Policy:

    Different views on HE

    democratization processresembles the debate betweenprocedural and substantive views

    Democratic ideals seem relevant todevelopmental knowledge system

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    6/12

    4/16/12

    Lessons

    On Knowledge System:

    Non-formal settings (non-formal interaction betweenscientists, politicians, government agencies, localcommunities, industry managers, etc.) offer greater

    opportunity for knowledge system creation Formal setting lacks mediating agencies

    E.g., discussions within the National Research Council (theministry of R &T) lacks of common vocabulary

    Social capitals resulting from non-formal interactions serveas an important source for instituting knowledge

    Contents of knowledge, by themselves, do not warrant

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    7/12

    4/16/12

    After RoKS

    Policy for expanding the role of ITB innational innovation system (2010 -2011) a book & a policy document

    Discussion on University Led

    Development (2010 - )

    Research project & book writing on

    research and innovation policy

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    8/12

    4/16/12

    (Biofuel) Scientists in theSociety

    A B C

    Centralapproach

    Top-down Network; startingfrom existinginterest

    Bottom-up

    Type of relation

    among actors

    Dependent Interdependent Hybrid;

    combinationbetweendependent andinterdependent

    Network graph

    Occupation Lecture Lecture Entrepreneur

    (Source: Fatimah & Yuliar, 2009)

    A B C

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    9/12

    4/16/12

    Bottom-up Innovation

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    10/12

    4/16/12

    Biofuel Project Findings

    opportunity for BoP groups(i.e., low income farmers, ruralhousewives, other informalpractitioners)

    informal interactions open new

    opportunities in most cases, biofuel markets

    have not taken place durablyweak interactions amongsupply-side and demand-sideactors

    despite intensive learning ontechnical improvements andbusiness models, values havenot yet materialized

    while learning by interactingis key to innovation, there is aquestion of actors coverageselective inclusion issue

    supply-side and demand-side

    actors need to interact moreclosely, in earlier phase oftechnical development Demand-side actors include

    intermediate and end consumers,especially low income consumers

    BoP groups need to berepresented in pricenegotiation and techniquesselection

    informal interactions need adurable framework

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    11/12

    4/16/12

    Discussion: Supporting Bottom-

    up Innovation Bricolage versus breakthrough

    (Garud & Karne, 2003)

    Protection versus exclusion Scaling up

  • 8/2/2019 Supporting Bottom-Up Innovation

    12/12

    4/16/12

    Thank you for your kind attention!

    Yuti Ariani

    [email protected]

    Sonny [email protected]

    Development Studies Graduate Program

    School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development