Supplier Selection Checksheet

8/11/2019 Supplier Selection Checksheet

1/28

form FRM SSC 14-005 7/25/96Page 1 of 28

SUPPLIER SELECTION CHECKSHEET

SECTION I PRE-WORK

DATE OF EVALUATION:_____________

Supplier Information

A. Company Name ___________________________________________________________

B. Company Address ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________

C. Contact Name/Title ___________________________________________________________

D. Telephone ________________ E. Fax _______________ F. E-Mail______________

G. Year of Est. ________________ H. Ownership (Private, Public JV, Other _________)

Statement of Purpose

State the purpose for evaluating the supplier:

_________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation Team

Leader ___________________________________________________________ Supplier Quality ___________________________________________________________ Contracting Agent ___________________________________________________________ Engineer ___________________________________________________________

Manufacturing ___________________________________________________________ Other(s) ___________________________________________________________

Pre-Work Checklist

Supplier Pre-Screen (New Version) Complete? _____ Yes _____ NoGE team members selected and purpose reviewed prior to site visit? _____ Yes _____ No

Agenda prepared for site visit? _____ Yes _____ NoKey personnel required for evaluation committed for attendance bypotential supplier? _____ Yes _____ NoPotential supplier contacted and informed of agenda? _____ Yes _____ No

Post-Work Checklist

Supplier selection score ____________________ Evaluation team recommends supplier? _____ Yes _____ NoReasons for decision _____ Yes _____ NoTeam review completed and discussed? _____ Yes _____ NoResults presented to productivity team? _____ Yes _____ NoImprovements reviewed with potential supplier? _____ Yes _____ NoImprovements completed? _____ Yes _____ No


2/28


3/28


Enter the suppliers RATIO and GRADE in the appropriate column. Average the grades over the five ratios andenter as the Average Score. (last two years, present year, forecast year)

A B C RATIO GRADE1. Debit Asset Ratio < 0.7 > 0.7 < 0.9 > 0.92. Current Ratio > 1.4 < 1.4 > 1.0 < 1.03. Debt Service Ratio > 2.0 < 2.0 > 1.0 < 1.0

4. Capital Expenditure Ratio > 1.25 < 1.25 > 1.0 < 1.05. Inventory Turnover > 6.0 < 6.0 > 4.0 < 4.0

A B C RATIO GRADE1. Debit Asset Ratio < 0.7 > 0.7 < 0.9 > 0.92. Current Ratio > 1.4 < 1.4 > 1.0 < 1.03. Debt Service Ratio > 2.0 < 2.0 > 1.0 < 1.04. Capital Expenditure Ratio > 1.25 < 1.25 > 1.0 < 1.05. Inventory Turnover > 6.0 < 6.0 > 4.0 < 4.0

A B C RATIO GRADE1. Debit Asset Ratio < 0.7 > 0.7 < 0.9 > 0.9

2. Current Ratio > 1.4 < 1.4 > 1.0 < 1.03. Debt Service Ratio > 2.0 < 2.0 > 1.0 < 1.04. Capital Expenditure Ratio > 1.25 < 1.25 > 1.0 < 1.05. Inventory Turnover > 6.0 < 6.0 > 4.0 < 4.0

A B C RATIO GRADE1. Debit Asset Ratio < 0.7 > 0.7 < 0.9 > 0.92. Current Ratio > 1.4 < 1.4 > 1.0 < 1.03. Debt Service Ratio > 2.0 < 2.0 > 1.0 < 1.04. Capital Expenditure Ratio > 1.25 < 1.25 > 1.0 < 1.05. Inventory Turnover > 6.0 < 6.0 > 4.0 < 4.0

Average Score Forecast Year__________ Based on these five grades, please answer the question below.

1. Calculate the average financial score by averaging the scores for year 1, year 2, and year 3:

Financial Score = (year 1 + year 2 + year 3) /3. Results of Financial Report Card.

5 = Financial Score = A

3 = Financial Score = B

1 = Financial Score = C

Objective Evidence Financial Reports for the past 2 years and current year(projected).

SUGGESTED MINIMUM REQU IRED SCORE = 3


4/28


2. To what degree is upper management versed in quality, statistical philosophies and thetechnologies for continuous improvement?

1 = Management has no formal training.

3 = Management has had some training and is developing plans to use indices of performance.

5 = Management reviews manufacturing process capability indices on a frequent basis, and theindices are used for planning. Elements of continuous improvement are evident in otherbusiness functions.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Documentation of implementation plan.Evidence of training (knowledge, certificates, measurements,etc.).

Level 5 Objective Evidence Documentation of ongoing management reviews.Discussion with randomly selected team members.

Actual effectiveness of randomly selected project.Capabilities (CpK, PPM) reviewed by management anddocumented.

3. To what degree are the suppliers strategic plans well defined?

1 = No plan is developed, and no central focus is evident.

3 = A plan is defined and is clearly communicated.

5 = The plan is defined, contains a strategy for achieving the mission, and is understoodthroughout the business.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Mission statement exists.Documentation of a strategic plan exists.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Individuals in various functions know the strategic plan andhave action items to support it.Performance measurements support strategic plan and arereviewed with all members of the organization.


5/28


6/28


SECTION II - RESPONSIVENESS

1. To what degree is there an order to deliver planning system which assures timely delivery ofmaterial?

1 = No formal planning system exists.

3 = An effective informal system exists which provides completion date only.

5 = A formal planning system exists which provides ongoing performance to schedule.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Documentation of system.Review schedule for a randomly selected shipment.Process map actual vs. documented system.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Performance data generated and reviewed by cross-functionalteam.Improvements made/documented.

2. To what degree is the supplier making shipments within the defined delivery band of suppliercommitment?

1 = The supplier does not have the data to determine this measurement.

3 = The supplier may or may not always track performance but meets commitments more than95% of the time.

5 = The supplier tracks performance, plans for improvement, and meets commitments more than99% of the time. The supplier also notifies customers when scheduled dates are going

to be missed.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Randomly selected shipment compared to schedule.Measurement documentation supporting performance.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Randomly selected shipment compared to schedule.Discussion with a current customer.Communications evidence (phone call, fax, E-mail).


7/28


3. To what degree is the supplier making shipments within defined delivery band of schedulechanges?

1 = The supplier has no flexibility.

3 = There is no formal system in place, but the supplier has a process by which theyaccommodate customer needs.

5 = A process is in place to handle schedule changes, and the supplier takes the ownership formeeting modified customer requirements. The supplier also tracks performance and plansfor improvement.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Documentation of system.Review schedule change for a randomly selected shipment.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Performance data generated and reviewed by cross-functionalteam.Improvements made/documented.

4. To what degree are cycle times well defined and improved?

1 = No data exists to support/verify cycle times. This is not part of the business strategy.

3 = Goals have been established; incremental improvement is evident.

5 = Order to remittance cycle times are clearly defined, and incremental elements aredocumented (i.e. process flow diagrams with time-lines, sequence chart, etc.) Data isobtained to verify cycle time elements. A formal improvement plan has been established,

and cycle time reduction goals and progress are reviewed on a regular basis. Goals havebeen established.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Total cycle time is measured, and tracking system exists.Performance data is generated and reviewed by cross-functional team.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Incremental elemental data is generated and reviewed bycross-functional team.

Action items are generated and reviewed for improvement.

Documentation exists to support cycle time reduction activities.


8/28


5. To what degree does the supplier respond to its customers comments, complaints, and requestsfor assistance (i.e. RFQ, corrective action, delivery status, order acknowledgment, requests forengineering/design assistance, etc.)?

1 = No formal process exists; customers must complete follow-up in order to obtain assistance.

3 = An informal process exists (possibly a single contact) and response is timely.

5 = A formal process* exists, and the supplier always takes the initiative to provide timelycustomer feedback.


Level 3 Objective Evidence A log of requests and promise dates as well as a system tofollow up exists and is documented.

A formal contact person is assigned to each customer.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Customer contacted for randomly selected complaint.Documentation of complaint reviewed for satisfactory results.Worst case during past year reviewed.Various functions aware of current complaint.Response time measured and tracked for improvement.Contact at business available at all times.Overall perception of supplier review team.

*A formal process may include a log of requests and promise dates as well as a means for internal follow up.

6. To what degree does the supplier have plans to support GETS delivery needs, now and in thefuture?

1 = Supplier has no plans, just order entry.

3 = Supplier has some ideas, but no formal manufacturing capacity planning exists.

5 = Supplier has strong evidence that GETS delivery/rate needs are obtainable.



9/28


7. To what degree does the supplier deliver products to its customers based on pull production?

1 = The supplier is willing to go on pull, but does not currently deliver products based on pullproduction.

3 = The supplier does currently deliver some products to customers based on pull production.

5 = The supplier does currently deliver most products to customers based on pull production.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Greater than 10% of the suppliers sales are on pull production.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Greater than 50% of the suppliers sales are on pull production.

SUM OF QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 6 = 35 X 100 =TOTAL POINTS FOR

RESPONSIVENESSSECTION

TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE = 100

IF SUGGESTED MINIMUM REQUIRED SCORE IS NOT ACHIEVED FOR ANY QUESTIONS, THE SUPPLIERMAY NOT BE RECOMMENDED WITHOUT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND A FOLLOW-UP PLAN.


10/28


SECTION III - QUALITY

1. Has the suppliers senior management issued a quality manual which includes the items listedbelow?

0 = No written procedures or quality manual exists.

5 = Written procedures exist, and they are issued and updated for the categories below but arenot tied together into a quality manual.

7= A quality manual exists, and it includes the categories below. It is issued, distributed andperiodically updated for the organization.

9 = A quality manual exists, and it includes the categories below. It is issued by seniormanagement and is controlled or updated and distributed to the organization periodically.


Level 5 Objective Evidence Quality policyOrganizationPlanningWritten procedures for:

Design change and document controlPurchased material qualityProcess controlInspection and testTest equipment and calibrationHandling/storingNonconformance/Corrective actionInternal Audits

Level 7 Objective Evidence At a minimum, the Quality Manual contains all of the abovemention categories in level 5.


11/28


2. To what degree does the supplier have an effective system for controlling purchased materialand the quality of incoming products and services? This includes any farmout operations, i.e.broaching, grinding, and plating as well as raw materials. (Ask to see certification for specialraw material.)

1 = The supplier has no system for the control of incoming quality. Purchasing documents donot clearly describe the product ordered. Incoming sampling is performed to a documentedplan.

3 = Receiving inspection plans, where applicable, provide adequate quality appraisal ofpurchased product, i.e. MIL STD 105 or equivalent.Inspection records are maintained.Purchasing documents clearly describe the product ordered.

5 = Includes #3 and: An approved supplier list exists; selection criteria is well defined. A formal audit plan exists, and records indicate its effectiveness.Subtier quality performance rating system based on audits and/or delivered quality existsand is updated periodically.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Self explanatory

Level 5 Objective Evidence The procedures used to assure that purchased material meetsrequirements include:

Selection of suppliers from an approved list based ondefined criteria.

Audits of selected suppliersEffective sampling plansMaintenance of recordsQuality performance rating of subtiers


12/28


3. To what degree does the supplier have an effective gage and/or test equipment maintenanceprogram?

New gages/test equipment shall be given identification numbers and inspected to designspecifications, calibrated, and approved before being used. Records shall indicate that

gages and test equipment are periodically inspected and calibrated. Calibration should be donein a environmentally controlled area. Note: All production gages must be calibrated.

0 = There is no gage maintenance program.

1 = Calibration procedures are not documented.No records exist to verify calibration.Standards are not traceable to N.I.S.T. or international equivalent.

3 = Calibration procedures are documented and include method and interval of calibration.Records indicate that procedures are not followed.Standards are traceable to N.I.S.T. or international equivalent.

5 = Calibration procedures are documented and include method and interval of calibration..Records indicate that procedures are followed.Standards are traceable to N.I.S.T. or international equivalent.

7 = Includes #5 and:Some gage R&R have been performed.

9 = Includes #5, #7 and:Gage R&R studies are performed regularly and clearly applied.Calibration procedure has provisions for adjusting calibration frequency based on calibrationresults. Also, procedure has provisions for notification of equipment user of significantly out

of tolerance conditions so that appropriate action can be taken with any affected parts.Procedure defines significantly out of tolerance.


Level 5 Objective Evidence Take a random sample of gages on the floor, document serial# and gage type and check calibration records and schedule.Check standards (i.e. JO blocks). Ask for outside labcertification and check for S.N. for devices traceable to N.I.S.T.


13/28


4. To what degree does the supplier control nonconforming material to assure it is not used?

Effective control shall be in place to provide accurate part number identification throughoutprocessing, storing, packaging, and shipping. There shall be no movement of rejected incomingmaterials in the production system until disposition by the appropriate personnel. Nonconformingproducts shall be separated from the stream of production, and effective control shall be in place

to prevent movement of such material until dispositioned.

1 = Procedures exist to stop the use of nonconforming material.Nonconformances are not quarantined.

3 = Procedures exist to stop the use of nonconforming material.Nonconformances are identified and segregated.Corrective action is taken when nonconformances are found.

5 = Includes #3 and: Accepted deviations are approved by the customer.Deviations effect form, fit and function.


Level 5 Objective Evidence Walk through the quarantine area and check for appropriatetags/markings. (How is shop notified of disposition? Is it

documented?).Nonconformances are identified, segregated, and stored in adesignated quarantine area. A documented procedure shouldsupport this.

5. To what degree does the supplier analyze nonconforming products returned by customers andtake appropriate action?

1 = Procedures exist for handling returned products.Data is fed back to the manufacturing system.

3 = Includes #1 and:Root cause/corrective action is always considered.Corrective Action is documented when implemented and tracked through closure.

5 = Includes #1, #3 and:Findings are always fed back to the customer.Supplier initiative/participation in proactive verification of product performance and end useby customer.



14/28


6. To what degree are handling, storage, and packaging adequate to preserve product quality?

The product, where appropriate, shall be protected against damage and contamination. Storageareas for incoming, in-process, and finished products shall be reviewed to determine if anyconditions exist which could affect product quality.

0 = There is no regard for handling and packaging. Parts could easily be damaged due to lack of regard.

2 = Parts are protected from damage in process.Stored parts are protected from deterioration.Parts are packaged to prevent damage and rust within the package.Packaging is adequate to survive transportation.Shelf lives (when applicable) are tracked.

3 = Includes #2 and:Supplier ownership in clearly defining and validating handling/storing of product as shippedand end use customer is evident


7. To what degree does the supplier have an effective training program?

The supplier shall establish and maintain procedures for identifying the training needs andprovide for the training of all personnel.

1 = The supplier has no procedures for identifying the training needs or providing for the trainingof personnel performing activities affecting quality.

3 = Job qualifications exist for job codes.Records identify qualified personnel.

5 = Includes #3 and:

The company pays for additional education for employees.Records identify qualified personnel.The company requires ongoing training and evidence supports only trained personnel areperforming work tasks.

A formal training plan exists, and records indicate the plan is followed.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Job qualifications exist and define how a new or transferredemployee is trained/qualified.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Records which identify qualified personnel exist and are

maintained.Special processes (i.e. welding, NDT, etc.) shall be definedincluding employee qualification procedure. Recordsidentifying qualified personnel shall be maintained.


15/28


16/28


10. To what degree are processes controlled to assure that parts conform to requirements?

0 = There is no evidence of process control.

1 = Routing sheets and other needed documents are available for jobs.

3 = Routing sheets and other needed documents are available for jobs.The status and identification of parts are clear.Work instructions are used.

5 = Includes #3 and:Routing sheets and other needed documents are available for jobs and are controlled.Measuring equipment is defined for each operation.Inspection frequencies are defined.Supplier understands process/product CTQs (critical to quality) and they are controlled andsupplier can provide process capability where required.

9 = Includes #3, #5 and:Routing sheets and other needed documents are available for jobs and are revisioncontrolled.SPC (x bar & R or pre-control) is used for CTQs and process capability is determinedknown.Obviously applying statistical techniques (i.e. embracing 6 sigma, etc.).


Level 5 Objective Evidence Objective evidence exists which defines how supplieridentifies/determines CTQs.

World Class Expert in process capability and control.

Note: Measuring equipment that needs definition are special non-standard tooling and measuring

equipment that is specialized or more accurate than standard measuring equipment used by supplier,i.e. dial bore gage vs. inside micrometers.


17/28


11. To what degree does the supplier review contracts to assure that requirements are understoodand can be met?

1 = Job routing is not performed.Needed materials are not defined.Supplier does not have copies of all specs or processes.Tooling is not defined.Needed measurement equipment is not defined.

3 = A process for reviewing customer documentation/requirements exists and is clearly followed.Job routing is completed before a job starts.Needed materials are defined.Tooling is defined before job starts.Needed measurement equipment is defined.

5 = End use of product is known and understood.Operating environment of product is understood and considered in the manufacture of theproduct.Through up front involvement in the design phase of the product with the customer, thesupplier clearly understands end use, reliability, productibility, environmental effects andincorporates into documentation review.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Quote files/job costing philosophy support up front definition of job routing/need materials/tooling, etc.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Clearly understands products end use and operatingenvironment.

Note: Tooling and measuring equipment that needs definition are special non-standard tooling and measuringequipment that is specialized or more accurate than standard measuring equipment used by supplier,

i.e. dial bore gage vs. inside micrometers.


18/28


12. To what degree does the supplier assure that the product is under strict revision controlusing the proper process?

1 = Procedures exist to control revisions, but are ineffective.Planning and drawing revisions are not in agreement.

3 = Procedures exist to control revisions.Planning and drawing revisions are in agreement.Procedures to remove obsolete documents exist, and evidence indicates they are followed.Customers are notified of significant process/design changes.

5 = Includes #3 and:Records are maintained to indicate changes and the date of the changes.Suppliers who design the product have procedures to assure that customers are notified ofdesign changes (where applicable).End product traceable to significant design/manufacturing changes.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Controls are in place to verify drawing revision on p.o. withdrawing revision on file.

An audit of files supports that revisions are current andobsolete documents are not present.

13. To what degree is corrective action taken to assure that the causes of nonconformances arefound and action is taken to prevent reoccurrence?

1 = Procedures exist for corrective action, but evidence indicates they are not followed.Planning is not always changed as a result of corrective action.

3 = Procedures exist for corrective action.Evidence indicates that Corrective Action is taken and documented

5 = Includes #3 and:Planning is changed as a result of corrective action.Evidence indicates that the corrective action is monitored for effectiveness andadditional action taken as required.Root cause analysis is fairly rigorous.

7= Includes #5 and:Root cause analysis is very rigorous.Once root causes are determined, all critical requirements are evaluated and statisticalcapability is reviewed.Supplier embraces problem solving and corrective action techniques, (i.e. 8-D).Nonconformances aggressively analyzed to identify quality trends (i.e. Periodic management

review of corrective actions for adequacy, resource allocation and determination if systemicproblems are present).



19/28


14. To what degree does the supplier monitor the costs of poor quality?

1 = There is no evidence that quality costs are monitored.The supplier claims to track quality costs, but no evidence exists to support the claim.

3 = Re-work and scrap costs are monitored.Yield rates by key processes are monitored or tracked by final test.

An analysis is performed to determine the biggest drivers of the costs.

5 = Includes #3 and:Prevention, appraisal, and internal/external costs are monitored and clearly understood.Plans exist for driving failure cost down and evidence indicates that they are effective.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Report of key drivers/processes exist.Reports/summaries are shared with the business in order totake the necessary action(s).

SUM OF QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 14 = 85 X 100 =TOTAL POINTS FORQUALITY SECTION




20/28


21/28


3. To what degree do the design personnel have experience in the associated commodity beingsupplied?

1 = Average commodity experience < 1 year.

3 = Average commodity experience = 3 years.

5 = Average commodity experience > 5 years.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Over half of engineering staff have engineering degrees.Individuals in key engineering positions have degrees (keydisciplines being mechanical, electrical, control hardware, andsoftware as appropriate).

Level 5 Objective Evidence Nearly all (90%+) engineers have a B.S. in engineering, and15%+ hold advanced degrees.

4. To what degree do the design personnel have experience in the business productdevelopment/requisitioning process? Represented are individuals who have participated inprogram engineering, design engineering, and systems modeling.

1 = No objective evidence is available.

3 = Some records are available.

5 = Organizational structure is built around these fundamentals.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Records are available which support that this level ofengineering to order has been completed before based onneed (a reaction vs. being built-in.)

Level 5 Objective Evidence Records are available which support that this level ofengineering to order is a matter of routine. Organizationcharts represent these engineering activities.


22/28


23/28


24/28


9. To what degree does the supplier have an engineering document control procedure?

1 = Not all changes are reviewed and/or captured by revision level.

3 = Changes are reviewed and always captured by revision level.

5 = A formal multi-functional change control process exists. Changes are always captured byrevision level. Critical to quality characteristics are clearly identified.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Supplier has a system and states they are compliant with ISO9001-1 but are not registered.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Supplier has a documented system. They are and ISO 9000-1registered company.

10. To what degree does the supplier perform prototype testing and evaluation?

1 = Test facilities are not available.

3 = Facilities and tests are subcontracted on an as-required basis with written test plans andqualification test data.

5 = The supplier has the facilities and the capability to perform prototype tests and evaluationand can provide written test plans and qualification test data.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Supplier can show at least two examples of test andqualification plans with resulting test data performed in the past

year.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Supplier can provide test and qualification plans with resultingtest data performed at their facilities in the past year.

11. To what degree is the supplier willing to provide design assistance?

1 = The supplier is only willing to make the part to print.

3 = The supplier is willing to take full design responsibility and work concurrently andcooperatively.

5 = The supplier is willing and capable to provide world-wide technical support and on-siteengineering assistance for extended periods.


Level 3 Objective Evidence Supplier can show design work they have completed with othercustomers.

Level 5 Objective Evidence Supplier can show technical service and support they haveprovided globally within the past three years.


25/28


12. To what degree is the engineering analysis process documented in design guides/manuals?

0 = There is no evidence of reference material being used in the design process.

3 = Only text books and previous design folders are used.

5 = The supplier has design guides, design folders, and a design review process with strongevidence of usage for engineering analytical design/verification.


SUM OF QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 12 = 60 X 100 =TOTAL POINTS FORENGINEERING SECTION




26/28


SECTION V - MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY

1. To what degree is modern control technology applied to manufacturing processes?

1 = The supplier has a control system which is inadequate for the industry they serve.

3 = The supplier has a typical control system for the industry they serve.

5 = The supplier has a special or advanced control system which makes them a leader in theindustry they serve.


2. To what degree is modern process measurement technology applied throughout manufacturingprocesses?

1 = The supplier has gaging and measuring equipment which is inadequate for the product beingmanufactured.

3 = The supplier has gaging and measuring equipment which are typical and adequate for theproduct being manufactured.

5 = The supplier has gaging, measuring equipment, and data collection systems which makesthem an industry leader for the product they manufacture.


3. To what degree is the manufacturing documentation complete, thorough, and utilized?

1 = Very little or no documentation exists. Revision control is inadequate.

3 = Appropriate level of methods, instructions, and product routing instructions exists andare controlled and used.

5 = All the information required by shop operators is on line, revision controlled, welldocumented, utilized, and traceable to product output. This information includes methodsinstructions, process flow diagrams, set-up procedures, tool lists, gaging instructions, etc.


5. To what degree does a formal manufacturing process development system/procedure exist?

1 = No formal development process exists. New designs are incorporated into existingmanufacturing processes.

3 = Some evidence of a structured approach toward developing new processes exists (i.e.sample production and prototype evaluation).

5 = Design of experiments is used to establish optimum process performance. Process yieldsare benchmarked against industry leaders.



27/28


6. To what degree is the philosophy of continuous improvement applied to manufacturingprocesses?

1 = There is no evidence of continuous improvement on established product lines.

3 = There is some evidence of an unstructured approach. Programs to achieve one time resultsare used. Capital investment is made to meet customer requirements as required.

5 = A structured approach towards continuous improvement exists. Supplier has a clearunderstanding of market growth and introduces new technology and processes in the market.


7. To what degree is new manufacturing technology research and evaluation conducted?

1 = No emphasis exists.

3 = Objective evidence resources are applied in this area but no formal responsibility existswithin the organization.

5 = A formal organization and/or responsibilities exist to search for, evaluate, and implementnew manufacturing technologies.


SUM OF QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 7 = 30 X 100 =TOTAL POINTS FORMANUFACTURINGTECHNOLOGY SECTION




28/28

SCORESHEET

TOTAL POINTS FORMANAGEMENT SECTION x .15 =

TOTAL POINTS FORRESPONSIVENESS SECTION x .15 =

TOTAL POINTS FORQUALITY SECTION x .40 =

TOTAL POINTS FORENGINEERING SECTION x .15 =

TOTAL POINTS FORMANUFACTURING x .15 =TECHNOLOGY SECTION

SUM =

TOTAL SUPPLIERSELECTION SCORE =

SUPPLIER NAME: ___________________________

VENDOR CODE: ___________________________

LOCATION: ___________________________

DATE: ___________________________

Supplier Selection Checksheet

Documents

Transcript of Supplier Selection Checksheet