TPC IROC Cooling measurements U.Frankenfeld(GSI), S.Popescu (CERN), H.R.Schmidt(GSI)
Summary of GSI Visit July 2013
description
Transcript of Summary of GSI Visit July 2013
1
Summary of GSI Visit July 2013Summary of GSI Visit July 2013
• Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC/SixTrack
• Analysis of Resonances in 4D: In particular non-linear normal Sextupole Coupling Resonance Qx + 2 Qy = n
• Intense Collaboration with Giuliano Franchetti
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
2
Benchmarking of MICROMAP Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC Iwith MAD-X/PTC I
• MAD-X Twiss: 2nd order terms included agrees with EXACT Hamiltonian up to this order; non-symplectic due to missing higher orders, SC with rescaling turn by turn
• PTC: approximate (kicks), exact or non-exact, always symplectic, very high orders included
• Sixtrack: always symplectic, non-exact, second order
• MICROMAP: always symplectic, non-exact, first order
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
3
Benchmarking of MICROMAP Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC IIwith MAD-X/PTC II
• Set-up of the PS an example with minimal set of elements, MAD-X clean-up via seqedit
• Conversion to MICROMAP more efficient now
• Perfect agreement of 4D parameters: tunes, TWISS and dispersion!
• Chromaticity off by 16% in horizontal plan due to lack of EXACT Hamiltonian
➔ SC comparison eagerly awaited!!!
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
4
Resonance CategorizationResonance Categorization
1. Fodo with single Sextupole unstable motion at ➔sextupole resonance, no islands
2. Stabilization via octupole islands➔
3. Sextupole (constant strength) distributed around a ring first order resonance compensated no ➔islands; detuning with amplitude; large scale chaos
4. Random Errors balances resonance and detuning ➔anything possible!
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 5
Resonances in Tune diagramResonances in Tune diagram
1D Resonance
2D coupled Resonance
Fixlines
2D crossing Resonances
2D Fixpoints
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 6
DA in 1DDA in 1D
Par
ticle
Los
s
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 7
1D close-up1D close-up
LOSSLOSS
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 8
2D Stable and Chaos2D Stable and Chaos
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 9
2D Fixpoints2D FixpointsVertical HorizontalHorizontal
Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 10
2D Fixlines2D Fixlines
Full Projection Cut in Phase Space
Stable
Chaos
11
Simple Toy PS Fodo with 1 Simple Toy PS Fodo with 1 Sextupole per FodoSextupole per Fodo
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
12Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Resonance Qx + 2Qy Large Island Resonance Qx + 2Qy Large Island TubeTube
13Frank Schmidt GSI visit
X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY
14Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Stroboscope Large Island Tube Stroboscope Large Island Tube
15Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Resonance Qx + 2Qy Small Island TubeResonance Qx + 2Qy Small Island Tube
16Frank Schmidt GSI visit
X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY
17Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Stroboscope Small Island TubeStroboscope Small Island Tube
18Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Resonance Qx + 2Qy on Fix-LineResonance Qx + 2Qy on Fix-Line
19Frank Schmidt GSI visit
X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY
20Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Stroboscope on Fix-LineStroboscope on Fix-Line
21
Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line
Standard Technique I Standard Technique I
• As in 1D the expectation is that particles are trapped in the island torus around the fix-line.
• To understand this mechanism in detail on has to determine the fixline.
• With this knowledge one can construct a normal plane to the fix-line which will allow to find the extent of the torus structure and the unstable fixlines.
• The motion in the plane can be interpreted as a secondary Poincaré section of motion! In fact, in this plane the motion around the fix-line resembles a 1D resonance.
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
22
Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line
Standard Technique I I Standard Technique I I
• First step is to put a particle somewhere into the island structure.
• The method works by restricting the motion in one plane to a wedge say with positive values and best in the linearly normalized phase space (I have called this stroboscoped motion above).
• The opening angle of the wedge is the free parameter in this technique.
• In the other plane one will then find a number of islands according to the nx * Qx + ny * Qy = n resonance.
• The analysis has to be restricted to one of these islands.
• The average of all 4 coordinates represents a good approximation of the stable fix-line.
• The technique is very time consuming since a sufficient amount of data has to be available in the restricted phase space: however with 2000 turns a good approximation of the fix-line could be found in 7 steps.
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
23Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Determine Fix-lineDetermine Fix-line
X-PxX-Px Y-PyY-Py
24
Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line
Using artificial Damping Using artificial Damping
• Experiments at LEP some 13 years ago have shown that in the presence of 4d stable fix-points the particle motions is damped to those fix-points rather than (0,0).
• The mechanism works because motion around the fix-point the particles increase there amplitude which can be seen as pseudo energy “gain”.
• Therefore, if the damping is not too strong the motion will zoom into the fix-point until the damping and the energy “gain” balances out.
• This should generally work in higher dimensions.
• One side-effect of this finding is that in presence of weak damping the resonance structure is preserved in all phase space!
• A fine-tuning of the damping as a function of the distance to the resonance and/or fix-line should improve the convergence of the technique.
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
25Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Lep: Damping at 4Lep: Damping at 4thth order order
26Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Damping in 1D in SimulationDamping in 1D in Simulation
27Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Damping in 2D in SimulationDamping in 2D in Simulation
28
Additional Tools Additional Tools
• Originally I had hoped that NormalForm would allow to determine detuning and resonance strength.
• Although true in principle, the trouble is that this technique is divergent in the vicinity of resonance structures. Therefore, despite the valuable information gained (direction of detuning and good prediction far from resonances) one could not determine the precise location of the resonance structures.
• Another tool is the harmonic analysis which decomposes the particle motion into a set of lines.
• Despite best efforts one could not yet determine the fix-lines with the help of this complete decomposion into lines. More effort will be invested.
• However, the island tune can be nicely determine as a set of side-bands.
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
29Frank Schmidt GSI visit
FFT Large Island TubeFFT Large Island Tube
30Frank Schmidt GSI visit
FFT Small Island TubeFFT Small Island Tube
31Frank Schmidt GSI visit
FFT on Fix-LineFFT on Fix-Line
32
Next Steps Next Steps
• The simulations will intensify both with MICROMAP and MAD-X-SC.
• We will have to define and revisit the Random Part of the multipole components newest value from ➔ Simone in collaboration with the magnet experts.
• MAD-X-SC is not yet under MPI but work has been started on that.
• The plan is to finish the analysis of the 2012 PS experiments by the end of the year 2013 and spring 2014 at the latest.
• The 2D resonance analysis will be brought to conclusion including 2D fix-points (2 separate resonance conditions full-filled: E.G. 3Qx and 4Qy) which is an additional challenge ➔publication in planning
Frank Schmidt GSI visit
33Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Fix-points motion 3Qx AND 4QyFix-points motion 3Qx AND 4Qy
34Frank Schmidt GSI visit
Fix-points motion 3Qx AND 4QyFix-points motion 3Qx AND 4Qy
X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY