Presented By:

Er. Rajendra Sapkota

Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C.

Er. Amit Ranjit

Er. Yogendra Chitrakar

Er. Lokendra Prasad Yadav

Presentation Outline

Introduction to Melamchi Water Supply project

- Er. Rajendra Sapkota

Introduction to topic, objective scope, methodology

– Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C

SWOT Analysis

– Er. Amit Ranjit

Findings

- Er. Yogendra Chitrakar

Conclusion and Recommendation

- Er. Lokendra P. Yadav

Introduction to Melamchi

Water Supply project

Er. Rajendra Sapkota

Waiting for water……

Melamchi River: source of MWSP

1. Introduction

MWSP – Much Debated Mega Project

Executing Agency- MoPPW, MWDB

Project duration – originally(July 2001 to 2006), now

extended to 2013

Estimated cost – US$ 464 million/ 317.3million in

2008

Funding: Donors & GoN

Source of water- stage I- Melamchi, Stage II& III-

Yangri & Larke(@170MLD)

1. Introduction contd…

Major component

Physical Infra structure Development

- MDS(approx. 40km), WTP, BDS, DNI

and Environmental Program

Institutional Reform

Project Implementation Support

Demand and Supply of water

S.N Time frame Demand

Supply

(corer liters)

Rainy Dry

1 2001 21.3 12 8

2 2005 28.5 12 8

3 2008 32.5 14+17 9+17

4 2015 39.7 31+17 26+17

5 2022 50 48+17 43+17

6 2027 55 65 60

7 2032 60 65 60

Source: MWSDB

d]nDrL vfg]kfgL ljsf;

;ldlt

d]=vf=lj=; sf=p=vf=Jo=jf]8{

d]nDrL vfg]kfgL

cfof]hgf

sf=p=vf=ln

d]nDrL pkTosf cjoj

+

kfgL k|zf]wg

s]Gb|, sf7df08f}+

vfg]kfgL dxz'n

lgwf{/0f cfof]u

cfof]hgf k'g{;+r/rgf, @))*

Source: MWSDB

Adjusted funding in 2008

Investme

nt

MWSP KUKL Total Remarks

GoN 73.90 16.70 90.60

ADB 103.80 33.20 137.0 Loan

JBIC 47.5 47.5 Loan

JICA 18.0 18.0 Grant

NDF 10.5 10.5 Loan

OPEC 13.7 13.70 Loan

Total 249.40 67.90 317.30

Source: MWSDB

Melamchi Project Layout

Intake Zone

Tunnel Outlet Zone: STUDY AREA

Distribution Zone

Water Treatment Plant

Source: MWSDB

1. Introduction contd..

MWSP

MWSP

SOCIAL

SOCIAL

SOCIAL

SOCIAL

We have all things although still delay in project ……??????

1. Project Area

Sundarijal VDC: Study Area

Any Question???

Thank You

Introduction to

topic, objective, scope, met

hodology

Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C

2. Introduction of the TopicSundarijal Adit

MWSP tunnel outlet

Location-Sundarijal ward no-7

About 14km north-east of Kathmandu Valley

Water Treatment Plant

Study AreaSundarijal Ward No-7

Major Caste- Tamang, Brahman-Chhetri,

Newar etc.

Major Occupation- Agriculture, Business,

service etc.

Satellite View of Sundarijal

Tunnel Outlet Site Office

Water Treatment

Plant areaStudy Area

Objective

To study the social impact due to blast on

tunnel construction

Other social issues due to project

activities

Scope of the study

Sundarijal ward no-7 (main affected area)

Mainly focus on impact due to blasting

Methodology

Secondary Data Collection

-Past Literature

Primary Data Collection

-Field Observation

-Questionnaire survey

Any Question???

Thank You

SWOT Analysis

Er. Amit Ranjit

3. SWOT Analysis• Effective way of examining Strengths and

Weaknesses, identifying the Opportunities and Threats.

• Complex Situations, limited time and resources

• provides a framework to identify critical issues

a

3. SWOT contd…..Strengths:

Satisfaction with the compensation

Improvement in the road

3. SWOT contd…..Strengths:

Improvement in the education and health infrastructure

Opportunity of employment

Environmental friendly project

Empowerment to local people

3. SWOT contd…..Weakness:

No clear guidelines to

distribute compensation

(damaged houses)

Long and formal

process for solution of any

problems.

High Intensity of sound

level

3. SWOT contd…..Weakness:

Poor solid waste management

Conventional method of tunnel boring

SUP not implemented till now

3. SWOT contd…..

Opportunities:

Expansion of market

Capacity development

Tourism development

3. SWOT contd…..Opportunities:

Increase value of land

Solution for crisis of drinking water for

Kathmandu valley

3. SWOT contd…..Threat:

Cost increase due to delay

Possibilities of disturbances

Increasing demand

3. SWOT contd…..Threat:

Possibility of mosquito breeding

Possibility of deterioration the fertility of the

agricultural land

Any Question???

Thank You

Findings

Er. Yogendra Chitrakar

4.Findings• Out come from the field social survey

• 6th December 2011, Sundarijal-7, questionnaire

• Social Impacts due to Tunnel Outlet Construction of

MWSP

• 20 households out of around 80 households from the

project area

• Inclusive Gender wise, Caste wise and Age wise

55%

45%

Genderwise

Male Female

45%

40%

15%

Agewise

15-29 30-59 >59

45%

45%

10%

Castwise

Brahman/Chhetri Tamang Newar

a. Familiarity with the Project

100 % of the people are aware of the running project

National Project

Inaugurated by the

Prime minister

b. Purpose of Construction

Familiar with the intention of tunnel construction and land

acquisition

c. Interaction about Project Major number of the local people has positively responded

Sundarijal development committee.

d. Effects due to Project Almost poured their grievances due to house cracks.

Landslides in the village, miscarriages of animals, damage to

the electrical appliances.

20

13

4

1

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Landslide Crack in House Miscarrage of cattles

Damage of Electrical

Appliances

No Impact

Cracks on the villagers' house due to blast during construction of Tunnel

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

%

e. Satisfaction by Compensation

More than half of the people were satisfied by the

compensation provided for land acquisition and displacement.

Few households were entertained by the compensation for the

crack house

40%

55%

5%

Satisfaction with the Compensation

Yes No N/A

f. Methodology of Demand

More than 50% of the people were aware of the methodology

of pouring their dissatisfaction.

Most of them go through the committee formed for that

purpose.

g. Social Upliftment Program (SUP) For project affected people to empower people, uplift the life

style, enhancing social structure

To achieve the sustainability of the project.

Most of the people was unaware of SUP.

15%

85%

Do you know about SUP ?Yes No

h. Benefits from the Project

Half of the people accepted the benefits from the access road

constructed for the Project.

Other benefits are increase in land value, employment, education

etc.

Road50%

Increase in land value17%

Employment17%

Education6%

Others10%

Benefits

i. Disadvantages due to the Project

Hamper directly to their private properties

Other disadvantages pollutions, increase in market

price, displacement and Chinese workers behaviours

Crack in house45%

Polution21%

Incease in Market Price

7%

Displaced3%

Others24%

Disadvantages

j. Commitment to the people

Almost of the people were not known to the commitment

before lunching the Project

They were aware of the access road and compensation only by

the project.

k .View toward the employee of the Project

Most of the People put their positive views towards the

employee

Only facing nuisance due to the fouls thrown by the Chinese.

l. Overall view to the Project

All the people wish for the successful implementation of the

project

Positive aspect for the Project especially in the outlet site of the

tunnel and Water treatment plant Zone.

Wished to be the part of the contributors in the Success of

Melamchi Water Supply Project ( National Project)

Sn Name Gender Age CastFamily

No.

Familiar

to the

Project

Any

discussion

about the

Project

Saticefaction

with the

Compansatio

n

Methodolo

gy of

demand

About

SUP

About

Comitment

before

implementati

on

Any

comment

about the

Employee

of the

Project

View

towards the

imlementati

on of the

Project

Impact due

to Project

Activities

Benefits Disadvantages

1 Harka Bdr. Tamang M 87

Taman

g 3 Y N N N N N N Y VN N

2 Bhola Ghimire M 55 Bahun 4 Y A NA A N N N Y V N Migaration

3

Chandra Bdr.

Tamang M 40

Taman

g 3 Y Y N N N N N Y V RoadN

4 Sumita Lama F 28

Taman

g 4 Y N N TC N N N Y V Road Lack of Compansation

5 Kanchha Tamang M 60

Taman

g 11 Y Y N Y N U N Y U Road U

6

Durga Devi

Tamang F 48

Taman

g 9 Y Y N TC N U Y Y V Road Lack of Compansation

7 Keshab Sapkota M 48 Bahun 4 Y N Y NY N U N Y V NA Exchange with money

8 Deepika Ghimire F 28 Bahun 5 Y N N TC N R N Y V NA NA

9 Pramila Ghimire F 23 Bahun 4 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Road Pollutions

10 Hari Maya Sapkota F 36 Bahun 5 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Road Exchange with money

11 Sita Simkhada F 27 Bahun 3 Y N Y TC N N N Y V Road

12 Saraswoti Tamang F 20

Taman

g 4 Y Y N A N N Y N V V Damaged Houses

13 Sudan Shrestha M 24 Newar 13 Y N Y TC N N N Y U Road Social Problems

14 Amir Simkhada M 18 Bahun 5 Y Y Y TC Y R N Y V Road Pollutions

15 Rajendra Tamang M 15

Taman

g 6 Y N Y A N N N Y V Road Damaged Houses

16 Kanchha Shrestha M 65 Newar 6 Y Y N N N N N Y V Road Damaged Houses

17 Nirmaya Tamang F 30

Taman

g 5 Y Y Y TC N N Y Y N Road NA

18 Rabindra Ghimire M 26 Bahun 15 Y N Y TC N N N Y V Road Pollutions

19 Sabbu Ghimire F 30 Bahun 4 Y N Y TC N R N Y V Road Income enhanced

20

Hari Bahadur

Tamang M 47

Taman

g 5 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Market Pollutions

Summary of Findings

Any Question???

Thank You

Conclusion and

Recommendation

Er. Lokendra Prasad Yadav

Conclusion Compensation must be given as soon as possible in order

to implement the project smoothly in future.

This project has increased the awareness and empowered

them.

Conclusion contd…

Most of the social issues are addressed in this project, it

was noticed that the people are satisfied.

During tunnel construction through blasting, cracks are

observed in houses of local people. As a result of which

they are terrified to live in their houses.

Recommendation

Clear guidelines must be made.

SUP program must be implemented as soon as possible.

In order to empower the local people, intensive awareness

program must be conducted.

Thank You

Any Question???