Studies of kinetics and flame chemistry of methyl-esters ... Annual Conf... · Studies of kinetics...
Transcript of Studies of kinetics and flame chemistry of methyl-esters ... Annual Conf... · Studies of kinetics...
Studies of kinetics and flame chemistry of methyl-esters and C0-C2 foundation fuels
Yiguang JuPrinceton University
Jeffery Santner, Michael Burke Pascal Dievart, Sanghee WonStephen Dooley, Fredrick L Dryer, Stephen Klippenstein
Collaborators:
Research Thrusts
•High pressure flame chemistry study for C0-C2 foundation
fuels
•Methyl-ester kinetic mechanism development
•A generic correlation between flame chemistry and transport
•Unsteady flow/chemistry interaction on low temperature
ignition
•Development of high pressure jet stirred reactor with
molecular beam mass spectrometry
1. High pressure flame chemistry study for C0-
C2 foundation fuels
High pressure flame experiments
4Few burning rate data are available at high pressure conditions
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pressure (atm)
Ma
ss
bu
rnin
g r
ate
(g
/cm
^2
s)
Present experiments
Li et al. (2007)
Davis et al. (2005)
Sun et al. (2007)
Konnov (2008)
O'Connaire et al. (2004)
Saxena & Williams (2006)
H2/O2/Ar, φ=2.5
Tf ~1600K
Burning velocity dependence on pressure, rich H2/O2
Experimental data and mechanism validation
6
Experimental data and mechanism validationH2, C1, C2 mixtures
• Model over-predicts flame burning rates for
CO, CH4, C2H4, C2H6M.P. Burke, F.L. Dryer, Y. Ju, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute (2010) in press.
J. Santner, M.P. Burke, F.L. Dryer, Y. Ju, in preparation.
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pressure (atm)
Ma
ss
bu
rnin
g r
ate
(g
cm
-2 s
-1)
USC-MECH II
H2/CH4/O2/He,
φ=0.7
Tf ~1600K
H2/CH4 = 100/0
H2/CH4 = 90/10
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pressure, atm
Ma
ss
bu
rnin
g r
ate
(g
cm
-2 s
-1)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
USC-MECH II
H2/add/O2/dil
φ=0.7
Tf ~1600K
H2/CO = 90/10
H2/C2H4 = 90/10
H2/C2H6 = 90/10
7
Effect of pressure on kinetics and model development
H+O2
OH+O (R1)
+Mhigher pressures and lower temperatures
lower pressures and higher temperatures
HO2 (R2)
OH+OHH2+O2
+H +OH
H2O+O2 O2+OH
+O
H2O2+O2
+HO2
H+HO2=OH+OH=H2+O2 OH+HO2=H2O+O2
• R1/R2 competition still controls pressure dependence• New branching and termination reactions becomes important
1. M.P. Burke, M. Chaos, Y. Ju, F.L. Dryer, S.J. Klippenstein, "Comprehensive H2/O2 Kinetic Model for High-Pressure Combustion," Int. J. Chem. Kinet. (2011).
8
A new hydrogen mechanismImprovements for C0-C2 flames
• Updated H2 model improves predictions of CO, CH4, C2H4, and C2H6 flames at high pressure
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pressure, atmM
as
s b
urn
ing
ra
te (
g c
m-2
s-1
)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
USC-MECH II
Updated H2 + USC-MECH II C1-C2
H2/add/O2/dil
φ=0.7
Tf ~1600K
H2/CO = 90/10
H2/C2H4 = 90/10
H2/C2H6 = 90/10
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pressure (atm)
Ma
ss
bu
rnin
g r
ate
(g
cm
-2 s
-1)
USC-MECH II
Updated H2 + USC-MECH II C1-C2
H2/CH4/O2/He,
φ=0.7
Tf ~1600K
H2/CH4 = 100/0
H2/CH4 = 90/10
CH4 C2H4/C2H6
2. Methyl-ester kinetic mechanism development
Research Methodology: A Bottom Up Approach for Biodiesel
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Methyl Formate Methyl Acetate Methyl Popanoate Methyl Butanoate
Methyl Decanoate
Similarity between Small/Large Esters?
Biodesel
+=
Methyl Butanoate(C4+1)
Alkane(C14)methyl stearate (C18+1)
Decomposition
0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.800.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CO
2
Fra
ctio
na
l Y
ield
1000/T [K-1]
1428K 1250K
1666K
MA
MB MP
2% Methyl Ester/Argon
1.5 atm, Yield at 1 ms
Reactivity of Methyl Ester Group:Ester pyrolysis : CO2 yield (Stanford University)
12
Fig. Branching ratio of Methyl Butanoate reactions with H atoms (a) and OH radicals (b), rate constant of the MBMJ
(CH3CH2CH2CO2CH2) radical β-scission reaction (c) and unimolecular methyl butanoate decomposition reaction to CH3O and
C3H7CO radical (d) in the models of Dooley et al. [7] (green), Hakka et al [29] (blue) and Fisher et al. [5] (black)
Branching ratio of Methyl Butanoate reactions with
H atoms (a) and OH radicals (b)
Bond Dissociation Energies (BDEs) (black: C–C bonds; gray, C–H bonds) calculated at 298.15 K for Methyl Decanoate (unit: kcal.mol-1)
Weakest bond
C1
H4
H5
C14 O12 C3
O13
H15
H17
H16
H11C2
H7
H8
C6
H9
H10
98.9
98.0
98.9
92.9
92.9
94.2
97.9
96.8
98.7
99.5
98.6
101.1
83.3
83.1
84.4
94.8
95.4
93.5
86.0
---
89.1
103.1
101.2
101.3
90.1
97.9
87.0
Methyl Butanoate
Bond Dissociation Energy of Methyl Esters
KEY: ExperimentMRSDCI//HF/cc-pVDZMRSDCI//B3LYP/6-311G(2d,p)CBS-QB3 of El-Nahas et al.
Carter et al. 2011 for MB
Seshadri et al. : 80.8 kcal/mol
14
Fig. Consumption pathways of methyl decanoate in a diffusion flame: differences between the present model, Seshadri et al. [14], and Luo et al. [20].
Consumption pathways of methyl decanoate in a diffusion flame
MD subset +C8-C10 linear
MB subset
C6-C7 linear
C0-C5
linear
C0-C7: n-heptane model Curran et al., 2008, 2010
MB: Ester functional groupDooley et al., 2008
MD subset
• Thermo: Benson’s group additivitymethod with updated group contributions
• Kinetics: direct analogy from MB for the methyl ester group atoms
Detailed model was reduced with Chem-RC (PFA, path flux analysis)
Mechanism development and validation
(C4, C10 Methyl esters)
MODEL VALIDATION (1)
The present model has been tested against ignition delays from Hanson’s group (Aerosol Shock Tube, very lean mixtures, highly diluted in argon, ~7.5 atm)
Present model in good agreement (35%), whereas literature models strongly overestimate MD oxidation rate (50 to 80%)
UFD Pressure Dependence can not entirely explained these discrepancies
EXTINCTION LIMITS
Present data are in close agreement with previous results of Seshadri et al.
Present model reproduces satisfactorily the experimental data
Seshadri et al.’s model strongly overestimates extinction limits
MB data, 500 K, Uddi et al.◆ MD data, 500 K▲ MD data, 468 K, Seshadri et al.
−−− MB computations, 500 K−−− MD computations, 500 K−−− MD computations, 468 K− − MD computations, 500K, Seshadri et al.
3. A generic correlation for diffusion flame extinction:
Extraction of kinetic information from global flame
properties
Diffusion flame extinction experiments:
ΔHcomb
(kcal/mol)MW
(g/mol)
MB -651.6 102.14
MD -1533.3 186.29
How to decouple chemistry from transport and
fuel heating value?
Methyl butanoate vs. methyl decanoate
i
fp
FF
F
e RTTC
QY
MMa *
)(/
1 ,
A generic correlation for extinction limit:Chemistry and Transport
Theory of counterflow flame extinction ( Won et al. 2011)
Transport Heat release/heat lossFuel chemistryRadical productionrate
32
, 3
2
,
1 2 1( , , ) ( , ) exp
fO aF F F O F F
E F f a f
TY TLe P Le Le L Le
Da e Y T T T T
Extinction Damkohler number
Extinction Strain Rate
21
Extinction limit vs. Transport-weighted enthalpy flux
MB and MD have the same high temperature kinetics!Dievart et al. 2011
Radical index and reactivity scaling of
Methyl butanoate (C4) vs. methyl decanoate (C10)
4. Low temperature flow/chemistry interaction in
unsteady counterflow flow flames
X [C7H16] = 0.1
X [He] = 0.9
X [O2 ] = 0.21
X [He] = 0.79
a = 20/100 s-1
vu
r
OxidizerFuel x
L = 2cm
Flame
Stagnation plane
p = 30 atm
2
2 exp sin 2
2
xPerturbation A f t
Unsteady counterflow diffusion flame ignition
IntroducingStrain
Φ = 1,
p = 30 atm
Impact of H2O2 addition on Low temperature ignition
a = 100 s-1
Tfuel = Toxidizer = 850 K
σ = 0.05/0.1/0.15/0.2 cm,
f = 15 ~ 2000 Hz
Impact of flow oscillation on ignition
5. Development of high pressure jet stirred reactor with
molecular beam mass spectrometry for low temperature
chemistry study
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Re
l. Io
n In
ten
sity
m/z
mass=4 He
mass=18 H2O
mass=32 O2
mass=34 H2O2
x 20
32 34
18
4
MBMS setup
JSR setup
Conclusions
• High pressure flame speeds are obtained for C0-C2 and a
validated high pressure hydrogen kinetic mechanism is
developed.
• An updated low temperature methyl decanoate mechanism
is developed.
• A generic correlation using radical index and transport
weighted enthalpy is obtained for diffusion flame extinction.
• Unsteady low temperature ignition is modeled and strong
flow chemistry coupling is demonstrated.
• A high pressure jet stirred reactor with molecular beam
mass spectrometry is developed.