Student Reassignment Committee Meeting - June 12,2012
-
Upload
nash-rocky-mount-public-schools -
Category
Education
-
view
704 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Student Reassignment Committee Meeting - June 12,2012
Student Reassignment Committee
Meeting Tuesday, June 12, 2012
6:00 p.m.
Scenario Review and Revision
District Reassignment Committee
Meeting
3
AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolTuesday, June 12, 2012 - 6:00 pm
Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward
Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller,
OREd Report to School Board 6/25/12 Questions?
Next Meeting Scenario Review and Revision (continued)
Monday, June 25, 20124:00 pm
Communications
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
5
TIME-LINE
Jan-Aug 2012
Committee Deliberations/
Monthly Reports to the School
Board
Aug - 2012Committee
Recommendations Presented to
the School Board
Aug – Dec 2012
Public Input/ Community Engagement
Board of Education Approval
August 2013Implementatio
n
6
PROCESS IS EVERYTHING
Board of Education
Community Feedback Committee
Committee Chairs
Public Engagement
Technical Support
OREDStaff
7
Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite
attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.
School Board Priorities
8
Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,
consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high
schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that
anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.
Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and
economic populations at each middle and high school.
School Board Priorities
9
IPSAC – TimelineFebruary 13 – Understanding the Optimization ProcessMarch 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision
(cont.)
June 25 – Final Scenario Presentation
TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings
Open to the publicWebsite
Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line
An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.
A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
11
Mike Miller, OREd
Scenario Review and Revision
Revisiting Optimal HS ScenarioScenario HS 02
Lessen reassignment impactConsider student balance metrics
Guidance from BoE on Middle School feedersConsider feeder patterns for 5 MS vs. 6 MSScenarios ready for June 25 meeting
IPSAC – Status
12
Factors to Consider:
Reassignment impactStudent balance metricsProvide relief for Southern Nash HSFill Rocky Mount HSProximitySystem-wide HS utilization = 100%
High School Scenario HS 02
13
Assignment Change Considerations:
Current assignmentBalance metricsContiguityTransportation issuesNatural/man-made barriersCapacity
Scenario Review – Methodology
14
High School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario HS 02 - Rev. 1 Data
(See data tables in handout.)
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 1232 1204 1130 1232
IMPACT + METRICS 1130 1233 1393 1042
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
9-12 Student Count
Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of special programs such as IB.
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 1.07130434782609 1.04695652173913 0.81294964028777 1.15355805243446
IMPACT + METRICS 0.982608695652174 1.07217391304348 1.0021582733813 0.975655430711611
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
Utilization
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.667207792207793 0.690199335548173 0.835398230088496 0.513798701298702
IMPACT + METRICS 0.656637168141593 0.589618815896188 0.870064608758076 0.526871401151631
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%85%95%
Minority %
Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of special programs such as IB.
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.666460829493088 0.651086556169429 0.71803867403315 0.64117389298893
IMPACT + METRICS 0.653429541595926 0.5733342154009 0.757041639415741 0.66889689578714
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash
CURRENT 0.597285067873303 0.614014933946008 0.530638029058749 0.631374453618262
IMPACT + METRICS 0.572347266881029 0.687109596819989 0.515570934256055 0.624854819976772
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%
Academic Proficiency %
High School Attendance ZonesCurrent/Scenario HS 02 - Rev. 1 Data
Maximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently 105%)
Minimum Utilization: 98%Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned:
745
CURRENT HIGH SCHOOLHIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1
Scenario Review – High Schools
Middle Schools: Exploring Feeder Patterns(Based on Scenario HS 02 – Rev. 1)
High School
Middle School
6-8 coun
t
MS capacit
yUtilization
Northern Red Oak 885 850 104% (currently 113%)
Central Central 907 670 135% (currently 90%)
Rocky Mount
Parker, Edwards, NEW *
1066 2134 50% (currently 54%) *
Southern Southern 946 850 111% (currently 127%)
* RM MS calculations include current RMHS facility, capacity = 750
Summary
Optimal High Scenario HS 02Lessen reassignment impactConsider student balance metrics
Scenario HS 02 - Revision 1Scenario data + mapTotal Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 745
Middle Schools: Clean FeedersSevere utilization imbalance between Central
MS and Rocky Mount area MS
21
Action Items:
July, August Meeting DatesExplore Middle School Feeder Options
22
February 13 – (4:00-5:30)*
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
May 29 (6:00)
June 12 (6:00)
Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)*
July/August - TBD
MEETING SCHEDULE
QUESTIONS