Avida “Reassignment of instruction sets using digital evolution.”
Reassignment committee meeting July 17
-
Upload
nash-rocky-mount-public-schools -
Category
Education
-
view
851 -
download
1
Transcript of Reassignment committee meeting July 17
Student Reassignment Committee
Meeting Tuesday, July 17, 2012
6:00 p.m.
Scenario Review & Revisions (cont.)
District Reassignment Committee
Meeting
3
AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolTuesday, July 17, 2012, 6:00 pm
Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward
Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant
Approval of Minutes from the June 25, 2012 Meeting (suspend until next meeting)
Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller,
OREd Report to School Board - August 2012 Questions?
Next Meeting Scenario Discussion
TBD
Communications
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
5
TIME-LINE
Jan-Aug 2012
Committee Deliberations/
Monthly Reports to the School
Board
Aug - 2012Committee
Recommendations Presented to
the School Board
Aug – Dec 2012
Public Input/ Community Engagement
Board of Education Approval
August 2013Implementatio
n
6
PROCESS IS EVERYTHING
Board of Education
Community Feedback Committee
Committee Chairs
Public Engagement
Technical Support
OREDStaff
7
Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite
attendance areas.
Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified
“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.
Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest
school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.
School Board Priorities
8
Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,
consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.
Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high
schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.
Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that
anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.
Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and
economic populations at each middle and high school.
School Board Priorities
9
IPSAC – Timeline
February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process
March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data
April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision
May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
June 25 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
July 17 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)
TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings
Open to the publicWebsite
Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line
An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.
A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
11
Mike Miller, OREd
Scenario Review & Revision (cont.)
Middle School ScenariosGeneral Committee requests:
Utilization, No feeder – MS 02, Rev. 13 middle schools in Rocky Mount – MS 05, Rev.1
Committee member requests:MS 04, Rev. 2
Elementary School ScenarioMinor adjustments to current zonesRelief for Benvenue (currently at 111%)
IPSAC – Status
12
Committee Member RequestsScenario Revision Tools sent June 27
Planning segment mapPlanning segment data tableDocumentation
IPSAC – Status
13
Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 02, Rev. 1/MS 05, Rev. 1 Data
(See data tables in handout.)
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)
703 653 282 808 847 511
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1) 488 625 353 888 932 518
100
300
500
700
900
1100
6-8 Student Count
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.881499395405079
0.944776119402985
0.77737881508079
1.07058823529412
1.29294117647059
0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)
0.937333333333333
0.974626865671642
0.506283662477558
0.950588235294118
0.996470588235294
0.681333333333333
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)
0.650666666666667
0.932835820895523
0.633752244165171
1.04470588235294
1.09647058823529
0.690666666666667
10%
50%
90%
130%
Utilization
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.781893004115226
0.669826224328595
0.877598152424942
0.585714285714285
0.51410373066424
0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)
0.655761024182077
0.47166921898928
0.96 0.570544554455446
0.563164108618654
0.96469104665826
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)
0.708418891170431
0.49520766773163
0.980169971671388
0.563758389261745
0.53755364806867
0.91015625
10%
50%
90%
Minority %
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.728409448818898
0.679363699582754
0.7765 0.581846153846154
0.64117389298893
0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)
0.658779781068899
0.505267094017094
0.87 0.586387096774194
0.685794532892761
0.870818815331011
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)
0.661940850277265
0.544407753050969
0.910032175032175
0.5733342154009 0.66889689578714
0.817447869446963
5%
35%
65%
95%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash NEW MS (RM HS site)
CURRENT 0.511127063890883
0.541571319603356
0.551357733175915
0.685584562996595
0.631374453618262
0
PROX + UTIL (MS 02, Rev. 1)
0.553660270078181
0.71123417721519
0.44 0.680661577608143
0.610831234256927
0.440622972096042
3 MS IN RM (MS 05, Rev. 1)
0.517730496453901
0.676159479251424
0.421965317919075
0.687109596819989
0.624854819976772
0.486238532110092
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%
Academic Proficiency %
Middle School Attendance ZonesCurrent/MS 02, Rev. 1/MS 05, Rev. 1 DataMaximum Utilization: 110% (SNMS, MS 05 Rev.1, currently
129%)
Minimum Utilization: 51% (Parker, MS 02 Rev.1, currently 78%)
MS 02, Rev. 1: NCMS to 3 high schools, Edwards and NEW to 2 high schools
MS 05, Rev. 1: All clean feeder to high schools except Edwards split to NCHS and RMHS
Total Grade 6-8 students reassignedMS 02, Rev. 1: 1334MS 05, Rev. 1: 1276
CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 02, REV. 1
Scenario Review – Middle Schools
CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOLMIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 05, REV. 1
Scenario Review – Middle Schools
Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 02
(See data tables in handout.)
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CUR-RENT
620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081
Sce-nario ES 02
620 372 688 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 581 550 437 1107
100
300
500
700
900
1100
K-5 Student Count
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.933734939759036
0.798594847775176
1.11227544910
18
0.991031390134529
1.03826955074
875
0.826086956521739
0.9609375
0.813397129186603
1.03958944281
525
0.897106109324759
0.719753086419753
1.01476014760
148
0.752151462994837
0.954104148278906
Sce-nario ES 02
0.933734939759036
0.871194379391101
1.02994011976
048
0.991031390134529
1.03826955074
875
0.826086956521739
0.9609375
0.813397129186603
1.03958944281
525
0.897106109324759
0.717283950617284
1.01476014760
148
0.752151462994837
0.977052074139453
10%
50%
90%
Utilization
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.65483870967
742
0.982404692082112
0.737550471063257
0.520361990950226
0.307692307692308
0.995789473684211
0.780487804878049
0.588235294117647
0.493653032440056
0.989247311827957
0.437392795883362
0.514545454545455
0.965675057208238
0.640148011100833
Sce-nario ES 02
0.65483870967
742
0.967741935483872
0.739705882352941
0.520361990950226
0.307692307692308
0.995789473684211
0.780487804878049
0.588235294117647
0.493653032440056
0.989247311827957
0.432937181663837
0.514545454545455
0.965675057208238
0.643179765130985
10%
50%
90%
Minority %
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coop-ers
Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.709450714823175
0.936566265060241
0.684589625738674
0.728067729083666
0.467428797468355
0.909124378109453
0.703311320754717
0.702206266318538
0.520635430038511
0.907741433021807
0.456706210746685
0.650129659643437
0.922113163972286
0.593824966681475
Sce-nario ES 02
0.709450714823175
0.921265474552957
0.684186725018235
0.728067729083666
0.467428797468355
0.909124378109453
0.703311320754717
0.702206266318538
0.520635430038511
0.907741433021807
0.457730103806228
0.650129659643437
0.922113163972286
0.595562714776632
5%
35%
65%
95%
Free/Reduced Lunch %
Bailey Baskerville
Benv-enue
Cedar Grove
Coopers Johnson MB Hub-bard
Middle-sex
Nash-ville
Pope Red Oak/Swift Creek
Spring Hope
Willi-ford
Win-stead/Engle-wood
CURRENT
0.618270799347472
0.450657894736842
0.629283489096573
0.731707317073171
0.729636048526863
0.377232142857143
0.575692963752665
0.61307901907
357
0.705801104972376
0.348122866894198
0.721815519765739
0.601973684210527
0.348448687350836
0.606741573033708
Sce-nario ES 02
0.618270799347472
0.453172205438066
0.635578583765112
0.731707317073171
0.729636048526863
0.377232142857143
0.575692963752665
0.61307901907
357
0.705801104972376
0.348122866894198
0.722383720930232
0.601973684210527
0.348448687350836
0.606930693069307
5%15%25%35%45%55%65%75%
Academic Proficiency %
Impacting six elementary schools: Benvenue, Baskerville, Red Oak/Swift Creek, and Winstead/Englewood
Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 71Benvenue utilization: 103% (currently 111%)
Elementary School Attendance ZonesCurrent/ES 02
CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 02
Scenario Review – Elementary Schools
Summary
Middle School ScenariosCommittee requests
Better utilization balance3 middle schools in Rocky MountMember request MS 04, Rev. 2
Elementary School ScenarioScenario ES 02
25
26
Proximity + Utilization
Optimal Scenarios
Review/ Revise
Review/ Revise
Optimal Scenarios
Review/ Revise
Review/ Revise
Impact + Feeder
YOU ARE HERE!!!
Committee Action Items
Further scenarios?Deadline for Committee member requests: July 24, 2012
How many options to present?“Packaging” the recommended scenarios?
27
Reminder: High-resolution review must be performed by NRMPS Transportation Dept.
February 13 (4:00-5:30)
March 26 (6:00)
April 30 (6:00)
May 29 (6:00)
June 12 (6:00)
Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)
Tuesday July 17 (6:00)
August - TBD
MEETING SCHEDULE
QUESTIONS