Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment Stress ...10.1038... · Supplementary Information...
Transcript of Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment Stress ...10.1038... · Supplementary Information...
Supplementary Information
Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment
switch in soft responsive hydrogels
Rajat K. Das, #*1
Veronika Gocheva,#2,3
Roel Hammink1, Omar F. Zouani,
*2,3 Alan E.
Rowan*1
1 Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ
Nijmegen - The Netherlands.
2 Histide. Chaltenbodenstrasse 8, 8834 Schindellegi - Switzerland.
3 Histide Lab. Accinov, 317, avenue Jean Jaurès, 69007 Lyon - France.
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] or [email protected]
# These authors contributed equally to this work.
Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitmentswitch in soft responsive hydrogels
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONDOI: 10.1038/NMAT4483
NATURE MATERIALS | www.nature.com/naturematerials 1
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 1. (a)-(f) Representative AFM images of dilute (1 µg / mL) chloroform
solution of polymers P1-P6, respectively, drop cast on freshly cleaved mica. Scale bar: 500 nm
for (a)-(e) and 1 µm for (f).
a b c
d e f
P1 P2 P3
P4 P5 P6
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 2. (a)-(f) Histograms showing the length distribution of single polymer
chains in individual polymers (P1-P6), as obtained by observing at least 150 single polymer
chains in AFM for dilute (1 µg / mL) chloroform solution of the polymers, drop cast on freshly
cleaved mica. These data were used to obtain the mean polymer length for the polymers.
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 3. (a) The non-linear rheology data of polymer gels P1-P6 in alpha-
MEM at 2 mg/ mL. The differential modulus Kʹ, scaled with storage modulus Go, plotted as a
function of applied stress σ. The experiments were repeated in triplicate and the mean plots are
shown. (b) Overlay of the plots of differential modulus Kʹ as a function of applied stress σ, for
the gels of shortest (P1) and the longest (P6) polymer. σC denotes the critical stress for the onset
of stress-stiffening.
ba
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 4. Confocal microscopy 400µm Z-stack side views (X,Z projections)
images showing the top, middle and bottom distribution of gel-encapsulated hMSCs (after 96 h
of culture) stained with calcein-AM. Scale bar: 200µm.
top
bottom
Side view
x
z
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 5. Representative micrographs showing cross-sections of hMSCs (DAPI
staining) 36 h after encapsulation into 3D soft hydrogel. On the right, hMSCs are shown in
Bright-field, DAPI, F-actin and Vinculin stainings. Left scale bar: 50 µm and right scale bar: 10
µm.
50 m
BF
D
AP
I F
-Actin
V
inculin
10 m
36h
DAPI
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 6. Total DNA content for short and long polymers (P1, P3, P4 and P6)
after 48 h and 96 h of cell culture as determined by the PicoGreen assay. A non-functionalized
hydrogel served as a control. Error bars, s.e.m. (n ≥ 3). NS. not significant (P > 0.05), Student’s
t-test.
N.S
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
DN
A c
on
ten
t (n
g)
48h
96h
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 7. Mean percentages of hMSC osteogenesis (a) and adipogenesis (b) in
different hydrogel materials from polymers P1-P6 after 96 h of culture in bipotential medium. A
non-functionalized hydrogel (cell culture in growth medium) served as a control. Error bars,
s.e.m. (n ≥ 3). NS. not significant (P > 0.05), *P < 0.05; Student’s t-test.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Os
teo
ge
ne
sis
(%
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Ad
ipo
ge
ne
sis
(%
)
a b
*
N.S
N.S N.S
N.S
*
Co
ntr
ol
Co
ntr
ol
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 8. (a) Immunofluorescent staining for OPN (red), actin (green), and
nucleus (blue) in hMSCs encapsulated in different hydrogel materials from polymers P1-P6 after
3 weeks of culture in bipotential medium. Scale bar: 100 µm. (b) Total cellular
immunofluorescence intensity of osteopontin quantified for hMSCs cultured for 3 weeks in
different matrices. (c) Triglyceride detection on hMSCs after 3 weeks on cell culture. A non-
functionalized hydrogel (cell culture in growth medium) served as a control for all the
experiments. Error bars, s.e.m. (n ≥ 3). NS. not significant (P > 0.05), *P < 0.05; Student’s t-test.
a
b
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Control
100 m
N.S
N.S
*
0
5
10
15
20
25
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Tri
gly
ceri
de D
ete
cti
on
(M
) 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Con
tro
l
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
Rela
tive I
nte
ns
ity
OPN
c
*
N.S
N.S
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 9. hMSCs commitment studies after 96 h of culture in different polymer
gels in the presence of integrin antibodies α1, 2, 3, 5 and β1, 2. (a) The quantitative PCR analysis
for RUNX2. No significant differences were observed between the highest critical stress matrix
(P6) and the lower critical stress matrices. (b) Total cellular immunofluorescence area of neutral
lipid accumulation in hMSCs. For all the experiments, a non-functionalized hydrogel (cell
culture in growth medium) served as the control (*P < 0.01).
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Re
lati
ve
mR
NA
le
ve
l
RUNX2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Re
lati
ve
Are
a
LIP
a
N.S N.S
N.S
*
b
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 10. Mean percentages of hMSC osteogenesis (a) and adipogenesis (b) in
different polymer gels in the presence of integrin antobodies α1, 2, 3, 5 and β1, 2. A non-
functionalized hydrogel (cell culture in growth medium) served as the control. Error bars, s.e.m.
(n ≥ 3). NS. not significant (P > 0.05), *P < 0.01; Student’s t-test.
a b
N.S
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Con
tro
l
P1
P3
P4
P6
Os
teo
ge
ne
sis
(%
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Ad
ipo
ge
ne
sis
(%
)
N.S *
N.S
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 11. The amount of STRO-1 present in the hMSCs is expressed as
average fluorescent density, normalized with the number of cells. Compared to control (non-
functionalized hydrogel), STRO-1 activity is present on matrices (+ blebbistatin), indicating that
the hMSCs have kept “stemness” after 96 h of culture in bipotential medium.
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Re
lati
ve
ST
RO
-1 I
nte
ns
ity
N.S
+ Blebbistatin
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 12. hMSCs commitment studies after 96 h of culture in different
polymer gels in the presence of soluble RGD ligands. (a) Quantitative PCR analysis for RUNX2.
No significant increase in RUNX2 gene expression was observed for all the matrices and no
significant differences could be detected between the higher critical stress matrices (P4 and P6)
and the lower critical stress matrices (P1 and P3) in the presence of soluble RGD. (b) Total
cellular immunofluorescence area of neutral lipid accumulation quantified for hMSC cultured for
96 h in different matrices. No significant increase in lipid accumulation was observed for all the
matrices and no significant differences could be detected between the different polymers. For all
the experiments, a non-functionalized soft polymer gel (cell culture in growth medium) served as
a control. NS. not significant (P > 0.05). Student’s t-test.
a b
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Re
lati
ve
Are
a
LIP
N.S
0
0,4
0,8
1,2
1,6
2
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Re
lati
ve
mR
NA
le
ve
l
RUNX2
N.S
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 13. Mean percentages of hMSC osteogenesis (a) and adipogenesis (b)
for different polymer gels (P1, P3, P4 and P6) in the presence of soluble RGD ligands. A non-
functionalized hydrogel served as a control. Error bars, s.e.m. (n ≥ 3). NS. not significant (P >
0.05), Student’s t-test.
a b
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Os
teo
ge
ne
sis
(%
)
N.S
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P3
P4
P6
Ad
ipo
ge
ne
sis
(%
) N.S
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 14. Commitment of hMSCs at different ligand densities (7 nm, 28 nm
and 70 nm) in polymer gels of lowest and highest critical stress (P1 and P6, respectively). (a)
The quantitative PCR analysis for RUNX2, and (b) Total cellular immunofluorescence area of
neutral lipid accumulation quantified for hMSC cultured for 96 h in bipotential medium. For all
the experiments, a non-functionalized soft polymer gel (cell culture in growth medium) served as
the control (*P < 0.005).
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
7nm 28nm 70nm
Re
lati
ve
mR
NA
le
vel
RUNX2
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
7nm 28nm 70nm
Re
lati
ve
Are
a
LIP
P1
P6
a b
* * * * * *
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 15. Immunofluorescent staining for MyoD, Tubulin β3 and Osterix in
hMSCs encapsulated in different hydrogel materials from polymers P1-P6 in presence of (a)
Cytochalasin D and (b) Taxol (inhibitor of actin and inductor of microtubule cytoskeleton
polymerization, respectively) after 96 h of culture in bipotential medium. Control condition
consists of naïve hMSCs encapsulated in non-functionalized soft hydrogel and cultured in
growth medium.
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
Contr
ol
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6 R
ela
tiv
e I
nte
ns
ity
/Are
a
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
Contr
ol
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6 R
ela
tiv
e I
nte
ns
ity
/Are
a
LIP
Tubulin 3
MyoD
Osterix
+ Cytochalasin D + Taxol
a b
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 16. Calcein-AM live-dead viability test (live cells fluoresce green) at
different time points (48 h and 96 h) for hMSCs treated with Taxol and encapsulated in polymer
gel P3 in growth medium. Scale bar: 20 µm.
48h 96h
Taxol
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 17. Representative bright-field images (Oil red O staining) of hMSCs
encapsulated in different gels from polymers P1-P6 after 96 h of culture in bipotential
(osteogenic/adipogenic) medium. Scale bar: 10 µm.
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 18. (a) Western blot showing RUNX2 protein expression for hMSCs
cultured on plastic for 24 h and 96 h. (b) Relative protein expression intensity for RUNX2 and
DCAMKL1 in different polymer gels (P1-P6) quantified from the Western blot presented in
Main Fig. 4a and showing a switch-like relationship between the two proteins.
a b
0
50
100
150
0 2 4 8
Pro
tein
qu
an
tity
(a
.u.)
RUNX2
DCAMKL1
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6
RUNX2 - 57
- 42
24h 96h kDa
-actin
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 19. (a) shRNA mediated DCAMKL1 silencing was induced, as shown
by western blot for hMSCs cultured on plastic for 24h. (b) Overexpression of DCAMKL1 was
enabled by transient transfection with a plasmid subcloned with the DCAMKL1 gene, as shown
by western blot for hMSCs cultured on plastic for 72h. (c) Non transfected cells or cells at 48 h
post-transfection (mock plasmid, shRNA or DCAMKL1) were incorporated into RGD-bound
hydrogels (P1 or P6) for 96h. Relative RUNX2 mRNA levels were then measured by using RT-
PCR. Non-transfected cells incorporated into non-functionalized hydrogels served as a control.
*P < 0.001; ** represents the comparison between RGD-Polymers and +DCAMKL1 for the P6
hydrogel and P < 0.05 ; Student’s t-test.
b c a
- 82
- 42
kDa
-actin DCAMKL1 - 82
- 42
kDa
Sh-DCAMKL1
- +
actin
DCAMKL1
+ DCAMKL1
- +
+
*
*
* *
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
P1 P6
Re
lati
ve
mR
NA
lev
el
RUNX2
Control
RGD-Polymer
RGD-Polymer Mock
RGD-Polymer
sh-DCAMKL1
RGD-Polymer
DCAMKL1
-
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 20. hMSCs commitment studies after 9 h of culture in different polymer
gels by Quantitative PCR analysis for RUNX2. No significant increase in RUNX2 gene
expression was observed for all the matrices and no significant differences could be detected
between the higher critical stress matrix (P6) and the lower critical stress matrix (P1). NS. not
significant (P > 0.05). Student’s t-test.
0
1
Co
ntr
ol
P1
P6
Re
lati
ve
mR
NA
lev
el
RUNX2
N.S
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 21. Representative time sweep rheology experiments after incubating
the cold polymer solution at 37 oC at an applied strain of 1% at a frequency of 1 Hz.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
1
10
100
1000
Sto
rag
e (
G')
an
d L
oss (
G'')
mo
du
lus (
Pa)
Time (s)
P1
P4
G'
G''
Kinetic experiment @ 37 oC
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Figure 22. Live-dead viability test at different time points, for hMSCs
encapsulated in control polymer gels (non-functionalized) in growth medium by (a) calcein-AM
(live cells fluoresce green), and by (b) MTT assay. Scale bar: 20 µm.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pla
stic
4
14
21
MT
T (
% c
on
tro
l)
Time (days)
a b
4d 14d 21d
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Supplementary Table 1. Nucleotide sequences of primers used for quantitative RT-PCR
detection.
Gene Primer Sequences
Runx2 5'-GACGTGCCCAGGCGTATTTC-3'(Forward)
5'-AAGTCTGGGGTCCGTCAAGG-3'(Reverse)
PPAR 5'-GGCTTCATGACAAGGGAGTTTC-3‘'(Forward)
5'-AACTCAAACTTGGGCTCCATAAAG-3‘ (Reverse)
GAPDH 5'-GCAGTACAGCCCCAAAATGG-3'(Forward)
5'-ACAAAGTCCGGCCTGTATCCAA-3'(Reverse)
© 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved