Steering the Course
description
Transcript of Steering the Course
![Page 1: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Steering the Course
Chapter 10: Launching the New Ship of State1789-1800
![Page 2: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Major Issues Faced by the New Federal Government
•representing “We the People”• managing the national government’s money
• managing “We the People”• foreign affairs• political parties• states’ rights
![Page 3: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Representing “We the People”
![Page 4: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Representing “We the People”
George Washington was unanimously
elected by the Electoral College.
![Page 5: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Representing “We the People”
Washington selected the first Presidential “cabinet” (group of advisors):
• Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson
• Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton
• Secretary of War Henry Knox
![Page 6: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Jefferson
Hamilton
Knox
The First Presidential Cabinet
![Page 7: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Representing “We the People”
• The First Congress immediately set to work and passed the Bill of Rights (first ten amendments to the Constitution) which established guarantees of individual rights, protection from arbitrary acts of
government, and established the concept of states’ rights.
![Page 8: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Representing “We the People”
• Congress also passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 which created the Supreme Court,
lower courts and office of Attorney General.
Art Credit: “The Honourable Sir Joseph Walton,” Vanity Fair Print (Spy Cartoons), 1909 http://www.antiquemapsandprints.com/SCANSD/D-1957.JPG
![Page 9: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
![Page 10: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton established the following fiscal policy:
• the national government assumed (took over) debts owed by the States
• government bonds would be paid at full value
**This resulted in the creation of a large national debt.**
![Page 11: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
Hamilton believed that debt was an asset
– that creditors have a “personal stake” in the success of the debtor.
![Page 12: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
The government raised money through
• customs duties derived from tariffs
• excise taxes (taxes on domestic goods)
![Page 13: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
Hamilton felt it was appropriate for Congress to establish a national bank
(the Bank of the United States).
Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the Constitution states that government may do whatever is “necessary
and proper” to carry out its expressed powers.
![Page 14: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Managing the National Government’s Money
Hamilton’s view was that if the government could coin money and collect taxes, it would be “necessary and proper” for the national government to create a
bank.Thomas Jefferson and the States
passionately disagreed!
The future of the national bank will be “shaky.”
![Page 15: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Managing “We the People”
![Page 16: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Managing “We the People”•Taxation did not agree
with “we the people.”
•Backwoods farmers in Pennsylvania refused to pay their whiskey excise
taxes and “tarred and feathered” revenue
officers who attempted to collect the taxes.
![Page 17: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Managing “We the People”
Uncertain of who would respond, Washington summoned the state militias. The force that showed up “dispersed” the “rebellion.” So many showed up
that it has been said that Washington “used a sledgehammer to crush a gnat.”
![Page 18: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Managing “We the People”
The significance of the “Whiskey Rebellion” is that • State militias will answer a national call, and
• a new respect is established for the power of the national government.
![Page 19: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Political Parties
![Page 20: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Political PartiesThe “two-party” history in this country has roots in the
Revolutionary era “Whigs” and “Tories.”
This system evolved during the ratification of the Constitution with the “Federalists” and
the “Anti-Federalists.”
A personal feud between Hamilton and Jefferson further evolved into two political camps, the
“Federalists” and the “Jeffersonians.”
![Page 21: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Political Parties•Though “third” parties often form, they usually have
a single issue focus and are short lived.
•The party system gives the “common man” a voice in government and allows people to feel comfortable
voicing their opinions.
•Competition ensures sound democracy.
![Page 22: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
![Page 23: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
The French Revolution, which began as Washington was taking office, erupt into a “continent-wide” war.
President Washington issued a declaration of neutrality (the Neutrality Proclamation of 1793) and
warned Americans to be impartial. He feared that the economy of the U.S. was too fragile to participate in a
foreign war.
![Page 24: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
Though damaging to foreign relations between the U.S. and France, neutrality conveniently aided
American merchants as neutral nations are allowed to trade with “both sides.”
Washington’s farewell address after his 2nd term advised the avoidance of “permanent alliances.” Washington encouraged isolationism – keeping to
ourselves and avoiding foreign entanglements.
![Page 25: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
Britain continued to defy the Treaty of Paris of 1783. They maintained forts in surrendered territory, traded arms to natives and began to seize American merchant
ships and impress sailors into British naval service.
![Page 26: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
• Federalists felt that war would harm the fragile financial system, but Jeffersonians clamored
for war.
•Chief Justice John Jay was sent to England to negotiate.
![Page 27: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
England consented to pay damages on seized merchant ships but demanded that the U.S. pay pre-
Revolutionary war debts.• Jay’s Treaty was seen as an
“alliance” with Britain.• Jay was branded a “traitor” by
Jeffersonians and executed in effigy.
![Page 28: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
The French were offended at this “alliance” and also began seizing American ships.
After John Adams was elected President in 1796, he sent a commission to France to
smooth things over.
![Page 29: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Foreign Affairs
The commission was approached by French agents “X,” “Y” and “Z” who demanded $250,000 to set up a meeting with the French foreign minister. They also
demanded the promise of loans to France.
The commission returned home in indignation (unhappy).
![Page 30: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
State’s Rights
![Page 31: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
States’ Rights
•The election of 1796 resulted in the narrow margin election of Federalist John Adams as President
and Anti-Federalist Thomas Jefferson as Vice President. Congress was controlled by the
Federalists.
•The Federalists were seen as the “rich people’s” party, while the Jeffersonians were seen as the party
for the “common man.”
![Page 32: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
States’ Rights
New immigrants to the U.S. were more attracted to the Jeffersonian Party. The Federalists feared the rapid
growth of that Party and losing control in government.
![Page 33: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
States’ Rights
The Federalist controlled Congress passed a series of “Alien Acts,” one of which raised residency
requirements for citizenship from 5 years to 14 years. This would delay the addition of immigrants to the
Jeffersonian party.
![Page 34: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
States’ Rights
The Sedition Act of 1798 restricted free speech and free press – in
direct contradiction to the Constitution – and was used to
silence outspoken Jeffersonians.
This law was conveniently written to expire in 1801 just in case the Federalists lost power in the election of
1800.
![Page 35: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
States’ Rights
The States of Virginia and Kentucky each passed resolutions stating that they would not follow the
Alien and Sedition Acts on the grounds that they were unconstitutional.
These actions asserted the States’ rights to nullify (make void) national legislation when the States felt
that the government had exceeded its authority.
![Page 36: Steering the Course](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816449550346895dd61075/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
States’ Rights
The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions marked the beginning of a series of very heated debates regarding
the power of the national government versus the power of the State governments.
This issue will never be fully resolved.