State Assessment, Wilson

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Wilson

1/52

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 41608 - Wilson Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-08

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Wilson Elem

Building Address: 2465 Little Dry Run Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-231-3240

Acreage: 15

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 34

Number of Floors: 1

Student Capacity: 395

Current Enrollment: 643

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 27

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Mr. Frank Forsthoefel

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 540

Current Middle Enrollment: 103

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 1


2/52

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Wilson Elem(41608)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

56,078 Total Existing Square Footage

1959,1962,1993 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

643 Current Enrollment

34 Teaching Stations

15 Site Acreage

Wilson Elementary, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1959 single story, 56,078 square foot brick school building located in a suburban residentialsetting. The facility was originally constructed in a pod concept with each pod connected with covered walkways. Over time many of the covered walkways have been enclosed form additional teaching stations or connecting corridors. The existing facility does use modular buildings. The st ructure of the original facility contains load bearing masonryexterior wall construction, with load bearing masonry wall construction in the interior. The floor system consists of concrete slab on grade. The roof structure is wood and concrebeams supporting structural wood deck. The roofing system of the original facility is primarily built-up asphalt with gravel ballast, installed in stages over the past 15 years. The

structure of the 1993 addition contains stud type exterior wall construction with brick veneer, with stud type wall construction in the interior. The floor system consists of concreteslab on grade. The roof structure is metal building framing. The roofing system of the 1993 addition is mechanically fastened EPDM, installed in 2003. The ventilation system ofthe building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The classrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Educationand Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a securitysystem. The building has a non-compliant fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with fire suppression. The building is reported to contain asbestos. The overall building inot compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 15 acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property is not fenced for security. Access ontothe site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is dedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for staff, visitors and community events isadequate.

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Wilson Elem(41608) Page 2


3/52

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Wilson Elem(41608) Page 3


4/52

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 41608 - Wilson Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-08

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Wilson Elem

Building Address: 2465 Little Dry Run Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-231-3240

Acreage: 15

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 34

Number of Floors: 1

Student Capacity: 395

Current Enrollment: 643

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 27

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Mr. Frank Forsthoefel

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 540

Current Middle Enrollment: 103

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 4


5/52

Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

Name Year Handicapped AccessFloorsSquare Feet

Original Building 1959 no 1 8,208

Classroom Addition 1962 no 1 43,018

Library Addition 1993 no 1 4,852

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 5


6/52

Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

Addition Auditorium C orridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Original Building (1959) 1117

Classroom Addition (1962) 7285 3386 2261 937

Library Addition (1993) 2259

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 6


7/52

Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 7


8/52

Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608)

Building Summary - Wilson Elem (41608)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Wilson Elem

Address: 2465 Little Dry Run Rd

Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 41608

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Mr. Frank Forsthoefel

Phone: 513-231-3240

Date Prepared: 2004-06-08 By: Vicki Siwek

Date Revised: 2005-04-05 By: Bill Mentges

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 15

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 34

Current Enrollment 643 Classrooms: 27

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet




Total 56,078

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,205,677.00 -B. Roofing 3 $415,918.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $521,137.40 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $331,491.00 -

F. Windows 3 $471,660.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $62,440.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $109,045.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $1,024,520.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $853,048.50 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $224,312.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $105,626.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $56,078.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $84,117.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $381,647.80 -

P. Site Condition 2 $85,707.60 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $50,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $73,432.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $226,998.50 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $224,312.00 -

W. Technology 3 $323,570.06 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $1,662,191.75 -

Total $8,492,929.61

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 100 72 72% Satisfacto

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 200 90 45% Po

3.0Plant Maintainability 100 52 52% Borderl

4.0Building Safety and Security 200 137 69% Borderl

5.0Educational Adequacy 200 116 58% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 200 92 46% Po

Commentary

Total 1000 559 56% Borderl

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,530,298

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) Page 8


9/52


Original Building (1959) Summary


Name: Wilson Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 41608



Phone: 513-231-3240











Total 56,078



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $176,472.00 -B. Roofing 3 $64,364.00 -




F. Windows 3 $94,710.00 -



I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $164,160.00 -





N. Fire Alarm 3 $12,312.00 -





S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -


U. Life Safety 3 $26,721.50 -


W. Technology 3 $47,360.16 -


- $276,614.31 -

Total $1,413,354.30









Commentary


C=Under Contract






10/52


Classroom Addition (1962) Summary


Name: Wilson Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 41608



Phone: 513-231-3240











Total 56,078



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $924,887.00 -B. Roofing 3 $351,554.00 -




F. Windows 3 $371,750.00 -



I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $860,360.00 -





N. Fire Alarm 3 $64,527.00 -





S. Exterior Doors 3 $50,000.00 -


U. Life Safety 3 $164,508.00 -


W. Technology 3 $248,213.86 -


- $1,303,504.89 -

Total $6,660,227.55









Commentary


C=Under Contract






11/52


Library Addition (1993) Summary


Name: Wilson Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 41608



Phone: 513-231-3240











Total 56,078


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $104,318.00 -B. Roofing 3 $0.00 -



E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $0.00 -

F. Windows 3 $5,200.00 -



I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 3 $0.00 -





N. Fire Alarm 3 $7,278.00 -





S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $243.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $35,769.00 -


W. Technology 3 $27,996.04 -


- $82,072.55 -

Total $419,347.76









Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary isrequested from a Master Plan.



12/52

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the original facility and first addition is a gas fired hot water system, installed in 1959, and is in fair condition. The facilityhas one 5 year old Well McLain, and 1 original Ray Burner boiler. The boilers are in fair and poor condition respectively. Heating water isdistributed to terminal units consisting of unit ventilators and air handlers. The terminal equipment was installed with the phase of constructionand is in fair condition. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanicalcode and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic type system temperature controls were installed with the phase of construction and are infair condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. Interior doors in this facility arenot louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. The existing system is not ducted. Relief air is exhausted via a louver in thewindow system. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long term life expectancy of theexisting system is not anticipated. The structure is not equipped with air conditioning. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks. Thelibrary addition is equipped with a carrier air handling / condensing unit that is pad mounted outside of the building. The carrier unit is equippedwith air conditioning.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School DesignManual standards. Provided for a ducted system.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original Building(1959)8,208 ft

ClassroomAddition (1962)43,018 ft

Library Addition(1993)4,852 ft

Sum Comments

HVAC SystemReplacement:

$18.00sq. ft . Required Required Required $1,009,404.00(includes demo of exist ing system and reconfiguration piping layout and new controls and air conditioning)

Convert To DuctedSystem Replacement

$3.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $196,273.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings,soffits, etc.)

Sum: $1,205,677.00$176,472.00 $924,887.00 $104,318.00

Hot Water Boiler Pneumatic Control System

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Facility Assessment Page 12


13/52


14/52

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with a central air conditioning system. Rooftop air conditioning units serve the office (10 years old), MH room(inoperable), music (12 years old), library (4 years old), and internal classrooms (3 years old). Window units are provided in various locations. Theventilation system in the 1962 addition consists of unit ventilators, installed in 1962 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to classrooms, and airhandlers, installed in 1962 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous spaces such as the Gymnasium. Interior doors are notlouvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. The ventilation system does not meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupantfresh air requirement. The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collectionsystems are not required in this facility. Exhaust systems for Restrooms, Kitchen, and Custodial Closets are adequate.

Rating:1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1959)8,208 ft

Classroom Addition (1962)43,018 ft

Library Addition (1993)4,852 ft

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Rooftop Air Conditioning Unit Rooftop Air Conditioning Units




15/52

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is three separate services one with 240 volts, 400 amp, 3 phase and 4 wire and two with120/208 volts, 400 amp, 3 phase and 4 wire. The systems were original with each addition and are in fair condition. Power is provided to theschool by one utility owned pole mounted transformer and multiple district owned pad mounted transformers. Additional step down transformersare located throughout the facility. The panel system, installed with the phase of construction, is in fair condition, and cannot be expanded to addadditional capacity. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical classroom contains 6 general purpose outletsand limited dedicated outlets for technology. There is not a dedicated outlet for the television monitor. There are some restroom spaces that haveno electrical outlets. The corridors are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterioroutlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements insupporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facilitys future needs.


Recommendations: The entire electrical system in the 1959 and 1962 sections require replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines due to condition,age and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. The 1993 addition requires additional outlets to comply with OSDMrequirements.



Classroom Addition(1962)43,018 ft


Sum Comments

SystemReplacement:

$9.90sq.ft. Required Required $507,137.40(includes demo of existing system. Does not includetelephone or data cable or equipment)

Additional Circuits: $800.00percircuit

5 Required $4,000.00

AdditionalReceptacles

$250.00each 40 Required $10,000.00

Sum: $521,137.40 $81,259.20 $425,878.20 $14,000.00

Transformer Panel / Transformer




16/52


17/52

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The original facility and 1962 addition are equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double pane insulated glazingcurtainwall window system, which was installed in phases (last phase 4 years ago), and is in fair condition. The window system has numerouspenetrations because of unit ventilators and relief air louvers. The 1993 library addition is equipped with aluminum frame windows with doublepane insulated glazing, which was installed in 1993, and is in poor condition. The exterior doors in the overall facility are equipped with thermallybroken aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in fair condition. The school does contain aluminum singlepane skylights in poor condition.


Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Replace skylights in the 1962addition. Replace window transoms and sidelights in exterior doors of the overall facility.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1959)8,208 ft



Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels: $50.00sq.ft . (Qty) 104 Required $5,200.00(with integral blinds)

Skylights: $100.00sq.ft. (Qty) 423 Required $42,300.00(remove and replace)Curtain Wall/Storefront System: $55.00sq.ft . (Qty) 1,722 Required 5,990 Required $424,160.00

Sum: $471,660.00 $94,710.00 $371,750.00 $5,200.00

Skylight Window System with Penetrations




18/52

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The original building and the 1993 addition are equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations ofmajor settlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in fair condition. The 1962 addition is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concretefootings, which displayed locations of settlement, cracking, and leaking, and are in fair to poor condition. Settling has contributed to cracking ofmasonry walls above. The District reports that there has been leaking in the Kindergarten rooms of the 1962 addition. The district recentlyremoved the concrete walk and provided a waterproofing system to the problem area.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Rework damaged foundation walls as required. Provide additional drainage tile around building perimeter to eliminate ponding issues.





Sum Comments

Drainage Tile Systems / FoundationDrainage:

$18.00ln.ft. 300 Required 1,500 Required 280 Required $37,440.00(include excavation andbackfill)

Other: Repair Foundation $25,000.00allowance Required $25,000.00Repair as required

Sum: $62,440.00 $5,400.00 $52,000.00 $5,040.00

Library Addition Foundation Library Addition Connection to Original




19/52

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The original facility and the 1962 addition have a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed locations of deterioration, andis in poor condition. The wood roof structure sets on concrete beams that bear on the masonry walls. The concrete beam has separated from themasonry in many locations. The faces are spalling off of bricks. A portion of the original building masonry was covered with EIFS that is in poorcondition. The original building and 1962 addition have a curtain wall system at non-bearing classroom exterior walls. The curtain wallconstruction is relatively new, but it has numerous penetrations for unit ventilators, window air conditioners, and miscellaneous piping. Sections ofthe 1962 addition have single wythe concrete masonry unit exterior walls. The original building and 1962 addition have a very low profile. Somespaces have roof structure that is below the allowable limit to consider the space occupiable per building code requirements. The exteriormasonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in fair condition. The exterior masonry has not beencleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration in multiple locations. There are areas where the brick hasseparated leaving over 1/2 cracks in the bed joints. Original building and 1962 addition interior walls are concrete masonry units and are in fair topoor condition. Interior masonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in fair condition. The 1993 addition is a metalbuilding with brick veneer. The brick veneer is damaged due to vandalism. The 1993 addition interior walls are metal stud with gypsum board andare in fair condition. The windowsills are an element of the aluminum window system. The exterior lintels are not exposed. The school hassufficient expansion joints.


Recommendations: Remove EIFS and replace existing exterior masonry on the original building. Replace sections of existing exterior masonry the 1962 addition.Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required in the 1993 addition. Provide masonry cleaning and sealing as required in the1993 addition.





Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $2.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,100 Required $2,750.00(wall surface)

Exterior MasonryCleaning:

$1.00sq.ft.(Qty)


Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft.(Qty)


Replace Brick VeneerSystem:

$21.00sq.ft.(Qty)

720 Required 4,000 Required $99,120.00(total removal and replacement including pinnand shoring)

Sum: $109,045.00 $15,120.00 $84,000.00 $9,925.00

Masonry Separating from Concrete Lintel Discolored due to Vandalism




20/52

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction, and is in fair condition. There is no crawl space. The roofconstruction of the original facility and the 1962 addition is 4 inch deep double T & G wood deck on wood or concrete precast beam construction,and is in fair condition. The original building and 1962 addition were built with very low profiles that will not allow for the addition of a fireseparation assembly. The 1993 addition is metal building construction.


Recommendations: Replace the roof framing system in the original building and the 1962 addition.




Sum Comments

Other: Replace wood roof structure$20.00sq.ft. Required Required $1,024,520.00Replace as required

Sum: $1,024,520.00 $164,160.00 $860,360.00 $0.00

T & G Structural Wood Deck Deteriorated Wood Deck




21/52


22/52

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical Classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 suspended fluorescent fixtures with switching located at the circuitbreaker. Classroom fixtures are in fair to poor condition and provide an average illumination of 20 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommendedby the OSDM. The typical Corridors in the facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixtures. Corridor fixtures are in fair to poorcondition and provide an average illumination of 15 FC, which is less than the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Gymnasium is equippedwith pendant T-8 fluorescent fixtures, in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 22 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommendedby the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with 2x4 lay-in T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an averageillumination of 45 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Student Dining spaces are equipped with 1x4 suspendedT-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 16 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommendedby the OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with 1x4 suspended T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair to poorcondition. The typical Administrative spaces are equipped with 1x4 suspended T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providinginadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not compliant with Ohio School DesignManual requirements due to age, condition, and due to inadequate lighting levels.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels, and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, I, J, and U.




Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $224,312.00

Sum: $224,312.00 $32,832.00 $172,072.00 $19,408.00

Corridor Lighting Fluorescent Lighting




23/52

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in offices, corridors, and spaces where 6or more computers are located. Some exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is not provided. CCTVcameras are provided at main entry areas. CCTV is monitored in Administrative Area with the use of TV, VCR, and multiplexer. The securitysystem is not adequately provided throughout, and the system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The exterior sitelighting system is equipped with surface or ceiling mounted metal halide entry lights in fair condition. Pedestrian walkways and parking areas areilluminated with pole mounted mercury vapor lights or metal halide fixtures mounted on the building that are in fair to poor condition. The exteriorsite lighting system provides inadequate coverage.

Rating:3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual. Provide partial replacement of exterior site lightingsystem, consisting of replacement of deteriorated fixtures and addition of fixtures in dark locations, to meet Ohio School Design Manualguidelines.




Sum Comments

Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $84,117.00(complete, area of building)Exterior Site Lighting:$0.50sq.ft. Required $21,509.00building

Sum: $105,626.00 $12,312.00 $86,036.00 $7,278.00

Security Camera / Exterior Light Camera Monitoring System




24/52

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in fair condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets OhioSchool Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system due to work outlined in item I.




Sum Comments

Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required Required $56,078.00(w/ battery pack)

Sum: $56,078.00 $8,208.00 $43,018.00 $4,852.00

Emergency Egress Lighting Emergency Egress Lighting




25/52

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices.The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is not equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smokedetectors, and heat sensors. The system is not adequately provided throughout. The system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA,and Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the fire alarm system to meet NFPA and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.





Sum Comments

Fire AlarmSystem:

$1.50sq.ft. Required Required Required $84,117.00(complete new system, including removal ofexisting)

Sum: $84,117.00 $12,312.00 $64,527.00 $7,278.00

Fire Alarm Panel Strobe Light




26/52

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: The exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steepramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Entrance doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADApower assist door. Special provisions for level changes in this single story structure addressed by means of interior ramps, however, ramps arenot equipped with the required handrails. Some interior doors are recessed, without adequate clearances. Interior doors are not provided withADA-compliant hardware. 13 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 9 are currently provided. 13 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 1 iscurrently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required,and none are currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal in fair to poor condition. Some do not provide appropriate ADA clearances.ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. ADA signage is not adequately provided on either the interior or theexterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toilet accessories, doorsand frames in the overall facility to facilitate the school meeting ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in Item P. Toilet accessoriescovered in item J.


OriginalBuilding (1959)8,208 ft


LibraryAddition(1993)4,852 ft

Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required Required $5,607.80(per building area)

Electric WaterCoolers:

$1,800.00unit 4 Required $7,200.00(replacement double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit 3 Required 14 Required $64,600.00(new ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 2 Required 11 Required $19,500.00(replacement ADA)Toilet Parti tions: $1,000.00stall 2 Required 6 Required $8,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)

ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,500.00leaf 17 Required 38 Required 8 Required $94,500.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light,includes hardware)

Replace Doors: $3,750.00leaf 17 Required 29 Required $172,500.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standarwhen door opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannotaccommodate a wheelchair. See diagram)

Other: Ramphandrails

$40.00ln.ft. 56 Required $2,240.00(aluminum handrails)

Sum: $381,647.80 $108,710.80 $260,451.80 $12,485.20

Non-compliant door recess and hardware Floor Mounted Toilet




27/52

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 15 acre relatively flat site is located in a suburban residential setting with moderate tree and shrub type landscaping. There are no apparentproblems with erosion but ponding was noted in several areas during the assessment. The site is shared with a modular classroom structure. Thesite is fronted by a moderately traveled city street. A one way combination bus loop / parking area allows access onto the site. Proper separationof bus and other vehicular traffic is not provided. Additional staff and visitor parking is facilitated by an asphalt parking lot, located to the west ofthe facility in fair condition. The parking areas provide 110 spaces, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled.The parking lot drainage design, consisting of appropriate slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and noproblems with parking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbs in fair condition are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks are properlysloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. Security fencing is not provided. The playgroundequipment is in fair condition, and on a combination of hard and soft surfaces.


Recommendations: Provide new asphalt wearing course on the bus loop area. Replace miscellaneous areas of damaged concrete sidewalk. Ponding issuescorrected in item G. Remove damaged playground equipment.


OriginalBuilding (1959)8,208 ft


LibraryAddition(1993)4,852 ft

Sum Comments

Removal of existing PlaygroundEquipment:

$5,000.00lump sum Required $5,000.00

Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $0.56sq.ft.(Qty)

3,163 Required17,105Required

1,867Required

$12,395.60(includes minor crack repair in less than 5of paved area)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

214 Required 1,159 Required 127 Required $6,000.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two.(Applies for whole building, so only oneaddition should have this item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SFand 100,000 SF

$1.50sq. ft. Required $12,312.00Include this one or the next. (Each additioshould have this item)

Sum: $85,707.60 $64,939.28 $19,214.80 $1,553.52

Playground Equipment Shared Parking / Loading Zone




28/52


29/52

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features a 4 service, and is in good condition. The facility is not equippedwith an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The systemprovides adequate pressure and capacity for the future needs of the school.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1959)8,208 ft



SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Service Entrance




30/52

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Entrance doors in the overall facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frame storefront / curtainwall construction. The door /window system was replaced recently and is generally in fair condition, but the system has numerous penetrations for mechanical and plumbingsystems. Entrance doors feature thermally broken tempered glass vision panels. Typical exterior doors in the 1962 addition are hollow metal typeconstruction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in poor condition. Typical exterior doors do not feature vision panels. There is an overheaddoor that is in good condition.


Recommendations: Replace entrance doors in the storefront construction due to work required in Item F. Replace hollow metal exterior doors due to condition.




Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 25 Required $50,000.00(includes removal of existi

Sum: $50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $0.00

Connector Exterior Door Library Addition Exterior Door




31/52

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic containing hazardousmaterials are located in the original facility and the 1962 addition in fair condition. These materials were described in the report to be in non-friablecondition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescentlighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials, as noted in the attached Environmental Hazards Assessment.Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.





Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mast ic $3.00sq.f t.(Qty)

4,350 Required 15,835 Required 0 Required $60,555.00

Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor toPerform Lead Mock-Ups

$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & BallastsRecycling/Incineration

$0.05sq.ft.(Qty)

8,222 Required 44,464 Required 4,852 Required $2,876.90

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System(Renovation only)

$0.40lumpsum

Required $0.40T Discrepancies From OldEHA System


-$0.20lumpsum

Required -$0.20T Discrepancies From OldEHA System


-$0.10lumpsum

Required -$0.10T Discrepancies From OldEHA System

Sum: $73,432.00 $23,461.00 $49,728.00 $243.00

Vinyl Asbestos Tile Vinyl Asbestos Tile




32/52

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are notpresent. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system. There are an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequatelyspaced. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs ofthe school. Rooms, with capacity greater than 50, are equipped with adequate egress. There are rooms that egress directly into other rooms.


Recommendations: Provide new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Rework egress as required to meet current code

requirements.





Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire SuppressionSystem:

$3.25sq.ft.(Qty)

8,222 Required 44,464 Required 4,852 Required $186,998.50(includes increase of service pipingif required)

Other: Provide egresscorridor

$20,000.00allowance Required Required $40,000.00Correct code issue

Sum: $226,998.50 $26,721.50 $164,508.00 $35,769.00

Kitchen Hood Fire Extinguisher




33/52


34/52

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with the required four technology data ports for student use, one data port for teacher use, one voice portwith a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. A 2-way PA system that canbe initiated by either party does exist. The facility does contain a media distribution center, and provides a computer lab for use by students.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.




Sum Comments

Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required Required Required $323,570.06

Sum: $323,570.06 $47,360.16 $248,213.86 $27,996.04

Technology Closet Typical Data Outlet




35/52


36/52

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Bill Mentges Date of Appraisal 2004-06-08

Building Name Wilson Elem

Street Address 2465 Little Dry Run Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45244

Telephone Number(s) 513-231-3240

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 15 Building Square Footage 56,078

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 395

Number of Teaching Stations 34 Number of Floors 1

Student Enrollment 643

Dates of Construction 1959,1962,1993

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:School Facility Appraisal Page 36


37/52


38/52

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and vertical circulation but many other areas require renovation.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 3

Very low slope roofing provides inadequate drainage. Evidence of ponding was noted. The district reported past roof leaks.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 4

Cracking was observed in the foundations.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 4

The facility is not equipped with sufficient control joints which has contributed to wall deterioration.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 2

Building entrances are awkwardly located and are narrow, restricting the efficient flow of traffic.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 7

Majority window wall construction, some composite masonry walls, insulated roof, and thermally broken windows provide an adequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 4

According to the report provided by the district, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 1

Flexibility is not easily achievable due to masonry interior walls.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 6

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Dark spots were observed in various locations throughout the facility.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 12

Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer, and has adequate pressure.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 5

A typical classroom is equipped with 6 electrical outlets, no phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 5

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 38


39/52


40/52

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 10

Aluminum windows, aluminum and steel doors and CMU walls require moderate maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 8

Typical classrooms have carpet or vinyl asbestos tile flooring. Typical corridors have concrete, vinyl composition tile or vinyl asbestos tile flooring. Typical restroomshave ceramic tile or terrazzo flooring.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Wood ceilings to do not require much maintenance. Painted wallsurfaces are cleaned easily.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 5

Built-in equipment is constructed of wood which allows for heavy maintenance.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 4

The hardware has a quality finish and adequate keying system, but is not ADA accessible.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 4

Toilets are floor mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve, floor mounted flush valve, or floor mounted central flush. Lavatories are wall mounted.ADA requirements are not met. The fixtures are in fair to poor condition.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 6

Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 4

Extension cords have to be used from adjacent classrooms in some areas.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair andreplacement

10 4

Outdoor light fixtures do not provide adequate light levels in all areas. Electrical outlets are conveniently located. Outdoor mechanical equipment is not easilyaccessible.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 52




41/52

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 5

The facility is equipped with a bus loop that is shared with teacher parking.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 8

Correctly sloped sidewalks, with crosswalks and curb cuts, exist.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

School signs are provided to permit safe site access.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 2

Buses and cars share an entrance to the shared parking / loading zone.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic. Some damaged equipment exists.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 12

The mechanical room is located away from student areas. Unit ventilators are located in student occupied areas.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 15

This is a single story facility.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 8

Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware. Some doors are heavy making them harder to open.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

The exit lighting is powered by battery backup. The system meets current building code standards.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 3

Classroom doors are recessed such that ADA clearance are compromised. Doors open outward.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 7

The facility is equipped with a security system with the following features: cameras, motion detectors, door contacts.



42/52

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 3

The ramps have non-slip pads.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 5

This is a single story facility.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 5

All glass appeared to be protected as required by code.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 3

Drinking fountains and benches extend more than the allowable dimension.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 3

There are no dead end corridors in the facility. Egress was very confusing.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 12

The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 15

Rooms with capacity greater than fifty persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 6

The roof structure is constructed of combustible materials.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 10

An emergency alarm system exists, but it is not equipped with all of the code required indicating devices.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 137




43/52

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 15

About half the classrooms meet the 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM. The remaining classrooms average 750 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by theOSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 10

Half of the classrooms are of moderate size allowing for somewhat affective small group arrangements. Half of the classrooms are large enough to allow for affectivesmall group activity.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away f rom disruptivenoise

10 9

Academic functions are grouped together. The location of the gym, cafeteria, and classrooms is remotely separated. The music room was located adjacent to theclassrooms, but was reasonably separated. No disruptive noise was evident.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 0

No designated personal space is present.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 7

Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 3

Very little casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair to poor.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 12

The average size of special education areas is similar to that recommended by the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 9

Handicap provisions are made in special education areas. Special education areas are equipped with casework and loose equipment specific to instructional need.Hardware is not ADA accessible.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 8

Library was well lit with newer equipment.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 4

The existing gym is slightly smaller than recommended by the OSDM, but appears to serve the needs of the age groups.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 10



44/52


45/52

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 116




46/52

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 3

Mismatched exterior with low profile.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 8

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 8

The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 7

The entrances are not sheltered. Covered walkways occur between pods.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 2

Mixed building styles and finishes make a distractive appearance.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 10

Color schemes are mixed and interior finishes are varied.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 6

The facility is equipped with a heating system only. The heating system is in fair to poor condition. Cooling and humidity control are provided in limited locations.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 6

The existing unit ventilator system does not provide the code required amount of fresh air.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 8

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Dark spots were observed in various locations throughout the facility. Low light levels throughout.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 8

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 7 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 5 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. Two of the drinking fountains are accessible. The majority of drinking fountains were in a centrallocation and not dispersed well throughout the facility.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 0

No common areas exists.



47/52

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 1

Most corridors are narrower than the OSDM recommendations. Traffic flow is very confusing. Some students must walk outside to get from one part of the buildingto another.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 3

Cafeteria, gymnasium, and media center provide minimal interaction space.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 4

Large group areas are not provided with a sound system. There are blind spots in the cafeteria where supervision is limited.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 6

Lay-in acoustic ceilings, masonry walls, and vinyl tile f loor provide fair acoustics. Open structure wood ceiling, masonry walls, and vinyl tile floor provide fairacoustics.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 7

Windows are curtain wall type design. Windows are not available in all areas where OSDM recommends them.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 5

The existing facility lacked some of the recommended equipment for OSDM standards. The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair condition.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 92




48/52

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Wilson Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. No central air conditioning.

2. Inadequate electrical system.

3. Asbestos present.

4. Low light levels.

5. No sprinkler system.

6. ADA deficiencies.


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 48


49/52


50/52

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Original Building

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 41608

Facility: Wilson Elem BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: 2004-06-28 Assessor: Vicki Siwek

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.006. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.008. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 4350 $3.00 $13,050.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $13,050.00

12 Sum of lines(1-9) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.002. Special Engineering Fees $5,000.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1 8208 8222 $0.05 $411.10

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $23,461.10

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $411.10

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06: Page 50


51/52

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Classroom Addition

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Classroom Addition


Facility: Wilson Elem BuildingAdd: Classroom Addition








9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 15835 $3.00 $47,505.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $47,505.00





C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.002. Special Engineering Fees $0.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00


1 43018 44464 $0.05 $2,223.20



F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $49,728.20

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $2,223.20

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06: Page 51


52/52

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Library Addition

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Wilson Elem (41608) - Library Addition


Facility: Wilson Elem BuildingAdd: Library Addition








9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $0.00





C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.002. Special Engineering Fees $0.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00


1 4852 4852 $0.05 $242.60



F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $242.60

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $242.60

State Assessment, Wilson

Documents

Transcript of State Assessment, Wilson