STaR Chart Analysis for NAMS-North Middle School

16
Star Chart Analysis and Summary for NAMS-North By: Yvonne Jordan NAMS-North Middle School

description

 

Transcript of STaR Chart Analysis for NAMS-North Middle School

  • 1. Star ChartAnalysis and Summary for NAMS-North By:Yvonne Jordan NAMS-North Middle School

2. I ntroduction

  • Purpose of a STaR Chart
  • Texas STaR Chart for NAMS-N:DomainI
  • Texas STaR Chart for NAMS-N:DomainII
  • Texas STaR Chart for NAMS-N:DomainIII
  • Texas STaR Chart for NAMS-N:DomainIV
  • Texas STaR Chart for NAMS-N: Overall

3. Campus STaR Charts

  • Based on 4 domains from the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020.
  • Allows campuses to identify their strengths and weaknesses with technology in the classroom.
  • Guides campuses in determining their needs and creating their goals to meet requirements.
  • Designed to help campuses gauge their progress toward meeting technology goals.

4. Texas STaR Chart Summary for NAMS-North 5. I. Teaching and Learning T1: Patterns of Classroom UseT4:Tech. Applications/TEKS ImplementationT2:Frequency/ Design Instructional SettingT5:Student Mastery of Technology Applications T3: Content Area ConnectionsT6:Online Learning Performance Descriptions 6. I. Teaching and Learning Summary GraphI. School Years Total Scores Change 2006-2007 15 Decreased 2007-2008 15 2008-2009 13 7. II.Educator Preparation & Development Performance Descriptions EP1: Professional Development ExperiencesEP4:Access to Professional DevelopmentEP2: Models of Professional DevelopmentEP5:Levels of Understanding and Patterns of Use EP3: Capabilities of EducatorsEP6:Prof. Development for Online Learning 8. II.Educator Preparation& Development Summary GraphII. School Years Total Scores Change 2006-2007 15 Decreased 2007-2008 14 2008-2009 13 9. III.Leadership, Administration,Instructional Support Performance Descriptions L1: Leadership and VisionL4:Communication and CollaborationL2: PlanningL5:Budget L3:Instructional SupportL6:Leadership and Support for Online Learning 10. III.Leadership, Administration,Instructional Support Summary GraphIII . School Years Total Scores Change 2006-2007 16 Decreased 2007-2008 13 2008-2009 14 11. IV.Infrastructure for Technology Performance Descriptions INF1: Students per ComputerINF4:Technical SupportINF2: Internet Access Connectivity SpeedINF5:Local/ Wide Area NetworkINF3:Other Classroom TechnologyINF6: Distance Learning Capacity 12. IV.Infrastructure for Technology Summary GraphIV. School Years Total Scores Change 2006-2007 19 Decreased 2007-2008 19 2008-2009 18 13. Overall NAMS-North STaR Charts Key Area Descriptions TL1: Teaching and LearningL:Leadership, Administration, Instructional SupportEP: Educator Preparation/ DevelopmentINF :Infrastructure for Technology 14. Overall NAMS-N STaR Charts Summary (slightly) 15. Summary

  • Domain I: Pattern of Classroom Use increased.Frequency/Design of Instructional Setting, Student Mastery of Technology Applications and Online Learning all decreased.
  • Domain II:Capabilities of Educators increased.Educator Preparation/ Development, Professional Development Experiences, Access to Professional Development and Level of Understanding all decreased.
  • Domain III:No area increased.Planning and Budget decreased.
  • Domain IV:Other Classroom Technology increased.Technical Support and Distance Learning Capacity both decreased.

16. Conclusion

  • Overall, the STaR Chart scores for all four domains have decreased.Since 2006-2007, the domainIscores dropped 2 points, the domainIIscores dropped 2 points, the domainIIIscores dropped 2 points and the domainIVscores dropped 1 point.
  • The NAMS-N administrators will need to evaluate the causes of these declines, set goals for the new year, and provide training and equipment to reach these goals, in order to stay in compliance with the new Texas Long Range Plan.
  • ClickHEREto read more about Star Chart campus charts.