Stage 3 - Process Validation: Measuring what matters · FDA (& EU) Process Validation Stages Stage...
Transcript of Stage 3 - Process Validation: Measuring what matters · FDA (& EU) Process Validation Stages Stage...
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Stage 3 - Process Validation: Measuring what matters
Trevor Schoerie - PharmOut
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
A quote….
“The company that fails is the company that comes to us and says “Just tell us what to do and we will do it.”
“The company that succeeds is the company that says to us “Here is what we did and why we think it is appropriate.”
Dr. Phillip Minor
National Institute of Biological Standards and Control
A science and risk based approach
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
What the current GMPs say
PIC/S, EU GMPs
§1.1 v. all necessary controls on intermediate products, and any other in process controls and validations are carried out.
CFR 211.110(a)
Sampling and testing of in-process materials
and drug products.
To assure batch uniformity … in-process materials…. Such control procedures shall … monitor the output and to validate… responsible for causing variability…
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
What the current GMPs say – EU/PIC/S
§1.2 ii. critical steps of manufacturing processes and significant changes to the process are validated;
§1.2 iii. all necessary facilities for GMP are provided including:
a. appropriately qualified and trained personnel; people*
b. adequate premises and space; environment*
c. suitable equipment and services; machines*
d. correct materials, containers and labels; materials*
e. approved procedures and instructions; methods*
f. Suitable storage and transport;
*fishbone (+measurements)
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
What the current GMPs say - FDA
CFR 211.110(a)
…. such control procedures shall include, but
are not limited to, the following, where appropriate:
1. Tablet or capsule weight variation;
2. Disintegration time;
3. Adequacy of mixing to assure uniformity and homogeneity;
4. Dissolution time and rate;
5. Clarity, completeness, or pH of solutions.
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Lifecycle concept, but QbD is at the start of the product lifecycle, i.e. product design, R&D
FDA Process Validation - 3 stages
1. Process Design (QbD & DOE)
2. Process Qualification
3. Continued Process Verification
FDA Process Validation?
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
EU GMP Guide Annex 15 “Qualification & Validation”
Concurrent Validation
• May be acceptable in exceptional circumstances "where there is a strong risk – benefit to the patient"
Traditional Approach
• Produce a number of batches under routine conditions, confirming reproducibility
Continuous Process Verification
• Science-based control strategy
Hybrid Approach
• The “Traditional Approach” and “Continuous Process Verification” together
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
EU GMP Guide Annex 15 “Qualification & Validation
Design Space
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Focus of FDA Process Validation Guideline
Variable or variability - Mentioned 19 times
Control - Mentioned 62 times
Statistics - Mentioned 15 times
What is the goal?
Inputs and OutputsFishbone Model
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
FDA (& EU) Process Validation Stages
Stage 1 – Process Design: The process is defined during this stage based on knowledge gained through development and
scale-up activities.
Stage 2 – Process Qualification: During this stage, the process design is evaluated to determine if the process is capable of reproducible commercial manufacturing.
Stage 3 – Continued Process Verification: Ongoing assurance is gained during routine production that the process remains in a state of control.
Identify sources of Variability
Control of Variability
Monitoring Variability - remains “in control”
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
LifecycleLe
ve
l o
f Q
C L
ab
Te
sti
ng
Time / Product & Process Knowledge
ProcessDesign
PV(PPQ)
CommercialManufacturing
Could vary
based on approach Variability
Estimate Established
Post Periodic Review Signal
Change introduced /
CAPA
PAT Implemented
Monitoring
QC Testing
Control Strategy is dynamic over the lifecycle
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
3 Stages - Generic Acetriptan Tablets
Define the Quality Target Product Profile
(QTPP)
Identify the CQAs
Define Process Steps & CPPs
Create a Control Strategy
Stage 1
Implement the Control Strategy
Qualify Facility, Utilities,
Systems and Equipment
Process Validation
(PPQ)
ContinuedProcess
Verification
Stage 2
Stage 3Science and Risk-based Approach at
all Stages of Lifecycle
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Quality Risk Management (QRM)
Begin the QRM Process
Risk Identification
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Reduction
Risk Acceptance
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Output of the QRM Process
Review Events
Risk Review
QRMTools
Risk C
om
mu
nicatio
nICH Q9
Product & Process Development
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Initial RA of the formulation variables
DP CQAsDrug
SubstancePSD
MCC/ Lactose
Ratio
CCS Level TalcLevel
Mag. Stearate
Level
AssayMedium Medium Low Low Low
Content UniformityHigh High Low Low Low
DissolutionHigh Medium High Low High
Degradation Products Low Low Low Low Medium
High Risk is unacceptable. Further investigation is needed to reduce the risk.
Medium Risk is acceptable. Further investigation may be needed in order to reduce the risk.
Low Broadly acceptable risk. No further investigation is needed.
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Design of Experiments (DoE)
• A designed experiment allows understanding of how input variables are related to output variables
• Experimental units are units to which one treatment is assigned or applied
• Input variables are called factors-controlled independent variables whose levels are set by the experimenter
• Levels of a factor are the settings that are tested in an experiment
Input Process Output
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Defining CPPs
Process Variable
Can variable be
controlled?
NO
Process Performance
Attribute
Product Quality Attribute
OR
Process Input
YES
Potential Impact to
CQAs?
NOYESPotentially
a CPPPotentially NOT a CPP
Risk Assessment.
CPP?
YESCritical Process Parameter
NO
Key Process Parameter
Non-Key Process Parameter
OR
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Equipment & fixed process parameters used in the formulation studiesProcess Step Equipment
Pre-Roller Compaction Blending and Lubrication
4 qt V-blender • 250 revolutions for blending (10 min at 25 rpm)
Roller Compaction and Integrated Milling
Alexanderwerk WP120 with 25 mm roller width and 120 mm roller diameter • Roller surface: Knurled • Roller pressure: 50 bar • Roller gap: 2 mm • Roller speed: 8 rpm • Mill speed: 60 rpm • Coarse screen orifice size: 2.0 mm • Mill screen orifice size: 1.0 mm
Final Blending and Lubrication
4 qt V-blender • 100 revolutions for granule and talc blending (4
min at 25 rpm) • 75 revolutions for lubrication (3 min at 25 rpm)
Tablet Compression 16-station rotary press (2 stations used) • 8 mm standard round concave tools • Press speed: 20 rpm • Compression force: 5-15 kN • Pre-compression force: 1 kN
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Tablet Compression Process Development
Effect of Main Compression Force, Press Speed and Ribbon Relative Density:
• Compression force and press speed (related to dwell time) can affect numerous quality attributes including hardness, disintegration, dissolution, assay, content uniformity, friability, weight variability & appearance.
• The density of the ribbon following roller compaction may also impact the compressibility and compactability of the granules which would then impact tablet hardness & dissolution.
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Tablet Compression Process Development
A 23 full factorial DoE with three centre points was performed to understand the effects of these parameters on tablet quality attributes
Factors: Formulation VariablesLevels
-1 0 +1
A Main compression force (kN) 5 10 15
B Press Speed (rpm) 20 40 60
C Ribbon relative density (no units) 0.68 0.75 0.81
The press was run at the speed of the specified DOE for at least five minutes prior to any sampling. Tablet samples were then pulled at the beginning, middle and end of each run (except one Batch which was sampled every 20 min).
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Tablet Compression Process Development
• The results obtained from the development work identify acceptable ranges
• Feeder frame paddle speed (8-20rpm)
• Press speed (20-60rpm)
• The data also allows potential In-Process Controls to be identified for the compression step:
Test Frequency Limits
Individual tablet weight (n =10) 30 min 200.0 mg ± 10.0 mg
Composite tablet weight (n =20) 30 min 4.00 g ± 0.12 g
Hardness (n = 10) 30 min Target: 8.0-10.0 kP Limits: 5.0-13.0 kP
Thickness (n = 10) 30 min 3.00 mm ± 0.09 mm
Disintegration* (n = 6) 3 x per run NMT 5 min
Friability* (sample weight = 6.5 g) 3 x per run NMT 1.0%
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Scale-Up from Lab to Pilot Scale and Commercial Scale
• Scale-up information is usually limited at the time of submission.
• The principles of scale-up should be detailed as part of a planned approach.
• It is the firm’s discretion to submit scale-up data such as actual process verification information at the time of submission for a complex drug product which has a high risk of scale-up failure.
Scale Batch Size Units
Development (Lab) 5Kg 25,000
Pilot (Exhibit) 50Kg 250,000
Commercial (Proposed) 150Kg 750,000
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Scale-Up of the Roller Compaction & Integrated Milling Process
Several process parameters to consider when scaling up to a larger, wider roller. The strategy employed should be documented.
• Roller Gap, Roll Force or Roll Pressure
• Screw Speed and Roll Speed
• Mill Screen Size and Mill Speed
Scale Model Roller width (mm)
Roller diameter
(mm)
Roller Gap (mm)
RollerPressure
(bar)
Mill screen orifice (mm)
Lab WP120 25 120 1.2-2.4 20-77 1.0
Pilot WP120 40 120 1.8 50 1.0
Commercial WP200 75 200 2.0-2.4 31-121 1.0
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Initial Risk Assessment of the Manufacturing Process
DP CQAsPre-RC
Blending & Lubrication
Roller Compaction
MillingFinal
Blending &
Lubrication
Compression
AssayLow Low* Low Low* Low
Content UniformityLow Low Low Low* Low
DissolutionLow Low Low Low Low
Degradation Products Low* Low* Low* Low* Low*
High risks identified during developmentScientific knowledge & understanding gained Appropriate controls developed to reduce risk to an acceptable level documented
*The level of risk was not reduced from the initial risk assessment
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Other items for consideration
Container Closure system:
• Round white opaque HDPE bottles with an induction seal liner and child resistant (CR) closure
• Labelled for storage at 25°C with excursions permitted to 15-30 °C
Microbiological Attributes:
• An accelerated stability study of the exhibit batch demonstrated that the drug product has low water activity and is not capable of supporting microbial growth. Routine testing of tablets unnecessary
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Control Strategy
• Built up based on previous knowledge and the outcome of extensive product & process studies
• Investigation of material attributes and process parameters that were deemed high risk to the CQAs of the DP during initial risk assessment
• Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) and Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) were determined
• Acceptable Operating Ranges were identified
• All variables that were deemed high risk are included in the control strategy
• Can be further refined as process knowledge increases over time
Create a Control Strategy
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Quality Risk Management (QRM)
Begin the QRM Process
Risk Identification
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Reduction
Risk Acceptance
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Output of the QRM Process
Review Events
Risk Review
QRMTools
Risk C
om
mu
nicatio
nICH Q9
Control Strategy Development
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Control Strategy Examples
Factor Attributes or
Parameters
Range Studied
Actual data for the exhibit batch
Proposed range for
commercial scale
Purpose of control
Raw Material Attributes
Acetriptan particle size distribution*
d90 10-45 μm 20 μm 10-30 μm To ensure in vitro dissolution, in vivo performance and batch-to-batch consistency
d50 6-39 μm 12 μm 6-24 μm
d10 3.6-33.4 μm 7.2 μm 3.6-14.4 μm
Talc, Grade D04
Particle size distribution
> 75μm: NMT 0.2%
> 75μm: 0.1%
>75μm: NMT 0.2%
To ensure batch-to-batch consistency
*Critical input Material Attributes (CMA)
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Control Strategy Examples
Factor Attributes or
Parameters
Range Studied
Actual data for
the exhibit batch
Proposed range for
commercial scale
Purpose of control
Pre-Roller Compaction Blending and Lubrication In-Process Controls
Blend uniformity*
Blend to endpoint: < 5.0% RSD (In-line NIR method) In-line NIR method is used for endpoint determination to ensure BU is met consistently
Tablet Compression Process Parameters
Rotary press Feeder frame paddle speed
8-20 rpm 15 rpm 8-20 rpm To ensure all tablet CQAs are met consistently
*critical process parameter (CPP)
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Stage 2 Process Qualification
• Demonstrate that the process is capable of reproducible commercial manufacture
• It should be completed before product is released commercially
• Two parts to this Stage:
Design & Qualification
of FSE
Process Performance Qualification
Product that meets predetermined quality
attributes
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Process Validation
• Demonstrates the validity of the process design and the suitability of the process control strategy
• At full-scale (commercial manufacture)
• Provides confidence (documented evidence) that systems of monitoring, control and SOPs in production are capable of detecting and compensating for potential sources of process variability over the product lifecycle
• The number of PV batches to be produced should be justified
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Knowledge vs # of PV batches
Prior Knowledge Process Design
Prior Knowledge
PV
Process Design PV
Comprehensive Prior Knowledge may support fewer PV batches
Limited Prior Knowledge may require more PV batches
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Stage 3 (a) and (b)How many PPQ batches?
This depends on the risk and the following elements could be applied to make the decision:
Rationale and experience-based justifications
Based on Target Process Confidence and Target Process Capability
Based on expected coverage
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Quality Risk Management (QRM)
Begin the QRM Process
Risk Identification
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Reduction
Risk Acceptance
Risk Assessment
Risk Control
Output of the QRM Process
Review Events
Risk Review
QRMTools
Risk C
om
mu
nicatio
nICH Q9
Continual Improvement
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Maintenance of the Validated State
• “Continued Process Verification”
• Change in the validated state of the process could impact product
• Monitored via:
• Change Control
• Periodic Monitoring
• Data Trending Review
• Calibration and PM
• Knowledge of operational parameters (Control Strategy) and Design Space (if applicable)
© PharmOut 2016 www.pharmout.net
Thank you for your time.Questions?
Trevor Schoerie
www.pharmout.net
Executive Consultant