st-osw_gnauck5330

download st-osw_gnauck5330

of 46

Transcript of st-osw_gnauck5330

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    1/46

    Wavelet Analysis of Water Quality Time Series

    by

    Albrecht Gnauck and Jean Duclos AlegueBrandenburg University of Technology at Cottbus

    Dept. of Ecosystems and Environmental Informatics

    Yearly Meeting of LTER - D

    St. Oswald, March 26 - 28, 2007

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    2/46

    Content

    1. Introduction

    2. Some Remarks on Water Quality Indicators

    3. Comments on Fourier Analysis of Havel River Data4. Comments on Wavelet Analysis of Havel River Data

    5. MRA of

    mov Reservoir Data6. Conclusions

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    3/46

    Introduction

    The behaviour of water quality processes observed infreshwater ecosystems is an amalgam of components orprocesses operating in parallel manner not only at different

    frequencies but as well at different time scales.

    Answering scientific and management questions about the

    processes represented by the measured data is ofteninherently linked to understanding their behaviour at differentfrequencies and time scales.

    To extract as much information on climate changes aspossible from the signals, classical time series methods likecorrelation and spectral analysis or Fourier analysis as well

    as modern methods like wavelet analysis can be used.

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    4/46

    The variables recorded can be denoted as stressors to the

    system, ecological state variables or driving forces for the

    freshwater ecosystem.

    Driving force

    Water

    Temperature

    Ecological

    state

    Chlorophyll-a

    Stressor

    Phosphate

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    5/46

    Freshwater

    Issue

    Indicator Indication Category

    Eutrophication Chlorophyll-a

    Phosphorus

    Nitrogen

    Secchi disktransparency

    Biomass / Trophic state

    Trophic state

    Trophic state

    Transparency / Trophicstate

    Ecological state

    Stressor

    Stressor

    Ecological state

    Acidification pH Acidity, alkalinity Ecological state

    Organic pollution BOD

    DO

    CO2

    Pollution

    Productivity

    Respiration

    Stressor

    Ecological state

    Stressor

    Pathogenic

    pollution

    E. coli Fecal material Stressor

    Freshwater quality problems and possible indicators

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    6/46

    Study Area and Indicators used(Dissolved oxygen, Chlorophyll-a, water temperature, pH)

    0 10 km

    Hv0120

    Hv0200

    Hv0190 Hk0030

    Hv0170

    345

    TeK0030

    SPK0020 SPK0010

    Hv0110

    Nu0120

    Hv0180

    Hv0130

    Hv0140

    Hv0160

    flow direction

    measuring point

    POTSDAM

    BRANDENBURG

    Havel

    Havel

    Sacrow-ParetzerKanal

    SchwielowSee

    Templiner

    See

    Nuthe

    Havelka

    nal

    Schlnitz-see

    Jungfern-see

    Wublitz

    GroerZernsee

    Trebelsee

    Kleiner

    ZernseeTeltow-kanal

    Hv0170

    Have

    l

    Fahrlander-see

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    7/46

    Time

    CD

    0 500 1000 1500

    65

    0

    750

    850

    950

    5 10 15 20 25

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    8/46

    Fourier analysis of water quality data

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    9/46

    Periodograms of water quality indicators

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    10/46

    Periodograms of water quality indicators

    150

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    11/46

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    0

    50

    100

    150

    Chlorophyll-a

    Fourier 4

    Fourier 4 model of chlorophyll-a

    F(t) = 48.76 + 4.7cos(0.0087t)+0.47sin(0.0087t) 29.64cos(0.02t)

    1.4sin(0.02t) 2.48cos(0.03t) + 1.3sin(0.03t) 20.35cos(0.04t) +

    sin(0.04t)

    Goodness of fitR-square: 0.68

    Adjusted R-square: 0.67

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    12/46

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    5

    10

    15

    0

    5

    Water temperature

    Fourier 3

    Fourier 3 model of water temperature

    F(t) = 13 + 0.39cos(0.009t) + 0.018sin(0.009t) 9.71cos(0.018t)

    2.47sin(0.018t) 0.4018cos(0.027t) + 0.23sin(0.027t)

    Goodness of fit

    R-square: 0.95

    Adjusted R-square: 0.95

    H

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    13/46

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    7.4

    7.6

    7.8

    8

    8.2

    8.4

    8.6

    8.8

    9

    9.2

    9.4

    pH

    Fourier 8

    Fourier 8 model of pH

    F(t) = 8.24 0.086cos(0.006t) + 0.044sin(0.006t) 0.10cos(0.012t)

    0.009sin(0.012t) 0.15cos(0.018t) 0.24sin(0.018t) 0.005cos(0.024t) +

    0.007sin(0.024t) + 0.05cos(0.03t) + 0.031sin(0.03t) 0.17cos(0.036t) 0.04sin(0.036t) 0.07cos(0.042t) 0.002sin(0.042t) 0.09cos(0.048t)

    0.024sin(0.048t)

    Goodness of fitR-square: 0.5

    Adjusted R-square: 0.49

    Di l d O

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    14/46

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    Dissolved Oxygen

    Fourier 7

    Fourier 7 model of dissolved oxygen

    F(t) = 10.23 0.13cos(0.006t) 0.75sin(0.006t) 0.41cos(0.012t)

    0.52sin(0.012t) 0.26cos(0.018t) + 1.2sin(0.018t) +0.2cos(.024t) 0.27sin(0.24t) 0.38cos(.03t) 0.07sin(0.03t) -0.58cos(0.036t) +

    0.53sin(0.036t) 0.16cos(0.042t) + 0.39(0.042t)

    Goodness of fitR-square: 0.29

    Adjusted R-square: 0.28

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    15/46

    Wavelet analysis of water quality data

    Wavelets are mathematical tools that have proven quiteuseful for time scale based signal analysis in physicsand engineering.

    The wavelet transform is a lens for decomposing asignal into components at different resolution and time

    scale.

    ,dt)t()t(f)s,u(W s,u =

    =

    s

    ut

    s

    1)t(s,u

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    16/46

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    17/46

    Multiresolutiondecomposition (MRD)

    reveals the variations at

    different scales denoted

    by d.

    Multiresolution analysis

    (MRA) filters information

    in the signal at differentscales represented by

    a.

    MRA

    Scale

    MRD

    Scale

    Freq

    a1 d1 1

    a2 d2 2

    a3 d3 4

    a4 d4 8

    a5 d5 16

    a6 d632

    a7 d7 64

    a8 d8 128

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    18/46

    Questions to be answered

    by wavelet methods

    Are the statistical variations in a given ecologicalindicator homogenous across time ? What are thetime dependent variations such as the presence oftrends ?

    What is the dominant scale of variation influencingthe long term variation of the indicator ? Are thevariations from one day to the next more prominentthan the variations from one week to the next ?

    How are two indicators related on a scale by scalebasis? How do they covary ? Are the time lags from

    one scale to the other significantly different ?

    DO-10 minutes

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    19/46

    DO-10 minutes

    DO hourly

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    20/46

    DO-hourly

    DO daily

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    21/46

    DO-daily

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    22/46

    Dissolved oxygen

    0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 04

    6

    8

    1 0

    1 2

    1 4

    1 6

    1 8

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    23/46

    DO Variance

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    24/46

    DO-Variance

    W l t i f DO CHA

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    25/46

    Wavelet covariance of DO-CHA

    Wavelet cross-correlation of DO-CHA

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    26/46

    Wavelet covariance of DO WT

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    27/46

    Wavelet covariance of DO-WT

    Wavelet cross-correlation of DO-WT

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    28/46

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    29/46

    0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 00

    5 0

    1 0 0

    1 5 0

    Chlorophyll-a

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    30/46

    W a v e le t v a ria n c e

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    31/46

    **

    *

    **

    *

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Wavelet Scale

    L L LL L

    LU

    U

    U

    U

    U

    1 2 4 8 16 32

    W a v e le t v a ria n c e

    Wavelet covariance of CHA-pH

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    32/46

    Wavelet covariance of CHA pH

    Wavelet covariance of CHA-DO

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    33/46

    Wavelet covariance of CHA DO

    Wavelet covariance of CHA Water temperature

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    34/46

    Wavelet covariance of CHA-Water temperature

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    35/46

    Water temperature

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    36/46

    Water temperature

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18000

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    37/46

    U

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    38/46

    * **

    **

    *

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Wavelet Scale

    L L L LL

    L

    U UU

    U

    U

    U

    1 2 4 8 16 32

    Wavelet analysis ofmov reservoir data

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    39/46

    Data for water temperature, chlorophyll-a, DO,

    COD and pH from 1984-2004

    MRA

    Scale

    MRD

    Scale

    Freq/days

    a1 d1 21

    a2 d2 42 days (1.4 months)

    a3 d3 84 days (2.8 months)

    a4 d4 168 days (5.6 months)

    Water temperature (1984-2004)

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    40/46

    Chlorophyll-a

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    41/46

    Dissolved oxygen

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    42/46

    COD-Cr

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    43/46

    pH

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    44/46

    Total phosphorus

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    45/46

    Conclusions

  • 8/6/2019 st-osw_gnauck5330

    46/46

    Conclusions

    Time series analysis methods are helpful toolsto investigate long-term ecological observations.They serve as means to understand the timeand frequency structure of measurements.

    Fourier analysis gives us suitableapproximations for physical water qualityindicators but cannot follow the disturbeddynamic ecological processes which take placein freshwater bodies.

    Wavelet analysis helps us to interpret thefrequency dependent long-term changes of timeseries due to environmental (or climate)

    changes.