SPEAR3 Chicane, Accelerator Physics Update, February 10, 2005 Electron optics design review August...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of SPEAR3 Chicane, Accelerator Physics Update, February 10, 2005 Electron optics design review August...
SPEAR3 Chicane, Accelerator Physics Update, February 10, 2005
• Electron optics design review August 11, 2004– “… no show stoppers. However, …”
• Additional electron dynamics simulations– Add insertion devices to computer model– Add damping and smaller ID gaps
• Scraper measurements– Lifetime vs. ID gap study– Injection loss vs. ID gap study
• Magnetic tolerance specifications
J. Corbett, M. Cornacchia, R. Hettel, Y. Nosochkov, G. Portmann, T. Rabedeau, A. Ringwall, J. Safranek,
J. Sebek, A. Terebilo, M. Yoon
East Pit
Baseline optics
Chicane optics
matching straight, y = 4.8 m
matching straight, y = 2.5 m
long straight, y = 10 m
long straight, y = 1.6 m
Electron dynamics• 3D harmonic oscillator
• Nonlinear elements: sextupoles, wigglers
• Limit to dynamic stability: dynamic aperture.
• Need sufficient aperture for lifetime and injection
))(cos()(
)',,',()(''
ssax
yyxxfxsKx
Dynamic aperture simulations(from previous review)
Baseline optics Chicane optics
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5
6x 10
-3
x [m]
y [m
]
Baseline Optics :DA + 5mm PA
On Energy3%
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5
6x 10
-3 Double Waist Asymmetric Chicane Optics :DA + 5mm PA
x [m]y
[m]
On Energy3%
•Did not include wigglers
•Did not include damping
•Course grid of initial conditions
LIMITATIONS:
-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.030
0.005
0.01
0.015
X0 [m]
Y0 [
m]
New simulations including wigglers and damping
-0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.0250
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3
X0 [m]
Y0 [
m]
Baseline with IDs, DAPA
On Energy Best/Worst
On Energy Mean3% Best/Worst
3% Mean
-0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.0250
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3 DW with IDs, DAPA
X0 [m]
Y0 [
m]
On Energy Best/Worst
On Energy Mean3% Best/Worst
3% Mean
Baseline optics
Chicane optics
BL12 gap; aperture scans
• BL9 aperture scans– Lifetime vs. vertical orbit– Lifetime ~ constant over 4 mm– Systematic errors– Re-measure with scrapers,
11/2004
• BL12 gap, conservative– 12 – 2 = 10 mm at BL9– Scales to 6.2 mm at BL12
• BL12 gap, aggressive– 12 – 4 = 8 mm at BL9– Scales to 5.0 mm at BL12
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Beam Bump Position [mm]
Life
time
[Hou
rs]
BL 9, Vertical Bump, 18.0 mA, 24 Bunches, Ion Pumps On, 4/20/04
Orbit bump at BL9 12 mm aperture.
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 20
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
mm
hour
s
~100 mA, 280 bunches (Scraper y 2005-02-02 00-43-19)
measuredfit
4.7 mm
TBC 1111
b
bunch
totT
totB
totC
IfN
I
If
yI
)apertureE(*
)apertureE(*pressure
*aperturey*pressure 22
Five fit parameters:
ringbeam
TBC
yy ,
,,, 000
Measured lifetime vs. vertical aperture
More tracking with apertures
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3 Baseline, on-energy
x [mm]
y [m
m]
max
min
mean
5.09 mm BL12 gap
6.36 mm BL12 gap
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3
x [mm]
y [m
m]
Baseline, 3% off-energy
6.36 mm BL12 gap
5.09 mm BL12 gap
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3 Chicane, on-energy
x [mm]
y [m
m]
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3 Chicane, 3% off-energy
x [mm]
y [m
m]
Measured injection vs. vertical aperture
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.50
0.5
1
1.5in
ject
ion
effi
cie
ncy
[arb
. un
its]
scraper vertical half aperture [mm]
BL12 gap [mm]5 5.5 6
BL12 field specifications• On-axis (x=y=0) specifications, normal, bn, and skew, an
– Integrated quadrupole < 50 G– Integrated sextupole < 75 G/cm– Integrated octupole < 40 G/cm2
• Off-axis specifications– 1st integral of By < 100 + 50*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm– 1st integral of Bx < 40 + 75*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm– 2nd integral of By < 1.5e4+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm. – 2nd integral of Bx < 5e3+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm – 1st integral deriv. < 50+150*|x| G; |x|<2.5 cm,
• Peak field transverse roll-off – dBy/dx < 11000+5500*|x| G/cm, |x|<2.5 cm (BL12)– d2By/dx2 < 15000+20000*|x| G/cm2, |x|<2.5 cm (BL12)
• Accelerator physics group will review fields, once the ID is designed.• Accelerator physics group will review magnetic measurements plan.
dzBx yx,
nnn iyxiba ))(()dziB -(B yx