Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

18
Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July 8, 2011 Net Conference • Summary of Motions • No motions were made during this meeting.

Transcript of Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Page 1: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Southwest Power Pool

MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING

July 8, 2011

Net Conference

• Summary of Motions •

No motions were made during this meeting.

Page 1 of 3

Page 2: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Minutes No. [162]

Southwest Power Pool

MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING

July 8, 2011

Net Conference

• M I N U T E S •

Agenda Item 1 – Call to Order, Proxies, Agenda Discussion

Chair Richard Ross (AEP) called the meeting to order at 8:35 a.m. The attendance was recorded and proxies were announced (Attachment 1 – MWG Attendance July 8 2011). The following members were represented by proxy:

Matt Moore (GSE) for Mike Wise (GSE) Mike Mushrush (OMPA) for Gene Anderson (OMPA)

The group reviewed the agenda (Attachment 2—MWG Agenda July 8 2011) and made no changes.

Agenda Item 2 – Modeling of Plants in EMS

Casey Cathey (SPP) expanded upon his presentation from the June 21-22, 2011 meeting (Attachment 3 – Plant modeling in Marketplace). Casey Cathey (SPP) walked MWG members through three different options (Attachment 4 – Modeling Options-Examples) for modeling non-combined cycle units electrically equivalent to the transmission grid (Attachment 5 – Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace). Due to the changes coming in the Marketplace, SPP staff wanted to inform members about the advantages and disadvantages of each option before moving forward with vendor design. Members asked questions about telemetry needs, dispatch instructions, Operating Reserve deployment, Resource offer granularity and visibility needs for reliability. After much discussion, MWG members continued to support the option (#3) for plant-level modeling as currently outlined in the Marketplace Protocols.

Agenda Item 3 – Review of Motions, Action Items and Future Meetings

Motions

No motions were made during this meeting.

Action Items

No action items were assigned during this meeting.

Future Meetings July 19, 2011 (1 p.m. – 6 p.m.) July 20, 2011 (8:15 a.m. – 12 p.m.) Location: AEP Office Room: 8th Floor August 16, 2011 (1 p.m. – 6 p.m.) August 17, 2011 (8:15 a.m. – 12 p.m.) Location: AEP Office Room: 8th Floor

Page 2 of 3

Page 3: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Minutes No. [162]

Page 3 of 3

Market Working Group Minutes July 8, 2011 September 20, 2011 (1 p.m. – 6 p.m.) September 21, 2011 (8:15 a.m. – 12 p.m.) Location: AEP Office Room: 8th Floor

Agenda Item 4 – Adjournment

Richard Ross (AEP) thanked the group and adjourned the meeting at 9:47 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debbie James Secretary Attachments Attachment 1—MWG Attendance July 8 2011 Attachment 2—MWG Agenda July 8 2011 Attachment 3 – Plant modeling in Marketplace Attachment 4 – Modeling Options-Examples Attachment 5 – Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace

Page 4: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

X = In Person ℡ = By Phone * = By ProxyAttend Full Name Company E-mail Business Phone Other PhoneDay 1 ℡ Richard Ross (Chair) AEP [email protected] (918) 382-9285 (918) 284-8702

Keith Sugg (V-Chair) AECC [email protected] (501) 570-2413 ℡ Debbie James (Sec.) SPP [email protected] (501) 614-3577 ℡ Aaron Rome Midwest Energy (785) 625-1431 ℡ Ann Scott Tenaska [email protected] (817) 462-1514 ℡ Darrell Wilson OGE [email protected] (405) 553-2773 * Gene Anderson OMPA [email protected] (405) 645-2280 ℡ Joshua Kirby WFEC [email protected] (405) 247-4403 (405) 317-3790 ℡ Jessica Collins Xcel Energy [email protected] (303) 571-7740 (303) 910-7960 ℡ Lee Anderson LES [email protected] (402) 467-7591

Michael Wise Golden Spread Electric Coop [email protected] (806) 379-7766 ℡ Patty Denny KCPL [email protected] (816) 654-1702 ℡ Randy Gillespie Kelson Energy [email protected] (443) 542-5137 ℡ Rick McCord EDE [email protected] (417) 625-5129

Rick Yanovich OPPD (402) 514-1031 ℡ Shah Hossain Westar [email protected] (785) 575-6453 ℡ Aaron Shipley SPP [email protected]

Alan McQueen SPPBarbara Stroope SPPBarry Spector Wright Talisman

℡ Bart Tsala PCI [email protected] (405) 447-6933 ℡ Bill Nolte SECI [email protected] (420) 272-5458

Bill Olson Xcel Energy [email protected] Thompson AEPBrandon Whittle Excelon [email protected] (512) 422-9063Brenda Harris Oxy [email protected] Hebert Horizon Wind [email protected] (713) 265-0365Brett Kruse CalpineBrian Holmes Structure [email protected] Walkup AECC [email protected] (501) 570-2639Bryn Wilson OGE [email protected] Cooper ETEC carrie.cooper@gdsassociates (770) 715-7189

℡ Carrie Simpson SPP [email protected] (501) 688-1757 ℡ Casey Cathey SPP [email protected] (501) 614-3267

CJ Brown SPP [email protected] Waso [email protected] Casale Iberdrola [email protected] Jones Duke Energy [email protected] Werner AEP [email protected] Franklin WestarCody Parker SPP [email protected] Strain AECI [email protected] l B WFEC

Market Working GroupJuly 8, 2011

Net Conference

Darryl Boggess WFEC [email protected] (405) 247-4518 ℡ Dave McGinnis Utilicast [email protected]

Dave Savage RES-Americas [email protected] Charles Basin Electric Power Co. [email protected] (701) 557-5631

℡ David Erickson AEPDavid Hackett KEMA [email protected] (321) 600-1228Derek Mosolf MCG Energy [email protected]

℡ Dirk Dietz NPPD [email protected] Clark AEP [email protected] Hudson SPP [email protected] Hammons GRDA [email protected]

℡ Eric Alexander GRDA [email protected] Jensen AREVAFarrokh Rahimi OATI [email protected] (615) 360-1654

℡ Gary Cate SPP [email protected] ℡ Gary Rosenwald The Glarus Group [email protected]

Gay Anthony SPP [email protected] ℡ George Fee AEP

George Kelly AccentureGordon Scott EPIC Merchant Energy (281) 760-4562Heather Starnes SPP [email protected] McAlipine Chermac Energy [email protected] 405-340-9326James Fife PSI/EPV [email protected] (281) 297-5406

℡ James Sanderson KCC [email protected] (785) 271-3159Jason Smith SPP [email protected]

℡ Jeff Anderson OATI [email protected] Zahnow Argus Media [email protected] 503-227-5481

℡ Jim Flucke KCPL [email protected] Guidroz Supervisor of Tariff Administration [email protected] (501) 614-3900

℡ Jim Krajecki Customized Energy Solutions [email protected] Stevens PSI/EPV [email protected] (713) 253-9396JJ Guo AEP [email protected] Woods SPP [email protected] Taylor Xcel Energy [email protected] (303) 571-7462John Baum NovisJohn Harvey John Deere Renewables [email protected] (515) 267-3532 (515) 473-5680

℡ John Hyatt SPP [email protected] Luallen SPP [email protected] Stephens City Utilities [email protected] (417) 831-8470John Sturm Aces Power Marketing (APM) [email protected] (317) 696-9031

Page 5: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

X = In Person ℡ = By Phone * = By ProxyAttend Full Name Company E-mail Business Phone Other PhoneDay 1

Market Working GroupJuly 8, 2011

Net Conference

℡ John Varnell Tenaska [email protected] (817) 462-1037 ℡ Jon Sunneberg NPPD [email protected]

Josh Phillips SPP [email protected] Slone AEP [email protected] Schuerger Xcel Energy [email protected] Donald UtilicastKevin Patten AEP [email protected]

℡ Kim Sullivan WFEC [email protected] Rodriguez Electric Power Engineers/Wind Coalition [email protected] (254) 399-8676Liam Noailles Xcel Energy [email protected] (305) 571-2792Lyman Wilkes Physical Systems Integration [email protected] (713) 443-4026 (281) 297-5449Mak Nagle SPP [email protected]

℡ Marisa Choate SPP [email protected] (501) 688-1707Mark Watson Platts [email protected] Wiggins PCI [email protected] Jo Montoya Xcel Energy [email protected] (303) 571-7191Matt Binette [email protected]

℡ Matt Johnson TEA ℡ Matt Moore Golden Spread Electric Coop [email protected] (806) 367-8687

Matt Pawlowski NextEraMatt Wolf Entergy EMOMark Lawlor Right of WindMike Hood AECC [email protected]

℡ Mike Mushrush OMPA [email protected] Williams WFEC [email protected] Robertson SPP [email protected] Parker SPP [email protected] Kelly SPP [email protected] (501) 614-3381Patty Harrell DC Energy [email protected] Dietz Westar paul.a.dietz@ westarenergy.com

℡ Pete Kinney WAPA [email protected] (605) 882-7560 (605) 228-6758Philip Bruich SPP [email protected] Bernard SPP Board of Directors [email protected]

℡ Randy Root GRDA [email protected] Dillon SPP [email protected] (501) 614-3228Ron Chartier SECI [email protected] (785) 623-3379

℡ Ron Thompson NPPD [email protected] (402) 845-5202Roy Klusmeyer WFEC

℡ Roy True Aces Power Marketing (APM) [email protected] (317) 695-4146Ryan Garrett SPP [email protected] McRae ARVEASam Ellis SPP [email protected] K Edi Mi i k @ di i iSam Kwong Edison Mission [email protected] Nielsen [email protected] Gaw Wind Coalition [email protected] (573) 645-0777Steve Haun [email protected] Rodgers SAIC [email protected] (214) 587-5197Steve McDonald Aces Power Marketing (APM) [email protected] (317) 344-7113Stuart Rein Boston Pacific [email protected] Burke Aces Power Marketing (APM) [email protected] (512) 788-4901Tom Fritsche SPP [email protected] Alexander SPP [email protected] Delacluyse PCI [email protected] Carlson JP Morgan [email protected] Fleming SAIC [email protected] (713) 345-0753Tyler Wolford TEA [email protected] (904) 360-1460Walt Shumate Shumate & Associates [email protected] (512) 496-7704Walt Yeager Duke Energy [email protected] Camp Accenture [email protected] (856) 204-0298Wendell Drost Alstom [email protected] (318)348-0014Wenchun Zhu Wind Capital Group [email protected]

41

Page 6: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Relationship-Based • Member-Driven • Independence Through Diversity

Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary • Reliability & Economics Inseparable

Southwest Power Pool, Inc. MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING

July 8, 2011 Net Conference

• A G E N D A •

Day 1 – 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.

1. Call to Order, Proxies, Agenda Discussion ........................................................................ Richard Ross

2. Modeling of Plants in EMS ................................................................................................ Casey Cathey

3. Review of Motions, Action Items and Future Meetings .................................................... Debbie James

4. Adjournment ....................................................................................................................... Richard Ross

Page 7: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …
Page 8: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Plant modeling in Integrated Marketplace

June 21st, 2011

Casey Cathey, P.E. [email protected] ∙ 501.614.3200

Page 9: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Plant modeling in Integrated Marketplace

• Current Design in Marketplace protocols ported from EIS design

• MP may aggregate individual physical units to a plant

• Example:    

• Resource will provide 3‐part offer on plant

• Resource will be committed and dispatched as a plant

• RTGEN (EMS AGC app) will disaggregate proportionally for Set‐Points

3

Page 10: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Plant modeling issues

• Market will clear all 5 products on the plant‐wide basis

• RTGEN deploys on unit basis

• Unclear which units are responding to set‐point

• Dispatch issues may be overcome, but commitment is all or none

• Plants have 1 set of attributes

– Plant modeling may be acceptable for a CC but it limits the commitment flexibility of a multi‐unit non‐CC

4

Page 11: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Common Bus logic

• Common Bus logic is a grouping for determination of response

– Logic that sums dispatch and output in order to determine response

– This logic may be utilized in lieu of plant modeling in order to obtain benefits of plant modeling, without complicating or losing commitment benefits

5

Page 12: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Plant modeling recommendation

• MWG to consider removing the plant‐level modeling known in EIS Market for the Integrated Marketplace due to:  

– The additional complexities associated with proper commitment of non‐CC plants, 

– Communication calculation issues, 

– Loss of granularity for situational awareness, analysis, & monitoring 

6

Page 13: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …
Page 14: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …
Page 15: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …
Page 16: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Non-Combined Cycle Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace

Introduction 

In SPP’s current EIS market, multiple units at a location can be aggregated into a plant for market dispatch.  With the introduction of the SPP Integrated Marketplace, the implications of using a similar plant modeling methodology deserve careful consideration. 

This report presents the known options available for non‐combined cycle plant modeling for units electrically equivalent to the transmission grid.  A description of each option is included along with a list of advantages and disadvantages. 

Modeling Methodology Options for Non‐Combined Cycle Plants 

Option #1 – Non‐Combined Cycle Plants not allowed in any aspect of the SPP Integrated Marketplace 

This option would require unit level modeling for all generation resources excluding combined cycle plants. 

Advantages 

‐ Maximizes Economic Efficiency Individual unit modeling will allow the Integrated Marketplace to maximize economic efficiency compared to aggregated plants.  Individual unit modeling allows for more efficient commitment and dispatch co‐optimization of the available generation resources across all the products when the expanded sets of offer parameters are considered.  

‐ Maximizes Visibility for Reliability Operators Aggregated plants reduce the visibility of the operational status of the individual units that comprise the plant.  Requiring unit level modeling will allow SPP discreet control of the individual units increasing reliability and situational awareness.  

‐ Expanded Resource Offer Granularity Market Participants would be allowed to submit a resource offer for multiple units as opposed to a single resource offer for the plant. 

Disadvantages 

‐ Expanded Resource Offers Submissions and Settlement Market Participants would be allowed to submit a resource offer for multiple units as opposed to a single resource offer for the plant. Shadow settlements complexity increases.  

‐ Individual Metering Required    

Attachment 5--Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace.docx Page 1 of 3

Page 17: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Option #2 – Non‐Combined Cycle Plants allowed in all aspects of the SPP Integrated Marketplace 

Plants and Units would essentially be utilized the same by the Integrated Marketplace.  Please note: for Market Participants currently registered as multiple physical units behind a single unit record may continue to do so in the Marketplace.   

Advantages 

‐ Offers for the Aggregated Plants Enables a Reduced Number of Offers and Settlement Locations  

‐ Additional Flexibility for Market Participants 

Disadvantages 

‐ Ability to Follow Dispatch Plants providing Operating Reserve could have an increased risk of disqualification due to poor performance.  If this occurs, fewer generation resources will be available to provide Operating Reserve and could increase the risk of scarcity pricing.  

‐ Increased Offer Complexity in the Integrated Marketplace Some of the resource offer parameters introduced by the Integrated Marketplace may be difficult to assign to an aggregated plant.  For example, an aggregated plant can only offer a single startup cost.  If the startup cost of one of the individual units is submitted, the plant might not be made whole for the startup cost of the entire plant.  If the startup cost of the entire plant is submitted, the plant could appear un‐economical to the commitment engine.  

‐ Decreased Unit‐Level Awareness for SPP Reliability and Market Operations BA and RUC Operators will not have visibility into the actual output and capabilities of the individual units   

Option #3 – Plant Aggregates converted to Individual Units in RTGEN (Existing EIS and Marketplace approach; units modeled as a single plant in Market system)  

The reliability (EMS) model and telemetry have individual units (subject to potential registration thresholds).  Market clears the plant resource and disaggregates the plant quantities to send ICCP dispatch instructions on a per unit basis.  There will be an option to allow the ICCP dispatch instructions to be rolled up to a plant level set point. 

Advantages 

‐ Unit‐Level Data is Available for SPP Reliability Operations  

‐ Offers for the Aggregated Plants Enables a Reduced Number of Offers and Settlement Resources 

 ‐ Additional Flexibility for Market Participants 

Attachment 5--Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace.docx Page 2 of 3

Page 18: Southwest Power Pool MARKET WORKING GROUP MEETING July …

Attachment 5--Plant Modeling in the SPP Integrated Marketplace.docx Page 3 of 3

Disadvantages 

‐ ICCP Instructions are Disaggregation of Plant Instructions Market Participants operate to sum of ICCP data for units at the plant.  Dispatch instructions are different for ICCP and XML:  ICCP is at unit level and XML is for the Aggregate Plants.    

‐ Disaggregation rules could be complex and likely will not cover all operating scenarios.  Example:  Fourteen 40 MW units at a single plant get an XML instruction of 140 MWs.  Does each unit get a 10 MW instruction?  

‐ Increased Offer Complexity in the Integrated Marketplace  

‐ Individual Metering Required  

‐ Reduced ramp sharing flexibility  

‐ Reduced product substitution flexibility