Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Section G Strategy Five: Assess Progress...

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas

Section G

Strategy Five: Assess Progressand

Strategy Six:Provide Continual Assistance


Assess and Monitor Progress

It’s important to…

And ways to do that are:

1. ___________________________

2. ___________________________

3. ___________________________

4. ___________________________

Tp. G. 1


What Leaders of Successful Change Do

• Strategy One: C______ a c______ for c______

• Strategy Two: D______ and a______ a shared v______

• Strategy Three: P______ and p______ r______

• Strategy Four: I______ in t______ and p______ d________

• Strategy Five: Assess/monitor progress

• Strategy Six: Provide continuous assistance

Tp. G. 2

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G. 3a


Outcome 1: Participants will review Stages of Concern as a means to assess the progress of change in implementers.

Outcome 2: Participants will relate the implementation dip to

stages of concern.

Outcome 3: Participants will review use of an Innovation

Configuration matrix.

Outcome 4: Participants will assess the use of an innovation through practice with Levels of Use.

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G. 3b


Outcome 5: Participants will identify methods for providing

continual assistance to individuals who are implementing a change.

Outcome 6: Participants will explore coaching as a model for providing continual

assistance.

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G.4

Stages of Concern: Typical Expressions of Concern about the

Innovation

Stages of concern Expressions of Concern

6 Refocusing I have some ideas about somethingthat would work even better.

5 Collaboration I am concerned about relating what I am doing to what other Instructors

are doing.

4 Consequence How is my use affecting kids?

3 Management I seem to be spending all my time getting material ready.

2 Personal How will using it affect me?

1 Informational I would like to know more about it.

0 Awareness I am not concerned about it (the innovation).

Developed by Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas at Austin. Available from Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, Texas.

IMPACT

TASK

SELF


Where we are headed

Where we started

When NOT to get

discouraged

Tp. G. 5

Implementation Dip

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G. 6

Implementation Dip

SoC 1

Introduce Change

Where we are headed

SoC 2

SoC 3

SoC 3

SoC 3



Two Basic Questions

• Is it being used?

• What is it?

Tp. G. 8

Ass

ess

Pro

gres

s

— p

roof

read

ing

— e

diti

ng

— r

ewri

ting

— s

ever

al p

arag

raph

s—

long

er w

ritt

en e

xerc

ises

— o

ther

___

____

____

____

— s

impl

e se

nten

ces

— g

ram

mat

ical

exe

rcis

es—

sin

gle

para

grap

hs

— o

ral l

angu

age

— te

ache

r w

rits

wor

ds,

s

tude

nts

copy

— s

tude

nts

wri

te w

ords

Com

pon

ent 1

: W

riti

ng

Ski

lls

Tau

ght

Com

pon

ent 2

: F

requ

ency

of

Wri

tin

g L

esso

ns

Com

pon

ent 3

: F

requ

ency

of

Stu

den

t Wri

tin

g

Com

pon

ent 4

: U

se o

f S

ourc

e B

ook

Com

pon

ent 5

: K

inds

of

Wri

tin

g A

ctiv

itie

s

Wri

ting

less

ons

are

taug

htda

ily.

Wri

ting

less

ons

are

taug

ht th

ree

or m

ore

tim

es a

wee

k.

Wri

ting

less

ons

are

taug

ht tw

o ti

mes

a

wee

k.

Stu

dent

s w

rite

dai

lyat

som

e co

mpo

siti

on-

rela

ted

assi

gnm

ent.

Tea

cher

s us

e it

re

gula

rly

as b

asis

for

inst

ruct

ion.

Sen

sory

/Des

crip

tive

— c

reat

ive

wri

ting

— d

escr

ipti

ve w

riti

ng

Stu

dent

s w

rite

thre

e or

mor

e ti

mes

a w

eek

at s

ome

com

posi

tion

-re

late

d as

sign

men

t.

Stu

dent

s w

rite

onc

e or

twic

e a

wee

kat

som

e co

mpo

siti

on-

rela

ted

assi

gnm

ent.

Stu

dent

s w

rite

but

no

t com

posi

tion

-re

late

d as

sign

men

ts.

Stu

dent

s do

no

t wri

te.

Wri

ting

less

ons

are

taug

ht

once

a w

eek.

Wri

ting

less

ons

are

not

taug

ht.

Ref

ers

to it

and

othe

r m

ater

ials

for

desi

gnin

g le

sson

s.

Use

d at

leas

ton

e le

sson

pla

nfr

om b

ook.

Pic

ked

out

a fe

w id

eas.

Jus

look

edit

ove

r.K

now

s a

litt

le a

bout

it.

Imag

inat

ive/

Nar

rati

ve—

sto

ries

— p

oetr

y—

nar

rati

ve

Pra

ctic

al/I

nfor

mat

ion

— le

tter

s—

rep

orts

Ana

lyti

cal/

Exp

osit

ory

— e

ssay

s—

rep

orts

Gra

de

Lev

el:

K 1

2 3

4 5

6

Wri

tin

g fo

r C

omp

eten

cyT

each

er:_

____

____

____

__S

choo

l:__

____

____

____

__D

ate:

____

____

____

____

__


Review the Innovation Configuration Matrix

Check when done:___ 1. Review all components to see if they are

really separate and significant components.

___ 2. Should any components be combined to make the checklist simpler?

___ 3. Review all the component variations to see if they describe operational aspects of use of the named component.

___ 4. Do any component variations need clarification? Do they represent

significantly different ways of using the component?




Levels of Use of Innovation: Typical Behaviors

Levels of Use Behavioral Indices of Level

VI Renewal The user is seeking more effective alternatives to the established use of the innovation

V Integration The user is making deliberate efforts to coordinate others in using the innovation.

IVB Refinement The user is making changes to increase outcomes.

IVA Routine The user is making changes to better organize use of the innovation.

II Preparation The individual is preparing to use the innovation.

I. Orientation The individual is seeking information about the innovation.

0 Nonuse No action is being taken with respect to the innovation.

USER

NONUSER

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G. 11a

Irene was the “star” student teacher in her cohort of preservice preparation teachers. She knew a great deal about her content specialty and she had read about authentic assessment. Her college teacher prep program was a fairly traditional—and conservative—one, and Irene was not well versed in instructional strategies such as Cooperative Learning (CL). Thus, when she came on board in January as a beginning teacher, she did not pay much attention to the teachers who were beginning to use Cooperative Learning. She was too busy learning about being a real teacher. [Irene can be characterized as Level of Use(LoU) 0 Nonuse with respect to Cooperative Learning.]

After two months on the job, Irene happened to read an article about Cooperative Learning in Educational Leadership. The article struck her as interesting, so when she had a minute she went to Walter, the teacher next door, to ask him how he “did Cooperative Learning. [Now Irene has shifted LoU I Orientation with respect to Cooperative Learning.]

When the spring break came, Irene took this time to get better “squared away” in her classroom. Feeling more organized and “with it,” Irene wondered if Cooperative Learning would be useful with her social studies class. After some reading of material Walter had given her, Irene decided in favor of Cooperative Learning. To get ready for using it in the fall, she signed up for a training program in the summer and began to visit Walter’s CL classroom every few weeks to get acquainted with it. [Irene is now LoU II Preparation.]

Irene’s summer was, in her estimation, very successful. The first four weeks she spent reviewing what she had done in that spring semester, making notes and revising plans and projects. Following that, she went on a backpacking trip in the Canadian Rockies. And then she attended the three-week CL training course. In the mornings, the teachers learned the theory of CL, and in the afternoons they practiced using CL with students registered in summer school. [Irene is definitely LoU II Preparation].

School began in late August, and after a few weeks when things seemed somewhat stable, Irene began organizing and introducing CL into her social studies class. The first week was, in a word, chaotic. The timing was way off, “stuff” wasn’t ready, and the kids thought the objective was to be social. On Friday, with a sigh, she went to Walter to seek advice. After Irene poured out her story, Walter asked if she had taught the students how to work (rules, “regs,” etc.) in a CL setting. “Well, no,” she said. “I thought I just needed to start doing it “ Walter suggested that she come sit in on his class of first-year students in American literature, with whom he was initiating CL strategies. She could see what he meant. [Is Irene at LoU III Mechanical Use? You bet!]

Implementing Cooperative Learning: Irene and Levels of Use

Southwest Educational Development LaboratoryAustin, Texas Tp. G. 11b

At spring vacation that year Irene had a chance to reflect on her progress in using CL with her class—and she was pleased. With a great deal of assistance from Walter, Irene had gotten her CL act together and things seemed to be functioning smoothly in social studies. The kids knew how it worked, and Irene could often predict problems ahead of time and consider how to avoid or solve them. Life in the classroom, thanks to Walter, seemed agreeable and productive. [Irene is at LOU IVA Routine.]

But, she thought, is there a way to benefit our kids even more with CL? If Walter and I integrated our efforts and our students, and did cross-discipline student cooperative projects, how much more powerful might that be in motivating the kids and increasing their academic and social skills? She went to Walter after spring break to talk with him and they made plans to use the large empty bandroom to house their two classes for a month and put their plans in action. [Irene and Walter are at LoU V Integration—did Irene skip a step—why didn’t she move to LoU IVB Refinement? Remember the levels are not lock-step hierarchical.]

This is not the end of Irene’s story. The following year she lost Walter, who moved into a principalship. In a conversation with environmentally concerned community people, Irene began to devise a new Cooperative Learning strategy: move her classroom into the community with community people, move the community people into her classroom—all work together on Cooperative Learning/Service Learning projects that would increase students’ understanding of how topography, climate, industrial/economic conditions, and their interaction affect a community’s quality of life. “Wow!” she thought, “I’ve got it—this is real l earning for living!” [Yes, she is at LOU VI Renewal.]

Irene is atypical—that is, the number of people who reach LoU VI are few, about 6% of the population studied by CBAM researchers.


Scoring Exercise A For Levels of Use of the Innovation

1. The teacher has made various attempts to get the new science equipment ready for the next day’s class without too much success. Next he’s going to experiment with a grocery cart so he doesn’t have to make so many trips around the room (Innovation: science program)

2. Her math modules are organized and she tested them out in class last year. She’ll use them just like she did then—they were quite successful. (Innovation: modules)

3. He’s quite excited—last month, for the first time ever, he and the teacher next door got together to “pool” their students. Now each of them offers a different social studies unit, so students can choose the one that interests them. (Innovation: social studies program)

4. Six weeks ago she constructed and began to use a self-checking system for her spelling program so her pupils who can move more rapidly don’t have to wait for her. (Innovation: spelling program)

5. The principal says the school will not begin teaming until the spring, so this kindergarten teacher says he will think about it then. (Innovation: teaming).

6. He’s going to his first workshop next week to see a demonstration of inquiry learning, which the school is thinking of using. He’s going to find out what it’s all about. (Innovation: inquiry learning)

Directions: For each statement indicate (a) the overall Level of Use (provide numeral and name of level) and (b) underline clues in the statement. (a)

___

___

___

___

___

___


What Leaders of Successful Change Do

• Strategy One: C______ a c______ for c______

• Strategy Two: D______ and a______ a shared v______

• Strategy Three: P______ and p______ r______

• Strategy Four: I______ in t______ and p______ d________

• Strategy Five: A__________ p___________

• Strategy Six: Provide continual assistance


Provide Continual Assistance

Training without follow-up is malpractice.

NSDC’s Staff Development Standards Trainer’s KitStephanie Hirsh, NSDC, 1996


Listen for...

And ways to provide it are:

1. ______________________________2. ______________________________3. ______________________________4. ______________________________

Provide Continual Assistance


How Effective Are These Staff Development

Components?

• Presentation of theory or description of the new skill or strategy

• Modeling or demonstration of skills or strategic models

• Practice in simulated and actual settings

• Structured and open-ended feedback to provide information about performance in the practice

• Coaching for application, the follow-up work to help with the at-home implementation of the new skill and/or knowledge

Joyce and Showers (1980) Bush (1984)


Coaching facilitates the transfer of an introduced practice by providing the

individual with assistance.


What is Coaching?A process that facilitates the transfer of an introduced practice by providing assistance

• Breaks down complex innovations into small learnable or workable units.

• Provides a model of desired behaviors

• Praises success

• Reassures and supports efforts

• Promotes appropriate independent use

• Facilitates interchange with another person over a difficult process

• Creates opportunities for sharing frustrations and successes

• Elicits suggestions from facilitator on how to improve

• Provides mutual reflection on progress


Coaching Is Not Evaluation

Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Section G Strategy Five: Assess Progress...

Documents

Transcript of Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Austin, Texas Section G Strategy Five: Assess Progress...