Solubility Profiles of Amyloidogenic Molecular Structures...f =2 f =3 20 40 60 80 100 0.05 0.1 0.15...
Transcript of Solubility Profiles of Amyloidogenic Molecular Structures...f =2 f =3 20 40 60 80 100 0.05 0.1 0.15...
Solubility Profiles of AmyloidogenicMolecular Structures
Key Theories Towards Meaningful Experiments
Florin Despa, PhD
Department of Pharmacology The University of California, Davis
A. Hydration profiles of amyloid proteins, embryonic amyloid composites and mature amyloid fibrils
• each structural archetype has distinct long-lived water structures;• magnetic resonance (MR) signals of these waters are structure-specific
and differ from the MR signal of normal protein background. (theory & experiment)
B. hIAPP: relationship between the state of aggregation of the protein and the degree of toxicity induced in cells
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
Outline
aggP
Time (min)
Despa, Biophys. Chem. (2009)
hIAPP:KCNTATCATQRLANFLVHSSNNFGAILSSTNVGSNTY
rIAPP:KCNTATCATQRLANFLVRSSNNLGPVLPPTNVGSNTY
Hyperinsulinemia &Hyperamylinemia
Molecular denaturationinduced by molecular
crowding
Oversecretion of PPinsulin & PPamylin in
the ER
Hyperglycemia &Increased Metabolic
Demands
Beta Cell dysfunctionAmyloid Formation
How does human islet amyloid polypeptide (amylin, hIAPP) become toxic ?
10 nm 100 nm 100 nm 1 μm 100 μm1 nm
toxic molecular species
electron microscopy light microscopy
adapted from
ex vivo detection
non invasive detection NO YES
Jack et al., J. Neurosci. 25:10041–8, 2005
In Vivo MR Microimaging of Individual Amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer’s Transgenic Mice
Amyloidogenic Proteins are characterized by:
• an increased number of poorly dehydrated backbone HBsFernandez, Kardos, Scott, Goto & Berry, PNAS, (2003)
Fernandez & Berry, PNAS, (2003)
• large surface densities of patches of bulk-like waterDe Simone et al., PNAS, 2005
• favor protein associationDespa, Fernandez & Berry, PRL, 2004Despa and Berry, Biophys. J, (2007); Biophys. J, (2008)
Fernandez, Kardos, Scott, Goto & Berry, PNAS, (2003)
Pathogenic Proteins Have Poor Desolvations of the Intramolecular HBs
Fernandez & Berry, PNAS, (2003)
Fernandez, Kardos, Scott, Goto & Berry, PNAS, (2003)
The DEHYDRON is a hydrophilic structural defect
Water in the desolvation region is mostly in contact with hydrophobes ….
dELβ
dNQ
0
1=f2=f
3=f
20 40 60 80 100
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25Polarized Water
Despa, Fernandez & Berry, PRL, 2004
( ) ( )2
2
43
2
1 AE
eA
EP−
=π
r
( ) ( ) 22
0
2
18, μαμ rr LE
NNffA =
( ) ( ) 22EEPEdrrrrr μμ ∫=
Water Molecular Dipoles Correlated in Pairs Through an Entropic Effect
( )psSτ
2 4 6 8 10 12 14( )nmR
10
20
30
40nml 75.00 =
nml 10 =50
60
experimentTan et al., JCP (2005)
Despa, PCCP, 2008
The fraction of correlated water and its characteristic relaxation time depend on the degree of confinement.
2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
4 6 8 10 12 14
η
)(nmR
correlated water
Despa, PCCP, 2008
cr2b
2b
Water structured at the interface between hydrophobes is a source of induction-dispersion effects that favor protein association
( )
( ) 32
0
22
3
612
0
142
2
rrg
fvrASAd
l
rb
rbrU
c
h
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
−⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛−⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛=
μπε
γ
ε
r
( )1−molKcalUh
( )oAr“wetting” regime
Despa and Berry, Biophys. J, (2007)
Despa and Berry, Biophys. J, (2008)
sc810−>τ (caged water)
sp910~ −τ (highly structured water)
sb1210~ −τ (bulk water)
snp1010~ −τ (bulk-like water)
(structural defects)
Prion (PrPC) Solvation MapDe Simone et al., PNAS, 2005
Proteins presenting structural defects are characterized by an increased fraction of water with a bulk-like behavior.
Association of Proteins to Form Oligomers and Fibrils Rescales the Long-lived Water Structures
Oligomers
Fibrils
The change in the distribution of long-lived water structures provides the MRI signal.
mMN 10 ≅
NΔ+
NΔ+
protein background
31 mV μ≅
)2.0( mM≅
69.0≅η
74.00 ≅η
69.0≅η
B
C
A
test isomer
native protein
negative control
Aqueous Environment Containing Protein Background + Test Isomers
Dimers
Compact Aggregates
Floppy Aggregates
rA
cA
scswater VVVNVVNV ++Δ++= )()( )()(
Partition of Water in the Protein System
test isomer(increased number of surface defects)
native proteinff A >)(
)( Af
surface density of defects
f
sp VfV )1( −≅
snp VfV ≅sV(surface water)
( )ρρ −=−= maxmWmc VVVV(caged water)
sp910~ −τ (highly structured water)
snp1010~ −τ (bulk-like water)
(structural defects)
sc810−>τ (caged water)
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
Water Fractionsprotein background + test isomers
( )( )
nppcr
A
np
A
p
c
XXXXNN
NfNfX
NNNffNX
X
−−−=Δ+Δ+−
=
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛Δ+Δ+
−−
=
−−=
1
111.0
1111.0
1
)(
)(
max
ηη
ηη
ηηρρ
scaling theory (Reiss, 1965)
(caged water)
(highly structured water)
(bulk-like water)
(bulk water)
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
mf A)()( Af (soluble oligomers)
mS VV 11.0≅
sc810−>τ sp
910~ −τ snp1010~ −τ
water fractions
residence time
( ) 1.0== ff A
( ) 3.0=Af( ) 5.0=Af
caged water
highly structured water
less structured water(bulk-like)
(control)
Histograms describing the partition of constrained water in a system of protein background plus test isomers
Change of the hydration profile following the formation of fibrils and plaques.
(caged water)
(highly structured water)
(bulk-like water)
(bulk water)
Compact Aggregates
( )( )
( ))()()()(
3/2)(
3/2)(
max)(
1
1111.0
111.0
1
ASAp
ASAnp
ASAc
ASAr
ASAp
ASAnp
ASAc
XXXXNN
NNfX
NNNNfX
X
−−−=
Δ+Δ+−
−=
Δ+Δ+−
=
−−=
ηη
ηη
ηηρρ
1. at equilibrium, most of the surface defects are buried inside the fibril:2. packing density of fibrils is high so they exclude surrounding water
(Petkova et al., Science, 2005)
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
ff A →)(
(caged water)
(highly structured water)
(bulk-like water)
(bulk water)
Floppy Aggregates
caged water
( )( ) ( )
( ))()()()(
3/2)(
3/2)(
max)(
1
1111.0
111.0
111.01
aggp
aggnp
aggc
aggr
aggp
aggnp
aagg
c
XXXXNN
NNfX
NNNNfX
NNNX
−−−=
Δ+Δ+−
−=
Δ+Δ+−
=
−−
Δ+Δ
+−−
=
ηη
ηη
ρρηη
ηηρρ
1. most of the surface defects are buried inside the aggregate;2. packing density of fibrils in a plaque is sufficiently low so that, plaques
contain additional caged water molecules (Nelson et al., Nature, 2005)
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
sc810−>τ sp
910~ −τ snp1010~ −τ
water fractions
residence time
caged water
highly structured water
controlprotein background + test isomersdimers of test isomers compact protein aggregates
floppy protein aggregates
less structured water(bulk-like)
Histograms describing the partition of constrained water in a system of protein background plus test isomers
Despa, Fernandez, Scott & Berry, JBP (2008)
∑ ⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−=
j jjjk T
TEkTTRXSS
,2,1max expexp1
∑=j j
j
TX
T ,22
1
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
++
++=
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
++
+=
22,2
22,1
212
15
32
1
214
11
jL
j
jL
jj
j
jL
j
jL
j
j
CT
CT
τωτ
τωτ
τ
τωτ
τωτ
Magnetic Relaxation Response
40 50 60 70
9.35
9.45
9.25
A (control)
BC
Less Structured Water
Highly Structured Water
D
E
TE (ms)
maxSSMR Intensity Signal
(grayscale)
BC
Protein Background + Test Isomers
Control Protein BackgroundA DE
Protein Background + Dimers
Protein Background + Compact Aggregates
Protein Background + Floppy Aggregates
• AD samples can display both bright and dark spots on MR images;• Bright spots are likely to indicate oligomers and protofibrils.
)(2
)(2
)(2
controlbc TTT >>
)(2
)(2
controlb TT >
)(2
controlT
)(2
)(2
controla TT <
hIAPP in serum
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
Aβ1-40 in serum
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
Objectives:• To detect the MR response of water following structural modifications of the amyloidogenic assemblies;• To test the hypothesis that the formation of oligomers and/or fibrils leads to an increase of the T2 values, shifting the MR signal towards values corresponding to bulk-like water.
1 2 3 1 2 3
serum+water
1 2 3
Water Proton NMR Spectroscopy of Amyloidogenic Structures
Dr. J. Walton Dr. S. Anderson
NMR Setup
ParaVision 3.0.2 to collect data, Nonlinear least square (NNLS) fit to analyze data
Data Analysis
200 250 300 350 40090
92
94
96
98
100
hIAPPAbeta
T2 (ms)
% o
f sam
ple
Water Proton NMR Spectroscopy of Amyloidogenic Structures
200
250
300
350
400hIAPPAbeta
m c1 c2
T 2 (m
s)
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
92
94
96
98
100hIAPPAbeta
m c1 c2
% o
f sam
ple
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
0.4, 0.441.2, 5.792.6, 97.48, 96.3 (95.46)
350, 370, 370363.33
6.3, 0.48, 1.61
0.71, 7.2, 1Abeta(c2)
93.5, 96.8, 95.9 (95.4)
310, 310, 330316.66
0.5, 0.47, 0.77
9.1, 5.7, 5.15.5, 1.27, 1.74
0.85, 2.4, 1.4Abeta(c1)
94.5, 95.97, 96.8 (95.76)
210, 210, 230216.66
0.26, 0.697.2, 5.14.3, 1.88, 2.01
1.1, 1.9, 3.6Abeta(m)
96.9, 98.27, 98.1 (97.76)
310, 310, 3102.2, 0.42, 0.51
2.1, 7.2, 7.2control(2)
96, 97.99, 97.7 (97.23)
310, 310, 310310
3, 0.58, 0.681.8, 8.1, 6.8hIAPP(c2)
0.33, 0.585.4, 6.495, 97.5, 97 (96.5)
230, 250, 250 (243.33)
4.1, 1.25, 1.81.1, 2.4, 1.1control (1)
94.4, 97.38, 97.4 (96.39)
250, 250, 260253.33
0.28.63.6, 1.11, 0.87
1.4, 5.1, 6.4hIAPP(c1)
93.4, 96.58, 96.8 (95.59)
200, 200, 2000.23, 0.77, 1.03
7.7, 8.1, 6.85.4, 1.21, 0.82
0.95, 1.5, 1.4control
93.9, 97.38, 97.7 (96.33)
200, 220, 220213.33
4.1, 1.11, 0.77
1.5, 7.2, 9.1hIAPP(m)
% of sampleT2(C) (ms)% of sampleT2
(B) (ms)% of sampleT2(A) (ms)
Water Proton NMR Spectroscopy of Amyloidogenic Structures
The formation of oligomers and/or fibrils leads to an increase of the T2 value
200
250
300
350
400ControlhIAPPAbeta
T 2 (m
s)
m c1 c290
92
94
96
98
100
ControlhIAPPAbeta
m c1 c2
% o
f sam
ple
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM 5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
hIAPP in serum
5 µM 50 µM100 µM
Aβ1-40 in serum
5 µM 50 µM 100 µM
1 2 3 1 2 3
serum+water
1 2 3
How does the amyloid toxicity manifest at the cellular level ?
cardiac myocyte
Amylin-Induced Toxicity in Cardiac Myocytes
Objective: To assess the functional alteration of myocytes induced by hIAPP.
Method: Monitor the intracellular Ca signal .
Sarcolemma
ICa
CaCaCa
Ca
3Na
MyofilCa
SRR
yRCa
3Na
Ca
T-Tu
bule
Na-CaX
NCXATP
PLB ATP
Na
Mito
3Na
2K
ATP
PLM
Na
NHE
H
AP(Em)
[Ca]i
Contraction
Ca
CaNa
H
2NaHCytCyt
Amylin-Induced Toxicity in Cardiac Myocytes
Experimental Protocol:- myocytes were plated on laminin-coated coverslips; - loaded with Fura-AM (10 μmol/L, for 45 min);- Fura was alternately excited at 340 and 380 nm (F340 and F380) using an Optoscan monochromator (Cairn Research, Faversham, UK);- fluorescence was collected at 510±20 nm;- the fluorescence ratio F340/F380 was calculated after background subtraction.
AP(Em)
[Ca]i
Contraction
Ca-mediated Cardiomyocyte Contraction
40 50 60 70
0.50
0.75
0.25normal protein background
bulk-like water
structured water
TE (ms)
S
Intensity of Magnetic Response of Water
fibrils
soluble amyloidogenic proteins
large, floppy aggregates
Concluding Remarks
• Amyloid proteins and embryonic amyloidcomposites can be differentiated based on their hydration profiles and characteristic MR signals of the surrounding water.
MRI Contrast Mechanism for Detection of AD
Jack et al., J. Neurosci. 25:10041–8, 2005
In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Microimaging of Individual Amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer’s Transgenic Mice
Clinical Implication:
40 50 60 70
0.50
0.75
0.25normal protein background
bulk-like water
structured water
TE (ms)
S
Intensity of Magnetic Response of Water
fibrils
soluble amyloidogenic proteins
large, floppy aggregates
Concluding Remarks
• Amyloid proteins and embryonic amyloidcomposites can be differentiated based on their hydration profiles and characteristic MR signals of the surrounding water.
• Toxicity induced by soluble amyloid composites manifests at the cellular level in a time-dependent manner: progressive damage of the membranes.
5 µM
msT 2132 ≅
50 µM
msT 2532 ≅
• Oligomers are the most toxic species. Fibril growth at the membrane is equally toxic….
Acknowledgements
• R. Stephen Berry (Chicago)• Ariel Fernandez (Rice) • L. Ridgway Scott (Chicago)• Christopher Rhodes (Chicago) • Donald Steiner (Chicago)• Ulrich Hansmann (Juelich)
• Sanda Despa (Davis)• Jeff Walton (Davis)• Steve Anderson (Davis)