Solid Waste Management in K Di i C il M l iKampar District ...2) MAMBANG DIAWAN 3) TRONOH MINES 4)...
Transcript of Solid Waste Management in K Di i C il M l iKampar District ...2) MAMBANG DIAWAN 3) TRONOH MINES 4)...
Solid Waste Management inK Di i C il M l iKampar District Council. Malaysia
Kampar District Council Perak. Malaysia
K Di t i t C il P k M l iKampar District Council, Perak, Malaysia
Operation area
1) KAMPAR
2) MAMBANG2) MAMBANG DIAWAN
3) TRONOH MINES )
4) GOPENG
5) KOPISAN5) KOPISAN
6) LAWAN KUDA
7) KOTA BHARU7) KOTA BHARU
8) JERAM
9) KUALA DIPANG
10) MALIM NAWAR
11) SUNGAI SIPUT (S)
Total Population year 2005 ‐ year 2010
99102
101183
100000
102000
95068
97064
96000
98000
ion
92619
92000
94000
mbe
rs of P
opulat
90449
88000
90000
Num
84000
86000
Total population
Year 2005 90449
Year 2006 92619
Year 2007 95068
Year 2008 97064
Year 2009 99102
Year 2010 101183
140
Estimated Total Waste Generation /Day
103107.89
112.6117.53120
94.9599
103
80
100
(Ton
s)
60
80
mbe
rs of W
atse
40
Nu
0
20
Estimated total waste generation /days
Year 2005 94.95
Year 2006 99
Year 2007 103
Year 2008 107.89
Year 2009 112.6
Year 2010 117.53
80
Total Waste Collection/ Day
6163.44
67.5470
80
54.1456
58.361
50
60
Tons)
40
mbe
rs of W
atse (T
20
30
Num
0
10
Total watse collection /days
Year 2005 54.14
Year 2006 56
Year 2007 58.3
Year 2008 61
Year 2009 63.44
Year 2010 67.54
5. Total Recyclables (20055. Total Recyclables (2005‐‐2010)2010)
No Materials 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010(Tones/year)(Tones/year)
1 Papers 5,973.41 6,247.92 6,535.58 6,837.06 7,153.05 7,484.272 Plastics 2,810.57 2,931.91 3,058.68 3,191.11 3,329.47 3,474.043 Glass 1,336.38 1,398.34 1,463.30 1,531.41 1,602.82 1,677.714 Ferrous Metals 553.68 579.00 605.52 633.32 662.44 692.965 Aluminium 141 13 147 78 154 76 162 08 169 76 177 825 Aluminium 141.13 147.78 154.76 162.08 169.76 177.82
Total10,815.17 11,304.95 11,817.84 12,354.97 12,917.54 13,506.80
MDKpr recycling R tRate…
Recycling Rate (%)
2006 2007 2008 2009 20105% 7% 9% 11% 13%
Total Municipal budget andit ll ti f SWMits allocation for SWM
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010RM8mil 8 mil 9 mil 10mil 12milRM8mil 8 mil 9 mil 10mil 12mil
RM 2.7 mil 3.4 mil 4.0 mil 4.3 mil 4.7 mil
Waste characteristic
Based on the landfill data, the recorded average total waste as disposed b d /dto be around 67.54 tones/day
No Generation Sources Waste as collected Percentage(tones/day)
g
1 Household 40.71 60.27%
2 Commercial 12.43 18.40%
3 Market 11 40 16 88%3 Market 11.40 16.88%
4 Industrial 1.2 1.78%
5 Public Parks /Garden 1.8 2.67%
Total 67.54 100.0%
3 Waste Composition3. Waste Composition
‐ Food waste : 39.6%
‐ Paper : 31.2%Paper : 31.2%
‐ Plastic : 8.1%
‐ Glass : 3.5%
‐ Scrap metal : 1 7%‐ Scrap metal : 1.7%
‐ Aluminums : 0.7%
‐ Others : 15.2%
Waste Flow in MDKpr
Waste generated
Waste discarded for collection
Waste Retained at source Otherscollection
Collection trucks Waste pickers Sent to recycling centers
Reuse
Sent to landfill Truck workers Sold to Traders
Final Disposal Scavengers Cooperative MDKS NGORecycling Industries
SWM Strategy of Kampar
Year prepare : 2005
Vision :
ea p epa e : 005
Reduce waste disposal to landfill by 22 % recycling f y y grate by year 2020 By:
Majlis Daerah Kinta Selatan (MDKS)
Supported by:Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG)
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Mission : To promote waste awareness minimization by increasing public and building effective recycling systemg y g y
Action PlanAction Plan
• Overall project plan for each targets.
•Registration system •Reduce plastic bagg y Reduce plastic bag
MDKS
•Intensive PR and set up partnership for pilot area
•Activities, events for pilot schools
partnership for pilot area
•In‐house promotion of recycling•Billboard•Brochure etc.
Progress results achieved alreadyProgress, results achieved already
• Achieve 13% recycling rate
• 13 model schools13 model schools
• 2 community initiatives
• 20 trainers
• Recycle network unit in district officeRecycle network unit in district office
• Information Network with recyclers
IssuesIssues
• Issues ‐ privatization of SWM ( federal level)
• Challenges : continuous and sustainingChallenges : continuous and sustaining program
C i ff d fi• Constraints : staff and finance
• Future action :
continue as LA 21 program
Compost centre at landfill site
How it tit get Started ? Promotion of
composting in Kampar
Started ?
Try Recycle in correct wayto achieve ZERO WASTE society
p g pJOCV
y用正确的方式进行再循环, 以达致“零垃圾”的社会
• 2 Cardboard Boxes
S il• Soil
• Charcoal
• Kitchen waste (Vegetable, fruits peels etc.)
• Mixing tool (shovel, turner, or lubber glove etc.)
***Optional***
Rice branRice bran
Existing Composting Program
Started in 2010
A) Technical workshopsB) Networking at Batu Putih new villagesCommunity Hall
operated by: Recycling activities carried out by:
COM
NGOsresident associationCharity organizations
by:Community committee
village headmandistribution of basket
MPOSCharity organizations
MHLGSchools
flaunching by statemaninformation dissemination
ST
THM – household program(Pilot Project)
Takakura home method – 2 basket per householdp
Stakeholders involved, role and responsibilities
1.NGOS – information dissemination2.Schools – information, workshop, role2.Schools information, workshop, role model
3 A d i i tit ti l d l d l3.Academic institutions – lead role model 4.Private sectors – financial supportf pp5.District council – main committee ( every month reporting progress )month reporting progress )
Mobilize external resourcesMobilize external resources
• Community participation – workshop with resident group.g p
• Launching by the statesman.
NGO i i i h di i i• NGO participation – handicap association e.g. Kampar beautiful Gates
• University students hands on project ( community service society)( community service society)
• International cooperation – JOCV
Budget Allocation For CompostBudget Allocation For Compost
• Municipal budget ( part of Local Agenda 21Municipal budget ( part of Local Agenda 21 program ) RM 30 K a year
F d l RM 45 K• Federal government ‐ RM 45 K
Final product of compostFinal product of compost
• Promotion of backyard gardeningPromotion of backyard gardening
• Sell back to landscape department for own bli l & dpublic places & garden use
Lesson LearnedLesson Learned
Success factor
• Segregation at source g g• Pure organic waste ( homogenous) such as food and beverages industriessuch as food and beverages industries is easier
• Bigger quantity and more sustainable• Bigger quantity and more sustainable• Market value for compost is also crucial
BarriersBarriers
• Lack of knowledge, attitude ( do not segregate waste) and skills g g )
• need continuous strengthening of project
M k f i ll• Market for compost is small
• Price is low
• Characteristic of compost content sensitive ( H l l h ti f li i( Halal or haram perspective from religious point of view)
External assistanceExternal assistance
• Demand market with reasonable price
• Budget to implement compost neededBudget to implement compost needed
• If market is available feasible doing )compost)
• E.g. sell it back to landscape department of g p p fown office usage for public landscaping worksworks
Recycle Network Unit
Kampar District Council
Jalan Iskandar, 31900,
Kampar, Perak. Malaysia
05-467 1020 / 467 104705 467 1020 / 467 1047
www.mdkampar.gov.my