Social Media Primer For Large Corporations

Internet Marketing Resources Portal

of 7

SSOOCCIIAALL MMEEDDIIAA PPRRIIMMEERR FFOORR LLAARRGGEE CCOORRPPOORRAATTIIOONNSS

Written by Carsten Cumbrowski, March, 27 2008, Originally published at SearchEngineJournal.com This is a comprehensive guide for large corporations to engage in social media properly, in order to

leverage its power and at the same time avoid some of the possible backlashes of a non-existing or

improper planned and/or executed social media strategy.

This guide was originally published with the title "Social Media Guide for Big Brand Corporate

Businesses" at the search engine marketing news blog Search Engine Journal, where it was well received

but the many thousands of blog readers.

IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN

The amount of activity and participation of

people on sites like MySpace, Facebook, Flickr,

YouTube, Wikipedia, Digg, Del.icio.us and other

so called social media sites and social networks

that make up what we call the new Web or

Web 2.0, did not go unnoticed by the big

business out there.

The possibilities to do something good with it

for your business are real, but hard to gauge,

measure, adjust and redirect like how must

things in the real world and the good old Web

1.0.

An untamed wild beast is powerful yet dangerous at the same time. Some beast can by nature not be

tamed entirely, regardless of what you do or try to do in order to keep it under control.

There will always some amount of uncertainty and risk involved when being around or doing something

with those animals. The same is true for social networks and "people" in general. However, the risks can

be reduced by knowing more about the beast, learning how to handle it, being aware of the possible

reactions (positive or negative) and having plans ready for as much as possible scenarios in the event

that they are needed fast.

Social media can be leveraged by any company, especially large corporations. The problem is that large

corporations are often scared of this new type of way of how communication is conducted and people

interact with the company and its products and services. Yes, it is different than it was in the past and it

requires some rethinking and learning, but it will be worthwhile doing, if you do it right.

http://www.cumbrowski.com/


of 7

Rushing the thing to jump onto the bandwagon as quickly as possible is not only dangerous, but also an

open invitation for disaster and the chance that things get even worse after the first "incident", which

will come for sure. That is not a question of IF but WHEN. The traditional "ignore", "bully", or "use the

PR-Agency" methods can have an unexpected backlash and hit you without you being ready for it.

Why go through all the trouble and even think about implementing a social network and for what?

Social media can be used internally, as an extension of an extra-net, which involves suppliers and

business partners and/or externally to communicate with existing and/or potential future customers.

Wikis and other collaborative editing/content management systems, rating and ranking features,

comments and discussion forums can be used for anything that is some sort of data repository, database

or collection of information. It can also be used for phone and contact lists and events calendars as well.

If you let your customers engage you and your products directly, things like focus groups and similar

vehicles for market research and testing could be replaced entirely and become more efficient than the

best "focus group" will ever be. You allow direct input from people who actually know and use your

products or your competitors. People who know what they need and can tell you exactly what that is

etc.

Projects that involve you and multiple of your suppliers could be coordinated in a way that each supplier

can interact with the other and discuss possible issues, specifications and time lines without the need

for you to do anything at all. Issues that arose from three way communication, no communication or

clarification of provided specifications can cause problems that result in delays and problems during the

project implementation. Errors and misunderstanding could be avoided, if open communication

between the involved parties would have been available during the whole course of the project.

Those are only a few examples, but you get the general idea I hope.

You want to make the most of your social media implementation and ensure that it does not become

just another unused tool, which was rejected by the users or simply ends up a mere replication of

existing data repositories without adding additional values.

You should consider the following things for your social media implementation.


of 7

MMAAKKEE IITT EEAASSYY

Make it easy for the user to express

their opinions and ideas in the social

media environment. Implement the

right tools and make sure that those

tools can be used right away

without the user having to go

through extensive training classes in

order to use the system. More is not

always better. As a compromise,

make the common features enabled and active by default and put all the other stuff under optional

"advanced" setting for the geeks and super users who cry for more fancy features.

The barrier of entry that makes users participate or not, depends significantly on the fact how hard it is

for a user to take the first steps that are necessary in order for him to see a result, gets a feeling of

accomplishment and if and when he sees gratification in return to his efforts.

BBEE AASS OOPPEENN AASS PPOOSSSSIIBBLLEE

In many cases are better results accomplished if more people are involved rather than a handful

selected few. The enlightening moment is often triggered by a seemingly outsider who provides new

views and thoughts to a discussion that is trapped in a vicious circle without being able to escape it.

Let as many people participate as you can. Use a black list approach rather than a white list one and

restrict access only where it is absolutely necessary for security reasons or where you have to protect

your intellectual property from competitors.

EENNCCOOUURRAAGGEE,, NNOOTT DDIISSCCOOUURRAAGGEE

Let people do what they do, even if they spin off a little and discuss more than a specific problem at

hand. You might want to moderate here and there and move discussions that are in the wrong section

to another place where it is more appropriate and let the discussion continue there. Do the same if

discussions spin off too far and get off track as a result of it.


of 7

PPOOLLIICCEE,, YYEESS,, BBUUTT ......

Sometimes people go over board and add content that is not appropriate. "Not liking" or "different

opinion" is not what I mean by inappropriate. I am referring to the use of aggressive or obscene

language, threatening other users, publishing of company secrets in places where unauthorized users

have also access to it etc.

Most of the reasons why you have to police something should already be written down in some sort of

user guide that explains the network rules and code of conduct.

If you take actions against a violator, especially actions that are visible by other users, provide clear

reasons for your actions that the users can understand, follow and agree with you on. Do not act like a

secret police that acts arbitrary under a cloud of unclear rules and without the need to justify its actions.

Doing so will get you many things, but not trust by the users.

KKEEEEPP CCOONNTTRROOLL

I mean by keeping control more that you know what is going on in order to be able to act where

necessary or appropriate. Don't do more than you can handle. If you go too broad and have more users

contribute to a vast number of things without you being able to keep an eye on what is happening, you

open yourself up for problems.

Create only as much as you can handle, even if that means that you have to make your social media

implementation a phased approach in order to be able to grow the necessary tools and staff to

moderate with it.

TTRRUUSSTT!!

Now I will talk about the most important key element that businesses, especially the large brands that

are in most cases overly protective about their brand image, should keep in mind, if they want to go the

route of social media. Not every company is ready for it, actually most are not.

In order to have a successful social media site that has value for you and for its users, you have to make

sure that people trust you and feel safe from expected and unexpected repercussions and consequences

if they are expressing their thoughts and opinions freely. I mentioned this already, but I will repeat it

again, a bit differently to make sure that it is understood correctly.

I am not referring to obscene, vulgar or plain and simple unethical, immoral or even illegal stuff, but to

straight forward and sometimes blunt truth and honesty, which is either in opposition to your own

views or at first glance negative for your precious brand image.


of 7

CCOOMMPPLLAAIINNTTSS,, NNEEGGAATTIIVVEE AANNDD OOPPPPOOSSEEDD OOPPIINNIIOONNSS

With a few exceptions are those negative or

opposed views and opinions not malicious

with the intention to just damage your

reputation and brand. They often show a

different perspective you have not been

aware about before or a spelled out problem

without any attempt to talk it nice and less

of an issue than it actually is. In those

instances is the intention of the person who

expresses himself that way almost in every

case very honorable.

The person intents to change something that

is not right, at least in the way how he

experienced it, and get it fixed or seek alternative options and suggestions. It is sometimes to remedy a

current issue that is still open and unresolved and in other cases something from the past, where the

person wants to help to prevent that other people have to make the same (negative) experience he

made.

Those expressions will occur and the one thing you don't want to do with them is to suppress them,

delete them or prohibit or use any other means to discourage those kinds of expressions. You would

lose trust and respect from people who notice it, from clients, staff members and outsiders alike.

If the negative opinion has some real basis and is real and no joke, censorship will not make it go away

or solve it. People are most likely to take their grudge and take it elsewhere to a place where you have

most of the time no control at all over the events that might follow as a consequence. The person who

took the time to express his issues and concerns at your site and finds out that you try solve the issue by

avoiding it and suppressing any conversation will only get elevated in his negative thinking about you

and get madder than he already is because of the issue itself. That does in almost any case because the

next rant by the same guy at another place to be much more negative and damaging than the original

expression on your site.

EEVVEERRYYBBOODDYY CCAANN FFOORRGGIIVVEE HHOONNEESSTT MMIISSTTAAKKEESS

Everybody can forgive honest mistakes, because we all make them. Nobody is perfect, including the

seemingly perfect brands that less people actually perceive that way, considering it to be fake, unreal

and detached from real life.


of 7

PPEEOOPPLLEE DDOO NNOOTT FFOORRGGIIVVEE CCEENNSSOORRSSHHIIPP

People however are less forgiving when it comes to how somebody responses to sound and real

criticisms. It demonstrates to any other customer and potential future customers how you handle

problems, conflicts and concerns of your customers. They will see what they might have to expect in the

case that they run into similar or completely different issues themselves.

Even the happiest customers of your might get worried if they see you handling such conflicts and

problems badly, without making reasonable attempts to clarify the issues, seek the cause and provide

either possible solutions to the problem or an explanation why that problem occurred and why you

might not be able to provide a solution that will be satisfactory to the grunted customer.

TTUURRNN NNEEGGAATTIIVVEE IINNTTOO PPOOSSIITTIIVVEE

This feedback is the most honest that you can get and no focus group will ever discover. It also lets you

turn negative publicity into something positive for you and valuable for your clients or potential clients.

The quality of your product or service will benefit from it, if you implement changes to improve it based

on customer response and feedback, if the product or service will not get better, then the specification

of what your product is good for and what it is NOT so good for will be better defined and most

importantly will customers of yours feel much better about doing business with you, as they can see

that you will not abandon them in the event of a problem that might come up down the road in the

future. … and since you allow all this to happen on your grounds, it will be less likely to spread around as

much, giving you the ability to "suck it all in" to just have to manage one larger fire that to combat many

small fires all over the place and you can make sure that the problem does not escalate or sidetracks to

make any solution finding impossible.

You can ensure that the discussion remains fair and civilized and not turns into pointless flame wars.

CCOOMMEE OOUUTT SSTTRROONNGGEERR

In short, your brand and business will get out of this much stronger, more confident with a much better

perception of you by the community, which will then result into a very good reputation, trust and more

business for your company. And that is at the end of the day what it is all about, isn't it?!


of 7

NNOOTT LLIIMMIITTEEDD TTOO CCUUSSTTOOMMEERRSS OONNLLYY

What I just said is not only limited to social media platforms that deal with outsiders, such as your

customers, but also for purely internal Wikis. If employees who express concerns or problems get

discouraged, belittled, branded as "trouble makers" or worse, fear for their job, they and everybody else

will simply stop raising those concerns and problems and only talk about all that is good and peachy.

This will cause problems to get worse and worse over time until they burst into the open and hard to

impossible to deal with. By the time everybody can see the problem, the possible solutions are most of

the time very radical and sometimes negative as well.

Many of those problems became a big problem over time and started out as a small and very

manageable problem that could have been easily fixed a long time ago, if only somebody who saw it

back at that early stage already would have voiced his concerns and pointed to the problem. That would

at least have given the company the opportunity to fix it right then or at least keep an eye on it to act a

bit later, but before it escalates into an unmanageable monster.

CCOONNCCLLUUSSIIOONN

I hope that you find the provided tips and recommendations useful. If you were not thinking about

possible ways for how to leverage social media for your business, this article might provide you with

some ideas to reconsider this option. If you are working for a large brand, I hope that you got out of this

that there is nothing to fear except for the fear of doing it itself and that doing it is worth the risks, if you

are aware of them and prepared for the things that are awaiting you.

FFUURRTTHHEERR RREESSOOUURRCCEESS

Social Media Optimization and Word of Mouth Marketing 2.0

http://www.cumbrowski.com/CarstenC/articles/20071126_SMO_and_Word_of_Mouth.asp

Social Media Primer For Large Corporations

Business

Transcript of Social Media Primer For Large Corporations