Social Judgment Theory Bg

13
Social Judgment Theory Griffen Ch. 14 2009.11.24

description

This is a basic powerpoint show developed to accompany Em Griffen\'s Communication Theory Text

Transcript of Social Judgment Theory Bg

Page 1: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Social Judgment Theory

Griffen Ch. 14

2009.11.24

Page 2: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Social Judgment Theory Basics:Information from Brad

• Internal (mental) processing of a communicated message

• 2 functions– Explain

• Conditions for attitude change

– Predict• Direction and extent of change

Page 3: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Basics Continued (p. 183)

• Present World View – When a message is seen or heard– Immediately compared to existing

• Values, beliefs, opinions, experience

– In relationship to bands of tolerance – Of similar and differing

• Values, beliefs, opinions, experience

Page 4: Social Judgment Theory Bg

3 Latitudes

• Acceptance – Preferred messages

• Rejection– Offensive messages

• Noncommitment – Indifferent messages

Page 5: Social Judgment Theory Bg

AIDS Awareness Poster

Page 6: Social Judgment Theory Bg

AIDS Ribbon in China

Page 7: Social Judgment Theory Bg

AIDS/HIV Messages

• Acceptance

• Rejection • Noncommitment

• Attitude structure: location and width of each latitude (p. 183)

Page 8: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Ego Involvement (p. 183-4)

• Importance of issue/topic to individual

• Favored position [acceptance] anchors all thoughts about topic

• Often: Membership in a group

Page 9: Social Judgment Theory Bg

3 Features of Ego Involvement (pp. 184-5)

• No latitude of noncommitment

• Wide latitude of rejection

• High emotional engagement

Page 10: Social Judgment Theory Bg

2 Processing Errors (pp. 185-6)

• Contrast – Message within

latitude of rejection – Perception of

message content pushes it further from anchor point

– Leads to polarization of ideas

• Assimilation– Message within

latitude of acceptance– Perception of the

message pushes it closer to the anchor point

– Leads to confusion about conflict

Page 11: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Attitude Change (pp. 186-7)

• Message with “latitude of acceptance”– Measured by distance from anchor point

• Positive effect

• Partial

• Biggest change – Within latitude of acceptance but far away from anchor

point

Page 12: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Attitude Change (pp. 186-7)

• Messages within the “latitude of rejection”– Movement away from the point of view of the

message– Effect against intent to persuade – Boomerang effect

• We move against a position in our latitude of rejection rather than toward on in our latitude of acceptance

Page 13: Social Judgment Theory Bg

Practical Advice for Persuader

• Know audience’s latitude of acceptance

– Persuade at the edge of the latitude

• Small steps not giant leaps

– Will take time and repetition