Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

49
Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro

Transcript of Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Page 1: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetorical Theory:A theory of Judgment

Michael Vicaro

Page 2: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 3: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

Page 4: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 5: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

Page 6: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

• A speaker

Page 7: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

• A speaker• Faced with a crisis (exigency)

Page 8: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

• A speaker• Faced with a crisis (exigency)• Appeals to an audience

Page 9: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

The Rhetorical Situation

• A speaker• Faced with a crisis (exigency)• Appeals to an audience•Whose judgment matters

Page 10: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

I.

Page 11: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetoric is about

Judgment

Page 12: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 13: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 14: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Greek Problems and Roman Problems

Page 15: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Greek Problems and Roman Problems

• Ancient Greek communication problem:

Page 16: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Greek Problems and Roman Problems

• Ancient Greek communication problem: How citizens can arrive at collective judgment when they begin with different beliefs and interests and the right course of action is unknown

Page 17: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Greek Problems and Roman Problems

• Ancient Roman communication problem:

Page 18: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Greek Problems and Roman Problems

• Ancient Roman communication problem: How to transmit official declarations from the center to the periphery of a broad empire

Page 19: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

A rhetorical view of Judgment Implies

Page 20: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

A rhetorical view of Judgment Implies

• Uncertainty

Page 21: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

A rhetorical view of Judgment Implies

• Uncertainty• Urgency

Page 22: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

A rhetorical view of Judgment Implies

• Uncertainty• Urgency• Interdependence

Page 23: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

A rhetorical view of Judgment Implies

• Uncertainty• Urgency• Interdependence• Hope

Page 24: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Alternatives to Judgment:

Page 25: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Alternatives to judgment:

• Force

Page 26: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Alternatives to judgment:

• Force• Submission

Page 27: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Alternatives to judgment:

• Force• Submission• Solitude

Page 28: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 29: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

On Lies

Page 30: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

On Lies

Rhetoric that employs deceit descends into force, submission, or solitude.

Page 31: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetoric, again, is about uncertainty, urgency, interdependence, and hope

Page 32: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

II.

Page 33: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetoric is about language

Page 34: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetoric is about languageand symbols more generally

Page 35: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

But Bodies Matter

Page 36: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 37: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 38: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.
Page 39: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

III.

Page 40: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

Rhetoric is about the Audience

Page 41: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume

Page 42: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume- the audience possesses:

• Intelligence

Page 43: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume- the audience possesses:

• Intelligence• Influence (their judgment matters)

Page 44: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume- the audience possesses:

• Intelligence• Influence (their judgment matters)• Hopes, fears, passions, ideals,

empathy, shame, imagination etc.

Page 45: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume- the audience possesses:

• Intelligence• Influence (their judgment matters)• Hopes, fears, passions, ideals,

empathy, shame, imagination, etc.• Pasts and futures

Page 46: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

What we must assume- the audience possesses:

• Intelligence• Influence (their judgment matters)• Hopes, fears, passions, ideals,

empathy, shame, imagination, etc.• Pasts and futures• Cultures, opinions, beliefs,

differences

Page 47: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

In sum

Page 48: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

In sum

Rhetoric is about influencing the judgment of audiences on whom

the speaker depends

Page 49: Rhetorical Theory: A theory of Judgment Michael Vicaro.

As critics we can ask

Who are the intended and untended audiences?

What appeals are made to sway their judgment

What alternatives have been excluded?