Social Exclusion3
Transcript of Social Exclusion3
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
1/16
1
Social Exclusion: State and Muslims in India
By: Zaheer Ali**
Introduction:
The oft-repeated assertions that have been reiterated in the country for the last twodecades are: 'India is among the five largest economies of the world;' 'Indian software
engineers are the mainstay of the silicon valley of the US;' 'India is shining;" 'India's space
programme is firmly in place;" and of course, 'India is now a proud member of the nuclearclub.' These assertions are no doubt true. However, they hardly tell the real story of socio-
economic conditions of about 75 percent of Indians who have been systematically excluded
from the professed development indices reflected in the aforementioned assertions. One may
realise the colossal number of Indians who are socially excluded when it is explained inconcrete terms that the victims of social exclusion in India are more than the combined
population of Europe and Indonesia (which is the fourth most populous country in the world).The figure is not based on any speculation of an opposition leader but is calculated on thebasis of the government-sponsored Ajit Sen Gupta Report that has revealed in 2007 that 77
percent Indians cannot even earn Rupees 20 per day. It goes without saying that a person
who cannot even earn Rupees 20 per day is obviously incapable of having access to most
state resources and is also outside almost all centres of power. It is also a well known fact thatmost victims of social exclusion in India are Dalits, Adivasis and religious minorities, in
particular, the Muslims.
This paper attempts to comprehend the notion of social exclusion including its mostobnoxious dimension i.e. state complicity in mass murder of religious minorities and then
relate it to determine the extent of social exclusion of the Muslims. Though Muslim constitutethe largest religious minority in India, they have been systematically kept out of the spheresof socio-economic, educational and political spheres of power. Like Dalits and Adivasis, an
overwhelming majority of Muslims too are subjected to intra-community social exclusion
along with the social exclusion including pogroms that are put through by the State. The
overall backwardness of the Muslims is a matter of common knowledge, however, for thesake of authenticity the data compiled by the Gopal Singh Commission and the findings of
the Sachar Committee are used to bring into focus the severity of social exclusion of
Muslims. Lastly, a few suggestions have also been made to improve the lot of the Muslimsthat may help India to develop into truly secular democracy.
The Notion of Social Exclusion:
Though common people have been facing the end results of social exclusion in almostall societies for centuries, the term 'social exclusion' itself has entered the lexicon of social
sciences quite recently. The term came to be used in place of certain other terms that were
popularly in use to describe the deliberate and methodical socio-economic dispossession ofthe people by the socio-political elite. For instance, terms such as 'marginalisation' or
'deprivation' were usually used to mean the state of disempowerment of the people. These
terms are still used but currently most academicians prefer the expression social exclusion
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
2/16
2
for, in view of some scholars, it encompasses all the dimensions of the social and political
processes through which the common people are thoroughly marginalisedor deprived.
The term 'social exclusion' first made its appearance in 1970s in France to denote thesegment of society that did not have the protection of social insurance
1. Obviously, that
segment comprised the most deprived people of the French society. Thereafter, the term got
wider currency in entire Europe and North America. On account of various studies the termsocial exclusion can be broadly defined as a social and political process wherein the targetedpeople are comprehensively denied ownership, access and control over resources; they are
deprived of the rights over productive resources of their labour; they are denied educational,
economic, political, healthcare and housing opportunities; they are denied state protection intimes of eruption of sectarian, caste or racial violence and, as a rule, the police and military
discriminate against them and occasionally massacre them; they are, more often than not, also
deprived of their right to freedom of religion as well as other constitutional and human rights.
The bases on which a group of people are targeted for social exclusion may vary fromcountry to country, however, they are usually identified as race, in case of India caste,
religion, region, language, gender (including gays and lesbians), disability and so on.
Besides social, cultural and psychological consequences of social exclusion the mostconspicuous corollary of it is poverty of the socially excluded group. The most common
strategy of social exclusion all over the world is to deny the economic opportunities to the
targeted group to weaken it materially and by a stretched out and sustained process demolish
its productive capacity. A materially weakened group automatically lags behind in education,housing, healthcare and cultural spaces. Consequently, the victims of social exclusion cannot
benefit even in an economy that is growing. In a growing economy the people with skills and
even unskilled labourers cannot be completely excluded for their services remain pivotal forsustaining the economic growth. They are allowed to participate in the economic process but
on extremely unfair terms. A cursory glance at the history of capitalist economies and its
current manifestation--global capitalism--can vouch for the deprived position of the working
classes across the world. The main thrust of global capitalism is to facilitate the transfer ofgoods and capital of developed nations to the under-developed and developing countries by
taking apart the tariff and trade barriers, reduce the wages, trim down the number of employs
by way of automation and do away with the labour laws. This entire stratagem is known bythe euphemism of economic reforms. Sadly, the current ruling clique of 'socialist' India is a
passionate partner of the global capitalists!
While scrutinising the concept of social exclusion Amartya Sen first raised quite a fewqueries such as, "Does it contribute to our understanding of the nature of poverty? Does it help in
identifying causes of poverty that may be otherwise neglected? Does it enrich thinking on policy
and social action in alleviating poverty? How would our understanding of poverty be any
different if we were to ignore the literature of social exclusion altogether? How would thepolicies chosen be any different?"
2 In his opinion answers to these posers are of prime
importance for the proper 'evaluation and assessment' of the notion of social exclusion. Having
thoroughly examined the vast literature on social exclusion, Sen concludes that it is not the
'novelty' of the notion that makes its significant but it certainly helps understand the hithertounfamiliar dimension of poverty and deprivation. He observes: "Seen in its proper context, the
idea of social exclusion has much to offer, andthe new literature has already brought out many
important connectionsthat had been neglected in earlier studies of poverty and deprivation."3
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
3/16
3
In the Indian context social exclusion is as old as the downfall of the Indus valley
civilisation and the socio-political ascendancy of the Aryan invaders. Though social exclusion
is a global phenomenon, India is perhaps the only country where it is religiously sanctified. Thehierarchical stratification of Hindu society with the notion of the 'polluted' groups of
'untouchables' is the worst form of social exclusion practiced with brazen religious legitimacy
for centuries in the Indian subcontinent. The use of the expression 'Indian subcontinent' isintentional because caste based social exclusion is all pervading in the countries of South Asia,be it Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal or Sri Lanka. The interesting point to be noted is that though
varna system is purportedly an essential part of Hinduism, it has made its inroads in socio-
cultural practices of non-Hindu religions such as Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism as well as thenon-Indian religions like Christianity and Islam. Therefore, in the countries of South Asia in
general, and India in particular, social exclusion is not merely an attitudinal phenomenon at
individual level but it is integral to the social structure. As a scholar underscores, "This is not a
situation where a particular individual ill-treats another person; instead, the social processitself is discriminatory in its principles and practice. Thus, social segregation is an
institutionalised form of social distancing expressed in physical separation.4
The occurrences of social exclusion of Dalits and Adivasis are far more pronounced andhave been steadily perpetuated for centuries. Nevertheless, the Hindu upper castes have also
been pursuing discriminatory practices with regard to the believers of the foreign faiths like
Christianity and Islam since the times they came into contact with them. The political
expediency compelled the Hindu upper castes to establish a working relationship with theMughals and the British because they were the ones who wheedled out the maximum benefits
by way of being part of the Mughal durbarsand the British bureaucracy. Despite being the
vital part of all the establishments, most members of the Hindu upper castes had alwaysfollowed a policy of strict social segregation concerning, in particular, the mlechchasi.e. the
Muslims.
Myth of Muslim Domination:
The first point that must be brought into focus at present is that the cataloging of
Indian history into Hindu period, Muslim period and the Modern age was deviously done by theBritish historians as it was very much a part of their imperialism's overall policy of divide and
rule. The stratagem worked as the Hindu Right jumped at to portray a rosy picture of the so-
called Hindu period when Indians were not only prosperous but they also enjoyed the loftyvalues such as liberty, equality, justice and human rights that were embedded in the ancient
political institutions. This veritable Hindu paradise was overrun by barbaric marauders, the
Muslim invaders who looted the wealth of the country, demolished temples, polluted Hindu holy
places and forced the peace-loving, unsullied Hindus to embrace Islam. This, more or less, is thetone and tenor of most written claptrap that goes by the name of history produced by the Hindu
Right. For instance, a prominent historian such as R. C. Majumdar is also guilty of carrying
forward the prejudices and canards against the rulers who happened to identify themselves as
Muslims. According to Irfan Habib, To him (Majumdar) the entire period c. 1200 onwards wasone of foreign rule; Muslims were alien to Indian (Hindu) culture; the Hindus oppressed and
humiliated, wished nothing better than to slaughter the Mlechchas (Muslims); the British
regime was a successor more civilised than Muslim rule; yet real opposition to the British came
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
4/16
4
from the Hindus, not Muslims, even in 1857; and finally the national movements course was
throughout distorted by concessions made to Muslims by Gandhiji5
The period between 1200 and 1857, purportedly the Muslim periodwas in reality aphase during which various monarchs, who happened to be Muslims, ruled over large parts of
India, in particular North India. To call this phase of Indian history a period of 'Muslim
domination' is a delusory exercise. The 'Muslim' ruling elite, like any other ruling elite, had noempathy or sympathy for the teeming masses who were rampantly exploited by the landholdersand their vassals. Most Muslims during the so-called Muslim period were part of the masses
and, therefore, had to face similar social exclusion as was practiced with the Hindu masses. It is
also a well-recorded fact that an overwhelming majority of the Indian Muslims comprisesconverts from the Hindu lower castes. Consequently, despite embracing an ostensible casteless
faith, they could neither dispose of the social stigma nor run off social exclusion. Thus, the
period of Muslim domination is just a myth.
Intra-community Social Exclusion Among Muslims:
Thus, the Islamic jurisprudence that is in force in the Indian subcontinent distinctlyupholds social ranking of Muslim groups taking into account birth and descent and the
consequent social hierarchy that prevails is nothing but caste system.6It is true that the gravity of
caste distinctions among Indian Muslims is not exactly similar to that of the Hindu caste system
because of the absence of the concept of untouchability among the Muslims. Yet, besides birthand descent, occupation too helps determine the social ranking of a group in the hierarchical
social order of Indian Muslims. This is exactly similar to that of Hindu varna system.7 The
Islamic scholars are divided in accounting for the reasons of social exclusion based on casteamong Muslims of the Indian subcontinent. A group of scholars opines that it is the corollary of
the Hindu caste system and that the Muslims of India living for centuries in a caste-ridden
society have acquired the social practices of the Hindus. This is a flawed explanation because it
camouflages two historical facts; a) social ranking of Muslim groups was firmly established inIslam immediately after the death of the Prophet and it was further strengthened by most schools
of Islamic jurisprudence; b) the bulk of the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent comprise the
local converts. Another group of scholars recognises that most Muslims of the Indiansubcontinent are, in fact, Hindu converts to Islam and that despite embracing a new religion they
have retained their social practices; caste system is one of those practices. The reasoning of the
second group is congruent with historical facts. It also explains why most Muslim castes orbiradarisare as endogamous as Hindu castes.
The contemporary scholars who have devoted themselves to study social exclusion
among the Indian Muslims usually divide the community into two broader hierarchical castes
viz. the ashraf,8 those who trace their origin to Arabia, Iran, Central Asia or Afghanistan,
comprise ostensibly the superior castes and ajlaf,9supposedly the inferior castes. In the ashraf
category the sub-castes such as Syed, Sheikh, Pathan and Mughal are included while the
category of ajlaf can further be divided into non-polluted and polluted castes. The non-polluted
caste group usually referred to as ajlaf is consisted of the converts whose occupations are rituallyclean such as halwai, barhai, julaha, lohar, darzi, nai, teli etc. For the polluted castes that include
sub-castes such as kalal, mahigir (also known as machchera in some regions) and kasai (kassab),
bhangi, chamar etc. another term arzal 10
is used. It must be underlined, however, that thesecategories are not the inventions of modern social anthropologists but the Muslim community,
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
5/16
5
like most religious communities, has always been hierarchical. Over and above the clannish
hierarchy of the Arab peninsula, the Muslim community in India got further stratified on ethnic
and occupational lines. The early Muslim immigrants from foreign lands who were of fairercomplexion than the native converts and the upper caste Hindu converts were responsible for the
caste hierarchy. The immigrants were obviously occupying high official posts, military jobs and
academic positions whereas most native converts continued with their ancestral occupationswhich were considered lowly and despicable. Thus, the Muslims of foreign origin and a smallsection of upper caste Hindu converts got to be considered superior, ashraf, than the native
converts, ajlafand arzal.
The caste-system among Indian Muslims got the official sanction in the thirteenth centuryitself during the reign of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. A source that is widely cited by almost all the
scholars dealing with the issue of caste based social exclusion among Muslims is Fatawa-i-
Jahandariby Ziaddin Barni, an historian, who most probably stratified the Indian Muslims into
ashraf and ajlaf for the first time. Fatawa-i-Jahandari may be described as a mishmash ofChanakyas Arthashastra and Manusmriti. Barni was vehemently opposed to the notion of
egalitarianism and in order to justify his hierarchical structure of the Muslim community he even
misinterpreted a Quranic verse viz.:
O mankind! Lo! We have created you male and female, and have made you
nations and tribes that ye may know one another. Lo! The noblest of you, in the
sight of Allah, is the best in conduct. Lo! Allah is knower. Aware.11
Firstly, the verse is not Muslim-specific. It is addressed to the entire humanity. Secondly,
the noblest persons in the eyes of the Almighty are those whose conduct is best and not thosewho are born in the so-called noble families. Most commentators of the Quran endorse that the
best conduct of a person has a direct correlation with her/his piety. So, one whose behaviour and
manners are pious is noble in the eyes of Allah. Barni, nevertheless, interprets the verse on the
basis of his skewed logic that a lowly-born and the one who is engaged in a lowly occupation isby nature incapable of pious conduct and, therefore, he should always be placed at a low social
status. In order to keep the ajlaf permanently at the lowest rung of the social ladder, Barni
recommends that the low caste Muslims should be denied access to education. His advice to theSultan in this regard goes like this:
Teachers of every kind are to be sternly ordered not to thrust precious stonesdown the throats of dogs or to put collars of gold round the necks of pigs and
bears-that is, to the mean, the ignoble and the worthless, to shopkeepers and to
the low-born; they are to teach nothing more than the rules about prayer, fasting,
religious charity and the hajj pilgrimage, along with some chapters of the Qur'anand some doctrines of the faith, without which their religion cannot be correct
and valid prayers are not possible. But they are to be taught nothing else, lest it
bring honour to their mean souls They are not to be taught reading and
writing, for plenty of disorders arise owing to the skill of the low born inknowledge. The disorder into which all affairs of the religion and the state are
thrown is due to the acts and words of the low born, who have become skilled.
For, on account of their skill, they become governors (wali), revenue-collectors('amils), auditors (mutassarif), officers (farman deh) and rulers (farman rawa). If
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
6/16
6
teachers are disobedient, and it is discovered at the time of investigation that they
have imparted knowledge or taught letters or writing to the low born, inevitably
the punishment for their disobedience will be meted out to them.12
Subsequently, the ulema, the elite and even some Sufis supported the caste based social
exclusion among Muslims on a dubious notion known as kufu, an Arabic term which literallymeans equal or comparable. According to this concept, social interaction, in particular,matrimonial relations, must be established between the Muslims of the same kufu i.e. those who
enjoy equal or comparable social status. As a scholar, Masood Alam Falahi, has pointed out in
his well-researched work13
that most of the revered ulema of the subcontinent seem to haveagreed upon the notion of kufu that legitimises social exclusion among Muslims. Falahi, on
account of authentic evidences, informs that prominent religious scholars such as Shah
Waliullah, Mufti Muhammad Shafi Deobandi, Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Maulana Syed
Mehmood Madani, Maulana Qari Muhammad Tayyab Siddiqui Qasmi et al have supported theconcept of kufu that consequently perpetuates caste stratification and social exclusion among
Muslims. Maulana Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi, as indicated by Falahi, respected Syeds so much
that he declared that though Sheikh, Mughal and Pathan were part of ashraf they could not bekufu of Syeds. Thus, Syeds came to acquire the similar highest and sacrosanct position among
the Muslims that the Brahmans are supposed to enjoy among the Hindus.
Not that only ulema supported the notion of kufu but even the modern socialreformers
such as Sir Syed too had worked only for the uplift of the ashraf. Falahi cites an excerpt of alecture of Sir Syed that he delivered while laying down the foundation of Madarsa-e-Anjuman-e-
Islamiain Bareli. The school was to cater to the educational needs of the children of ajlaf. Sir
Syed believed that it was not necessary to teach English education to the children of low-casteMuslims but suggested: It is better and in the interests of the community that they are engaged
in the old form of studyIt appears appropriate if you teach them some writing and math. They
should also be taught small tracts on everyday affairs and through which basic beliefs and
practices of Islamic faith.14
It is shocking to note that even after the passage of six hundredyears the opinions of the Muslim elite on the issue of education remained exactly the same as Sir
Syed appeared to be just parroting the views of Ziauddin Barni!
The concept of kufu, in no way, can be justified on the basis of the Quran but in actualpractice it is supported by influential ulema of the subcontinent. In the view of a scholar,
"Despite its egalitarian principles, Islam in South Asia historically has been unable to avoid the
impact of class and caste inequalities.15
Consequently, caste stratification persists among IndianMuslims. It is, however, argued that the caste differences and practices of social exclusion
among Muslims are not as discriminating and domineering as they are among the Hindus. This
contention is probably the offshoot of the display of egalitarianism within the precincts of a
mosque where all Muslims, irrespective of caste and economic differences, can pray side by side.Once they are outside the mosque they reclaim their respective social positions and interact
accordingly. The ashraf, by and large, mete out similar abhorrent and hateful treatment to the
lower caste Muslims as the Hindu upper castes keep up with Dalits and Adivasis. In fact, in the
opinion of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, the social evils among the Muslims are worse than those seenin Hindu society.
16
As per an estimate ajlaf and arzal constitute 75 % of the Muslim population in
India.17
Nevertheless, the mainstream historical accounts of Indian Muslims do not reflect theirlives, aspirations, sentiments or agonies; they merely portray the lives and actions of the ashraf.
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
7/16
7
Political history from the conquest of Sind by Muhammad bin Qasim to the last Mughal
emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar, is evidently dominated by the adventures and achievements of the
rulers whose foreign origin automatically puts them in the category of ashraf. The economicorder that emerged during the medieval period was so exploitative that the common people that
included an overwhelming majority of the Muslims were practically reduced to the level of
slaves. Additionally, thezamindars, in order to maintain their so-called cultural superiority intactwould not even allow the Muslim landless peasants to christen their progenies with properMuslim names; instead the zamindars themselves would name them as Kallan, Jumman,
Buddan, Baban, Pathro, Bhiku, Raheeman, Shareefan, Sausan etc. What is true about medieval
history is also largely true about the ancient and modern histories of India. If truth be told, we arestill waiting for our own Howard Zinn to write a peoples history of India.
Similarly, the substantially large body of theological literature that has been produced in
India has been written by and for the protection of the interests of the ashraf. It has already been
pointed out that almost all the leading religious scholars of India have overtly or covertlysupported the concept of kufu. The confrontation with the western civilization and the loss of
political power kicked the ashrafout from their palatial dwellings wherein they were ensconced
leading a life of opulence at the cost of the labour of the toiling masses. In response, first theythought of regaining political power from the British by force that resulted in the disastrous
adventurisms of Syed Ahmad Barelwis Wahabi movement and the uprising of 1857. Though
the common people were used as cannon fodder on both occasions, the leaders were from the
category of the ashraf and the purpose was to regain the lost glory of the upper castes. Likewise,the so-called socio-educational reform movement among the Muslims launched by Sir Syed, the
Aligarh Tahreek, essentially catered to the needs and aspirations of the upper caste Muslims.
In the beginning of the twentieth century, the ashraf, encouraged by the oblique supportof the British masters established the Muslim League that institutionalised communalism in
Indian politics. It was not accidental that the Muslim League remained an insignificant political
force in the Muslim dominated provinces of Punjab, Bengal, Sind and North Western Frontier
Province. It was the ashraf of U. P. and after 1932, when Muhammad Ali Jinnah becameproactive in the affairs of the Muslim League, the Muslim businessmen of the province of
Bombay, lent the crucial support to the Muslim separatist movement.
Indian State and Social Exclusion of Muslims:
It is pointless to discuss social exclusion of the Muslim during the British rule because,depending on the exigencies of the circumstances, the colonial masters kept shifting their
favoritism to Hindu or Muslim elites. Their constant policy, however, had always been social
exclusion of Indians. The Muslims in India have been facing blatant social exclusion since
independence because in the popular perception they were responsible for the partition of thecountry. A passing reference is already made above that the movement for Pakistan was
essentially elitist which was initiated and sustained by the ashrafof U. P. and Muslim business
class of the Bombay province. It was not the preferred political alternative in the provinces
where Muslims constituted the majority. The common Muslims, therefore, had nothing to dowith the separatist movement that was carried on by a political organisation of nawabs,
zamindars and businessmen, which the Muslim League was in reality. It must also be
underscored that on accomplishment of their political purpose, a large number of Muslim ashrafhad migrated to Pakistan for they had the means and the motive. The overwhelming majority of
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
8/16
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
9/16
9
population broke out, aided and abetted by its regulars. On learning something of them the
figurehead Muslim Congressman in Delhi, Maulana Azad, then Minister of Education, prevailed
on Nehru to let a team investigate. It reported that a conservative estimate between 27,000 and40,000 Muslims had been slaughtered in the space of a few weeks after the Indian takeover."
21
The Nehru Government, of course, never admitted the occurrence of massacre. What was
scandalous that Nehru brazenly announced that Indian victory in Hyderabad was achievedwithout a single communal incident! The famous historian William Dalrymple in his book, TheAge of Kali, informs that the Sunderlal Report has been leaked and published abroad, and
"estimates that as many as 200,000 Hyderabadi Muslims were slaughtered."22
It was the largest
and the most gruesome pogrom against the Muslims in independent India.Thereafter, the second mass murder of the Muslims took place during the spell of Meerut
riots of 1987. On 22nd May 1987, 29 personnel of the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC),
picked 42 young Muslim men from Hashimpura, a locality of Meerut, took them to the a
secluded place near Murad Nagar in Ghaziabad district and killed them in cold blood. Their deadbodies were thrown in the canals. The case was registered when the dead bodies were seen
floating in the canals. Thereafter, only 16 PAC personnel surrendered and were immediately
released on bail. The case was transferred to the Supreme Court in 2002 where it is still pending,which makes it one of the oldest cases before the apex court. As per the information sought
through an RTI application on 24th May 2007, none of the accused was ever suspended and their
complicity in the heinous pogrom was not even mentioned in the annual confidential reports.
The crux of the matter is that the State apparatus, irrespective of the political party inpower, has always been pursuing an anti-Muslim policy and whenever it suits the political
stratagem of the ruling clique it does not hesitate to slaughter a few thousand Muslims. What
could be the worse mode of social exclusion than massacre of a targeted group. In addition to the
physical decimation, the Muslims are subjected to the worst kind of economic exclusion. Thepolicy of excluding Muslims from public services started by Patel and willingly continued by
Nehru, his daughter and the successive governments is firmly in place. Besides, government
services other economic opportunities have also been denied to the Muslims because even thenationalised banks callously reject loan applications of the business-inclined sections of the
community. The cruel joke, however, is that the Congress never loses any opportunity to project
itself as the defender of Muslim interests and the Hindu Right, in particular, the BJP accusesCongress of pursuing a policy of Muslim appeasement!
The reality is that the Muslim representation in government services is abysmally low.
Though the socially committed members of the community have launched various projects
during the last two decades to prepare the educated youths for the competitive examination, theaverage percentage of successful Muslim candidates was never allowed to go beyond 3.5%. The
people engaged in helping the young Muslims prepare for the civil services allege that the
blanket policy of the Union Government and also of many State Government is not to recruit
more than 3% Muslims in government services. Their allegation seems to be correct if weconsider the following table
22 that gives a picture of Muslim representation in civil services
during the last ten years:
Result Declared No. of Successful Candidates Muslim Candidates % of total No.
May 2003 284 9 3.1
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
10/16
10
May 2004 413 13 3.2
May 2005 422 13 3.1
May 2006 425 12 2.8
May 2007 448 17 3.8
May 2008 734 27 3.67
May 2009 791 32 4.04
May 2010 875 21 2.4May 2011 920 31 3.36
May 2012 910 30 3.29
The situation is even worse in the military. It is obvious that the reason for under-
representation of the Muslims lies in the partition of the country. However, the purportedlysecular State of India has done nothing to correct the wrong of the history; on the contrary it
fervently follows a policy to keep the Muslims out of Services. Mahavir Tyagi who was the
Minister of State in Nehru's Council of Minister, "admitted that at the time of partition the
percentage of Muslims in the services was 32 and now it had gone down to two."23
It must alsobe pointed out that when the Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, instituted the Sachar Committee
to investigate the social, economic and educational conditions of the Muslims and when theCommittee members sought to know the percentage of the Muslims in the military there was a
hue and cry from the senior army officers who thought that it would communalise the 'secular'Services. Thereafter in February 2007, surprisingly, a lieutenant-general supplied the exact figure
of the Muslims in the army that stood at 29, 093.24
It means even after 60 years of independence
the percentage of the Muslim could not rise more than 2. The prejudice against Muslims by theDefence establishment may be determined "by a press release issued by a defence office in
Jammu five years ago (in 2002). Seeking recruits for the Indian army, the press release said: No
vacancies for Muslims and tradesmen.25
Muslim representation in other elite services is also abysmally low. In the Indian ForeignService they are 1.8 % while in the Indian Police Service the Muslim representation is 4 %. It
goes without saying that in that there is almost a blanket exclusion of Muslims from the top andsupposed to be highly 'sensitive' posts in intelligence agencies such as CBI, IB and RAW.Muslims are also barred from holding significant positions in Space Research Organisation and
National Security Guards. Muslim representation in State Government jobs is even worse in
almost all the States. These facts have always been known to those who ever bothered to probethe issue. However, the official legitimacy to Muslim exclusion from all social, economic and
educational spheres was made available when the findings of the Sachar Commitee were placed
in the public domain in 2006.
It must be pointed out, however, that Sachar Committee was not the first of its kind toprobe Muslim socio-economic and educational exclusion. Its precursor was a high level Gopal
Singh Commission that was appointed on May 10, 1980 with almost similar brief that was
assigned to Sachar Committee. Gopal Singh Commission submitted its report to the Prime
Minister on June 14, 1983. It was neither placed before Parliament nor its findings wereofficially made public. In order to estimate the callousness of the political elite it is appropriate
to mention what Asgar Ali Engineer experienced. "When Shri V. P. Singh became the Prime
Minister and convened a meeting of Muslim leaders and intellectuals," writes Engineer, "I askedhim about implementation of Gopal Singh High Powered Commission report. He, to my shock,
was not even aware of any such report."26
Though the findings of the Gopal Singh Commission
were not officially made public, the data filtered through unofficially. As per the findings of the
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
11/16
11
Commission the Muslim representation in the IAS had come down to 3.2 % while the SCs
representation then (1980) was 9.9%. in the IPS the Muslims percentage was reportedly 2.7
while that of the SCs was 9.8. Similarly, in IFS, the Muslim representation was much lesser i.e.3.37 % in comparison with SCs percentage of 16.48.
27Almost a quarter of century later when the
findings of the Sachar Committee came to light the condition of the Muslims in many spheres
got deteriorated even further. Despite Government's claim that it is committed to implement therecommendations of the Sachar Committee, the popular perception among Muslims is that justlike Gopal Singh Report or Rangnathe Mishra Commission
28 report, nothing concrete would
come out of it.
Nevertheless, the findings of Sachar Committee are very significant as they provide usthe severity of social exclusion of Muslims in socio-economic and educational fields. Muslims,
as per the 2001 census constitute 13.4 % of India's population. However, in the field of
education, they lag behind other communities. According to the Committee's findings the
literacy rate for Muslims in 2001 was 59% as against the national average of 65%. Muslimliteracy was also lower than that of the SCs and STs. At the school level 25 % of Muslim
children in the age group of 6-14 either were not enrolled in the schools or dropped out at various
stages of school education. At the undergraduate level only 1 out of 25 and at post-graduate level1 out of 50 happen to be Muslim students. It must be underlined that according to Committee's
findings the major cause of low percentage of Muslims in education particularly at the primary
level is the non-availability of Urdu medium schools in most States. It is obviously a lapse of the
State to uphold a constitutional commitment.In the field of employment the Committee findings revealed that almost 50% Muslim
men in the age-group of 25-45 were self employed and only 18% were in regular employment as
compared to 25% Hindus. As regards government jobs Muslim representation in all states wasmuch lower in comparison to their percentage in population. Consider the following table
29 to
have an idea about Muslim representation in State Government employment in the twelve States
where there proportion in population is considerable.
Sr.
No.
Name of the State % Muslims in Population % Muslims in Employment
1 Andhra Pradesh 9.2 8.8
2 Assam 30.2 11.2
3 Bihar 16.5 7.6
4 Delhi 11.7 3.2
5 Gujarat 9.1 5.6
6 Jharkhand 13.8 6.7
7 Karnataka 12.2 8.5
8 Kerala 24.7 10..4
9 Maharashtra 10.6 4.4
10 Uttar Pradesh 18.5 5.1
11 Tamil Nadu 5.6 3.212 West Bengal 25 4.2
The notable figures are from Andhra Pradesh where Muslim representation in state employment
is closer to their percentage in population. Conversely, the worst figures are from West Bengal
where Muslims constitute one-fourth of the state population but their representation in stateemployment is merely 4.2 %. This is especially reprehensible because the CPI (M), the 'flag-
bearer' of secularism was in power in the State for more than three decades. Though the figures
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
12/16
12
for Jammu and Kashmir are not shown in the table, it must be added that the Muslim percentage
of population in that only Muslim majority State is 67 while there representation in state
employment is less than 50%.In the elite All-India Services, the figures reported by the Committee are not very
different from those that were revealed by the Gopal Singh Commission. The Muslim
percentages in the IAS is 3.1, in the IFS it is 1.8 and in the IPS 4. As a rule the Muslimrepresentation in intelligence agencies and Space Research Organisation continues to beabysmally low. In the Railways, which is the largest single state employer in India the Muslim
representation is merely 4.5%. In judiciary the overall Muslim presence of 7.8 per cent in 12
States with high Muslim concentration is almost half of their percentage in country's population.Surprisingly in this category too the Muslim representation in Jammu and Kashmir is 48.3 %.
Social exclusion of Muslims in the banking sector and other financial institutions is
extremely pronounced. The findings of the Sachar Committee reveal the share of Muslims in
'amounts outstanding' is only 4.7 %, which is lower than the figure of other minorities that ispegged at 6.5%. The most loathsome aspect of the banking system that has been reported by the
Committee is that many banks have adopted a policy to mark the areas with Muslim
concentration as 'negative' or 'red' regions which means bank loans are not given to the residentsof the areas who are overwhelmingly Muslims. Almost all the banks, public or private, victimize
Muslims as a rule. Their loan applications are vehemently rejected not for any technical or
procedural reason but only because the applicants are Muslims. As a result of it, a sizable section
of the community that is business-inclined does not get the necessary support to become self-employed. In pursuance of the Prime Minister 15-Point Programme for the uplift of minorities,
the Reserve Bank of India launched the banking and credit facilities for the targeted groups.
However, as per the findings of the Committee these efforts benefited other religious minoritiesmore than the Muslims. The other statistics are similarly appalling. For instance 94.9 per cent of
the Muslims living below poverty line dont get the food-grains. In rural India, 60.2 % of
Muslims dont own land and only 1 % own hand pumps or tube-wells.
Muslim exclusion from the field of politics is equally glaring. In this context we mustrefer to a thorough study by Professor Iqbal A. Ansari30 that provides valuable data about the
exclusion of Muslims from the institutions of political power. According to the study the
percentage of elected Muslim Members of Parliament never reached even 10. With regard to theState Legislatures, in the 12 Legislative Assemblies with considerable Muslim population, the
number of Muslim members fluctuated between 21 and 49. In terms of percentage of the total
membership of the state legislatures it can be translated between 4.3 and 6.6. The reasons forsuch an abysmally low political representation of the Muslims are mainly two. First, the so-
called secular parties have never given tickets to the Muslims in proportion to their population.
Secondly, the first past the post electoral system is innately anti-minority because a political
party in such a system can afford to completely exclude an ethnic or religious minority and stillwin elections as Narendra Modi has proved in Gujarat for the third consecutive time. These are
alarming findings indeed and it is equally true that immediate corrective measures are badly
needed.
Affirmative Action:
It is usually observed that any suggestion for affirmative action to uplift the socio-economic, educational and political status of Muslims in India invariably leads to the issue of
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
13/16
13
making reservations available for the community in government jobs and educational institutions
on the lines that have been provided to the SCs and STs. I, personally, have reservation about
providing religion-based reservations. It would gravely erode the secular character of our politythat is already under attack by the Hindu Right. Secondly, the Constitution does not permit such
a measure. In view of the current political scenario a constitutional amendment to make
provision for religion-based reservation is highly unlikely and even if such an amendment iscarried out, it would certainly invite a Hindu backlash and would politically strengthen the HinduRight. What can be done, therefore, is to implement the recommendations of the Rangnath
Mishra Commission report that are about religious minorities and not exclusively about the
Muslims. According to the Commission, the intra-community social exclusion among theMuslims and Christians is a reality. The lower caste Hindus who got converted to Islam or
Christianity centuries ago continue to face similar kind of social exclusion at the hands of the so-
called upper strata of their respective communities as is the case with the SCs and STs. For that
reason, the Commission recommended the conferment of Scheduled Caste status to Muslimarzals and the low caste Christians. Once these segments of the Muslims and Christians are
included in the SC category they would be constitutionally entitled to enjoy benefits of
reservations that are available to the SCs among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs.Similarly, the recommendations of the Sachar Committee must also be implemented
sincerely. The most important recommendations that need immediate State response are: a)
setting up of an autonomous Assessment and Monitoring Authority (AMA) that should do
regular audit whether the communities concerned are benefitting from various governmentschemes and programmes that are launched for their uplift; b) instituting of an Equal
Opportunities Commission (EOC) to examine the grievances of socially excluded communities
of Indian society; c) exploring the possibility of making available some incentives to a 'DiversityIndex' in the fields of education, government as well as private employments and housing
schemes; d) evolving some kind of 'nomination' procedure for increasing the levels of
inclusiveness in governance; e) in the field of education the Committee's recommendations
include institutionalising evaluation procedure for text-books, alternate admission norms inuniversities and colleges, cost friendly hostel facilities for minority students, state-run education
Urdu medium school for primary education in mother tongue, ensuring appointment of experts
from minority community on interview panels and boards and linking madarsas with highersecondary schools; f) in order to ensure better representation for the Muslims in politics, the
Committee recommended certain measures such as removal of anomalies in Reserved
Constituencies in view of frequent complaints that the territorial constituencies withconcentration of Muslim voters are usually declared reserved for SCs and STs. The Committee
has also observed reported that there were many complaints of Muslims names missing from
electoral rolls. Additionally, it must also be pointed out that we must have a relook at 'first past
the post' electoral system. In view of experts a proportional representation system can betterensure inclusion of minorities in the institutions of political power. Some scholars have also
suggested that a candidate can be declared elected only if he bags at least 25% of minority votes
from his constituency.
The simplest corrective measure to improve the lot of the Muslims is to stick tosecularism as an operative principle of running administration. The bureaucracy in India is
perhaps the most communal section of our society. If the Muslim percentage in employment is
abysmally low, the main culprits are the bureaucrats, many of whom have covert affiliations withthe RSS. By making the recruitment procedure truly transparent we can attract deserving Muslim
-
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
14/16
14
youths to join the public services. Another area that needs reexamination is the financial sector.
The working of the banks and other financial institutions must be carried on strictly on
professional and secular lines. An urgent necessity is to weed out communal elements from thelaw enforcing agencies. The situation at present is so bad that in the eyes of every policeman a
Muslim is a potential terrorist. The irony is that, if there is a blast even in a mosque causing
deaths of Muslims alone, the so-called intelligence agencies and the police get in action to arresthumble, innocent Muslims! The latest trend adopted by the police and other security agencies isto implicate Muslim youths in false cases of terrorism. As a result the hapless young Muslims
arrested on trumped up terrorism charges usually spend years in jails and ultimately many of
them are acquitted by the courts. However, in the course of this sinister process they end up associal and psychological wrecks. They also become unemployable because of the stigma of
spending years behind bars albeit as part of conspiracy of communal minded security officers.
It is this damaging psychological factor that alienates the common Muslims from the
national psyche and forces them to go back in their shells. On that account they fall prey to theintrigues of the wily mullahs and the crooks masquerading as the Muslim leaders. The most
important exigency, it must be reiterated, is to improve the educational status of the Muslims.
The unfortunate reality in India today is that political gangsters who run most of the institutionsof higher and professional education coerce the Union and State governments to finance their
institutions. Obviously, the percentage of institutions that cater to the needs of the Muslims is
negligible. If the UPA government is really sincere about helping Muslims improve their socio-
economic and educational conditions, it should see to it that the enrollment of Muslims childrenin schools increases, their drop-out rate decreases and they must have fair and judicious
opportunities to join institutions of higher and professional education.
__________________________________________________________________________
Notes and References
1. Amartya Sen in his Asian Development Bank's Social Development Paper No. 1, 'Social
Exclusion: Concept, Application and Scrutiny' June 2000, informs:"The term 'socialexclusion' is of relatively recent origin. Ren Lenoir, writing about a quarter of a century
ago, is given credit of authorship of the expression."
2. Ibid.3. Ibid.
4. Prakash Louis' paper, 'Social Exclusion: A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework',
December 2007.
5. Shaheryar Ali's online review of Irfan Habib's 'History an Interpretations:Communalism and Problems of Indian Historiography 3,
http://sherryx.wordpress.com/tag/irfan-habib/
6. For instance, according to the Hanafi School to which most Indian Sunni Muslims adhere
to specifies the rules of precedence of groups thus: (a) an Arab was superior to a non- Arab; (b) amongst Arabs, all Quraishites were of equal social standing in a class by
themselves, and all other Arabs were equal irrespective of their tribes; (c) amongst non-
Arabs, a man by birth the equal of an Arab if both his father and grandfather had beenMuslims before him, but only if he were sufficiently wealthy to provide an adequate
http://sherryx.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/history-and-interpretationscommunalism-and-problems-of-indian-historiography-3/http://sherryx.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/history-and-interpretationscommunalism-and-problems-of-indian-historiography-3/http://sherryx.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/history-and-interpretationscommunalism-and-problems-of-indian-historiography-3/http://sherryx.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/history-and-interpretationscommunalism-and-problems-of-indian-historiography-3/http://sherryx.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/history-and-interpretationscommunalism-and-problems-of-indian-historiography-3/ -
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
15/16
15
mahr(marriage endowment); (d) a learned non-Arab was equal to an ignorant Arab, even
if he was a descendant of Ali, for the worth of learning is greater than the worth of
family; a Muslim kazi or theologian ranked higher than a merchant and a merchanthigher than a tradesman. Quoted in Imtiaz Ahmad(Ed.), Caste and Social Stratificationamong Muslims in India,Manohar, New Delhi, 1978, p. 14.
7. Though clannish affiliation was mainly the determining factor for social ranking in theArab peninsula, interestingly, the word zat,from which are derived Indian terms such asjat and jati, are themselves Arabic. The term zat in Arabic, however, does not mean a
social group but it connotes being, essence/nature of a person, self etc.
8. Singularsharif. Arabic meaning respectable/ superior people.9. Singularjilf. Arabic, meaning boorish, rude, uncivilised people.
10. Singular razil. Arabic, meaning low, mean, vile, despicable, contemptible people.
11. The Meaning of the Glorious Quran, XLIX: 13, translated by Muhammad Marmaduke
Pickthall, Idara Ishaat-e-Diniyat, New Delhi, 2006,, p. 36712. Quoted by Yoginder Sikand in the article Islam and Caste Inequality among Indian
Muslims,www.dalitmuslims.com.See also his book,Islam, Caste and Dalit-Muslim
Relations in India, Global Media Publications, New Delhi, 2004.13. Masood Alam Falahi,Hindustan Mein Zaat-Paat Aur Musalman(Urdu), Al-Qazi, New
Delhi, 2007
14. Ibid.
15.Ayesha Jalal in her book,Democracy and Authoritarianism inSouth Asia.16. Ambedkar, B. R.,Pakistan or the Partition of India, Thackers Publishers.
17. Anwar, Ali, Masawat ki Jung: Pasemanzar: Bihar ka Pasmanda Musalman, (Hindi),
Vani Prakashan, New Delhi, 200117. Guha, Ramchandra,India After Gandhi:The History of the Worlds Largest Democracy, Pan
Macmillan, Picador India, New Delhi, 2007, p. 366
18. Ibid.
19. See Moin Shakir, Muslims in Free India, Kalamkar Prakashan, New Delhi, wherein hequoted
fromLinkissue of November 9, 1969 and Y.B. Chavan's statement in the Lok Sabha reported
in Times of India, November 29, 1969.20. Quoted by Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar in his article, 'Declassify Report on the 1948
Hyderabad Massacre', Sunday Times of India, November 25, 2012.
21 Quoted by Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar, Ibid.22 Source: Syed Zubair Ahmad's online article, 'Blanket State Policy to put Muslims within 3%
in Civil Services', www.twocircles.net
23. Quoted in Moin Shakir, Op. Cit.
24. Arvind Kala's online article, 'Muslims in Army : Hiding what`s Well-known',www.business-standard.com
25. ibid.
26. See Asghar Ali Engineer's online article, "Identity and Social Exclusion: A Muslim
Perspective", www.csss-isla.com/arch27. Dr. Shekh Belal Ahmad's article, "Indian Muslims and Their Social Exclusion", International
Research Journal, July 2010
28. Though the Government of India constituted the National Commission for Religious andLinguistic Minorities (NCRLM) under the chairmanship of Justice Rangnath Mishra in
http://www.dalitmuslims.com/http://www.dalitmuslims.com/http://www.dalitmuslims.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayesha_Jalalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asiahttp://www.business-standard.com/http://www.business-standard.com/http://www.business-standard.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayesha_Jalalhttp://www.dalitmuslims.com/ -
8/13/2019 Social Exclusion3
16/16
16
October 2004, its constitution was delayed because of which it became functional only in
March 2005. In its report submitted in May 2007, the Commission inter aliarecommended
that lower castes people who embraced Islam or Christianity should be treated as lower castesand be included in the SC list so that they could also get benefit of reservation in employment
and educational institutions.
29. Source : Sachar Committee Report, p. 370.30. Iqbal A, Ansari,Political Representation of Muslims in India 1952-2004, Manak PublicationPvt. Ltd. New Delhi
___________________________________________________________________________
___***The writer is a former professor of Political Science. Currently, he is a human rightsactivist, a political commentator and a freelance journalist. He heads the Centre for
Democracy and Secularism.