SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments Presented by Kathleen (Kat)...
-
Upload
katlyn-curless -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments Presented by Kathleen (Kat)...
SNDT Women's University
Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments
Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton
4 August, 2007
2
SNDT Women's University
Evaluation Model – Donald Kirkpatrick
In 1959, Donald Kirkpatrick developed what has become one of the most popular models for evaluating education programs.
Kirkpatrick's system has four levels of evaluation.
3
SNDT Women's University
Evaluation
Purpose of Evaluation
“The reason for evaluating it to determine the effectiveness of a training program.”
© Donald L. Kirkpatrick, “Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels,”
4
SNDT Women's University
Main Reasons for Evaluation
Determine how to improve future programs
Determine whether a program should be continued or dropped.
Justify the existence of the training department
5
SNDT Women's University
Kirkpatrick’s Level 1 - Reaction
Measure of “Customer Satisfaction”
Measures the emotional reaction of participants after a learning experience. – It attempts to answer questions regarding the
participants' perceptions:
– Did they like it?
– Was the material relevant to their work?
– Did it meet their expectations?
– How should the learning experience be improved?
6
SNDT Women's University
Why Measure Reaction?
It provides valuable feedback and suggestions
It makes the trainees feel that their input is important
It is easy to do effectively
A positive reaction promotes motivation!
7
SNDT Women's University
Guidelines for Evaluating “Reaction”
1. Determine exactly what you want to find out
2. Design a form the will quantify reaction
3. Encourage written comments and suggestions
4. Get a 100 percent immediate response
5. Get honest responses
6. Develop acceptable standards
7. Measure reactions against standards and that action
8. Communicate (as appropriate)
8
SNDT Women's University
Kirkpatrick’s Level 2 - Learning
Measures whether or not a student achieved the learning objectives during the learning event or during a series of such events.
For example: we might test for written communication skills after instruction to determine if the learner is now qualified for the job.
Before Training
After Training
9
SNDT Women's University
Why Measure “Learning?”
Kirkpatrick defines learning as, “the extent to which participants change attitudes, increase knowledge and/or skill as a result of attending a program.”
Was knowledge increased?
Were skills developed?
Were attitudes changed?
10
SNDT Women's University
Guidelines for Evaluating “Learning”
1. Use a control group if possible
2. Use pre/post tests– Written for knowledge measurement
– Performance for skills
3. Get 100 percent response
4. Use results to take appropriate action
11
SNDT Women's University
Kirkpatrick’s Level 3 - Behavior
Measures whether learners are able to apply their new knowledge and skills to their job. – Are they using those skills on the job?
– Are there other issues that are stopping them from being successful on the job?
– Has their behavior changed?
Information for Level 3 evaluations is generally gathered via surveys and personal interviews.
12
SNDT Women's University
Four Conditions for Behavior to Change
The person must have the desire to change
The person must know what to do and how to do it
The person must work in the right climate
The person must be rewarded for changing
13
SNDT Women's University
Guidelines for Evaluating “Behavior”
Use a control group if possible
Allow time for the change in behavior to take place
Evaluate before and after the program
Survey or interview the trainee, as well as someone who observes their behavior
Get 100 percent response
Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times
Consider cost versus benefits
14
SNDT Women's University
Kirkpatrick’s Level 4 - Results
Increased Production
Improved Quality
Decreased Costs
Reduction in Accidents
Increased Sales
Reduced Turnovers
Higher Profits
15
SNDT Women's University
Challenges to Evaluating “Results”
Some are intangible
Results may not occur for a long time
Many other factors impact results
The trainer cannot control all factors
Such is hard to control all those
wild cats!
16
SNDT Women's University
Guidelines for Evaluating Results
Use a control group if possible
Allow time for results to be achieved
Measure both before and after
Repeat the measurement at appropriate times
Consider cost versus behavior
Be satisfied with evidence, if proof is not possible
17
SNDT Women's University
Assessments
What is an assessment ?
“Any systematic method of obtaining evidence from posing questions to draw inferences about the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other characteristics of people for a specific purpose”
© Copyright Questionmark Corporation 2004
18
SNDT Women's University
Types of Assessments
Exam
Test
Quiz
Survey
19
SNDT Women's University
Uses of Assessments
Diagnostic
Formative
Needs
Reaction
Summative
20
SNDT Women's University
Diagnostic Assessments
Typically used in pre-learning
Identity skill gaps and needs
Identity student preferences
21
SNDT Women's University
Formative Assessment
Provide feedback for the learners
Search and retrieval
May contribute to overall grades
22
SNDT Women's University
Needs Assessments
Assess knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes
Serve as a gap analysis
Determine what should be taught based upon needs
23
SNDT Women's University
Reaction Assessments
Students’ opinions are collected
Kirkpatrick's Level 1
Instructor can alter the learning experience for the future
24
SNDT Women's University
Summative Assessments
Summary of knowledge/skill of the learner
Provides a quantitative grade
May result in certification
25
SNDT Women's University
Stakes of an Assessment
Assessment “stakes” are the consequences to the candidate
Low
Medium
High
26
SNDT Women's University
Comparison
Assessment Type Assessment Use Assessment Stakes
Exam Summative Medium, High
Test Diagnostic Low, Medium
Quiz Formative Low
Survey Needs, Reaction, Diagnostic
Low
27
SNDT Women's University
Summary
Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model
Types of Assessments
Uses for Assessments
Assessment Stakes
28
SNDT Women's University
Thank You for Your Time!
Contact me at:
Goodbye from your new “virtual” friend, Kat Miller