SMC Martin Inc. - US Environmental Protection Agency · SMC Martin Inc. REPORT ON BIOLOGICAL...
Transcript of SMC Martin Inc. - US Environmental Protection Agency · SMC Martin Inc. REPORT ON BIOLOGICAL...
SMC Martin Inc.
REPORT ONBIOLOGICAL STUDIESCONDUCTED AT SINCLAIR REFINERY SITEWELLSVILLE, NEW YORK
300001
A Subsidiary of Science Management Corporation
SMC Martin
900 W. Valley Forge RoadP.O. Box 859Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482Telephone 215 265-2700 or 783-7480
November 6, 19858764-040-9200
Chittibabu Vasudevan, Ph.D., P.E.Senior Sanitary EngineerBureau of Western Remedial ActionDivision of Solid and Hazardous WasteNew York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation
50 Wolf RoadAlbany, NY 12233-0001
Dear Dr. Vasudevan:
The Biological Studies Report submitted here is part of theTask 2 remedial investigation of the Sinclair Refinery. Thiswork was performed for our contract No. D-000638 with NYSDEC.The firm of Michael Baker, Jr., of New York was subcontracted toperform the biological studies on this project; this documentrepresents their final report following our review andmodifications made to the draft version dated November 26, 1984.
There have been no significant changes in interpretation ofthe data, or conclusions of the report from the previouslysubmitted draft version, the results of which were considered inpreparation of our draft report "Phase I Remedial Investigation- Sinclair Refinery Site," dated March 14, 1985. I will contactyou shortly to answer any questions you may have on thissubmittal.
Sincerely,
SMC MARTIN, INC.
• C^O-^Vvjaxv^-^Daniel E. Erdman PG, CP6SProject Manager
DEE/mh8764:deelmh2
300003A Subsidiary of Science Management Corporation
REPORT ONBIOLOGICAL STUDIES CONDUCTEDAT THE SINCLAIR REFINERY SITE
WELLSVILLE, NY
PREPARED FOR
SMC MARTIN INC.900 W. VALLEY FORGE ROADVALLEY FORGE, PA 19482
PREPARED BY
MICHAEL BAKER, JR. OF NEW YORK, INC.295 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017
JULY 16, 1985
300004
OBJECTIVES
The subject study has been designed to assess the extent to which thebioaccumulation of 59 priority pollutants has occurred in representativeaquatic and terrestrial fauna inhabiting the Sinclair Refinery Site.The study involves biological field work, chemical analysis of compositeanimal tissue samples, data analysis/interpretation, and the formulationof recommendations for further study, if warranted. Due to the extreme-ly large number of potential test organisms, test tissues, pollutants,and sampling locations, this study must be regarded as a "first cut"attempt to ascertain whether specific organisms and specific prioritypollutants merit detailed investigations.
The experimental design of investigations directed at amphibians andsmall mammals was ecologically oriented. The intent of these investiga-tions was to quantify average whole body concentrations for each of thesubject priority pollutants in populations of insectivorous and herbi-vorous species inhabiting the Sinclair Site; and to compare/contrastthese concentrations with those measured in off-site populations. Ifthese organisms have, in fact, bioaccumulated priority pollutants, theirconsumption by predatory species could impair the reproductive successof these consumers. This phenomenon has been well documented in thetechnical literature for pesticides in raptors (birds of prey). Wholespecimens were used in the analytical work of the subject study inasmuchas amphibians and small mammals are consumed whole by predatory species(e.g., owls, hawks, eagles, foxes, and snakes) in nature.
The experimental design of investigations directed at fish and aquaticmacroinvertebrates was oriented toward public health and environmentalengineering considerations. The public health considerations involvesport fishermen removing fish from the Genesee River reach downstream ofthe Sinclair Site for personal consumption. The environmental engi-neering considerations involve supplementing water and soil test datawith biological data in order to assess the extent of contaminantmigration from the site under existing conditions (prior to remedia-tion). Originally, public health considerations were deemed to be the
300005
overriding factor in the aquatic program. Consequently, standardfillets (similar to those that would be taken by fishermen) of speciestypically regarded as game fish or panfish were slated for chemicalanalyses. During the actual field work, however, specimens capturedwere of insufficient size to fillet and still obtain the requisitesample size for the analytical protocol. Whole body homogenates weretherefore used in the analyses, with the emphasis of the study shiftingto the aforementioned environmental engineering considerations. Wholebody tissues were also used in the chemical analysis of forage fishesand most benthic macroinvertebrates inasmuch as these fish food organ-isms are consumed whole by game fish and panfish.
SAMPLING
General
Selected aquatic and terrestrial fauna were captured; identified to thelowest taxonomic level practicable (generally, to species for verte-brates and to family or genus for invertebrates); characterized to theextent practicable (vertebrates only) in terms of relevant morphologicalparameters (length, weight, sex, etc.); and processed in the field forsubsequent chemical analysis in the laboratory. Organisms were capturedby a variety of methods, as detailed below, from suspected areas ofcontamination as well as from upgradient, off-site locations. Biologi-cal field work was performed by ecologists representing Michael Baker,Jr. of New York, Inc. (New York, NY) and its subcontractor, AquaticSystems Corporation (Pittsburgh, PA). All ecologists performing on-sitework had completed EPA-approved health and safety training courses. Allfield work was completed in July of 1984. All collections were made inaccordance with the provisions of Scientific Collector's License SC-1870, issued to Baker by the New York State Department of EnvironmentalConservation on November 7, 1983.
300006
Aquatic Organisms
Fish were sampled at three locations near the Sinclair Refinery site(See Figure 1). Station #1 was located approximately 2-1/2 river milesupstream of the refinery site, near Stannards, NY. Station #3 waslocated adjacent to the refinery site and Station #4 was located approx-imately 1-1/2 river miles downstream of the refinery site. All fishwere collected by electroshocking and netting. Aquatic macroinverte-brates were collected at the three aforementioned sites and also in aslough draining the refinery site (Station #2). Macroinvertebrates werecollected with a Surber sampler.
The locations of all aquatic sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.Ecologists assigned to the sampling program used their knowledge ofhabitat preferences to select sampling locations with the greatestlikelihood of sampling success. In all cases, sampling activities beganat the upstream most station and progressed in a downstream direction.
After capture, organisms were identified, homogenized and composited bytaxa, containerized in glass jars, and shipped on dry ice to RECRAResearch Labs (Amherst, NY) for analysis. At RECRA Labs, the tissuehomogenates were analyzed for the 59 priority pollutants listed inAppendix A. The constituents chosen for analysis were selected from theU.S. EPA's list of priority pollutants. These are compounds with knownsignificance in terms of public health and environmental effects. Theselection of a limited number of constituents is consistent with theobjectives of this study, namely to provide data that may indicate overtcontamination of biological systems at a reasonable level of effort andto determine the need for additional studies.
Terrestrial Organisms
Small mammals were captured with Victor® snap-type mouse traps set ingrids. Trapping was performed at two locations on the Sinclair Refinerysite, and at one off-site location (approximately 1-1/2 miles southeastof the refinery) in order to provide background data. Station #5 (the
30000?
T. •TV f.
Go!' \,// £<•«•?
^ • jj^^JF- "* »V">^JJ1 vJV
^*.-t;*f
^(fit-̂ K
^.-'^MUM I MlIftC FIELD
'....»L..
nE\
/, / ';y\
•>\)*r<
SrATfoHO
P,,.
\
BIOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLMG LOCATIONSSNCUUR RERNERY - WELLSVLLE, NY
A -AQUATIC STATIONSFIGURE 1 • -TERRESTRIAL STATIONS
SUloo WMt
\.
300008
off-site location) was composed of two, 24-trap grids. One of thesegrids was located in an old field area, and the other was located in anadjacent section of forestland. The first on-site terrestrial station(Station #6) was located on an upland portion of the refinery site.This station was composed of an open area with low vegetative cover anda number of bare spots, some of which contained oil. As at the off-siteterrestrial station, sampling here consisted of two, 24-trap grids, withtraps set at approximately 10 meter intervals. Station #7 was thesecond of the on-site terrestrial sampling locations. This station wascomposed of an old field bordered by woodlands within the refinery site.
The locations of all terrestrial sampling stations are shown in Fig-ure 1. In all cases, ecologists assigned to the sampling project usedfield observations, coupled with their knowledge of habitat preferences,to choose sampling locations which had the greatest likelihood fortrapping success. The location of the off-site sampling station waschosen because of its similarity to the habitats present on the refinerysite.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
Organisms sorted into taxa-specific station-specific lots were homogen-ized whole in an Osterizer® multi-speed electric blender with a stain-less steel blending assembly and standard borosilicate glass jar. Priorto all blending operations, the jar was decontaminated by the followingprocedure: 1) washing with non-phosphate detergent and hot water;2) rinsing with tap water; 3) rinsing with distilled water; 4) rinsingwith acetone; 5) rinsing with hexane; and 6) air-dry ing.
Although EPA's "Interim Methods for the Sampling and Analysis of Prior-ity Pollutants in Sediments and Fish Tissue" (_!) recommends pre-coolingthe blender jar with dry ice and blending the tissues in the presence ofdry ice, blending operations for this study did not use dry ice. Therationale for this procedural modification is that carbon dioxidereleased during sublimation may induce chemical transformations in theanimal tissues as a result of pH depression. The field team did,
300009
however, perform all blending operations as quickly as possible to avoidvolatilization of organic compounds from thawing specimens.
RESULTS
General
Generally, the success of the aquatic sampling program was greater thanthat of the terrestrial program. Of the 17 aquatic samples originallyscheduled to be collected, only one (A-6, macroinvertebrates fromrefinery slough) was not collected. Organisms for this sample were notavailable because of habitat conditions in the slough (silt bottomapparently contaminated by petrochemicals). The terrestrial samplingprogram was less successful, with only 6 of the original 21 scheduledsamples collected. This reduced success may be attributed to poorphysical habitat for small mammals (e.g., few brush piles, fallen logs,rock piles, etc.), or the fact that traps were often prematurely sprungby invertebrates (slugs).
Table 1 shows a list of the species collected under the biologicalprogram, the location where the samples were taken, and the compositionin terms of species and number of organisms in each sample.
After blending, the contents of the blender jar were poured into wide-
mouth, glass sample jars with screw caps consisting of Teflon® liners inphenolic plastic caps. The sides of the blender jar were scraped asnecessary with a Teflon® policeman to provide as complete a sampletransfer as practicable. The sample bottles were decontaminated priorto use by the standard procedure described earlier. The sample bottleswere labeled, and stored on dry ice while awaiting shipment to theanalytical laboratory.
On the final day of the field trip, all sample containers were packagedin ice chests containing dry ice. Samples were packaged to avoidbreakage of the glass sample jars. The ice chests and NYSDEC Continuity
300010
TABIZ 1MASTHl LIST OF SAMPLES PREPARED IMXR THE BIOLOGICAL PROGMH
Sanple StationCode Oode Station Location
A-l SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-2 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-3 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-4 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-5 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-7 SIA 2 On-Site SloughA-8 SIA 3 Gen. River at SiteA-9 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site
A-10 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site
A-ll SIA 3 Gen. River at SiteA-l 2 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site
A-13 SIA 4 Gen. River Rt-17
A-14 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-1S SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-16 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-l 7 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17T-4 SIA 5 Off-Site ParcelT-5 SIA 5 Off-Site ParcelT-7 SIA 6 On-Site Zone I1
T-ll SIA 6 On-Site Zone flT-18 SIA 7 On-Slte Zone 12T-21 SIA 7 On-Site Zone 12
Hater ofTaxa
SpeciesSpeciesSpeciesFamilySpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpecies
1 Family
SpeciesSpecies
Family
SpeciesSpeciesFamilySpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpecies
Commttne
Creek ChubUnite StickerRock BassCrayfishBullfrog TadpoleBullfrog TadpoleCreek ChubWhite Sucker
PunpWneeedRock BassLargemouth BassSballmouth Baas
CrayfishBullfrog Tadpoles
Golden ShinerCannon ShinerBlintnose Minnow
White SuckerPunpkinBeedCrayfishBullfrog TadpoleMeadow VoleDeer MouseShorttail ShrewMeadow VoleMeadow VoleShorttail Shrew
Scientific Mane
Senotllus atranaculatusCatoetonus ocnnereoniAobloplltes rupestrlsAstacldaeRana catesbelanaRana catesbelanaSenotllus atranaculatusCatoetcnus uMimamd
Leponds glbbosusAnUoplltes rupestrlsMlcropterus ««iiiin<A»«Micropterus dolcndeui
AstacldaeRana cateabelana
Notarigonus crygoleucasNotropis oomutusPiaepnales notatus
Catostonus coonersoniLepoBds glbbosusAstacldaeRana catesbelsnaMlcrotus pen isylvanlcusPeromyscus maniculatusBlarlna brevicaudaMlcrotus pemsylvanicusMlcrotus pemsylvanicusBlarlna brevicauda
SpecimensHomogenized
8118
16"12«12
' 105
3622
14«12
51420
72217
»1244
10252
SanpleWeight (g)
178ISOISO135ISO150168150
130
124150
142
150150143ISO10170
18681
14830
Specimen lengthRange (on)
76-18697-31048-175
———
70-189179-315
57-12151-105
55-6183-105
_—
77-9559-107
42-81
117-26656-122
——
98-150117-157100-120136-152105-150
90-96
Specimen WeightRange (g)
7-809-3292-115
———
3-7260-292
4-343-263-4
9-14
__—
4-92-111-7
14-2044-41
——
13-4511-2116-2442-4317-4015-17
ArchiveAvailable
YesYesYesHoHoHaYesYes
Ho
HoHo
No
YeaYesNoNoNoNotbHoNoNo
ArchiveUeltfit (g)
=80=•350=70N/AN/AN/A200
N/A
N/AN/A
N/A
"400*200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
captured for the following sanples: A-6, T-1, T-2, T-3, T-6. T-8, T-9, T-10, T-12, T-13, T-1 A, T-1S. T-16, T-17, T-19, and T-20. Archive materials are stored at thecorporate headquarters of Baker Engineers In Beaver, Pennsylvania.
Analysis of sample T-5 was not conducted because Deer Mice were not collected on-site.
300011
of Evidence Forms identifying the ice chest contents were then shippedby overnight mail service to the RECRA Research, Inc. Laboratory inAmberst, New York.
Aquatic Organisms
None of the organic pollutants analyzed for were found above the limitsof detection in any of the aquatic samples. Likewise, cadmium was belowthe detection limit in all of the aquatic samples.
Lead was detected mostly in the bullfrog tadpole samples. Levels oflead in the upstream, at-site, slough and downstream tadpole sampleswere 0.173, 0.374, 0.100 and 0.197 Vg/g, respectively. The only othersamples containing lead were the at-site creek chub sample with 0.196Vg/g and the downstream forage fish containing 0.123 Vg/g.
The bullfrog tadpole samples were the only samples found to containarsenic above its detectable limits. Arsenic levels (expressed as Vg/g)in the tadpole samples were as follows: upstream, 0.885; at-site, 1.08;slough, 0.930; and downstream, 0.394.
Of the heavy metals tested, nickel occurred with the greatest frequencyand in the greatest concentration. Table 2 summarizes the nickelconcentrations detected in the aquatic samples.
TABLE 2
CONCENTRATION OF NICKEL IN AQUATIC SAMPLES*
Crayfish Tadpoles Forage Fish Creek Chubs White Sucker Sport Fish
Upstream £0.1 1.70 -- 0.470 0.900 £0.1At-site 0.585 3.11 -- 3.69 6.17 0.461Slough -- 1.40Downstream £0.1 4.88 0.123 -- 0.128 1.05
*A11 concentrations in vg nickel/g tissue.
-- Indicates sample not collected.
8
300012
Terrestrial Organisms
None of the organic pollutants analyzed for occurred above their respec-tive limits of detection in any of the terrestrial samples.
Table 3 summarizes the concentrations of lead, nickel, cadmium andarsenic in the terrestrial samples and in composite soil samples fromonsite and background soil samples.
TABLE 3
METAL CONCENTRATIONS* IN SOIL AND TERRESTRIAL TISSUE SAMPLES
Nickel
Composite Soil BackgroundMetal
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Sample Areas**
14-31
ND
53-1190
Soils
7.9-19
ND
1.3-29
15-49 22-33
On-SiteAnimals
ND
ND
Vole: 0.173-0.176Shrew: 0.157-0.259
Vole: 0.470-0.787Shrew: 0.212-0.452
Off-SiteAnimals
ND
ND
Vole: <0.1
Vole: 0.466
*A11 concentrations in ppm.**Compiled from Reference 2.ND « Not Deleted
DISCUSSION
General
Trapping efforts over four consecutive nights did not provide anyanimals for several of the terrestrial samples. Based upon fieldobservations by the wildlife biologist, the general lack of success canbe attributed to low population densities (resulting from poor physicalhabitat quality, e.g. no fallen logs, etc.) at the on-site stations, andfrom problems with slugs springing the traps.
• f'
3000̂ 3
Organics
Organic chemicals tend to biomagnify through food-chains as contaminatedorganisms serve as food for higher tropic level organisms. The extentto which an organic constituent biomagnifies is a function of itsconcentration in the environment and its solubility in animal lipidtissue (lipophilicity). Inasmuch as all animals contain a certainproportion of lipid tissue, any organism which can serve as food toanother organism can potentially contribute to the biomagnification oflipophillc organic compounds. Large amounts of fatty material in thesolvent extract of several samples interferred with the detection ofmany of the compounds of interest. In cases where such interferenceswere encountered, detection limits (Appendix A) are higher to reflectthis. However, in spite of certain elevated detection limits, adequatedetection limits (0.05 ppm) were obtained for all volatile organicconstituents. The fact that these constituents were not detected in anyof the aquatic or terrestrial samples would seem to indicate that thesubject animals do not regularly come into contact with these contamin-ants.
Inorganics
The total lack of cadmium detection among all samples tested wouldindicate that environmental contamination by this material is notoccurring at or around the Wellsville site. This is consistent with theconspicuous lack of cadmium detection in any of the composite soilsamples collected on-site.
Lead levels detected among bullfrog tadpole samples collected at theat-site station were 116% greater than tadpole samples collected up-stream of the site. Initially, this finding would seem to indicate thestrong likelihood of lead contamination from the Sinclair refinery site.However, tadpoles collected from the refinery slough, an area assumed torepresent a worst case location, had lead levels 422 lower than similarsamples from the upstream station. Lead is known to bioconcentrate inliving tissue from the surrounding medium (3_). Concentrations of 0.24
10
3000M
and 0.16 ppm of lead have been reported in freshwater fish (£̂ 5). Leadwas not detected in any of the samples of game fish collected. Thisfinding suggests that, with respect to lead, no public health conse-quences would result from the consumption of gamefish near the refinerysite. Among the terrestrial samples, lead occurred in significantlyhigher levels among all on-site samples compared with samples collectedoff-site. This finding, in conjunction with elevated levels of lead ison-site soils (Table 3), strongly suggests a causal relationship betweencontaminated site soils and elevated lead levels in the terrestrialon-site samples.
Arsenic is ubiquitous in the environment and is found in all livingorganisms. Information concerning the ecological cycling of arsenic islimited and it is not possible to state with certainty whether arsenictends to accumulate in any one section of the ecosystem (7) • The onlysamples containing arsenic above its limits of detection were thebullfrog tadpole samples. Arsenic levels from tadpole samples collectedat-site and in the refinery slough were roughly 221 and 5% higherrespectively than tadpole samples collected upstream of the site. Allsamples had an arsenic content of less than 1.1 ppm. Freshwater organi-sms inhabitating uncontaminated waters contain up to 3 ppm of arsenic.The average arsenic content of a variety of freshwater aquatic organismsvaries up to 2.1 ppm (7). In light of this, the range of arsenicconcentrations found in the tadpole samples collected as part of thisstudy (0.394-1.08 ppm) does not seem unreasonable and cannot be inter-preted as an indication of overt arsenic contamination of the aquaticecosystem at the site. Also, the fact that arsenic was detected in onlyone species, and also detected in all samples of that species, suggeststhat the elevated concentration of this element in the tadpoles may be aspecies-related phenomenon rather than occurring as a result of contamin-ation.
Nickel, like many trace elements, is widespread in the contemporary-human environment (8). Of the priority pollutants for which analyseswere conducted, nickel was by far the most widespread constituent and italso occurred in the greatest concentrations. When compared to theircorresponding upstream samples, the at-site homogenates of bullfrog
300015
tadpoles, white suckers, and creek chubs showed significant increases innickel concentrations. While superficially these data would seem toindicate the possibility of nickel contamination by the Wellsville site,the lack of an associated increase in nickel concentrations in the riversediments sampled upstream and at the site, would tend to indicate thatthese data may merely reflect consistently higher nickel concentrationsamong aquatic animals of the Genessee River. Normal ranges for nickelin aquatic tissue are well below those values observed from animalscollected near the refinery site. Normal levels of nickel reported forflesh of various species of freshwater fish collected in the northeast-ern United States average 0.2 ppm (J5). However, a direct comparisonwith these data does not apply, as reported data refer to flesh samplesrather than to whole body homogenates. Most ingested nickel is excretedthrough the feces; and, since whole-body homogenates were analyzed, anymaterial in the digestive tracts of the specimens would have beenincluded in the analyses. Inasmuch as domestic crude oil contains anaverage of 0.00142Z nickel (10), and since the Sinclair site processeddomestic crude oil, the possibility of an association between therefineries' presence, and elevated nickel levels observed among theaquatic fauna living nearby cannot be overlooked. The concentration ofnickel in meadow voles collected at the on-site sampling stations is notsignificantly higher than in the offsite vole sample. Similarly,although no corresponding offsite shrew sample was available for directcomparison, the levels of nickel in shrew tissue collected on-site donot Indicate overt contamination by this element.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of this study, no further studies on the bioaccumu-lation of priority pollutants are recommended at this time. However,additional ecological studies of the Genesee River main stem before,during, and after remediation are strongly recommended.
The remedial action ultimately selected for implementation may disruptthe ecology of the river in two ways: 1) by sedimentation impacts,which are commonly encountered in large earthmoving projects; or 2) by
12 300016
offsite migration of toxic priority pollutants, which could result fromexposure of wastes during site cleanup. The most reliable and quantita-tive means of documenting whether such impacts occur is by sampling andcharacterizing the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Accordingly, itis recommended that five sampling stations be established in the one-mile reach of the Genesee River downstream from the Sinclair site. Inthe vicinity of each station composite samples would be collected atrandom from the left third of the channel, center channel, and the rightthird of the channel. These samples would be collected before, during,and after remediation with an attempt to match collections in terms ofseason. The resultant data would be compared and contrasted in aquantitative fashion using the Shannon-Weaver species diversity index(d). The data also would be evaluated in a quantitative fashion givenavailable information on the pollution-tolerances of dominant forms.
REFERENCES
(1) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1980. "Interim Methods forthe Sampling and Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments andFish Tissue." EPA 600/4-81-055, Washington, D.C.
(2) SMC Martin, Inc., 1985. Draft Phase I Remedial Investigation,Sinclair Refinery Site, Wellsville, New York. Volume II.
(3) Pringle, B.H., D.E. Hissong, E.L. Katz, and S.T. Mulawka. 1968."Trace Metal Accumulation by Estuarine Mollusks." J. Sanit. Eng.Div.; Proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 94:455-475.
(4) Kehoe, R.A., F. Thamann, and J. Cholak. 1933. "On the NormalAbsorption and Excretion of Lead. I. Lead Absorption and Excre-tion in Primitive Life." J. Ind. Hyg. 15:257-272.
(5) Harley, J.H. 1970. "Discussion - Sources of Lead in PerennialRyegrass and Radishes. Environ. Sci. Tech. 4:225.
(6) Bowen, H.G.M. 1966. Trace Elements in Biochemistry, AcademicPress, Inc., NY.
13 300017
(7) Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, NationalResearch Council. 1977. Arsenic; Medical and Biologic Effects ofEnvironmental Pollutants. National Academy of Science, Washington,D.C.
(8) Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, NationalResearch Council. 1975. Nickel; Medical and Biologic Effects ofEnvironmental Pollutants. National Academy of Science, Washington,D.C.
(9) Wells, G.C. 1956. Effects of Nickel on the Skin. Brit. J. Derm.68:237-242.
(10) Anon. 1969. "Hand Eczema and Other Hand Dermatoses in SouthSweden." Acta Derm. Venereol. 49:5-91, (Supp:61).
300018
fib
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
INTRODUCTION:
On July 31, 1984 samples were received at Recra Environmental Laboratories.
A request was made by Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. to have the samples
analyzed for selected volatile, acid extractable, and base neutral compounds,
pesticide/PCB's, and four total metals.
This report will address the results of those analyses.
METHODS:
Volatile, acid extractable, and base neutral compounds were analyzed by
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Pesticide/PCB's were analyzed
by Gas Chromatography.
Methodologies for the volatile and metals analyses can be found in
Interim Methods for the Sampling & Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments
& Fish Tissue, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Revised October 1980.
Samples for the analyses for acid/base neutral compounds and pesticide/PCB's
were prepared according to Sonication Extraction - Method 3550 found in Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, July 1982, SW-846,
Second Edition, and analyzed according to the appropriate Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) methodologies.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
As requested, sample T-5 was not analyzed.
The following samples were analyzed in replicate but no positive values
resulted:
A-4 and A-16 for acid/base neutral compoundsA-8, A-10, A-13, and T-ll for volatile compounds
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (CONT'D.):
Low recoveries for pentafluorophenol and the volatile internal standards
in certain samples were determined to be a function of the sample matrix.
Checks for possible instrumentation problems were negative and replicate
analyses of the samples in question resulted in the same low recoveries.
Analyses for specific Pesticides/PCB's are based upon the matching of
retention times between samples and standards on a single gas chromatographic
column. Gas chromatographic values reported as "less than" (<) indicate the
working detection limit for the given sample and/or parameter.
Compounds reported as ND are "not detected".
Respectfully Submitted,
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Barbara J. KrajewskiGC/MS Supervisor
BJK/jhs
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES O U U U C J.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)
3.3
42
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-l
ND
ND
A- 2
ND
ND
A- 3
ND
ND
A- 4
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIOiNSarnnle Dat*Extraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luoropheno] - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentaf luorcpheTiCl - Recovery
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g
91%12 ug/g79%
12 ug/g56%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g120%12 ug/g92%
12 ug/g51%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g
98%12 ug/g65%
12 ug/g74%
7/24/84 i9/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%
12 ug/g80% _
12 ug/g0%
FOR RECRA EnVIRGNMIiNIAL LABORATORIES
DATEV
A-3
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. //S4-754 300022
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHIIOMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/64
1
PARAMETER
2-chlorophenol
2, 4-dinitro phenol
DETECTIONLIMITC'̂ /8)
3.3
42
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A- 5
ND
ND
A- 7
ND
ND
A- 8
ND
ND
t
A- 9
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Levelceuterat^d phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (3S1) - Level2-f lucrophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2.) - Levelnentaf luoro-fuer.ol - Recovery
7/24&26/S49/18/849/21/842.0 UE/E
74%12 UE/E80%
12 UE/E62%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E
110%12 UE/E61%
12 UE/E47%
7/248,26/849/18/849/21/842.0 UE/E
130%12 UE/E-80%
12 UE/E55%
7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E
110% {12 UE/E32%
12 UE/E25%
FOR RECRA Eirv iROKHENTAL LABORATORIES
DATEff
A-4
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
3000?3
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMEli.K
2-chlorophcnol
2 , 4-din'! trophenol
DETECTIONLIMIT(UR/g)
3.3
42
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-10
ND
ND
A-ll
ND
ND
A-12
ND
ND
A-13
ND
ND
ADDITIONAI. SAMPLE INFORMATIONSa-.r-le DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f lueroDhenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpn-t-.ir luorc'Dhenol - Recovery
7/24&26/S49/18/849/21/842.0 UB/E
94%12 U£/E70%
12 UE/E56%
7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g
93%12 ue/e45%
12 ue/e36%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g
76%12 ue/E77%
12 UE/g65%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g140% !12 u?/g68%
12 ue/g60%
FOK RECRA ElT^IRONTiENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-5
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 300024
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
2-chlorophenol
2 , 4-dinitrophenol
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)
3.3
42
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-14
ND
ND
A-15
ND
ND
A-16
ND
ND
A-17
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION| Sample Date! Extras tier. DateI Anslvsis Date! Internal Standard (IS) - Level! deuterated phenanthrene - RecoveryI Surrogate Standard (SS1) - Leveli 2-f luorophenol - Recoveryi Surrogate Standard (SS2) - Level
•Dcncafluorophenol - Recovery
7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g
88%12 yg/g51%
12 ug/g61%
7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g
65%12 ug/g90%
12 yg/g58%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g
87%12 yg/g -55%
12 yg/g0%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%12 yg/g55%
12 yg/g60%
FOP. RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
s Avfrkl
i J i
fib A-6
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300025
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
2-chlorophenol
2 , 4-dini trophenol
DETECTIONLIMIT(UE/E)
3.3
42
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
T-4
ND
ND
T-7
ND
ND
T-ll
ND
ND
T-18
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelcentaf luorophenol - Recovery
_9/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E
120%12 UR/E62%
12 MR/R53%
7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E
110%12 UE/E43%
12 uR/a25%
7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g
110%12 UE/E90%
12 UR/P,76%
7/27/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g
72%12 ug/R88%
12 UR/R71%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
i#U<<
A-7RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300026
Page i or 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERacenaohtheneacer.aphthyleneanthracenebenzo ( a ) an thracene
benzo(a)pyrenebenzo (g , h , i ) pervlene
benzo (k) f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene
- chrysenedibenzo (a, h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene
1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2, 4-dinitro toluene
2,6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/e)1.93.51.97.82.5A.I2.51.92.52.51.91.9A. 45.7
1.92.21.91.9
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-l
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
ND
A-2
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
A-3
NDND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ND
A-4
ND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
(Continued)
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
A-8 30002?
rage 01
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepvrene
1,2, 4-tr ichlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.6
1.925251.91.91.9 .
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-lND
NDNDNDND
ND
ND
A-2ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
A- 3ND
ND
NDND
ND
NDND
A-4ND
NDND
ND
ND
NDND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobipjhenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorobiphenyl - Recovery
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g91%
12 ug/g67%
10 ug/g66%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g120%
12 yg/g78%10 ug/g84%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g98%12 yg/g80%10 yg/g90%
7/24/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g110%12 ug/g100%10 ug/g100%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
/ J
A-9RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300028
Page 1 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERacenaohtheneacenaphthyleneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracene
benzo(a)pvrenebenzo (g , h , i )pery lenebenzo (k)f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalenechrysenedibenzo (a, h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene
1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(vg/g)1.9
3.51.97.82.54.12.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-5NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
A-7ND
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
A-8ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
A-9ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
NDND
NDND
NDND
(Continued)
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
A-10 300029
rage 01 «.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodinethylanineN-ni.trosodi-N-propylami.neN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 •
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-5NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
A- 7NDNDND
NDNDNDND
A-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND
A-9NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
ND
s~ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2- f luorobiphenyl - Recovery
7/24&26/$49/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g74%
12 yg/g77%
10 ug/g77%
7725/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%
12 ug/g100%10 pg/g
7/246.26/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g130%12 ug/g88%10 ug/g
100% ! 98%
7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%12 ug/g38%10 ug/g38%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-ll
HECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754 300030
rage i 01
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERacenaphthenea cenaph thy leneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenso (g , h , i )pery lenebenzo (k) f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene
\ chrysepedibenzc (a, h) anthracenei , 2-dichlorobenzene1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenefluoranthenefluorenehexachlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(UB/g)1.93.51.97.82.54.12.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-10
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
A-ll
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
A-12
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDKD
NDND
A-13
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND 'NDNDNDNDND'NDNDNDND
(Continued)
RiCRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
A-12
300031
Page 2 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethvlamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 -
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-10ND
NDND
ND
NDND
ND
A-llND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
A-12ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
A-13ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fiuorobiphenyl - Recovery
7/24426/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g94%
12 yg/g63%
10 yg/g
7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g93%
12 yg/g84%
10 yg/g
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g76%
12 yg/g84%
10 yg/g80% ! 87% | 90%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 ng/g140%12 yg/g100%10 yg/g100%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE^ I
ft* A-13RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
300032
Page i or 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETERacenaphtheneacenanhthvleneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracene
benzo(a)pyrene
benzo ( g , h , i ) pery lene
benzo (k)f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene
' chrvsened ihenzo (a ,h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene
1 , 3-d ichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlcrobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)1.93.5
1.97.8
2.5A.I2.5
1.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-14
NDNT)
ND
KB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
A-15
ND
ND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
A-16
ND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
. ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
A-17
ND
NDND
NDND
NDND
NDND
NDNDND
NDND
NDND
NDND
(Continued)
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
A-14300033
Page 2 01 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
naphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1 , 2 ,4-trichlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(Ug/g)
1.61.925251.91.91.9 ,
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-14ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
A-15ND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
A-16ND
NDND
ND
NDND
ND
A-17ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorbbiphenyl - Recovery
7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g88%12 yg/g89%10 yg/g94%
7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g65%12 pg/g85%10 pg/g83%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g87%12 yg/g60%10 yg/g76%
7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%
12 yg/g100%
10 yg/g110%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-15RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300034
rage i 01
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
acenaphtheneacenaphthyleneanthracenebenzo ( a ) an thracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo ( g , h , i ) perylenebenzo (k) f luoranthene
2-chloronaphthalenechrysene
dibenzo (a, h) an thracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2 , 4-dinitro toluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(UR/8)1.93.51.97.82.5A.I2.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.7
1.92.21.91.9
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
T-4ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
T-7ND
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
T-ll
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
T-18
NDND
NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
NDND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
(Continued)
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
A-16 300035
Page 2 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
naphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4- trichlorobenzene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 -
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
T-4
ND
NDNDND
ND
NDND
T-7ND
ND
NDND
NDND
ND
T-llND
NDNDND
ND
NDND
T-18ND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorobiphenvl - Recovery
—9/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%
12 yg/g69%
10 ug/g76%
7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%
12 yg/g40%10 ug/g56%
7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%
12 vg/g85%10 yg/g67%
7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g72%12 yg/g90%10 yg/g87%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATEV U
A-17
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
300036
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethyl chloride
tetrachloroethylenetoluene
1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane1,1, 2-trichloroethane:richloroethvlene
DETECTIONLIMIT(ye/kg)50505050505050505050
SAl-fPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-l
NDND
NDNDNDNDNDND
NDND
A- 2NDND
ND
NDND
NDNDND
NDND
A-3NDND
ND
NDNDNDNDND
NDND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbroraochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/24/848/16/8440 yg/kg46%40 yg/kg33%40 yg/kg35%
7/24/848/16/8440 yg/kg1%40 yg/kg37%40 yg/kg30%
7/24/848/16/8440 ye/ke110%40 yg/kg77%40 yg/kg100%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-18
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-75430003?
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
beruenecarbon totrachloridechleirobenzenechloroformcethvl chloride
tetrachloroethvlenetoluene1,1, 1-trichloroethane
1 , 1 , 2-tr ichloroethanetri^hlorcethylene
DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/kg)50505050505050505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-4
NDND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
A- 5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
NDND
A-7NDND
ND
NDND
ND
NDND
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis Dateinternal Standard - LevelbroTDnrhlornnethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-brcne-i-chicropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-cichlorobutane - Recovery
7/24/848/14/8440 ug/kg80%40 ug/kg76%
40 ug/kg40%
7/24&26/S48/17/8440 ug/kg27%
40 ug/kg68%40 ug/kg77%
7/25/848/16/8440 wg/kg71%
40 vg/kg56%
40 ug/kg57%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATEv g
A-19
RECfIA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
300038
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzer.echloroformirethyl chloride
tetrachloroethylenetolue-u=1 , 1 ,1-trichloroethane1.1, 2-trichloroethane•trichlcreethvler.e
DETECTIONLIMIT(US/kg)
50505050505050505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-8NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ND
A-9NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
A-10NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-broao-l-chloropropsne - RecoveryIntfcn-i.il Standard - Level
i 1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/246.26/848/15/8440 UE/kE43%40 uE/kR18%40 ug/kg29%
7/24&26/S48/17/8440 UE/kE10%
40 UB/kB19%40 we/kg23%
7/24&26/S48/16/8440 uE/ke4%40 ue/kE12%40 UE/kE49%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-20RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300039
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethyl chloridetetrachloroethylenetoluene1,1, 1-trichloroethane1,1, 2-tr ichloroethanetrichloroethylene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/kg)50
505050505050505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-llNDNDNDND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDND
A-12NDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDNDNDND
A-13NDNDND
ND
ND
ND
NDNDND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/24&26/S48/15/8440 yg/kg61%40 yg/kg33%40 yg/kg30%
7/24/848/15/8440 yg/kg84%40 yg/kg67%40 yg/kg67%
7/25/848/16/8440 yg/kg6%40 yg/kg30%40 yg/kg48%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE jfatit.—:
A-213ECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300040
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzene
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzenechloroform
methyl chloridetetrachloroethvlene
toluene
1 , 1 ,1-trichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane
trichloroethylene
DETECTIONLIMIT(pg/kg)
505050
50
505050
505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-14ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-15
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-16ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND 1
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSar.ple Date j 7/25/84Analysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-c'iloropropane - RacovervInternal Standard - Level1 , 4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
8/15/8440 yg/kg
20%40 ye/kg
51%40 yR/kR
40%
7/25/848/15/8440 ug/kg
25%40 ug/kg
22%40 ug/kR
34%
7/25/848/15/8440 ue/kR
68%40 yg/kg
75%40 yg/kg
57%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-22
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
300041
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAZL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzene
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzene
chloroform
methvl chloride
tetrachloroethylene
toluene
1,1, 1-trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane
trichlorcethvlene
DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/kg)50505050505050505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-7ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSarr.cle DateAnaivsis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,^-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/25/848/14/84
40 VK/kE71%
40 PE/kE61%
40 PR/kg100%
—8/16/8440 uE/ke
57%40 uE/kE
46%40 ug/kg
48%
7/27/848/15/8440 ug/kg
68%40 uE/ke
57%40 uE/ke
10%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
/li&^fjtew'
A-23
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
300042
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
benzenecarbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzenechloroform
methyl chloridetetrachloroethvlene
toluene1,1, 1-trichlcroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene
DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/kg)50505050505050505050
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
T-llND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-18BDL
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/27/848/15/8440 ME /kg
9%40 PR/kg
10%40 UR/kR
6%
7/27/848/17/8440 uE/kE
53%40 MR/kR
38%40 pR/kR
27%
7/27/848/17/8440 VR/kE
53%40 PR/kR
32%40 UR/kR
33%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-24
BECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 300043
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPKY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Aldrinci-BHC
e-BHC
6-BHC
V-BHC
Chlordane
4,4' ODD
4,4' DDE4,4' DOT
Dieldi'in
FCB - 1016
PCS - 1221
PCB - 1232PCS - 1242
PCE - 1248PCB - 1254
PCB - 1260
UNITS OF MEASURE
yg/gyg/g
yg/g
yg/g
yg/gyg/gyg/g
yg/g
yg/g
yg/g
yg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)
A-l(7/24/84)<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4
<4<2<2<2<2
A- 2(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<4<4<2<2<2<2
A- 3(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-4(7/24/84)<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<4<4<2<2<2<2
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-25
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-7543000^4
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Aldrin
a-EHC
n-BKC
6-BKC
Y-BHC
Chlordane
4,4' DDD
4,4' DDE
4,4' DOT
Dicldrin
PCI', - 1016
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1242PCB - 1248PCB - 1254
PCB - 1260
UNITS OF MEASURE
ug/gPg/g
MS;/&M Z, / g
U6/g
vg/eug/gug/gvg/gug/gU ° / £
Ug/8
V15/8ug/gug/gug/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)
A-5'7/24&26/S4)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4
<2<2<2
Ufi/R S <2
A-7(7/25/84)<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4
<2<2<2<2
A- 8C7/24&26/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-9(7/24&26/S4)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2<0.2 !
<0.2 |<0.2 1<2 |<4 ;<4
-1<2 !1
<2
<2 ;
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-26
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I .D. #84-7543000/15
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Aldrinci-BHC
c-BHC
5-BHC
-,-BHC
Chlordane4,4' DDD
4,4' DDE
4,4' DOT
Dieldrin
tCB - 1016
FCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
FCB - 1242
PCB - 1248PCB - 1254
PCB - 1260
UNITS Or MEASURE
ug/gV.V./V,
US/8U'g/g
Ug/g
ug/gyp/sujj./e
y?/gus/e
,̂/g
i'.s/Eug/g
us/gUg/g
UK/P
'•Jg/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)
A-10(7/246,26/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2
"<0.2
<0.2<2
<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-ll(7/24&26/S4)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A- 12(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-13(7/25/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2 i
<0.2 :
<2 !<4<4<2<2
<2 i
<z i
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-27
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. //S4-754 300046
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Aldrin
a-BHC
6-BHC
c-BHC
>-BKC
Chlcrdane
4, A' DDD
4,4' DDE
4,4' DDT
Dieldrinpen _ ; r- 1 (-.r s_ u * vj i. O
PCE - 1 ° ~* I
PCB - 1232
PCS - 1242
PCB - 1248FC3 - 1254
PC3 - 1260
UNITS OF MEASURE
yg/gyg/g
Ug/g
ug/iUg/g
Pg/8
U8/g
Ug/g
ug/gug/g
yg/f?yg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE'1
A-14(7/25/84)<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-15(7/25/84)<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2
<2<2
A-16(7/25/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2
<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
A-17(7/25/84)<0.2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2
<0.2<0.2<2<4<4
<2 !<2<2
<2 j
fa*FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-28
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
7 . D . /(RA-7S4
/ I
30004?
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Report Date: 9/27/84
1
PARAMETER
Aldrin
ct-BHC
c-RKC
6-BHC
•Y-BHC
Chlordane4,4' DDD
4,4' DDE
4,4' DDT
Dieldrin
?CE - 1016PCS - 1221
FCB - 1232FCB - 1242
PCB - 1248PCB - 1254PCB - 1260
UNITS OF MEASURE
ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gUg/g
ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)
T-4(-)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2"<0.2<0.2
<2<4<4<2<2<2<2
T-7(7/27/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<4<4<2<2<2<2
T-ll(7/27/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<4<4<2<2<2<2
T-18(7/27/84)
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2
<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4
<4<2<2<2<2
I
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-29
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI .D. #84-754
C2'
300048
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
Report Date: 1/17/85
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A-l
A- 2
A- 3
A- 4
A- 4 Dup
A- 5
A- 7
A- 8
A-9
A-10
A-ll
A-12
A-13
A-U
A-15
A-16
A- 16 Dup
A-17
T-4
T-7
T-ll
T-18
DETECTION LIMIT(pg/g)
5.0
5.0
5.05.05.05.05.0
5.05.05.05.05.05.05.05.0
5.05.05.05.05.0
5.05.0
COMPOUND
PHENANTHRENE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 additional
A-30 300049
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/.?7/8i
i1
PAPAMETEFl
Total ArsenicTotal CadmiumTotal LeadI-. _.. 1 VJ -t. .1i*. i. L.*. . 1 1 <_ -'*i_-l.
UNITS OFMEASURE
US/.?
ng/gyg/g1 1 .-» / o— ™. , -,
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-l
O/24/84)
<o.i<0.1<0.10.470
A- 2C7/24/84)
<0.09<0.09<0.090.900
A— 3(7/24/84)
<0.09<0.09<0.09<0.1
A-4C7/24/84)
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1
r^> it c7 'FOE. RKCSA ENVIROJMEKTAL LABORATORIESV } I J\J ' 7^ ^Vyxv
DATE
A-31RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300050
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Total ArsenicTotal CadmiumTotal LeadTo t a 1 Nickel
UNITS OFMEASURE
ug/gWg/g
Ug/g
Pg/8
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-5
(7/24-26/84)0.885<0.090.1731.70
A- 7(7/25/84)0.930<0.080.1001.40
A- 8(7/24-26/84)
<0.1<0.10.196
3.69
A- 9(7/24-26/84)
<0.1<0.1<0.16.17
FOR EECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
ft* A-32RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300051
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Total ArsenicTotal Cadmium
Total Lead
Total Nickel
UNITS OFMEASURE
Pg/g
Ug/g
Wg/g
Ug/R
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-10
(7/24-26/841
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.461
A-lln/24-26/841)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.585
A-12(7/24/841
1.08
<0.1
0.374
3.11
A-13(7/25/841
<0.09
<0.09
0.123
1.25
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, LABORATORIES
DATE
A-33RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
300052
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Total Arsenic
Total CadmiumTotal Lead
Total Nickel
UNITS OFMEASURE
ug/gUg/g
Pg/g
Wg/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-14
(7/25/84)
<0.08
<0.08
<0.08
0.128
A-15(7/25/84)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.05
A-16(7/25/84)
<0.1
<0.1<0.1<0.1
A-17(7/25/84)
0.394
<0.1
0.197
4.88
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
.\J.
A-34RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300053
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Tctal ArsenicTotal Cadmium
Total Lead
Tc-tnl Nickel
UNITS OFMEASURE
UR/g
Ug/g
ug/R
us/K
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)T-4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.466
T-7(7/27/84)
<0.1<0.10.1570.452
T-ll(7/27/84)
<0.1<0.10.1730.787
FOR KliCRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES V-X L u (/ x
EATE
A-35
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
300054
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Report Date: 9/27/84
PARAMETER
Total ArsenicTotal Cadmium
Total Lead
Total Nickel
UNITS OFMEASURE
Ug/gVg/gUg/g
Ug/g
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)T-18
(7/27/84 ">
<0.1
<0.1
0.1760.470
T-21(7/27/841*
<0.2
<0.2
0.259
0.212
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTALNTAL LABORATORIES V-^i x \J ' / /
A-36RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
300055
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
EXTRACTABLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFMETHOD BLANK
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
2-chlorophenol1,3-dichlorobenzene
2,4-dichlorophenoldi-n-octylphthalate
f luoranthenenaphthalenenitrobenzene
ng OFSPIKE
50505050505050
ngRECOVERED
2944
1840364335
%RECOVERY
58
883080728670
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION
L .
Extraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentaf luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - Leveldecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-f luorobiphenyl - Recovery
9/18/849/21/8420 ug/1100%
120 ug/161%
120 ug/124%
120 ug/180%
100 ug/178%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-37RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I .D. #84-754300056
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
EXTRACTABLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-17
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
2-chlorophenol
1 , 3-dichlorobenzene2 , 4-dichlorophenoldi-n-octylphthalatef luoranthenenaphthalene
nitrobenzene
2,4, 6-trichlorophenol
ng OFSPIKE5050505050
50
5050
ngRECOVERED
54
26
57
2511
31
3558
%RECOVERY
108
521145022 '62
70 !
116
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentafluorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - Leveldecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-f luorobiphenyl - Recovery
7/25/849/27/849/27/842.0 ug/g
110%12 ug/g52%
12 ug/g55%
12 ug/g50%
10 ug/g60%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-38RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300057
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-2
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
benzenecarbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzenechloroformmethvl chloride
tetrachloroethylenetoluene
1 ,1 , 1-trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane
trichloroethvlene
ng OFSPIKE
1AOO1400
1400
1400
140014001400
1400
14001400
ngRECOVERED
3601201101403308820054160140
%RECOVERY
268.67.81024
6.314
3.911
10
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/24/848/20/8440 yg/kg8%
40 Lg/'kg8%
40 yg/kg26%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
•VL
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I .D. #84-754
A-39 300058
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTRQMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-10
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
benzene
carbon teLrachloridechiorcbenzene
chloroformimethvl chloride
tetrachloroethvlene
toluene
1 ,1 ,1-trichloroethane .
1,1. 2- trichl oroethane
cr i.'?.hl'.>i\>titiivleri£
ng OFSPIKE
1400
1400
1400
1400140014001400
1400
1400
1400
ngRECOVERED
210
11012035021080140
160210150
t"/»
RECOVERY
15 |7.88.625
i155.7
1011 "*
15
. » - J
I.
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INTORMc'.TlONScnit>le DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelEromochloromt thane - Recoveryl:it 2rn£l SU'.niarc; - Level2-hicmo-l-chlurGpropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 .4- dichlorcbuvane - Recovery
7/24S.26/848/16/8440 yg/kg387.
4u 'jR/.-.c.30%
40 ug/kg38%
FOR RECRA ENA' . LABORATORIES
DATil
A-40RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
T . D .
300059
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-14
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
benzene
carbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethvl chloride
tetrachloroethylenetoluene
1,1 ,1-trichloroethane -1,1, 2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene
ng OFSPIKE1400
1400
1400140014001400
1400
1400
14001400
ngRECOVERED
650
560530950530410470
600400600
%RECOVERY
4640
3868382933432843
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 , 4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/25/848/15/8440 ug/kg56%40 u:z/kg38%40 ug/kg30%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-41
i RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
T . D . m-754300060
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-18
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
benzene
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzenechloroform
methvl chloridetetrachloroethylenetoluene
1 ,1 , 1-trichloroethane •
1,1 ,2-trichloroethanetric-hloroethvlene
ng OFSPIKE14001400
140014001400
1400
1400
1400
140014QG
ngRECOVERED
330280150360
380130210500200170
%RECOVERY
232011
26279.3153614
12
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery
7/27/848/20/8440 ug/kg37%
40 iic/ke18%40 vg/kg20%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754
A-42 300061
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/8A
VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-21
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
benzene
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzenechloroform
methyl chloride
tetrachloroethylenetoluene1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene
ng OFSPIKE
1AOO
1400
1400
140014001400
1400
1400
14001400
ngRECOVERED490180300
630580310450460390350
%RECOVERY
35
132145412232
332825
ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recoverv
7/27/848/20/8440 ng/kg92%40 ye/kg41%40 ug/kg31%
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-43RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
T . D . #84-7543000R2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHYQUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-4
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
p,p' DDD
p,p' DDEp,p' DOT
ng OFSPIKE0.480.480.48
ngRECOVERED
0.370.370.37
.%RECOVERY
777777
RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-5
COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION
Aroclor 1016
ng OFSPIKE
10
ngRECOVERED
8.8
%RECOVERY
88
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-44RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754300063
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
REPLICATE ANALYSES
PARAMETER
Total Arsenic
Total Cadmium
Total Lead
Total Nickel
SAMPLEI.D.
A-4
A- 16A-4A-16A-4A-16A-4A-16
UNITS OFMEASURE
Pg/g
Vg/g
vg/gug/gMg/g
yg/gug/gyg/g
VALUE1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1
VALUE2
<0.1<0.1<0.1
<0.1<0.1
<0.1<0.1<0.1
MEAN
<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1
<0.1<0.1
STANDARDDEVIATION
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
PERCENTCOEFFICIENT
OF VARIATION_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
A-45 300064RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I.D. #84-754
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.QUALITY CONTROL
Report Date: 9/27/84
RECOVERY ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
Total Arsenic
Total Cadmium
Total Lead
Total Nickel
SAMPLEIDENTIFICATION
A-12
T-4
A-12
T-4
A-12
T-4
A-12
T-4
Mg OFSPIKE
100
100
1,000
1,000
100100100100
ugRECOVERED
65
39980
96085
3912595
%RECOVERY
65
39989685
3912595
L-
FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
DATE
*ECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
I .D. #84-754A-46
300065