SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

38
Showcase an Impact Analysis Use Case: Restructuring Services to Specific Customer Types Karsten Voges

description

Use Case based on a fictions example Asset Management Corp. showcasing how iteraplan can be used for an impact analysis (for restructuring services to specific customer types)

Transcript of SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

Page 1: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

Showcase an Impact AnalysisUse Case: Restructuring Services to Specific Customer Types

Karsten Voges

Page 2: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

2

Agenda

Background and Approach

Scenario Walkthrough

Scenario Evaluation

Page 3: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

3

Background and Approach

Senior management needs to understand the impact of a strategic decision regarding restructuring products for high-wealth individuals.

Requires understanding the business viewpoint, information viewpoint, technology viewpoint, and solution viewpoint.

Actors: CEO, Sr. Management Team, Chief Architect, CIO, Enterprise Architect, Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Goal: Product mix for specific high-wealth individuals is known and impact (cost, level of effort, etc.) is fully known across EA viewpoints and stakeholders.

Impact Analysis of Strategic Decision

Page 4: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

4

Agenda

Background and Approach

Scenario Walkthrough

Scenario Evaluation

Page 5: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

5

Scenario Walkthrough

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 6: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

6

As-Is Situation at ABC Asset ManagementLandscape Diagram: Business Support Map – Process & Org 2012

Unlike Risk Management’s enterprise approach, Customers and Products are managed and serviced separately within each country, resulting in different product offerings -> Contrast to new global strategy

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How do the new business, information, and technology requirements influence the need for new solutions?

Page 7: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

7

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 8: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

8

As-Is Situation at ABC Asset ManagementPortfolio Analysis: IS Portfolio – 2012 – Strategic Assessment

• Conclusion There is a need for action with regard to the country- specific Customer and Product Management solutions!

CRM and product management systems are highly critical for business and have poor business and regulatory alignment, although three of them are SOX relevant

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How do the new business, information, and technology requirements influence the need for new solutions?

How does this impact the global IT strategy?

Page 9: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

9

As-Is Situation at ABC Asset ManagementInformation Flow Diagram: Information Flow 2012 Need for Action

• As the different countries have different Customer strategies, Customer information flows run separately within each country.

• CRM and Product Management systems are not integrated at all.• Recommendation: Consider a consolidation measure

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How do the new business, information, and technology requirements influence the need for new solutions?

Page 10: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

10

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 11: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

11

Link DiscrepanciesNew Capabilities required in new Org-Unit

What business changes are required globally and locally?

What new processes and organization is required?

Are all the skills in place to enable this restructuring or will there need to beretraining or new skills acquired?

Page 12: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

12

Link DiscrepanciesEasy access to new strategy via Fulltext-Search

Page 13: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

13

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 14: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

14

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsCluster Diagram: Information Systems – Planned/Target

• Information Objects “Customer” and “Portfolios” must be redesigned• Functionality to ensure the consistency of portfolios across entire

organization must be implemented

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new information is required?

What new information will be needed in support of which business processes?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 15: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

15

Scenario EvaluationMaster Plan Diagram: Roadmap – Initiatives and IS 2012-2015

Master Plan with estimated• Roadmap• Costs• Benefits• Risks

Already scheduled initiatives interdependencies to manage

IT initiative “Realign High Value Individuals” with affected “current” solutions

Solution scenarios with directly affected “planned” and “target” solutions

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What solutions will now need to be retired and what is the cost and the level of effort involved to retire them?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

Page 16: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

16

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 17: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

17

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsInformation and BusinessProcess

What new information will be needed in support of which business processes?

• This diagram visualizes which information is required in which business process (based on solutions in place)

CEO/CIO

Business Mgmt

Information Architecture

Business Architecture

Page 18: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

18

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsInformation Flow Diagram: Information Flow 2012 – Strategy Impact

• This diagram visualizes the directly affected systems and those, with which the relevant systems have interfaces

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How is the current state architecture impacted?

Page 19: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

19

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsBusiness Support Map – Process & Org 2012 – Strategy Impact

• In the first step, the information systems relevant for current strategies have been identified

• Blue colored systems are relevant for “Realign High Value individuals strategy

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How is the current state architecture impacted?

Page 20: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

20

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsInformation Flow Diagram: Information Flow 2012 – SOX Relevance

• This diagram visualizes information systems that are relevant for legal and regulatory compliance (SOX)

• It is important to consider all the identified relevant systems while estimating skills and efforts necessary for different project scenarios

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How is the current state architecture impacted?

Page 21: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

21

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsCluster Diagram: Information Systems – Current/Planned

• Affected information systems• Affected business processes• Affected business units• Affected information objects

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

How is the current state architecture impacted?

What information currently exists and can be leveraged?

Page 22: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

22

CEO/CIO

IT Management

Technology Architecture

Solution Architecture

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsCurrent/Planned Technologies – Required Skills

Are the IT skills required to implement the solutions in place? If not, what new skills will be required?

Technologies already in place or scheduled

Technologies to be used in the planned or target solutions

What is the impact to technology roadmaps?

Understanding what business and information changes are required, what arethe new technologies which must be acquired?

Page 23: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

23

Strategy Impact – Realign High Value IndividualsAffected Information Systems

CEO/CIO

IT Management

Business Architecture

• IT initiative Realign High Value Individuals has been configured• All identified affected systems have been allocated• Strategic Importance and Business Criticality is known

How is the current state architecture impacted?

Solution Architecture

Page 24: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

24

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 25: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

25

The following solution scenarios have been defined

S1 Consolidate CRM and Product Management Systems

S2 Consolidate CRM Only

S3 Consolidate Product Management Only

S4 Improve AS-IS

IT Response to the New Business StrategyIT initiative – Realign High Value Individuals

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

Page 26: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

26

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS1 Consolidate Customer and Product Management Systems

• In this scenario, country specific CRM and Product Management systems are consolidated to CRM Salesforce and ProdCore information systems

• The diagram also shows systems that will remain (Murex) and those, which are already scheduled to be replaced (FIZ VaR)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 27: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

27

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS1 Consolidate Customer and Product Management Systems

• In this scenario, country specific CRM and Product Management systems are consolidated to CRM Salesforce and ProdCore information systems

• The diagram also shows systems that will remain (Murex) and those, which are already scheduled to be replaced (FIZ VaR)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Technology Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 28: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

28

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS2 Consolidate Customer Management Systems Only

• In this scenario, only the country specific CRM systems are consolidated to the new CRM Salesforce information system

• Country specific Product Management systems are only improved and migrated to the target releases

• The diagram also shows systems that will remain (Murex) and those, which are already scheduled to be replaced (FIZ VaR)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 29: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

29

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS3 Consolidate Product Management Systems Only

• In this scenario, only the country specific Product Management systems are consolidated to the new ProdCore system

• Country specific CRM systems are only improved and migrated to the target releases

• The diagram also shows systems that will remain (Murex) and those, which are already scheduled to be replaced (FIZ VaR)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 30: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

30

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS4 Improve AS-IS

• In this scenario, the country specific information systems are improved and migrated to the target releases

• The diagram also shows systems that will remain (Murex) and those, which are already scheduled to be replaced (FIZ VaR)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

Page 31: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

31

Scenario EvaluationSpreadsheet Report (Projects): Resource Demand [PD]

SOX expertise must be acquired as it is not in place in the current IT organization

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

Are the IT skills required to implement the solutions in place? If not, what new skills will be required?

Page 32: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

32

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 33: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

33

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS1 Consolidate Customer and Product Management Systems

Status based

SOX relevance based

• Skills are necessary and efforts must be scheduled to ensure the legal and regulatory compliance (SOX)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is to consider to meet legal and regulatory requirements?

Page 34: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

34

IT Response to the New Business StrategyS3 Consolidate Product Management Systems Only

Status based

SOX relevance based

• Skills are necessary and efforts must be scheduled to ensure the legal and regulatory compliance (SOX)

CEO/CIO

Risk & Compliance Mgmt

Information Architecture

Solution Architecture

What new solutions are required to meet the strategic decision?

What solutions will now need to be retired?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is to consider to meet legal and regulatory requirements?

Page 35: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

35

Scenario

1. CEO and Sr. Mgmt are being presented with an impact analysis of the strategic decision.

2. Chief Architect uses the system to demonstrate how the strategic decision is linked with the current business strategy.

3. Any discrepancies in the linkage are noted and explained.

4. Overall impact of strategic decision and specifically costs and level of effort (time and resources required).

5. Specific impacts: How is the current state architecture impacted?

How is the future state architecture impacted?

What is required to make the changes to the future state architecture?

6. Three potential scenarios for a future state architecture with comparison.

7. Stakeholder concerns are addressed.

8. There is enough information to make the strategic business decision.

Page 36: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

36

Scenario Evaluation to make business decisionPortfolio: Scenarios with Benefits, Costs and Risk (Color)

Our champion to recommend:Scenario 3: “Consolidate Product Management Only”

CEO/CIO

Senior Business Mgmt

Scenarios below this line have negative Cost/Benefit ratio

Scenario 3: although, benefits not that high,

costs are lower and first of all risks are much lower.

Scenario 1: the highest benefits but also considerable

costs and high risks

Page 37: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

37

Capability Mapping

Based on stacked Bar-Chart, enable effort and skill comparison

Compare Scenarios based on skills required

Page 38: SMART360°EA showcasing iteraplan Impact Analysis

© 2013 SMART 360° Biz

38

Agenda

Background and Approach

Scenario Walkthrough

Scenario Evaluation