SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
-
Upload
adriana-rezende -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Transcript of SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
1/22
NMR Relaxation
of Clay-Brine Mixtures
Abigail Matteson, Joseph Tomanic,
Michael Herron, David Allen andWilliam KenyonSchlumberger-Doll Research
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
2/22
2
T2 (ms)
0.03 3.0 33 30000.3
Small pore water Capillary
bound
water
Free-fluid porosity
Producible fluids
3-ms porosity
Total CMR porosity
Sandstone T2 Distribution
Signaldistribution
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
3/22
3
Transverse Relaxation Equation
Surface relaxation
Bulk fluid relaxation
Diffusion in field gradient
relaxation
1T2S
=
1
T2B=
1
T2D
=
1
T2
1
T2S
1
T2B T2D= + +
1
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
4/22
4
Surface Relaxation Equation
r2 = Surface relaxivityS = Surface area
Vp = Pore volume
1T2S
SVp
=
2r
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
5/22
5
T2 Response of
Clay-Bound Water
T2 (ms)
Clay particles
Bound
water
Air
Signaldistribution
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
6/22
6
T2 Response of
Clay-Bound Water and Brine
slow Molecular diffusion fast
Clay particlesBoundwater
Brine
Signal
distribution
T2 (ms) T2 (ms)
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
7/22
7
Objective of Study
l clay-bound water
l clay type andl pore-size distribution?
Can a T2
distribution be used to
measure
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
8/22
8
Experimental Setup
l Maximize the amount of clay-bound water
l Use various clay types
Kaolinite, smectite, illite and glauconite
l Vary pore volume Compact clay-brine mixtures (max 16,000 psi)
l Measure T2
distributions
Clays, clay-brine mixtures
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
9/22
9
Clay Types and PropertiesClay CEC
(meq/100 g)
Magnetic
susceptibility(micro cgs, 10-6)
Fe2O3(wt%)
Kaolinite
Warren Co., Georgia
17.310.9 0.5 1.0
Illite
Fithian, Illinois
97.816.0 8.6 9.2
Texas
Smectite 62.282.6 1.8 1.2
Glauconite
Birmingham, New Jersey
72.321.4 21.7 22.2
Surface area(m2/g)
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
10/22
10
T2 Response of
Clay-Bound Water
T2 (ms)
Clay particles
Bound
water
Air
Signaldistribution
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
11/22
11
Clay T2 Distributions at
Room Humidity Conditions
T2 (ms)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000
Smectite
Illite
Glauconite
Kaolinite
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
12/22
12
Smectite
0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000
T2 (ms)
0
0.50
0.70
1.00
1.20
2.50
30
20
20
20
14Slurry
8 psi
27 psi
89 psi)
500 psi
1,000 psi
2,000 psi
4,000 psi
8,000 psi
16,000 psi
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
13/22
13
Illite
0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000
T2 (ms)
0
0.50
10
20
40
60
60
80
80
80
30Slurry
8 psi
23 psi
78 psi)
500 psi
1,000 psi
2,000 psi
4,000 psi
8,000 psi
16,000 psi
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
14/22
14
T2 Peak Positions
0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000
T2 (ms)
8-11 psi
500 psi
16,000 psi
Glauconite
Illiite
Smectite
Kaolinite
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
15/22
15
Surface Relaxation Equation
r2 = Surface relaxivityS = Surface area
Vp = Pore volume
1T2S
SVp
=
2r
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
16/22
16
4
0
1
2
3
0 5000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Pressure (psi)
r2 (mm/s)
KaolinitePressure Versus Surface Relaxivity (r2)
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
17/22
17
Iron Concentration VersusSurface Relaxivity (r2)
Fe2O3 (wt%)
4
0 5 10 15 20 25
Kaolinite
0
1
2
3
Illite
Kaolinite
Smectite Glauconite
r2 (mm/s)
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
18/22
18
0
5
10
0 50 100
Cation exchange capacity(meq/g)
Log-mean
T2
(ms)
Kaolinite
Smectite
Illite
Glauconite
CEC Versus Log-Mean T2
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
19/22
19
Shale 1
T2 (ms)
0
2
4
6 40% Illite
0% Smectite
21% Kaolinite
0% Chlorite
4% Glauconite
0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 10,000
3 ms
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
20/22
20
5
15
25
35
40% Illite
7% Smectite
14% Kaolinite
0% Chlorite
0% Glauconite
Shale 2
T2 (ms)
0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 10,000
3 ms
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
21/22
21
Objective of Study
l clay-bound water
l
clay type andl pore-size distribution?
Can a T2 distribution be used to
measure
-
7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides
22/22
22
Conclusionsl T2 distributions have a single peak.
Cannot measure clay-bound water Implies fast diffusion between clay-bound
and pore waters
l T2 peak position is a function of
Clay type
Compaction and clay concentration (S/Vp)
Surface relaxivity (varies with iron
content).Cannot identify clays
l T2 peak position is not a function of CEC.