SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

download SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

of 22

Transcript of SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    1/22

    NMR Relaxation

    of Clay-Brine Mixtures

    Abigail Matteson, Joseph Tomanic,

    Michael Herron, David Allen andWilliam KenyonSchlumberger-Doll Research

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    2/22

    2

    T2 (ms)

    0.03 3.0 33 30000.3

    Small pore water Capillary

    bound

    water

    Free-fluid porosity

    Producible fluids

    3-ms porosity

    Total CMR porosity

    Sandstone T2 Distribution

    Signaldistribution

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    3/22

    3

    Transverse Relaxation Equation

    Surface relaxation

    Bulk fluid relaxation

    Diffusion in field gradient

    relaxation

    1T2S

    =

    1

    T2B=

    1

    T2D

    =

    1

    T2

    1

    T2S

    1

    T2B T2D= + +

    1

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    4/22

    4

    Surface Relaxation Equation

    r2 = Surface relaxivityS = Surface area

    Vp = Pore volume

    1T2S

    SVp

    =

    2r

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    5/22

    5

    T2 Response of

    Clay-Bound Water

    T2 (ms)

    Clay particles

    Bound

    water

    Air

    Signaldistribution

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    6/22

    6

    T2 Response of

    Clay-Bound Water and Brine

    slow Molecular diffusion fast

    Clay particlesBoundwater

    Brine

    Signal

    distribution

    T2 (ms) T2 (ms)

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    7/22

    7

    Objective of Study

    l clay-bound water

    l clay type andl pore-size distribution?

    Can a T2

    distribution be used to

    measure

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    8/22

    8

    Experimental Setup

    l Maximize the amount of clay-bound water

    l Use various clay types

    Kaolinite, smectite, illite and glauconite

    l Vary pore volume Compact clay-brine mixtures (max 16,000 psi)

    l Measure T2

    distributions

    Clays, clay-brine mixtures

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    9/22

    9

    Clay Types and PropertiesClay CEC

    (meq/100 g)

    Magnetic

    susceptibility(micro cgs, 10-6)

    Fe2O3(wt%)

    Kaolinite

    Warren Co., Georgia

    17.310.9 0.5 1.0

    Illite

    Fithian, Illinois

    97.816.0 8.6 9.2

    Texas

    Smectite 62.282.6 1.8 1.2

    Glauconite

    Birmingham, New Jersey

    72.321.4 21.7 22.2

    Surface area(m2/g)

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    10/22

    10

    T2 Response of

    Clay-Bound Water

    T2 (ms)

    Clay particles

    Bound

    water

    Air

    Signaldistribution

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    11/22

    11

    Clay T2 Distributions at

    Room Humidity Conditions

    T2 (ms)

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000

    Smectite

    Illite

    Glauconite

    Kaolinite

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    12/22

    12

    Smectite

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000

    T2 (ms)

    0

    0.50

    0.70

    1.00

    1.20

    2.50

    30

    20

    20

    20

    14Slurry

    8 psi

    27 psi

    89 psi)

    500 psi

    1,000 psi

    2,000 psi

    4,000 psi

    8,000 psi

    16,000 psi

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    13/22

    13

    Illite

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000

    T2 (ms)

    0

    0.50

    10

    20

    40

    60

    60

    80

    80

    80

    30Slurry

    8 psi

    23 psi

    78 psi)

    500 psi

    1,000 psi

    2,000 psi

    4,000 psi

    8,000 psi

    16,000 psi

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    14/22

    14

    T2 Peak Positions

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000

    T2 (ms)

    8-11 psi

    500 psi

    16,000 psi

    Glauconite

    Illiite

    Smectite

    Kaolinite

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    15/22

    15

    Surface Relaxation Equation

    r2 = Surface relaxivityS = Surface area

    Vp = Pore volume

    1T2S

    SVp

    =

    2r

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    16/22

    16

    4

    0

    1

    2

    3

    0 5000 10,000 15,000 20,000

    Pressure (psi)

    r2 (mm/s)

    KaolinitePressure Versus Surface Relaxivity (r2)

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    17/22

    17

    Iron Concentration VersusSurface Relaxivity (r2)

    Fe2O3 (wt%)

    4

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    Kaolinite

    0

    1

    2

    3

    Illite

    Kaolinite

    Smectite Glauconite

    r2 (mm/s)

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    18/22

    18

    0

    5

    10

    0 50 100

    Cation exchange capacity(meq/g)

    Log-mean

    T2

    (ms)

    Kaolinite

    Smectite

    Illite

    Glauconite

    CEC Versus Log-Mean T2

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    19/22

    19

    Shale 1

    T2 (ms)

    0

    2

    4

    6 40% Illite

    0% Smectite

    21% Kaolinite

    0% Chlorite

    4% Glauconite

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 10,000

    3 ms

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    20/22

    20

    5

    15

    25

    35

    40% Illite

    7% Smectite

    14% Kaolinite

    0% Chlorite

    0% Glauconite

    Shale 2

    T2 (ms)

    0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 10,000

    3 ms

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    21/22

    21

    Objective of Study

    l clay-bound water

    l

    clay type andl pore-size distribution?

    Can a T2 distribution be used to

    measure

  • 7/27/2019 SLB NMR Clay Brine Slides

    22/22

    22

    Conclusionsl T2 distributions have a single peak.

    Cannot measure clay-bound water Implies fast diffusion between clay-bound

    and pore waters

    l T2 peak position is a function of

    Clay type

    Compaction and clay concentration (S/Vp)

    Surface relaxivity (varies with iron

    content).Cannot identify clays

    l T2 peak position is not a function of CEC.