SICI GA 2012 Prague Implications of OECD Study Graham Donaldson.
-
Upload
annis-joseph -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of SICI GA 2012 Prague Implications of OECD Study Graham Donaldson.
SICI GA 2012 Prague
Implications of OECD Study
Graham Donaldson
Implications of OECD Study
Authoritative and comprehensive world perspective
Covers key areas of interest to inspection
Provides benchmarking evidence for judgements
Highlights areas of common difficulty
Offers insights into what and how to improve
How can we make best use of it?
Influences on inspection
Culture/tradition
Political environment – national / local / professional
Governance
Resource
State of education
Inspection Traditions
Control/compliance with statute/policy
Teachers
School
Agent of accountability to stakeholders
Improvement
Hybrids
Plasticity of Inspection
Assurer
‘Best buy’ guide
Mitigator of risk
Catalyst
Capacity builder
Partnership builder
Agenda setter
Trends in Educational Policy
Central to broader government policy – innovation the norm
Increased expectations – scope, relevance, standards
Inputs to outcomes – data dominance
International benchmarking
Increased school autonomy
Focus on teacher quality
Multiple accountabilities
Viral ideas
Search for Success
Early focus on expansion of provision
1960/70s alphabet soup curriculum reform
Standards movement - measurement mania
School effectiveness
Professional conspiracies – competition & inspection
Teachers Matter - “It’s the teacher, stupid”
A new synthesis?
Lessons from High-Performing Systems
Clarity of purpose – values and curriculum High expectations of achievement Enabling all young people to achieve their potential Emphasis on early learning High quality teachers Culture of professional learning High quality leadership at all levels Outward looking with a strong culture of innovation Intelligent accountability Reflective and self-evaluative
A New Synthesis?
Purpose
Balance
Alignment
Synergies
Capacity
Focus
Impact
School Evaluation What purposes does it serve?
How well aligned is it with wider educational and professional policy?
What is the balance between self evaluation and externality?
Are those involved competent?
Is there a common language and are there agreed indicators/criteria?
Does it focus on what matters? (if it’s not happening in the classroom it’s not happening – Elmore)
Does it make a difference? (in the capacity of the school to serve its young people)
Implications for SICI Members
Use to review aspects of current practice
Disseminate messages to inspectors
Be proactive in explaining implications for policy
THANK YOU