Shock

89
Shock Shawn Dowling, PGY-5

description

Shock . Shawn Dowling, PGY-5. Objectives. Briefly discuss general pathophysiology Classification of shock Review of vasopressors Lots of cases We will not talk about septic shock - this will be discussed in a future set of rounds. Intro. 35M. Pulled from an industrial fire. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Shock

Page 1: Shock

Shock

Shawn Dowling, PGY-5

Page 2: Shock

ObjectivesBriefly discuss general pathophysiology Classification of shockReview of vasopressorsLots of casesWe will not talk about septic shock - this will be discussed in a future set of rounds

Page 3: Shock

Intro35M. Pulled from an industrial fire.Brought in by EMS.Pt is awake, but clearly altered. Only complaint is a HA. Prev well.T37, HR 110, BP 160/70, RR 20/100% c/s 7The nurses have already drawn a venous gas

CO is 18%, lactate is 13

Is this patient in shock?

Page 4: Shock

What do you think is going on?Lactate > 10 is highly predictive of cyanide toxicity with inhalational exposure regardless of CO levelBaud FJ, et al: Elevated blood cyanide concentrations in victims of smoke inhalation. N Engl J Med 2001; 325:1761–1766.

How do you want to treat this patient other than with O2 +/- hyperbarics? Why?

Only give the sodium thiosulfate portion of the Cyanide Antidote Kit – if you give them the nitrite component you induce more of a functional anemia which they will not tolerate because of the other functional anemia – the CO

Page 5: Shock

Definition of shockRude unhinging of the machinery of life

OrThe inability of the circulatory system to adequately supply tissues with 02 & nutrients and remove cellular waste

Page 6: Shock

Diagnosis of Shock – Rosen’s Need 4 of 6 Ill appearance or decreased LOC (as a general rule MAP< 50 before AMS)HR > 100RR > 22 or PC02 < 32Base deficit <-5 or lactate >4Urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/hrHypotension > 20 minute duration

NOTE - ↓BP not required for Dx

Page 7: Shock

Diagnosing ShockThe more advanced the shock state, the easier the Dx, but…

Significant tissue hypoxia appears to exist prior to development of significant signs & symptoms

THE BETTER WE CAN RECOGNIZE SHOCK, THE EARLIER WE CAN INSTITUTE Tx

TIME IS TISSUE (see RIVERS STUDY)

Can be is shock with “normal” vitalsNormal BP in face of hypovolemia means some organs are hypoperfused to maintain systemic BP

Page 8: Shock

Shock is the transition between life and death

Page 9: Shock

Shock unifying features:Imbalance between cellular O2 demand and supplyDisrupted cellular homeostasisFailed aerobic metabolism –> anaerobic metabolism –> lactic acidosisCalcium shifts - impairs cardiac contractilityFailed ion gradients and cellular pumpsCell edema and death

Page 10: Shock

How does our body compensate?

Counter-regulatory mediatorsCatecholamines, glucocorticoids, angiotensin, vasopressin, insulin

Increased substratesglucose, TG and FFA

Anaerobic metabolismincr CO2:02 ratio

Page 11: Shock

Pertinent Critical Care formulas

CO = HR x SV

BP = CO x SVR

O2 content = 1.34 x hgb x O2 saturation + 0.003 x Po2

(02 bound to hgb) (02 in plasma)Oxygen delivery is the CO x O2 contentWhy is this equation so important to a shock talk?In which shock scenario do we target the O2 in plasma for treatment?

CO poisoning

Page 12: Shock

What are some different shock classifications?

Page 13: Shock

Classification of ShockMany different ways

MnemonicsPhysiologicClinical

It doesn’t matter which you use as long asYou know it coldIt’s exhaustive

Page 14: Shock

Shock

BP = ↓CO x ↓SVR

HypovolemicCardiogenicObstructive

Distributive

Page 15: Shock

ShockShock

Hypovolemic Cardiogenic Obstructive Distributive

Bleeding or Fluid Loss•Overt•Occult•Excessive Losses

•Vessels•Rhythm•Valvular•Myocardium•Pericardium

•Intravascular •Extravascular

NASTENeurogenicAnaphylacticSepticToxicologicEndocrine

Page 16: Shock

HypovolemicOvert/Occult losses of blood

5 sources of life threatening hemorrhage in trauma?Chest, Abdo, Pelvis, Long bones, Street (from skin)

Excessive Fluid loss3rd spacing (burns, pancreatitis, dermatologic, ascites)Excessive sweating/vomiting/diarrhea/urine output(diuretics, DI)

Page 17: Shock

CardiogenicVessels

AMI or acute or chronic– usually need to infarct 40% to cause shockAoD

RhythmBradyTachydysthrythmias

ValvularStenosisRegurgitation

MyocardiumRupture (FW or VSD)MyocarditisCardiomyopathyRV involvement

PericardiumTamponade

Page 18: Shock

ObstructiveIntravascular

PEAmniotic Fluid EmbolismAir embolismFat embolism

ExtravascularTension PTXCardiac tamponadeSVC syndrome

Page 19: Shock

DistributiveNeurogenicAnaphylacticSepticToxicologic

(CaCB, BB), CO, cyanide, iron, ASA, etcEndocrine

Adrenal insufficiency, thyroid storm, electrolytes (hyperK)

Page 20: Shock

Top three causes of shock in infantsSepsisHypovolemicCardiac

SHOCK in a neonateSepsisCardiacnon-Accidental TraumaMetabolicSurgical

Page 21: Shock

Physical Exam

Two purposes1. Try to determine if the patients is in shock

– Look for evidence of end organ damage

2. Determine the cause of the shock– JVP & perfusion status is VERY helpful

Page 22: Shock

Thanks to ICU Crash Course

Page 23: Shock

Match the shock with the appropriate vasopressor and why

Sepsis

Neurogenic Shock

Anaphylactic Shock

EpinephrineEphedrinePhenylephrineNorepinephrineDopamineMilrinone

Page 24: Shock

Direct vs indirect vasopressors

Direct agents stimulate the receptor directlyIndirect agents have their effect by stimulating the adrenals to release catecholamines:. If stressor has been ongoing for a period of time -> body’s catecholamine reserve is likely deplete and the indirect agents will have less effect

DirectNorepiEpiPhenylephrine

IndirectDopamineDobutamineEphedrine

Page 25: Shock

αα

ßß11

ßß22

DD

D=Dopaminergic

Receptor Primary location Primary fx

Page 26: Shock

α Vessel walls Peripheral Arterial Constriction

ß1 Heart Inotropy/Chronotropy

ß2 Lungs/Skeletal muscle Dilatation of smooth muscle (skeletal and bronchial)

D Kidneys Increase renal blood flow

D=Dopaminergic

Receptor Primary location Primary fx

Page 27: Shock
Page 28: Shock
Page 29: Shock

Cochrane Review:(updated) Feb. 11, 2005.

For all kinds of shock RCTs

Levo vs Dop (3 studies, N=62) RR death 0.88 (0.57,1.36)

Levo + dob vs epi (2 studies, N=52) RR death 0.98 (0.57,1.67)

Unfortunately, these studies are too small to definitively answer the question but better data to support that norepi achieves HD endpoints better and since it’s a direct agent likely better for septic patients

Page 30: Shock

Case 1PP: 8yo F with known allergy to waspsPMHx: Healthy and no medsHPI:

At day camp and “forgot” her epi-penStung by 2 hornets after accidentally running into a nestPresents by personal vehicle to ED Given PO Benadryl by family member

Page 31: Shock

Case 1Generally

Appears unwell and flushedHR=128, RR=38, T=37.8, BP=85/40, Sat 89% RA

CVSTachy, warm extremities

RespSignificant indrawingAudible wheeze throughoutNo stridor noted

Derm Urticarial rash and diffuse flushing

ENTLip swelling noted and uvula swollen on exam

Page 32: Shock

Case 1

1) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfalls

Page 33: Shock

Case 1

The pediatric nurse is panicked…..He wants to know how much Epinephrine you want to give this child and by what route…..

Page 34: Shock

Case 1

The patient is not responding to your IM epinephrineThe pressure is 60 systolic and the patient has become obtunded…..

Page 35: Shock

Case 2 PP:

58yo Male with known shrimp allergy

PMHXMI 2 years agoNIDDMHTN

HPI:Ate the “egg roll special” at a Thai restaurantImmediate throat swellingEMS called and IM epinephrine given on route

Page 36: Shock

Case 2Generally

Appears flushed and unwell with marked work of breathing and distressHR 62, RR 28, BP 80/46, Sat 89% on mask, T37.4

CVSNormal heart sounds, normal cap refill

Resp Diffuse wheeze throughout

AbdomenSoft but mildly tender

Neuro Starting to appear somnolent

Page 37: Shock

Case 2

You repeat another IM injection of 0.3cc of 1:1000 epi and give H1 and H2 blockers intravenouslyThere is no improvement and the patient remains hypotensive and relatively bradycardic…..

Page 38: Shock

Case 21) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology• Difference between anaphylaxis and

anaphylactoid?3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfalls

Page 39: Shock

ManagementFluidsMeds

Epi is the first line Tx for anaphylaxis IV (1:10,000)

1 mL (100ug) aliquot – repeat q60sec until desired effectInfusion - 1ug/min-4ug/minIf pt not in shock – IM (why not SC?)

Ventolin nebsBenadryl 50mg IVZantac 50mg IVSolu-medrol 125mg IV

Page 40: Shock

Glucagon (for pts on ßß, ?ACE-I)1-2mg IV Then 5-15mcg/min infusion Inotropic/chronotropic/vasoactive properties beyond the b-receptor

Page 41: Shock

Case 380M. Hx of COPD. Presents with productive cough and feels unwell.T-40, RR28, sats 85% on NRB, HR-120, BP 90/50Working Dx – Pneumonia + SepsisYou decide you going to intubate this patient because of failure to oxygenateAny concerns? How are you going to prepare? Induction agent? Other meds?

Page 42: Shock

Sepsis and airway management

Sepsis significantly increases you O2 requirements – therefore these patients can desaturate quite rapidly – :. Optimize the conditions (i.e. positioning, pre-oxygenate, best-intubator, etc)

Use of accessory muscles can ↑O2 consumption by 50-100%!Another reason to manage their airway early or if you are not meeting your physiologic end points

Any other concerns

Page 43: Shock

Post-intubation hypotensionSeptic patients are very catecholamine driven – intubating can remove that stimuli and they can drop their pressures precipitouslyAlso, the agents we give for intubation may play a role ↑ intra-thoracic pressure (from mechanical ventilation) can drop the preload :. causing hypotension)

Page 44: Shock

Intubating a septic patientPre-oxygenate as much as possiblePretreat with fluids +/- bicarb if you thing they are really acidotic (no evidence)Careful choice of induction agent

Ketamine or ½ dose etomidate (0.15mg/kg) are likely best options, AVOID propofol

Have some pressors drawn up (phenyl/norepi)Why not dopamine or ephedrine?phenylephrineHow do you mix this?10mg in 100mL bag – draw up 10cc and give 1cc(100Ug)/dose

RSI if no CI (gives you the best look)

Page 46: Shock

Case 3PP: 38yo Male transfer by STARSPmHx: Asthma but otherwise healthyMeds: Ventolin and Flovent PRNHPI:

Patient riding QUAD in kananaskis country and flipped+ Helmet and no LOCTrapped under bike for 10 minutes extrication by friendsSTARS scene callNo major blood loss noted on scene

Page 47: Shock

Case 3Generally

GCS 12/15 patient confused and aggitatedHR 120, BP 81/40, RR 15, Temp 37.2, Sats 92%

CVSTachycardic, normal HS, Cap refill 4 seconds, weak thready pulse

RespClear bilaterally but poor inspiratory effort

AbdomenDiffusely tender to palpationSoft and not distended

MSKPelvis is grossly unstable to palpationPerineal hematoma notedFemurs and hips normal to exam

NeuroPEARL, No signs of depressed skull or basal skull injuryNo signs of head trauma

Page 48: Shock
Page 49: Shock
Page 50: Shock

Case 3

1) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfalls

Page 51: Shock

Case 3

You do a ED FAST and it is negative for free fluid in the abdomenWhat do you want to do now?

Page 52: Shock

Case 468yo Male with known small cell lung CaMeds:

Undergoing outpatient chemotherapy and radiotherapy at TBCC for last 2 months

HPI:3 day history of dyspnea, apprehension and mild chest painPresents today feeling very unwell, presyncopal and markedly short of breath on minimal exertion

Page 53: Shock

Case 4Generally

Appears unwell and dyspneic, markedly diphoreticHR 119, RR 24, BP 90/55, Sat 98% RA, Temp 36.9

CVSFaint HS appreciated, normal S1S2 and no EHSExtremities cool and cap refill 3-4 seconds, +mottledPeripheral edema is noted JVP = 6cm above sternal angle and pulsus paradoxus = 22mmHg

Resp Chest clear throughout but shallow breaths

AbdSoft but tender to palpation diffusely

Neuro Alert but confused and disorientated

Page 54: Shock

DDX of pulsus paradoxusCardiac:

pericardial effusionTamponadePECardiogenic shock

Pulmonary:AsthmaCOPDTension pneumothorax

Other:AnaphylaxisSVC syndrome

Page 55: Shock

EKG

Page 56: Shock

EDUS

Page 57: Shock

Case 4

1) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfalls

Page 58: Shock

Management of TamponadeMaximize preload

Fluids to ↑ filling pressure

Pressors (dialysis)

Uremic pce is an indication

PericardiocentesisSee remergs.com for how to

(thoracotomy)If post-traumatic

Temporizing Measures

Definitive Measures

Page 59: Shock

Case 5PP: 26yo FemalePMHx: HealthyHPI:

Involved in motorcycle accident at highway speeds + Helmet+ LOC on scene and now GCS 9STARS transfer and advised hypotensive on route unresponsive to fluids

Page 60: Shock

Case 5Generally

GCS 6, collared, not responding to painNo obvious sites of external bleedingHR 57, RR 16, BP 79/40, Sats 98% 3L NP, T37.8

CVSHeart sounds normal, no pedal edema, JVP normalWarm and dry skin

RespNormal

AbdomenSoft and non-distended

MSKPelvis stable

NeuroPEARL, no signs of depressed or basal skull fractureReflexes absentPoor rectal tone

Page 61: Shock

C-spine xray

Page 62: Shock

Case 5

What is the difference between spinal shock and neurogenic shock?

Page 63: Shock

Spinal ShockConcussive injury to the spinal cordCauses total neurological dysfunction distal to the site of injuryUsually lasts <24hrs

May persist for several days

The end of spinal shock is heralded by the return of…..

Bulbocavernousus reflex

Page 64: Shock

Neurogenic Shock

Disruption of sympathetic autonomic ganglia resulting in loss of vasomotor tone and lack of reflex tachycardia

Results in hypotension (low SVR)

Bradycardia: can be absolute or relativeDue to unopposed vagal tone to heartUsually only occurs is lesion is at/above T4

Page 65: Shock

DDx for hypotension & bradycardiaMedications (CaCB, BB, digoxin)Neurogenic ShockAdrenal insufficiency++ vagal tone (yng, intra-abdominal issue)

Page 66: Shock

Case 5

1) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfalls

Page 67: Shock

Management of neurogenic shock

Fluids – they have relative hypovolemiaAtropine 0.5 mg – 1.0 mg iv

Can try to help with their pressure transientlyHave ready for intubation as they may brady down 2ndary to the vagal response

PressorsPhenylephrine: 100mcg aliquots is a good temporizerEphedrine is an alternative

Page 68: Shock

Case 6

53yo M1400 golfing and severe central CP radiating to R shoulder and SOBWithin minutes was unresponsive and EMS called

Nitro given and BP ↓↓Palpable pressure on route

Page 69: Shock

Case 6Generally

Appears very unwell, pale diaphoretic and cool periphery. Minimally responsiveHR 108, BP 88/65, Sats 84% non-rebreather, RR 30

CVSTachy with no obvious murmurCool peripheries and thready pulse

Resp Diffuse crackles throughoutPink froth at the mouthSignificant respiratory distress

Page 70: Shock

EKG

Page 71: Shock

Case 6

1) Name the general category of shock2) Describe the pathophysiology3) Name the management goals4) Define the best interventions to obtain

the above goals5) Name potential pitfall

Page 72: Shock

Shock Post-MI

DDxMyocardium: pump failure,VSD, FWR, RV infarctValvular: acute MRRhythm: brady/tachycardiaOther (later): PE, pericardial effusion, stroke, bleed (from a/c)

Page 73: Shock

Cardiogenic shock approach

AMI +shock?

RV infarct? YES NO

Volume resuscitate Pulmonary congestion present? NO YES

Response adequate Pressor

Revascularize Response adequate YES

IABP and PTCA

Thanks Phil

YESNO

NO

Page 74: Shock

How does a IABP work?

Page 75: Shock

Cardiogenic Shock:Approach

Stabilize the ABCsIdentify etiology of cardiogenic shockSmall fluid bolus (250cc)Don’t be shy on fluids if RV infarctIonotropic/vasopressor supportManage infarct (avoid ßß & nitrates)

Cath vs lytics

Page 76: Shock

MI + Cardiogenic shock:How to manage the MI?

OptionsThrombolysisGet BP up with ionotropes then thrombolyseStabilize with IABP then thrombolyseEarly Revascularization (PTCA or CABG)

What does the literature tell us?

Page 77: Shock

MI + Cardiogenic shock:How to manage the MI?

Thrombolysis in cardiogenic shockGISSI (N=280) 30 day MR

streptokinase 70.1%medical mx 69.6%

NO trial has shown reduction mortality with cardiogenic shock with thrombolysis

Thanks Rob

Page 78: Shock

SHOCK trialRCT of AMI + cardiogenic shock

152 early revascularization (PTCA or CABG) or 150 initial medical mx only (lysis initially, some had PTCA/CABG after 52hrs)End Point early revasc. Med Mx stats

30d MR 46.7% 56% p=.11 6mth MR 50.3% 63.1% p=.027

Page 79: Shock

Cardiogenic Shock:the SHOCK trial

Hochman JS. One year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001. End Point

early revasc. Med Mx stats

1yr survival 46.7% 33.6% p=.03

Page 80: Shock

MI + Cardiogenic shock:How to manage the MI?

Conclusions …….Patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, especially those < 75yo, should undergo emergent revascularization (PTCA or CABG)

Page 81: Shock

Bonus Case78F. Presents with SOB, hypoxia + hypotension

PMHX: CAD, CHF

VS:HR 110 BP 80/50, RR28, sats 88%RAJVP up, lungs are clear, no peripheral edema – poorly perfused

You order a portable CXR

Page 82: Shock

N CXR

Page 83: Shock

What do you think?

What do you want to do?

Page 84: Shock

Which can help you make the Dx?

STAT ECHOCT

– but this patient is not stable enough for CT

Empiric heparinwhile investigating(if no CI)

Page 85: Shock

As the pCXR is being done the patient finally stops pestering you with questions about what you think is going on.You’re enjoying the silence until you see the monitor…

Page 86: Shock

What do you want to do know?

Page 87: Shock

Jerjes-Sanchez C. et al. Streptokinase and Heparin versus Heparin Alone in Massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of Thrombosis and

Thrombolysis. 1995.

Prospective and randomised trial, N=8all had “massive” PE and in cardiogenic shockhigh prob. V/Q, with abnormal RH on echo or >9 obstructed segments on V/Q100% survival in streptokinase plus heparin group 100% mortality in heparin group

Small study, lots of limitations BUT one of the few studies on this

Page 88: Shock

tPA in PEThe role for tPA in submassive PE is debatable – not a decision for us to makeIf the patient is in shock & they have a PE – give tPA (likely in consultation with ICU)

In the mean time intubate, heparinize + fluids PRN +/- pressors

If the patient has a cardiac arrest – give it tPA dosing

1mg/kg over 2-5 mins if in CAOver 30mins if perfusingIf stable 100mg over 2 H & ask yourself why you’re giving it in emerg

Page 89: Shock